Election Interference: Here are the Four Colorado Justices Who Voted to Exclude Donald Trump from the 2024 Ballot

[WEATHER53]

This is a hoot
Can’t run. No no no

 

[Synthaholic]

It has not been established that he engaged in insurrection.

Yes it has. By the Colorado Supreme Court.

Aren't you paying attention?

 

[Synthaholic]

The only traitor running for office is Biden. Let’s get all the red states to keep his name off the primary because of that.

It's more effective if you stomp your feet and hold your breath until your face turns blue, toddler.

 

[WEATHER53]

Yes it has. By the Colorado Supreme Court.

Aren't you paying attention?

To the make pretend?

 

[Crepitus]

No they didn't.

"The 14th Amendment was part of the “Reconstruction Amendments” that were ratified following the Civil War. It was passed to prohibit former Confederate military and political leaders from holding high federal or state office. These men had clearly taken part in a rebellion against the United States: the Civil War. That makes it all the more absurd that a left-wing group in Colorado is asking a federal court to disqualify the 45th President on the same grounds, equating his speech to rebellion against the United States.

And there’s another legal problem: Trump is not a former “officer of the United States,” as that term is used in the Constitution, meaning Section 3 does not apply. As the Supreme Court explained in Free Enterprise Fund v. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (2010), an “officer of the United States” is someone appointed by the President to aid him in his duties under Article II, Section 2. The term does not apply to elected officials, and certainly not to the President himself. “

Dude, you can call it "absurd" all you want. It doesn't change the facts.

 

[Blaster]

Ex-White House lawyer says Supreme Court could rule ‘9-0’ in possible Trump 14th Amendment case

Former White House lawyer Ty Cobb predicted Tuesday that the U.S. Supreme Court could rule “9-0” in favor of former President Trump in a potential appeal of Colorado Supreme Court&#8217…

thehill.com

 

[BackAgain]

Yes it has. By the Colorado Supreme Court.

Aren't you paying attention?

You’re seriously too stupid to breathe.

The Co. Supreme Cousrt court heard no evidence and it wasn’t reviewing any lower court verdict of guilty.

This is very basic Constitutional law stuff. Weren’t you ever educated?

 

[Crepitus]

Yes it's a crime of white supremacy, right?

Huh?

Sometimes I wonder if we are reading the same posts as you tRumplings.

 

[Frankenstein]

It was a speech given by the GOP leader in the Senate after he just voted for the acquittal of Benedict Donald.

You sound salty. Sounds like

It was a speech given by the GOP leader in the Senate after he just voted for the acquittal of Benedict Donald.

Who care he is compromised as bad as Biden is!

 

[Crepitus]

No, it is not. No matter how strongly I might disagree with their opinion.

Nor was it a crime, and certainly not an "insurrection," for Trump to tell his supporters to peacefully march to the Capitol.

Exorting the crowds to unlawfully go into the Capitol was a crime, but the DOJ/FBI have not chosen to arrest or prosecute Ray Epps for it.

Hard to imagine why . . .

But it was indeed an insurrection.

You just need to learn to accept that.

 

[Frankenstein]

But it was indeed an insurrection.

You just need to learn to accept that.

No it most certainly wasn't

 

[Hum Dinger]

Ex-White House lawyer says Supreme Court could rule ‘9-0’ in possible Trump 14th Amendment case

Former White House lawyer Ty Cobb predicted Tuesday that the U.S. Supreme Court could rule “9-0” in favor of former President Trump in a potential appeal of Colorado Supreme Court&#8217…

thehill.com

Ty Cobb!



One of Trump's brilliant legal eagles!

 

[BrokeLoser]

What do you think? Should they be tormented outside their homes?

That behavior is exclusive to purple hair woke white guilt faggots with nose rings….Do you think Chuck Schumer will sick his degenerates on high court judges again?

 

[Hollie]

Ty Cobb!



One of Trump's brilliant legal eagles!

A message board (im)poster with a law degree from wiki.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Okay my fellow MAGAs and law abiding citizens. Should they be given the treatment like Kavanaugh and Amy Barrett got outside their homes by radical leftists? They've been identified. They've committed treachery!

Election Interference: Here are the Four Colorado Justices Who Voted to Exclude Donald Trump from the 2024 Ballot | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hᴏft

The unelected justices of the Colorado Supreme Court ruled on Tuesday that the people of Colorado cannot vote for former President Donald Trump on the ballot for the 2024 presidential election.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

And no conviction or trial of insurrection. Those activist need to be removed

 

[BS Filter]

The purpose is to prevent insurrectionists from taking part in the government they tried to overthrow.

Trump has never been charged with insurrection.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Is that really your argument? If you don’t think there are merits then you are simply stating your lack of understanding

When was trump charged with insurrection? If anyone needs to be charged with insurrection that would be Ray Epps

 

[BS Filter]

Judge's opinion. That's why they are there. To decide things, to judge things.

And it is the law. It says "engaged in insurrection", not convicted of insurrection.

Still an opinion. A higher opinion will soon rub this one out. Then you can whine and whine and whine...

 

[Hum Dinger]

When was trump charged with insurrection? If anyone needs to be charged with insurrection that would be Ray Epps

Ugh!

Did it occur to you that in the 24 pages of this thread, that question has already been asked and answered?

 

[Slade3200]

That behavior is exclusive to purple hair woke white guilt faggots with nose rings….Do you think Chuck Schumer will sick his degenerates on high court judges again?

Was that your way of saying NO to the question?