Economics 101

[Toddsterpatriot]

No you didn't. It's a stupid claim.

Post 112.
Do you read ANY posts besides the ones your involved with?

Reagan was bullying banks into lending hundreds of millions of dollars to every non-US nation to build factories.

Link?

Guess what? The corrupt of the best of them took the money and we were left with non-existent or empty factories.

This makes no sense. Please explain further.

Why? Because no one did their due diligence to ensure that the loans were being utilized properly.

Okay, if you say so.

Now when you get around to sharing your definition of Supply-Side economics and your explanation of how it was responsible for the Crash of 1987, I'll attempt to rebut your "argument".

Listen, Young Republican, 90% of anything that happened before 2001 isn't on YouTube.

I presume you haven't looked up the definition of Supply Side Economics because your mommy hasn't taught you to use Google.
In fact, I posted the Wikipedia link 2 weeks ago and you still refuse to read it because it spells out the shithead Reagan was.

Prove there was an American Revolution using YouTube.
No dramatic reenactments; I want the actual footage.

Listen, Young Republican, 90% of anything that happened before 2001 isn't on YouTube.

That's your excuse for failing to prove your claim?

I presume you haven't looked up the definition of Supply Side Economics because your mommy hasn't taught you to use Google.

You claim it caused the crash. It's a stupid claim.
I'm not going to use the actual definition to discuss your claim.
You need to share your definition and share your explanation of cause and effect.
All your blathering about banks and loans has nothing to do with supply side.

Supply Side is funded by banks because the 3rd World shitholes that produce our products don't build factories with their own money.
Are you really that ignorant?

Supply Side is funded by banks

That's awful. Let's see your definition of Supply Side Economics already.

 

[Indeependent]

Partial bullshit...
Black Monday was due to the failure of Supply Side Economics.
The DOT Com Crash was due to people being wary of using their Credit Cards over the Internet.
The Housing Crash was due to Supply Side Economics.

Go ahead, empty headed, greedy Neo-Cons, tell me how wrong I am.

Black Monday was due to the failure of Supply Side Economics.

LOL!

You laugh yet you have NEVER rebutted the failure of Reagan's failed brainchild.

This is about Black Monday....

Take your meds so you can focus.

You know squat about Black Monday, little child.
Reagan was bullying banks into lending hundreds of millions of dollars to every non-US nation to build factories.
Guess what? The corrupt of the best of them took the money and we were left with non-existent or empty factories.
Why? Because no one did their due diligence to ensure that the loans were being utilized properly.

I lived it asswipe....

My portfolio dove...and recovered in about three months.

Eat crap and die quickly.

Oh, I get it...Your Portfolio.
In other words, you didn't work on Wall Street and have zero idea of what happened there because you were too busy read the WSJ.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

This is about Black Monday....

Take your meds so you can focus.

You know squat about Black Monday, little child.
Reagan was bullying banks into lending hundreds of millions of dollars to every non-US nation to build factories.
Guess what? The corrupt of the best of them took the money and we were left with non-existent or empty factories.
Why? Because no one did their due diligence to ensure that the loans were being utilized properly.

I lived it asswipe....

My portfolio dove...and recovered in about three months.

Eat crap and die quickly.

You recovered, millions didn't.

The crash of 1987 was unbelievable!!!
The market ended the year higher than it started.
Within 2 years it recovered its peak.

This is about Black Monday....

Take your meds so you can focus.

You know squat about Black Monday, little child.
Reagan was bullying banks into lending hundreds of millions of dollars to every non-US nation to build factories.
Guess what? The corrupt of the best of them took the money and we were left with non-existent or empty factories.
Why? Because no one did their due diligence to ensure that the loans were being utilized properly.

I lived it asswipe....

My portfolio dove...and recovered in about three months.

Eat crap and die quickly.

You recovered, millions didn't.

The crash of 1987 was unbelievable!!!
The market ended the year higher than it started.
Within 2 years it recovered its peak.

A Conservative talking point.
What's good for Wall Street is NOT good for Main Street.

Main Street was mostly unaffected by the 87 Crash.

 

[Indeependent]

You know squat about Black Monday, little child.
Reagan was bullying banks into lending hundreds of millions of dollars to every non-US nation to build factories.
Guess what? The corrupt of the best of them took the money and we were left with non-existent or empty factories.
Why? Because no one did their due diligence to ensure that the loans were being utilized properly.

I lived it asswipe....

My portfolio dove...and recovered in about three months.

Eat crap and die quickly.

You recovered, millions didn't.

The crash of 1987 was unbelievable!!!
The market ended the year higher than it started.
Within 2 years it recovered its peak.

You know squat about Black Monday, little child.
Reagan was bullying banks into lending hundreds of millions of dollars to every non-US nation to build factories.
Guess what? The corrupt of the best of them took the money and we were left with non-existent or empty factories.
Why? Because no one did their due diligence to ensure that the loans were being utilized properly.

I lived it asswipe....

My portfolio dove...and recovered in about three months.

Eat crap and die quickly.

You recovered, millions didn't.

The crash of 1987 was unbelievable!!!
The market ended the year higher than it started.
Within 2 years it recovered its peak.

A Conservative talking point.
What's good for Wall Street is NOT good for Main Street.

Main Street was mostly unaffected by the 87 Crash.

I are you on drugs?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

I lived it asswipe....

My portfolio dove...and recovered in about three months.

Eat crap and die quickly.

You recovered, millions didn't.

The crash of 1987 was unbelievable!!!
The market ended the year higher than it started.
Within 2 years it recovered its peak.

I lived it asswipe....

My portfolio dove...and recovered in about three months.

Eat crap and die quickly.

You recovered, millions didn't.

The crash of 1987 was unbelievable!!!
The market ended the year higher than it started.
Within 2 years it recovered its peak.

A Conservative talking point.
What's good for Wall Street is NOT good for Main Street.

Main Street was mostly unaffected by the 87 Crash.

I are you on drugs?

Graph: Real Gross Domestic Product

Point to the crash on the GDP chart.
Durr.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

Black Monday was due to the failure of Supply Side Economics.

LOL!

You laugh yet you have NEVER rebutted the failure of Reagan's failed brainchild.

This is about Black Monday....

Take your meds so you can focus.

You know squat about Black Monday, little child.
Reagan was bullying banks into lending hundreds of millions of dollars to every non-US nation to build factories.
Guess what? The corrupt of the best of them took the money and we were left with non-existent or empty factories.
Why? Because no one did their due diligence to ensure that the loans were being utilized properly.

I lived it asswipe....

My portfolio dove...and recovered in about three months.

Eat crap and die quickly.

You recovered, millions didn't.

Garbage.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

You laugh yet you have NEVER rebutted the failure of Reagan's failed brainchild.

This is about Black Monday....

Take your meds so you can focus.

You know squat about Black Monday, little child.
Reagan was bullying banks into lending hundreds of millions of dollars to every non-US nation to build factories.
Guess what? The corrupt of the best of them took the money and we were left with non-existent or empty factories.
Why? Because no one did their due diligence to ensure that the loans were being utilized properly.

I lived it asswipe....

My portfolio dove...and recovered in about three months.

Eat crap and die quickly.

You recovered, millions didn't.

The crash of 1987 was unbelievable!!!
The market ended the year higher than it started.
Within 2 years it recovered its peak.

It was at 95% of peak within about three months.

It was driven, in part, by computerized trading.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

This is about Black Monday....

Take your meds so you can focus.

You know squat about Black Monday, little child.
Reagan was bullying banks into lending hundreds of millions of dollars to every non-US nation to build factories.
Guess what? The corrupt of the best of them took the money and we were left with non-existent or empty factories.
Why? Because no one did their due diligence to ensure that the loans were being utilized properly.

I lived it asswipe....

My portfolio dove...and recovered in about three months.

Eat crap and die quickly.

You recovered, millions didn't.

The crash of 1987 was unbelievable!!!
The market ended the year higher than it started.
Within 2 years it recovered its peak.

This is about Black Monday....

Take your meds so you can focus.

You know squat about Black Monday, little child.
Reagan was bullying banks into lending hundreds of millions of dollars to every non-US nation to build factories.
Guess what? The corrupt of the best of them took the money and we were left with non-existent or empty factories.
Why? Because no one did their due diligence to ensure that the loans were being utilized properly.

I lived it asswipe....

My portfolio dove...and recovered in about three months.

Eat crap and die quickly.

You recovered, millions didn't.

The crash of 1987 was unbelievable!!!
The market ended the year higher than it started.
Within 2 years it recovered its peak.

A Conservative talking point.
What's good for Wall Street is NOT good for Main Street.

On that we agree wholeheartedly.

But that argument is not what you are making.

You are simply trying to say something happened that clearly did not.

I hate Wall Street.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

No you didn't. It's a stupid claim.

Post 112.
Do you read ANY posts besides the ones your involved with?

Reagan was bullying banks into lending hundreds of millions of dollars to every non-US nation to build factories.

Link?

Guess what? The corrupt of the best of them took the money and we were left with non-existent or empty factories.

This makes no sense. Please explain further.

Why? Because no one did their due diligence to ensure that the loans were being utilized properly.

Okay, if you say so.

Now when you get around to sharing your definition of Supply-Side economics and your explanation of how it was responsible for the Crash of 1987, I'll attempt to rebut your "argument".

Listen, Young Republican, 90% of anything that happened before 2001 isn't on YouTube.

I presume you haven't looked up the definition of Supply Side Economics because your mommy hasn't taught you to use Google.
In fact, I posted the Wikipedia link 2 weeks ago and you still refuse to read it because it spells out the shithead Reagan was.

Prove there was an American Revolution using YouTube.
No dramatic reenactments; I want the actual footage.

Listen, Young Republican, 90% of anything that happened before 2001 isn't on YouTube.

That's your excuse for failing to prove your claim?

I presume you haven't looked up the definition of Supply Side Economics because your mommy hasn't taught you to use Google.

You claim it caused the crash. It's a stupid claim.
I'm not going to use the actual definition to discuss your claim.
You need to share your definition and share your explanation of cause and effect.
All your blathering about banks and loans has nothing to do with supply side.

Supply Side is funded by banks because the 3rd World shitholes that produce our products don't build factories with their own money.
Are you really that ignorant?

I can't laugh at this claim any harder.

I don't like the offshoring of jobs.

I also don't like that America seems to think the world owes it something.

 

[Indeependent]

You recovered, millions didn't.

The crash of 1987 was unbelievable!!!
The market ended the year higher than it started.
Within 2 years it recovered its peak.

You recovered, millions didn't.

The crash of 1987 was unbelievable!!!
The market ended the year higher than it started.
Within 2 years it recovered its peak.

A Conservative talking point.
What's good for Wall Street is NOT good for Main Street.

Main Street was mostly unaffected by the 87 Crash.

I are you on drugs?

Graph: Real Gross Domestic Product

Point to the crash on the GDP chart.
Durr.

That's too funny...you are presenting a chart that shows there was no crash.
Don't you just love statistics?

 

[Indeependent]

Post 112.
Do you read ANY posts besides the ones your involved with?

Reagan was bullying banks into lending hundreds of millions of dollars to every non-US nation to build factories.

Link?

Guess what? The corrupt of the best of them took the money and we were left with non-existent or empty factories.

This makes no sense. Please explain further.

Why? Because no one did their due diligence to ensure that the loans were being utilized properly.

Okay, if you say so.

Now when you get around to sharing your definition of Supply-Side economics and your explanation of how it was responsible for the Crash of 1987, I'll attempt to rebut your "argument".

Listen, Young Republican, 90% of anything that happened before 2001 isn't on YouTube.

I presume you haven't looked up the definition of Supply Side Economics because your mommy hasn't taught you to use Google.
In fact, I posted the Wikipedia link 2 weeks ago and you still refuse to read it because it spells out the shithead Reagan was.

Prove there was an American Revolution using YouTube.
No dramatic reenactments; I want the actual footage.

Listen, Young Republican, 90% of anything that happened before 2001 isn't on YouTube.

That's your excuse for failing to prove your claim?

I presume you haven't looked up the definition of Supply Side Economics because your mommy hasn't taught you to use Google.

You claim it caused the crash. It's a stupid claim.
I'm not going to use the actual definition to discuss your claim.
You need to share your definition and share your explanation of cause and effect.
All your blathering about banks and loans has nothing to do with supply side.

Supply Side is funded by banks because the 3rd World shitholes that produce our products don't build factories with their own money.
Are you really that ignorant?

I can't laugh at this claim any harder.

I don't like the offshoring of jobs.

I also don't like that America seems to think the world owes it something.

If there was no off-shoring your portfolio would not be nearly as over-inflated as it is.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

The crash of 1987 was unbelievable!!!
The market ended the year higher than it started.
Within 2 years it recovered its peak.

The crash of 1987 was unbelievable!!!
The market ended the year higher than it started.
Within 2 years it recovered its peak.

A Conservative talking point.
What's good for Wall Street is NOT good for Main Street.

Main Street was mostly unaffected by the 87 Crash.

I are you on drugs?

Graph: Real Gross Domestic Product

Point to the crash on the GDP chart.
Durr.

That's too funny...you are presenting a chart that shows there was no crash.
Don't you just love statistics?

I'm showing a chart to back up my claim that the stock market crash mostly left Main Street unaffected.

 

[Indeependent]

A Conservative talking point.
What's good for Wall Street is NOT good for Main Street.

Main Street was mostly unaffected by the 87 Crash.

I are you on drugs?

Graph: Real Gross Domestic Product

Point to the crash on the GDP chart.
Durr.

That's too funny...you are presenting a chart that shows there was no crash.
Don't you just love statistics?

I'm showing a chart to back up my claim that the stock market crash mostly left Main Street unaffected.

It consolidated the top 8 Accounting Firms and many Financial Institutions.
Many people lost their jobs and those that were left to convert bought entities to their own databases and paper formats were working 100+ hours a week for many years.
I presume you have never been part of a team to convert a department of one company into the company employing you.
These mega institutions had hundreds of departments that had to be audited, converted and tested.
Especially difficult was the conversion of non-relational databases...a horrid experience.

This experience lasted well on into the Senior Bush years.

I guess for those living far away from Financially based markets it took much longer to feel the pinch of the major consolidation of discretionary cash.
Clinton simply got lucky with the DOT COM age.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Main Street was mostly unaffected by the 87 Crash.

I are you on drugs?

Graph: Real Gross Domestic Product

Point to the crash on the GDP chart.
Durr.

That's too funny...you are presenting a chart that shows there was no crash.
Don't you just love statistics?

I'm showing a chart to back up my claim that the stock market crash mostly left Main Street unaffected.

It consolidated the top 8 Accounting Firms and many Financial Institutions.
Many people lost their jobs and those that were left to convert bought entities to their own databases and paper formats were working 100+ hours a week for many years.
I presume you have never been part of a team to convert a department of one company into the company employing you.
These mega institutions had hundreds of departments that had to be audited, converted and tested.
Especially difficult was the conversion of non-relational databases...a horrid experience.

This experience lasted well on into the Senior Bush years.

I guess for those living far away from Financially based markets it took much longer to feel the pinch of the major consolidation of discretionary cash.
Clinton simply got lucky with the DOT COM age.

Years and years later. Would have happened regardless.
Had zero to do with the crash.

 

[P@triot]

This is about Black Monday....

Take your meds so you can focus.

You know squat about Black Monday, little child.
Reagan was bullying banks into lending hundreds of millions of dollars to every non-US nation to build factories.
Guess what? The corrupt of the best of them took the money and we were left with non-existent or empty factories.
Why? Because no one did their due diligence to ensure that the loans were being utilized properly.

I lived it asswipe....

My portfolio dove...and recovered in about three months.

Eat crap and die quickly.

You recovered, millions didn't.

The crash of 1987 was unbelievable!!!
The market ended the year higher than it started.
Within 2 years it recovered its peak.

This is about Black Monday....

Take your meds so you can focus.

You know squat about Black Monday, little child.
Reagan was bullying banks into lending hundreds of millions of dollars to every non-US nation to build factories.
Guess what? The corrupt of the best of them took the money and we were left with non-existent or empty factories.
Why? Because no one did their due diligence to ensure that the loans were being utilized properly.

I lived it asswipe....

My portfolio dove...and recovered in about three months.

Eat crap and die quickly.

You recovered, millions didn't.

The crash of 1987 was unbelievable!!!
The market ended the year higher than it started.
Within 2 years it recovered its peak.

A Conservative talking point.
What's good for Wall Street is NOT good for Main Street.

Actually - nothing could be further from the truth.

The absolute, undeniable, reality is that what is good for Wall Street is also good for Main Street, healthcare, security, employment, technology, innovation, etc., etc., etc. - freedom. Government intervention, control, and regulation creates collapse and failure every time. Freedom, free markets, etc. create wealth, prosperity, and innovation every time. It's simply an undeniable, universal reality which has been proven to be true 100% of the time throughout history.

With freedom - only the people making bad decisions suffer (like being dumb enough to gamble your money away in the stock market). With government (like the $19 trillion in debt), all of society suffers. Even those who have never made a bad decision in their life. If you handed your money over to some broker on Wall Street that you've never met because you're greedy to make money without working for it, and they cheat you out of it, that's not their fault and that's not the fault of a lack of regulations. That's your fault. I've never placed a single damn penny into Wall Street - and guess what? I've never lost a single damn penny. No matter how irresponsible they were or reckless they were, their actions didn't affect me one damn bit. It's the beauty of freedom. The problem with liberals is that they always want someone else to take responsibility for their own bad decisions. Only when government got involved and mandated stuff did I become affected (like their banking regulations which caused banks which previously provided free checking to start charging checking account fees did I become affected).

 

[Indeependent]

You know squat about Black Monday, little child.
Reagan was bullying banks into lending hundreds of millions of dollars to every non-US nation to build factories.
Guess what? The corrupt of the best of them took the money and we were left with non-existent or empty factories.
Why? Because no one did their due diligence to ensure that the loans were being utilized properly.

I lived it asswipe....

My portfolio dove...and recovered in about three months.

Eat crap and die quickly.

You recovered, millions didn't.

The crash of 1987 was unbelievable!!!
The market ended the year higher than it started.
Within 2 years it recovered its peak.

You know squat about Black Monday, little child.
Reagan was bullying banks into lending hundreds of millions of dollars to every non-US nation to build factories.
Guess what? The corrupt of the best of them took the money and we were left with non-existent or empty factories.
Why? Because no one did their due diligence to ensure that the loans were being utilized properly.

I lived it asswipe....

My portfolio dove...and recovered in about three months.

Eat crap and die quickly.

You recovered, millions didn't.

The crash of 1987 was unbelievable!!!
The market ended the year higher than it started.
Within 2 years it recovered its peak.

A Conservative talking point.
What's good for Wall Street is NOT good for Main Street.

Actually - nothing could be further from the truth.

The absolute, undeniable, reality is that what is good for Wall Street is also good for Main Street, healthcare, security, employment, technology, innovation, etc., etc., etc. - freedom. Government intervention, control, and regulation creates collapse and failure every time. Freedom, free markets, etc. create wealth, prosperity, and innovation every time. It's simply an undeniable, universal reality which has been proven to be true 100% of the time throughout history.

With freedom - only the people making bad decisions suffer (like being dumb enough to gamble your money away in the stock market). With government (like the $19 trillion in debt), all of society suffers. Even those who have never made a bad decision in their life. If you handed your money over to some broker on Wall Street that you've never met because you're greedy to make money without working for it, and they cheat you out of it, that's not their fault and that's not the fault of a lack of regulations. That's your fault. I've never placed a single damn penny into Wall Street - and guess what? I've never lost a single damn penny. No matter how irresponsible they were or reckless they were, their actions didn't affect me one damn bit. It's the beauty of freedom. The problem with liberals is that they always want someone else to take responsibility for their own bad decisions. Only when government got involved and mandated stuff did I become affected (like their banking regulations which caused banks which previously provided free checking to start charging checking account fees did I become affected).

Bullshit.

 

[regent]

It takes government intervention to keep capitalism, capitalistic.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

I lived it asswipe....

My portfolio dove...and recovered in about three months.

Eat crap and die quickly.

You recovered, millions didn't.

The crash of 1987 was unbelievable!!!
The market ended the year higher than it started.
Within 2 years it recovered its peak.

I lived it asswipe....

My portfolio dove...and recovered in about three months.

Eat crap and die quickly.

You recovered, millions didn't.

The crash of 1987 was unbelievable!!!
The market ended the year higher than it started.
Within 2 years it recovered its peak.

A Conservative talking point.
What's good for Wall Street is NOT good for Main Street.

Actually - nothing could be further from the truth.

The absolute, undeniable, reality is that what is good for Wall Street is also good for Main Street, healthcare, security, employment, technology, innovation, etc., etc., etc. - freedom. Government intervention, control, and regulation creates collapse and failure every time. Freedom, free markets, etc. create wealth, prosperity, and innovation every time. It's simply an undeniable, universal reality which has been proven to be true 100% of the time throughout history.

With freedom - only the people making bad decisions suffer (like being dumb enough to gamble your money away in the stock market). With government (like the $19 trillion in debt), all of society suffers. Even those who have never made a bad decision in their life. If you handed your money over to some broker on Wall Street that you've never met because you're greedy to make money without working for it, and they cheat you out of it, that's not their fault and that's not the fault of a lack of regulations. That's your fault. I've never placed a single damn penny into Wall Street - and guess what? I've never lost a single damn penny. No matter how irresponsible they were or reckless they were, their actions didn't affect me one damn bit. It's the beauty of freedom. The problem with liberals is that they always want someone else to take responsibility for their own bad decisions. Only when government got involved and mandated stuff did I become affected (like their banking regulations which caused banks which previously provided free checking to start charging checking account fees did I become affected).

Bullshit.

Can I complement you on your incredible well put together argument.

I mean, you didn't get much data, but at least you got some theory.

You, on the other hand simply need one word to make your point.....

Well....wait....you didn't make a point.

You simply stuck your fingers in your ears and then stuck your head up your ass and said.....

Un uh..........

 

[Rshermr]

Post 112.
Do you read ANY posts besides the ones your involved with?

Reagan was bullying banks into lending hundreds of millions of dollars to every non-US nation to build factories.

Link?

Guess what? The corrupt of the best of them took the money and we were left with non-existent or empty factories.

This makes no sense. Please explain further.

Why? Because no one did their due diligence to ensure that the loans were being utilized properly.

Okay, if you say so.

Now when you get around to sharing your definition of Supply-Side economics and your explanation of how it was responsible for the Crash of 1987, I'll attempt to rebut your "argument".

Listen, Young Republican, 90% of anything that happened before 2001 isn't on YouTube.

I presume you haven't looked up the definition of Supply Side Economics because your mommy hasn't taught you to use Google.
In fact, I posted the Wikipedia link 2 weeks ago and you still refuse to read it because it spells out the shithead Reagan was.

Prove there was an American Revolution using YouTube.
No dramatic reenactments; I want the actual footage.

Listen, Young Republican, 90% of anything that happened before 2001 isn't on YouTube.

That's your excuse for failing to prove your claim?

I presume you haven't looked up the definition of Supply Side Economics because your mommy hasn't taught you to use Google.

You claim it caused the crash. It's a stupid claim.
I'm not going to use the actual definition to discuss your claim.
You need to share your definition and share your explanation of cause and effect.
All your blathering about banks and loans has nothing to do with supply side.

Supply Side is funded by banks because the 3rd World shitholes that produce our products don't build factories with their own money.
Are you really that ignorant?

Supply Side is funded by banks

That's awful. Let's see your definition of Supply Side Economics already.

Jesus H. Christ. It is not possible to have lived 20 years and not understand supply side economics, or Trickle Down theory. That it is no longer taught in universities except, of course, liberty university, tells you how successful the then Supply Side School of Economics was. Great for economists looking for awards and monetary awards. It was such a great new set of theories. But, me boy, over the years, rational economists pretty much all waw the light. Now, being a Supply Side guy probably means you are a Libertarian drinking the CATO cool aid, and sitting out on an island with the few well paid economists who could care less about truth.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Reagan was bullying banks into lending hundreds of millions of dollars to every non-US nation to build factories.

Link?

Guess what? The corrupt of the best of them took the money and we were left with non-existent or empty factories.

This makes no sense. Please explain further.

Why? Because no one did their due diligence to ensure that the loans were being utilized properly.

Okay, if you say so.

Now when you get around to sharing your definition of Supply-Side economics and your explanation of how it was responsible for the Crash of 1987, I'll attempt to rebut your "argument".

Listen, Young Republican, 90% of anything that happened before 2001 isn't on YouTube.

I presume you haven't looked up the definition of Supply Side Economics because your mommy hasn't taught you to use Google.
In fact, I posted the Wikipedia link 2 weeks ago and you still refuse to read it because it spells out the shithead Reagan was.

Prove there was an American Revolution using YouTube.
No dramatic reenactments; I want the actual footage.

Listen, Young Republican, 90% of anything that happened before 2001 isn't on YouTube.

That's your excuse for failing to prove your claim?

I presume you haven't looked up the definition of Supply Side Economics because your mommy hasn't taught you to use Google.

You claim it caused the crash. It's a stupid claim.
I'm not going to use the actual definition to discuss your claim.
You need to share your definition and share your explanation of cause and effect.
All your blathering about banks and loans has nothing to do with supply side.

Supply Side is funded by banks because the 3rd World shitholes that produce our products don't build factories with their own money.
Are you really that ignorant?

Supply Side is funded by banks

That's awful. Let's see your definition of Supply Side Economics already.

Jesus H. Christ. It is not possible to have lived 20 years and not understand supply side economics, or Trickle Down theory. That it is no longer taught in universities except, of course, liberty university, tells you how successful the then Supply Side School of Economics was. Great for economists looking for awards and monetary awards. It was such a great new set of theories. But, me boy, over the years, rational economists pretty much all waw the light. Now, being a Supply Side guy probably means you are a Libertarian drinking the CATO cool aid, and sitting out on an island with the few well paid economists who could care less about truth.

It is not possible to have lived 20 years and not understand supply side economics, or Trickle Down theory.

That must be why Indeependent hasn't spelled out what he's whining about.
He's a poor confused liberal, like you.