Environmental Religious Zealots, you have blood on your hands because of "CLEAN ENERGY".

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yes, because it is true.

OK. So long as you have a "standard". It isn't true, and you couldn't possibly support your contention with actual research, but you "feel" it is true.

Your comment was nothing but trolling people who disagree with you and your subsequent hypocrisy of whining over someone insulting and not providing useful information is noted.

Methinks there's a bridge somewhere with a vacancy sign underneath. You should go check out Craigslist to check for it...
 
I just know that a lot of countries are working on a solution. No sense wasting time on hysterics.

Agreed. There's not going to be any energy source that doesn't come with some cost or risk. That's how we advance our technological landscape. We can do it rationally and responsibly.
 
Why are they a racket? Don't you believe they can generate energy?

You would be very surprised to know that farmers have used them for centuries.
unreliably sure. Not near the power required to be a replacement for coal or natural gas or hydro, nope.
 
Agreed. There's not going to be any energy source that doesn't come with some cost or risk. That's how we advance our technological landscape. We can do it rationally and responsibly.
yep and Germany is back opening coal plants. hmmmmmmm
 
unreliably sure. Not near the power required to be a replacement for coal or natural gas or hydro, nope.

The future will look very different to what you and I grew up with. By necessity. Windfarms cannot by themselves replace all of coal or nat gas. But we don't really have a choice in the matter in the long run. Wind won't run out. Coal, oil and natural gas will someday. And on the way there these non-renewables will further pollute and harm the environment and climate.

The future of energy will be a more distributed system of multiple renewables. (So long as the luddites don't work overtime to destroy progress).
 
OK. So long as you have a "standard". It isn't true, and you couldn't possibly support your contention with actual research, but you "feel" it is true.

Your comment was nothing but trolling people who disagree with you and your subsequent hypocrisy of whining over someone insulting and not providing useful information is noted.

Methinks there's a bridge somewhere with a vacancy sign underneath. You should go check out Craigslist to check for it...
Methinks you’re a hypocrite. I feel ok trolling you.
 
The future will look very different to what you and I grew up with. By necessity. Windfarms cannot by themselves replace all of coal or nat gas. But we don't really have a choice in the matter in the long run. Wind won't run out. Coal, oil and natural gas will someday. And on the way there these non-renewables will further pollute and harm the environment and climate.

The future of energy will be a more distributed system of multiple renewables. (So long as the luddites don't work overtime to destroy progress).
They aren't going to run out. Wind will run out at the same time that they do.
"While much of the First World is suffering from climate derangement syndrome, the global warming scare offers great opportunities for graft, corruption, and greater political power to “leaders” who know better but use the ginned-up crisis to harden the bubbles they live in."
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top