Of course energy prices are higher. They have been going up by 5% to 10% a year in a lot of places. And were doing so long before the alternatives started being put in place. However, here in Oregon, where most of the power is hydro, with wind providing about 10%, we have lower prices for electricity than most states in the nation.
As for our oil boom, it will be gone in a few years, and most of that new oil will go to South America or Asia. And you cost for gasoline will not come down significantly at all. Because it is the world market that determines the price for petroleum now, not the local US market.
The very fact that the US can reduce its reliance on buying oil from the midde eastern countries that hate us should be incentive enough to become energy independant.
It is a bit of a contradiction to say "it will be gone in a few years" and then say "and most of that new oil will go to South America or Asia." don't you think?
And, exporting oil or any other product is a big plus to the US economy, and lowers our balance of payments as well as our deficit. Those are all good things!
LOL. You are amusing. Resources that are very finite go through a regular boom, bust cycle. Right now, with oil at $100 a barrel, we can afford to frack the shale oil and make money off of it. And when that is gone, and the price of oil goes up to $200 or $300 a barrel, we can afford to recover oil from other sources. However, will be consumer be able to afford to use it?
We have many, many ghost towns in the West that are the result of boom-bust cylcles in natural resources, and oil is no differant.
Tell us finite oil is. Libs have been saying we'll run out of it in 75 years. That was 40 years ago. Today we have more in the ground than ever.
And if oil goes to 200/barrel and consumers cannot afford it, how much of it will be produced? Trick question I know because being a lib you're bad at both math and econ.