Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The fourteenth amendment clearly states that eligibility to run hinges on not being an insurrectionist.That’s the problem - it’s a matter of OPINION.
Individual state courts don’t remove eligible nominees they dislike because it is their OPINION he is guilty of insurrection. It’s ridiculous, and the more I think about it, the more I think that it’s possible the SCOTUS will overturn 9-0.
Otherwise, the Republican states can kick Biden off because it is their opinion he is guilty of treason.
And we no longer have the people choose the president, via elections.
Again your opinion.How is it ridiculous? They voted on the grounds that Trump is an insurrectionist, when there was never an insurrection.
So a state court can judge that Trump is a murderer, and keep him off the ballot that way?The fourteenth amendment clearly states that eligibility to run hinges on not being an insurrectionist.
Every judgement is an opinion. Be it murder or eligibility. So the US has clearly stated who can make those opinions. We call them judges. It's both a job description and a title.
And it’s your opinion that he was. Fortunately, in America, people are not punished based on OPINIONS. They get a trial.Again your opinion.
Well, we’ll see what SCOTUS says about that.No surprise. There are Republicans who hate Trump.
Still irrelevant, though, to the fact that a state court can’t violate the Constituion and declare someone they don’t like an insurrectionist to keep him off the ballotl
Trump had a trial.And it’s your opinion that he was. Fortunately, in America, people are not punished based on OPINIONS. They get a trial.
Judges do NOT get to make that call. Only Congress can do so.
Otherwise, what’s to stop the Courts in Wyoming, West Virginia, Oklahoma, etc., etc., from looking at the evidence and making the ruling that Biden is an insurrectionist by inviting an invasion of foreigners in and thus is ineligible to run?
Again with this? The “thing” in CO was not a trial.Trump had a trial.
So you quoted me saying nothing? Yep, you are a lunatic.I quoted you not answering my question. That's how, Dumbfuck.
Please tell me what wasn’t a trial about it?Again with this? The “thing” in CO was not a trial.
And the law states that Congress decides who is an insurrectionist. Not a biased Democrat state court.
No, you royal dumbfuck. I quoted you saying something.So you quoted me saying nothing? Yep, you are a lunatic.
Why do you find that interesting? There is no shortage of Republicans who hate Trump. You been in a coma since 2016?Well, this is interesting.
Turns out the lawsuit that opened the Colorado case was filed by six people: Two unaffiliated voters, four Republican voters.
Go figure.
Why 4 GOP voters filed the lawsuit that eventually disqualified Trump from the Colorado 2024 primary ballot
Some of the petitioners in the lawsuit that threatens Donald Trump's placement on the ballots have played prominent roles in Colorado politics.www.businessinsider.com
The lead plaintiff, Anderson, 91, is a former state legislator who served as a Republican in Colorado's House of Representatives and state Senate.
"As Norma likes to say, she has been a Republican for longer than most of her lawyers have been alive," Sherman said.
Again with this? The “thing” in CO was not a trial.
Link?No, you royal dumbfuck. I quoted you saying something.
Link?
www.usmessageboard.com
No. YOU called it a “trial.” Explain how it constituted a trial without the accused getting due process.Please tell me what wasn’t a trial about it?
Let’s start from the beginning, lunatic: Quote me admitting what you just claimed i admitted. Try to find some actual words this time, vermin.Thanks for admitting the 14th Amendment doesn't require a conviction. Explains why some Confederates were denied public office without a trial for insurrection, just fir engaging in it or providing comfort or aid to those who did.
Ah, it appears you’re talking out your ass and just saying things without knowing why you believe it.No. YOU called it a “trial.” Explain how it constituted a trial without the accused getting due process.
How would you characterize the Jann 6 attack on the Capitol ?How is it ridiculous? They voted on the grounds that Trump is an insurrectionist, when there was never an insurrection.
