NYcarbineer
Diamond Member
I oppose using drones to kill civilians.
Why do you think killing civilians will make things better?
If you oppose without exception any military operation that can lead to civilian 'collateral damage', how would one successfully fight a war like, say,
World War II?
Why do you keep putting words in my mouth instead of answering the question, why do you think killing civilians will make things better?
I answered your question. Unless you believe that collateral damage in the form of civilian casualties is sometimes justifiable,
then you must believe that we weren't justified in bombing, for example, German and Japanese cities, in World War II.
That makes you an idiot.