Truthmatters
Diamond Member
- May 10, 2007
- 80,182
- 2,272
- 1,283
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #21
the facts.
do you not like facts?
do you not like facts?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
the facts.
do you not like facts?
these charts show that the rgith wing claims of a Horrendous economy under Obama is nothing but manufactureded lies to cover up the real numbers.
this shows that the right wing meme of Obama being terrible on job creation is nothing but lies.
Economic growth picked up to 2.5 percent last quarter - Washington Times
sequestration is killing that momentum
then explain why the Bush numbers are so low too?
You guys were claiming it was great while Bush presided over similar numbers
i know you hate facties.
maybe you should stay away from my posts to protect yourself
then explain why the Bush numbers are so low too?
You guys were claiming it was great while Bush presided over similar numbers
Who are 'you guys' and what does Bush have to do with Obama's recovery. Bush preceded under an area of prosperity (phony prosperity, but prosperity none the less). Obama is suppose to be having a recovery. This means you need job growth to keep up with population growth. This is not what is happening.
i know you hate facties.
maybe you should stay away from my posts to protect yourself
then explain why the Bush numbers are so low too?
You guys were claiming it was great while Bush presided over similar numbers
Who are 'you guys' and what does Bush have to do with Obama's recovery. Bush preceded under an area of prosperity (phony prosperity, but prosperity none the less). Obama is suppose to be having a recovery. This means you need job growth to keep up with population growth. This is not what is happening.
so then why is it called a recovery if no recovery is taking place like you are claiming.
You do realize words have definitions right?
i know you hate facties.
maybe you should stay away from my posts to protect yourself
Exactly what facts have you presented? I'm still eagerly waiting to hear something.
then explain why the Bush numbers are so low too?
You guys were claiming it was great while Bush presided over similar numbers
Who are 'you guys' and what does Bush have to do with Obama's recovery. Bush preceded under an area of prosperity (phony prosperity, but prosperity none the less). Obama is suppose to be having a recovery. This means you need job growth to keep up with population growth. This is not what is happening.
You have got to be right wing if you claim there is no recovery going on.
the numbers are facts.
why do you deny cold hard facts?