Clementine
Platinum Member
- Dec 18, 2011
- 12,919
- 4,825
- 350
Holder has made decisions based strictly on his bias, as with the New Black Panthers. He isn't there for the good of the country, only for certain people.
End Of The Line For Holder? | Independent Journal Review
Let’s take a look back on Holder’s track record, which is more checkered than Ben Johnson’s. First, there was Holder’s refusal to indict nightstick-wielding New Black Panther thugs who stood in front of a Philadelphia polling station in a clear attempt to intimate voters.
Then, we had the Fast and Furious gun-running scandal that resulted in the shooting death of border patrol agent Brian Terry. Guns tracked by the ATF have been found at crime scenes on both sides of the U.S.-Mexican border, including the scene where Terry was killed.
Now, Holder is up to his eyeballs in the DOJ/AP scandal, which includes the secret surveillance of Fox News White House chief Washington reporter James Rosen.
The problem, of course, is that the day after Holder’s denial (lie), DOJ admitted that the attorney general personally signed off on the search warrant relating to Rosen’s personal emails. Moreover, in addition to signing the warrants, Holder vetted them – which means he can’t claim he just signed a stack of paperwork without reading it.
End Of The Line For Holder? | Independent Journal Review
Last edited: