Email Shows Military Prepared Benghazi Rescue

[easyt65]

At this point, what difference does it make

"It is our job to figure out what happened and do and do everything we can to prevent it from ever happening again, Senator."

Liars got to lie about the subject on which she was speaking.

Like the "You didn't build that" campaign slogan failure. A lie that only a dupe could believe.

So Hillary declaring the reason for the attack and her failed actions that led up to it - which directly involved who attacked the compound and why - no longer mattered was in any way an appropriate response?

The reason she declared WHO attacked and murdered Stephens did not matter was because she KNEW it was a terrorist attack, KNEW she had already admitted that to a foreign rep and her daughter before lying about it to the American people. She KNEW the compound had been attacked twice before 9/11/12 BY TERRORISTS and that she had not only denied HUNDREDS of Stephens' requests for additional security but had stripped him of 14 members of his security detail AFTER those 2 attacks - her own e-mails showed / proved ALL of this.
-- When confronted about denying hundreds of Stephens requests, in her own e-mails, she LAUGHED about it and claimed she thought the HUNDREDS of requests were part of a JOKE and 'reflective of his sense of humor'.



Hillary was in full 'cover-up' mode and tried to get everyone else to suddenly agree with her that who attacked the compound and why didn't really matter so they would never get to her e-mails / the truth.

In the end, however, the only truth that really matters is THIS:

She and Obama knew there was a call for attacks on US embassies/compounds throughout the Middle east on 9/11/12. They KNEW every other country had pulled their people out before hand but still left Stephens in place. They KNEW an Al Qaeida leader had called for Stephens' assassination in retaliation for an Al Qaeida leader's (from Benghazi) death due to a drone strike earlier that month - told to them by the Mayor of Benghazi. They KNEW Stephens' compound had been attacked by terrorists twice in the weeks leading up to 9/11/12 - these were attacks to test the compound's defenses. The last attack left a 4-foot hole in the compound wall. Despite all of this Hillary and the State Department denied HUNDREDS of requests from Stephens for more security - the man was BEGGING FOR HIS LIFE. AFTER the 2 terrorist attacks on his compound Hillary and the State Department not only did not give him more security but TOOK AWAY 14 members of his security detail!

They ignored threat warnings.
They ignored 2 terrorist attacks on his compound.
They ignored the actions of other nations who protected their people.
They denied him of the additional security he needed.
They took away security he needed, putting his security team far below the level it needed to be.
Stephens shouldn't have ever been there on 9/11/12.
He should have been ordered out when every other nation pulled their people.
He should NOT have been denied the security he asked for.
His security team should never have been cut, ESPECIALLY since they knew he had been attacked before and - according to them - knew the military would never get there in time if another / major attack happened.

HILLARY / THEY F*ED UP!

If they were TRYING to get him killed they couldn't have done a better job!

 

[BlindBoo]

At this point, what difference does it make

"It is our job to figure out what happened and do and do everything we can to prevent it from ever happening again, Senator."

Liars got to lie about the subject on which she was speaking.

Like the "You didn't build that" campaign slogan failure. A lie that only a dupe could believe.

So Hillary declaring the reason for the attack and her failed actions that led up to it - which directly involved who attacked the compound and why - no longer mattered was in any way an appropriate response?

The reason she declared WHO attacked and murdered Stephens did not matter was because she KNEW it was a terrorist attack, KNEW she had already admitted that to a foreign rep and her daughter before lying about it to the American people. She KNEW the compound had been attacked twice before 9/11/12 BY TERRORISTS and that she had not only denied HUNDREDS of Stephens' requests for additional security but had stripped him of 14 members of his security detail AFTER those 2 attacks - her own e-mails showed / proved ALL of this.
-- When confronted about denying hundreds of Stephens requests, in her own e-mails, she LAUGHED about it and claimed she thought the HUNDREDS of requests were part of a JOKE and 'reflective of his sense of humor'.



Hillary was in full 'cover-up' mode and tried to get everyone else to suddenly agree with her that who attacked the compound and why didn't really matter so they would never get to her e-mails / the truth.

In the end, however, the only truth that really matters is THIS:

She and Obama knew there was a call for attacks on US embassies/compounds throughout the Middle east on 9/11/12. They KNEW every other country had pulled their people out before hand but still left Stephens in place. They KNEW an Al Qaeida leader had called for Stephens' assassination in retaliation for an Al Qaeida leader's (from Benghazi) death due to a drone strike earlier that month - told to them by the Mayor of Benghazi. They KNEW Stephens' compound had been attacked by terrorists twice in the weeks leading up to 9/11/12 - these were attacks to test the compound's defenses. The last attack left a 4-foot hole in the compound wall. Despite all of this Hillary and the State Department denied HUNDREDS of requests from Stephens for more security - the man was BEGGING FOR HIS LIFE. AFTER the 2 terrorist attacks on his compound Hillary and the State Department not only did not give him more security but TOOK AWAY 14 members of his security detail!

They ignored threat warnings.
They ignored 2 terrorist attacks on his compound.
They ignored the actions of other nations who protected their people.
They denied him of the additional security he needed.
They took away security he needed, putting his security team far below the level it needed to be.
Stephens shouldn't have ever been there on 9/11/12.
He should have been ordered out when every other nation pulled their people.
He should NOT have been denied the security he asked for.
His security team should never have been cut, ESPECIALLY since they knew he had been attacked before and - according to them - knew the military would never get there in time if another / major attack happened.

HILLARY / THEY F*ED UP!

If they were TRYING to get him killed they couldn't have done a better job!

Nope. She was not discussing reasons for the attack, but ways to prevent attacks in the future.

Are you saying Sec. Clinton ordered Stephens to Benghazi?

 

[Siete]

At this point, what difference does it make

"It is our job to figure out what happened and do and do everything we can to prevent it from ever happening again, Senator."

Liars got to lie about the subject on which she was speaking.

Like the "You didn't build that" campaign slogan failure. A lie that only a dupe could believe.

So Hillary declaring the reason for the attack and her failed actions that led up to it - which directly involved who attacked the compound and why - no longer mattered was in any way an appropriate response?

The reason she declared WHO attacked and murdered Stephens did not matter was because she KNEW it was a terrorist attack, KNEW she had already admitted that to a foreign rep and her daughter before lying about it to the American people. She KNEW the compound had been attacked twice before 9/11/12 BY TERRORISTS and that she had not only denied HUNDREDS of Stephens' requests for additional security but had stripped him of 14 members of his security detail AFTER those 2 attacks - her own e-mails showed / proved ALL of this.
-- When confronted about denying hundreds of Stephens requests, in her own e-mails, she LAUGHED about it and claimed she thought the HUNDREDS of requests were part of a JOKE and 'reflective of his sense of humor'.



Hillary was in full 'cover-up' mode and tried to get everyone else to suddenly agree with her that who attacked the compound and why didn't really matter so they would never get to her e-mails / the truth.

In the end, however, the only truth that really matters is THIS:

She and Obama knew there was a call for attacks on US embassies/compounds throughout the Middle east on 9/11/12. They KNEW every other country had pulled their people out before hand but still left Stephens in place. They KNEW an Al Qaeida leader had called for Stephens' assassination in retaliation for an Al Qaeida leader's (from Benghazi) death due to a drone strike earlier that month - told to them by the Mayor of Benghazi. They KNEW Stephens' compound had been attacked by terrorists twice in the weeks leading up to 9/11/12 - these were attacks to test the compound's defenses. The last attack left a 4-foot hole in the compound wall. Despite all of this Hillary and the State Department denied HUNDREDS of requests from Stephens for more security - the man was BEGGING FOR HIS LIFE. AFTER the 2 terrorist attacks on his compound Hillary and the State Department not only did not give him more security but TOOK AWAY 14 members of his security detail!

They ignored threat warnings.
They ignored 2 terrorist attacks on his compound.
They ignored the actions of other nations who protected their people.
They denied him of the additional security he needed.
They took away security he needed, putting his security team far below the level it needed to be.
Stephens shouldn't have ever been there on 9/11/12.
He should have been ordered out when every other nation pulled their people.
He should NOT have been denied the security he asked for.
His security team should never have been cut, ESPECIALLY since they knew he had been attacked before and - according to them - knew the military would never get there in time if another / major attack happened.

HILLARY / THEY F*ED UP!

If they were TRYING to get him killed they couldn't have done a better job!

Nope. She was not discussing reasons for the attack, but ways to prevent attacks in the future.

Are you saying Sec. Clinton ordered Stephens to Benghazi?

east doesn't have a clue whats its saying ..

one thread Robert Gates is a traitor, the next thread Gates is a hero for questioning Obama.

 

[easyt65]

Nope. She was not discussing reasons for the attack, but ways to prevent attacks in the future.

Are you saying Sec. Clinton ordered Stephens to Benghazi?

1. She WASN'T discussing it - she said it didn't matter, and she was wrong.

2. Stephens worked FOR Hillary. SHE was responsible for his safety and security. SHE was responsible for pulling him out, like the other COMPETENT nation's Reps who pulled their people out did. She was also responsible for providing him with additional security ,which she refused to do hundreds of times despite the obvious threat / requests. Watching the other nations pull their people out while she flew around collecting donations from Wall Street and Islamic nations and leaving Stephens there was a complete lack of leadership, a failure to do her job. When people work for you, they work FOR you. They don't do whatever the hell they want. If Stephens could have done that he would have granted his own requests for additional security. It was HILLARY'S job...she failed.

 

[easyt65]

At this point, what difference does it make

"It is our job to figure out what happened and do and do everything we can to prevent it from ever happening again, Senator."

Liars got to lie about the subject on which she was speaking.

Like the "You didn't build that" campaign slogan failure. A lie that only a dupe could believe.

So Hillary declaring the reason for the attack and her failed actions that led up to it - which directly involved who attacked the compound and why - no longer mattered was in any way an appropriate response?

The reason she declared WHO attacked and murdered Stephens did not matter was because she KNEW it was a terrorist attack, KNEW she had already admitted that to a foreign rep and her daughter before lying about it to the American people. She KNEW the compound had been attacked twice before 9/11/12 BY TERRORISTS and that she had not only denied HUNDREDS of Stephens' requests for additional security but had stripped him of 14 members of his security detail AFTER those 2 attacks - her own e-mails showed / proved ALL of this.
-- When confronted about denying hundreds of Stephens requests, in her own e-mails, she LAUGHED about it and claimed she thought the HUNDREDS of requests were part of a JOKE and 'reflective of his sense of humor'.



Hillary was in full 'cover-up' mode and tried to get everyone else to suddenly agree with her that who attacked the compound and why didn't really matter so they would never get to her e-mails / the truth.

In the end, however, the only truth that really matters is THIS:

She and Obama knew there was a call for attacks on US embassies/compounds throughout the Middle east on 9/11/12. They KNEW every other country had pulled their people out before hand but still left Stephens in place. They KNEW an Al Qaeida leader had called for Stephens' assassination in retaliation for an Al Qaeida leader's (from Benghazi) death due to a drone strike earlier that month - told to them by the Mayor of Benghazi. They KNEW Stephens' compound had been attacked by terrorists twice in the weeks leading up to 9/11/12 - these were attacks to test the compound's defenses. The last attack left a 4-foot hole in the compound wall. Despite all of this Hillary and the State Department denied HUNDREDS of requests from Stephens for more security - the man was BEGGING FOR HIS LIFE. AFTER the 2 terrorist attacks on his compound Hillary and the State Department not only did not give him more security but TOOK AWAY 14 members of his security detail!

They ignored threat warnings.
They ignored 2 terrorist attacks on his compound.
They ignored the actions of other nations who protected their people.
They denied him of the additional security he needed.
They took away security he needed, putting his security team far below the level it needed to be.
Stephens shouldn't have ever been there on 9/11/12.
He should have been ordered out when every other nation pulled their people.
He should NOT have been denied the security he asked for.
His security team should never have been cut, ESPECIALLY since they knew he had been attacked before and - according to them - knew the military would never get there in time if another / major attack happened.

HILLARY / THEY F*ED UP!

If they were TRYING to get him killed they couldn't have done a better job!

Nope. She was not discussing reasons for the attack, but ways to prevent attacks in the future.

Are you saying Sec. Clinton ordered Stephens to Benghazi?

east doesn't have a clue whats its saying ..

one thread Robert Gates is a traitor, the next thread Gates is a hero for questioning Obama.

At least you were smart enough NOT to disagree with anything I said.

 

[rightwinger]

Benghazi Committee Chair gives away the game


There was nothing the military could have done on the night of Sept. 11, 2012, to stop the attacks in Benghazi, Libya, but the special House committee investigating the terrorist incident will continue to probe the Pentagon’s actions that night, the committee’s chairman said Tuesday.
“Whether or not they could have gotten there in time, I don’t think there is any issue with respect to that. They couldn’t,” Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., told Fox News.

 

[Siete]

At this point, what difference does it make

"It is our job to figure out what happened and do and do everything we can to prevent it from ever happening again, Senator."

Liars got to lie about the subject on which she was speaking.

Like the "You didn't build that" campaign slogan failure. A lie that only a dupe could believe.

So Hillary declaring the reason for the attack and her failed actions that led up to it - which directly involved who attacked the compound and why - no longer mattered was in any way an appropriate response?

The reason she declared WHO attacked and murdered Stephens did not matter was because she KNEW it was a terrorist attack, KNEW she had already admitted that to a foreign rep and her daughter before lying about it to the American people. She KNEW the compound had been attacked twice before 9/11/12 BY TERRORISTS and that she had not only denied HUNDREDS of Stephens' requests for additional security but had stripped him of 14 members of his security detail AFTER those 2 attacks - her own e-mails showed / proved ALL of this.
-- When confronted about denying hundreds of Stephens requests, in her own e-mails, she LAUGHED about it and claimed she thought the HUNDREDS of requests were part of a JOKE and 'reflective of his sense of humor'.



Hillary was in full 'cover-up' mode and tried to get everyone else to suddenly agree with her that who attacked the compound and why didn't really matter so they would never get to her e-mails / the truth.

In the end, however, the only truth that really matters is THIS:

She and Obama knew there was a call for attacks on US embassies/compounds throughout the Middle east on 9/11/12. They KNEW every other country had pulled their people out before hand but still left Stephens in place. They KNEW an Al Qaeida leader had called for Stephens' assassination in retaliation for an Al Qaeida leader's (from Benghazi) death due to a drone strike earlier that month - told to them by the Mayor of Benghazi. They KNEW Stephens' compound had been attacked by terrorists twice in the weeks leading up to 9/11/12 - these were attacks to test the compound's defenses. The last attack left a 4-foot hole in the compound wall. Despite all of this Hillary and the State Department denied HUNDREDS of requests from Stephens for more security - the man was BEGGING FOR HIS LIFE. AFTER the 2 terrorist attacks on his compound Hillary and the State Department not only did not give him more security but TOOK AWAY 14 members of his security detail!

They ignored threat warnings.
They ignored 2 terrorist attacks on his compound.
They ignored the actions of other nations who protected their people.
They denied him of the additional security he needed.
They took away security he needed, putting his security team far below the level it needed to be.
Stephens shouldn't have ever been there on 9/11/12.
He should have been ordered out when every other nation pulled their people.
He should NOT have been denied the security he asked for.
His security team should never have been cut, ESPECIALLY since they knew he had been attacked before and - according to them - knew the military would never get there in time if another / major attack happened.

HILLARY / THEY F*ED UP!

If they were TRYING to get him killed they couldn't have done a better job!

Nope. She was not discussing reasons for the attack, but ways to prevent attacks in the future.

Are you saying Sec. Clinton ordered Stephens to Benghazi?

east doesn't have a clue whats its saying ..

one thread Robert Gates is a traitor, the next thread Gates is a hero for questioning Obama.

At least you were smart enough NOT to disagree with anything I said.

I was ignoring your hogwash then ... Gates is anything BUT a traitor.

 

[Siete]

Benghazi Committee Chair gives away the game


There was nothing the military could have done on the night of Sept. 11, 2012, to stop the attacks in Benghazi, Libya, but the special House committee investigating the terrorist incident will continue to probe the Pentagon’s actions that night, the committee’s chairman said Tuesday.
“Whether or not they could have gotten there in time, I don’t think there is any issue with respect to that. They couldn’t,” Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., told Fox News.

same thing Gates said.

 

[easyt65]

Benghazi Committee Chair gives away the game


There was nothing the military could have done on the night of Sept. 11, 2012, to stop the attacks in Benghazi, Libya, but the special House committee investigating the terrorist incident will continue to probe the Pentagon’s actions that night, the committee’s chairman said Tuesday.
“Whether or not they could have gotten there in time, I don’t think there is any issue with respect to that. They couldn’t,” Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., told Fox News.

No one is saying the military could have stopped the attacks or prevent loss of life. Hillary could have done that, but she failed. The military, according to military members, could have saved 1 -2 of the men killed had they launched when they 1st wanted to. At the very least the military should have launched to secure the area and recover the bodies...ya know, like Obama SAID he believed -- 'never leave a man behind'?!

 

[BlindBoo]

Nope. She was not discussing reasons for the attack, but ways to prevent attacks in the future.

Are you saying Sec. Clinton ordered Stephens to Benghazi?

1. She WASN'T discussing it - she said it didn't matter, and she was wrong.

2. Stephens worked FOR Hillary. SHE was responsible for his safety and security. SHE was responsible for pulling him out, like the other COMPETENT nation's Reps who pulled their people out did. She was also responsible for providing him with additional security ,which she refused to do hundreds of times despite the obvious threat / requests. Watching the other nations pull their people out while she flew around collecting donations from Wall Street and Islamic nations and leaving Stephens there was a complete lack of leadership, a failure to do her job. When people work for you, they work FOR you. They don't do whatever the hell they want. If Stephens could have done that he would have granted his own requests for additional security. It was HILLARY'S job...she failed.

There you go lying about what she said again. She never once said it didn't matter. You're easily duped aren't you? Or are you just pretending?

 

[easyt65]

Nope. She was not discussing reasons for the attack, but ways to prevent attacks in the future.

Are you saying Sec. Clinton ordered Stephens to Benghazi?

1. She WASN'T discussing it - she said it didn't matter, and she was wrong.

2. Stephens worked FOR Hillary. SHE was responsible for his safety and security. SHE was responsible for pulling him out, like the other COMPETENT nation's Reps who pulled their people out did. She was also responsible for providing him with additional security ,which she refused to do hundreds of times despite the obvious threat / requests. Watching the other nations pull their people out while she flew around collecting donations from Wall Street and Islamic nations and leaving Stephens there was a complete lack of leadership, a failure to do her job. When people work for you, they work FOR you. They don't do whatever the hell they want. If Stephens could have done that he would have granted his own requests for additional security. It was HILLARY'S job...she failed.

There you go lying about what she said again. She never once said it didn't matter. You're easily duped aren't you? Or are you just pretending?

So, Bill ' It depends on the definition of the word 'is' Clinton, you are saying that 'What difference does it make' does NOT mean the same things as 'it doesn't matter'?!

 

[BlindBoo]

Nope. She was not discussing reasons for the attack, but ways to prevent attacks in the future.

Are you saying Sec. Clinton ordered Stephens to Benghazi?

1. She WASN'T discussing it - she said it didn't matter, and she was wrong.

2. Stephens worked FOR Hillary. SHE was responsible for his safety and security. SHE was responsible for pulling him out, like the other COMPETENT nation's Reps who pulled their people out did. She was also responsible for providing him with additional security ,which she refused to do hundreds of times despite the obvious threat / requests. Watching the other nations pull their people out while she flew around collecting donations from Wall Street and Islamic nations and leaving Stephens there was a complete lack of leadership, a failure to do her job. When people work for you, they work FOR you. They don't do whatever the hell they want. If Stephens could have done that he would have granted his own requests for additional security. It was HILLARY'S job...she failed.

There you go lying about what she said again. She never once said it didn't matter. You're easily duped aren't you? Or are you just pretending?

So, Bill ' It depends on the definition of the word 'is' Clinton, you are saying that 'What difference does it make' does NOT mean the same things as 'it doesn't matter'?!

You and your ilk like to change what was said because then you can use the phrase to describe a a whole litany of phony phrases from that testimony. "It doesn't matter", a statement that lends itself to those type of lies much better than "At this point what difference does it make.", a question put to the obnoxious GOPers she was mixing it up with.

 

[francoHFW]

At this point, what difference does it make

"It is our job to figure out what happened and do and do everything we can to prevent it from ever happening again, Senator."

Liars got to lie about the subject on which she was speaking.

Like the "You didn't build that" campaign slogan failure. A lie that only a dupe could believe.

So Hillary declaring the reason for the attack and her failed actions that led up to it - which directly involved who attacked the compound and why - no longer mattered was in any way an appropriate response?

The reason she declared WHO attacked and murdered Stephens did not matter was because she KNEW it was a terrorist attack, KNEW she had already admitted that to a foreign rep and her daughter before lying about it to the American people. She KNEW the compound had been attacked twice before 9/11/12 BY TERRORISTS and that she had not only denied HUNDREDS of Stephens' requests for additional security but had stripped him of 14 members of his security detail AFTER those 2 attacks - her own e-mails showed / proved ALL of this.
-- When confronted about denying hundreds of Stephens requests, in her own e-mails, she LAUGHED about it and claimed she thought the HUNDREDS of requests were part of a JOKE and 'reflective of his sense of humor'.



Hillary was in full 'cover-up' mode and tried to get everyone else to suddenly agree with her that who attacked the compound and why didn't really matter so they would never get to her e-mails / the truth.

In the end, however, the only truth that really matters is THIS:

She and Obama knew there was a call for attacks on US embassies/compounds throughout the Middle east on 9/11/12. They KNEW every other country had pulled their people out before hand but still left Stephens in place. They KNEW an Al Qaeida leader had called for Stephens' assassination in retaliation for an Al Qaeida leader's (from Benghazi) death due to a drone strike earlier that month - told to them by the Mayor of Benghazi. They KNEW Stephens' compound had been attacked by terrorists twice in the weeks leading up to 9/11/12 - these were attacks to test the compound's defenses. The last attack left a 4-foot hole in the compound wall. Despite all of this Hillary and the State Department denied HUNDREDS of requests from Stephens for more security - the man was BEGGING FOR HIS LIFE. AFTER the 2 terrorist attacks on his compound Hillary and the State Department not only did not give him more security but TOOK AWAY 14 members of his security detail!

They ignored threat warnings.
They ignored 2 terrorist attacks on his compound.
They ignored the actions of other nations who protected their people.
They denied him of the additional security he needed.
They took away security he needed, putting his security team far below the level it needed to be.
Stephens shouldn't have ever been there on 9/11/12.
He should have been ordered out when every other nation pulled their people.
He should NOT have been denied the security he asked for.
His security team should never have been cut, ESPECIALLY since they knew he had been attacked before and - according to them - knew the military would never get there in time if another / major attack happened.

HILLARY / THEY F*ED UP!

If they were TRYING to get him killed they couldn't have done a better job!

Sorry, dupes, nobody in the real world cares about your piles of tripe...

Hillary was saying that no attacker had said what their motive was, so what difference did all the bs blowhard RW drivel matter, what the RW dupes have been brainwashed about...The lies all come from the RW propaganda machine...Of course the video was probably involved in the timing duh. Obama was talking about containment of the ISIS caliphate on the ground. Al-Qaeda "association" is also pretty much baloney, without real evidence but propaganda. Stephens insisted on being there, Mr. misinformed Monday Morning QB.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

At this point, what difference does it make

"It is our job to figure out what happened and do and do everything we can to prevent it from ever happening again, Senator."

Liars got to lie about the subject on which she was speaking.

Like the "You didn't build that" campaign slogan failure. A lie that only a dupe could believe.

So Hillary declaring the reason for the attack and her failed actions that led up to it - which directly involved who attacked the compound and why - no longer mattered was in any way an appropriate response?

The reason she declared WHO attacked and murdered Stephens did not matter was because she KNEW it was a terrorist attack, KNEW she had already admitted that to a foreign rep and her daughter before lying about it to the American people. She KNEW the compound had been attacked twice before 9/11/12 BY TERRORISTS and that she had not only denied HUNDREDS of Stephens' requests for additional security but had stripped him of 14 members of his security detail AFTER those 2 attacks - her own e-mails showed / proved ALL of this.
-- When confronted about denying hundreds of Stephens requests, in her own e-mails, she LAUGHED about it and claimed she thought the HUNDREDS of requests were part of a JOKE and 'reflective of his sense of humor'.



Hillary was in full 'cover-up' mode and tried to get everyone else to suddenly agree with her that who attacked the compound and why didn't really matter so they would never get to her e-mails / the truth.

In the end, however, the only truth that really matters is THIS:

She and Obama knew there was a call for attacks on US embassies/compounds throughout the Middle east on 9/11/12. They KNEW every other country had pulled their people out before hand but still left Stephens in place. They KNEW an Al Qaeida leader had called for Stephens' assassination in retaliation for an Al Qaeida leader's (from Benghazi) death due to a drone strike earlier that month - told to them by the Mayor of Benghazi. They KNEW Stephens' compound had been attacked by terrorists twice in the weeks leading up to 9/11/12 - these were attacks to test the compound's defenses. The last attack left a 4-foot hole in the compound wall. Despite all of this Hillary and the State Department denied HUNDREDS of requests from Stephens for more security - the man was BEGGING FOR HIS LIFE. AFTER the 2 terrorist attacks on his compound Hillary and the State Department not only did not give him more security but TOOK AWAY 14 members of his security detail!

They ignored threat warnings.
They ignored 2 terrorist attacks on his compound.
They ignored the actions of other nations who protected their people.
They denied him of the additional security he needed.
They took away security he needed, putting his security team far below the level it needed to be.
Stephens shouldn't have ever been there on 9/11/12.
He should have been ordered out when every other nation pulled their people.
He should NOT have been denied the security he asked for.
His security team should never have been cut, ESPECIALLY since they knew he had been attacked before and - according to them - knew the military would never get there in time if another / major attack happened.

HILLARY / THEY F*ED UP!

If they were TRYING to get him killed they couldn't have done a better job!

Nope. She was not discussing reasons for the attack, but ways to prevent attacks in the future.

Are you saying Sec. Clinton ordered Stephens to Benghazi?

How does one prevent spontaneous attacks to videos?

 

[washamericom]

with red lines and executive orders ? and of course jailing the videomaker.

 

[Siete]

At this point, what difference does it make

"It is our job to figure out what happened and do and do everything we can to prevent it from ever happening again, Senator."

Liars got to lie about the subject on which she was speaking.

Like the "You didn't build that" campaign slogan failure. A lie that only a dupe could believe.

So Hillary declaring the reason for the attack and her failed actions that led up to it - which directly involved who attacked the compound and why - no longer mattered was in any way an appropriate response?

The reason she declared WHO attacked and murdered Stephens did not matter was because she KNEW it was a terrorist attack, KNEW she had already admitted that to a foreign rep and her daughter before lying about it to the American people. She KNEW the compound had been attacked twice before 9/11/12 BY TERRORISTS and that she had not only denied HUNDREDS of Stephens' requests for additional security but had stripped him of 14 members of his security detail AFTER those 2 attacks - her own e-mails showed / proved ALL of this.
-- When confronted about denying hundreds of Stephens requests, in her own e-mails, she LAUGHED about it and claimed she thought the HUNDREDS of requests were part of a JOKE and 'reflective of his sense of humor'.



Hillary was in full 'cover-up' mode and tried to get everyone else to suddenly agree with her that who attacked the compound and why didn't really matter so they would never get to her e-mails / the truth.

In the end, however, the only truth that really matters is THIS:

She and Obama knew there was a call for attacks on US embassies/compounds throughout the Middle east on 9/11/12. They KNEW every other country had pulled their people out before hand but still left Stephens in place. They KNEW an Al Qaeida leader had called for Stephens' assassination in retaliation for an Al Qaeida leader's (from Benghazi) death due to a drone strike earlier that month - told to them by the Mayor of Benghazi. They KNEW Stephens' compound had been attacked by terrorists twice in the weeks leading up to 9/11/12 - these were attacks to test the compound's defenses. The last attack left a 4-foot hole in the compound wall. Despite all of this Hillary and the State Department denied HUNDREDS of requests from Stephens for more security - the man was BEGGING FOR HIS LIFE. AFTER the 2 terrorist attacks on his compound Hillary and the State Department not only did not give him more security but TOOK AWAY 14 members of his security detail!

They ignored threat warnings.
They ignored 2 terrorist attacks on his compound.
They ignored the actions of other nations who protected their people.
They denied him of the additional security he needed.
They took away security he needed, putting his security team far below the level it needed to be.
Stephens shouldn't have ever been there on 9/11/12.
He should have been ordered out when every other nation pulled their people.
He should NOT have been denied the security he asked for.
His security team should never have been cut, ESPECIALLY since they knew he had been attacked before and - according to them - knew the military would never get there in time if another / major attack happened.

HILLARY / THEY F*ED UP!

If they were TRYING to get him killed they couldn't have done a better job!

Nope. She was not discussing reasons for the attack, but ways to prevent attacks in the future.

Are you saying Sec. Clinton ordered Stephens to Benghazi?

How does one prevent spontaneous attacks to videos?

give the RW's a second,they can dream something up to fit any scenario ..

 

[easyt65]

give the RW's a second,they can dream something up to fit any scenario ..

Liberals are all experts on this so please, Siete, enlighten us with your knowledge:

What is the mission of a QRF?

What is their team make-up?

What assets do they use?

What are their standard procedures and what is/was the ROE att?
- Your DO know what QRF and ROE mean, right?

What is their required response time?

Does a QRF/the military give a flying F* why someone is storming a compound - whether it is over a video or it is ANOTHER terrorist attack on the compound - when their mission is to respond and protect American lives?

It has been said by some liberals on this board, self-proclaimed experts, that the military does not put itself in harm's way when they do not know all the information regarding the situation? Do you prescribe to that utterly ridiculous opinion or are you intelligent enough to know better?

How long exactly did you serve again, and what s your AFSC?

Please do share.

 

[francoHFW]

STHU, idiot.

 

[easyt65]

STHU, idiot.

Yeah, I thought so.....

 

[francoHFW]

Thank you for your service, our soldiers are fantastic, but 90% of them should be nowhere near gov't policy.