Espionage On The Homefront

[debbiedowner]

DESPERATE ATTEMPT AT DIVERSION FROM THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN'S RUSSIAN COMMUNICATIONS!

Clearly a dunce like you doesn't understand what a diversion is.

Let me help:


"CNN’s Don Lemon Comes Unglued Over Susan Rice: ‘We Will Not Aid and Abet People Trying to Misinform You’ (VIDEO)"
CNN’s Don Lemon Comes Unglued Over Susan Rice: ‘We Will Not Aid and Abet People Trying to Misinform You’ (VIDEO)



Clearly CNN is afraid it might jar you into actually 'thinking.'

Tell them that isn't a possibility.

Seems you're on a mission. Why don't you make yourself a sign and trek down to D.C. and have your one person protest in front of the Capitol.

Seems like you've penned a post that attempts to hide your desire to dispute what I've posted.....

....but admits that you can't.

Hence....not well hidden at all.



I fervently desire you inserting that 'Dunce' in the middle of your avi, as it would provide information, and an amusing alliterative avi.

No I meant if you don't like it or feel you're correct, do something about it. Again though unmasking is not illegal.

 

[PoliticalChic]

DESPERATE ATTEMPT AT DIVERSION FROM THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN'S RUSSIAN COMMUNICATIONS!

Clearly a dunce like you doesn't understand what a diversion is.

Let me help:


"CNN’s Don Lemon Comes Unglued Over Susan Rice: ‘We Will Not Aid and Abet People Trying to Misinform You’ (VIDEO)"
CNN’s Don Lemon Comes Unglued Over Susan Rice: ‘We Will Not Aid and Abet People Trying to Misinform You’ (VIDEO)



Clearly CNN is afraid it might jar you into actually 'thinking.'

Tell them that isn't a possibility.

Seems you're on a mission. Why don't you make yourself a sign and trek down to D.C. and have your one person protest in front of the Capitol.

Seems like you've penned a post that attempts to hide your desire to dispute what I've posted.....

....but admits that you can't.

Hence....not well hidden at all.



I fervently desire you inserting that 'Dunce' in the middle of your avi, as it would provide information, and an amusing alliterative avi.

No I meant if you don't like it or feel you're correct, do something about it. Again though unmasking is not illegal.

"....do something about it."

I have.....that's what brought you out from under the rock.

 

[PoliticalChic]

7. Let's get to some real "Lies"....those that hide the espionage of the Obama administration:



" Repeating an accusation over and over again is not evidence that the accused is guilty, no matter how much “confidence” the accuser asserts about the conclusion. Nor is it evidence just to suggest that someone has a motive for doing something. Many conspiracy theories are built on the notion of “cui bono” – who benefits – without following up the supposed motive with facts.


.... that is essentially what the U.S. intelligence community has done regarding the dangerous accusation that Russian President Vladimir Putin orchestrated a covert information campaign to influence the outcome of the Nov. 8 U.S. presidential election in favor of Republican Donald Trump.


....the case, as presented, is one-sided and lacks any actual proof. Further, the continued use of the word “assesses” – as in the U.S. intelligence community “assesses” that Russia is guilty – suggests that the underlying classified information also may be less than conclusive because, in intelligence-world-speak, “assesses” often means “guesses.”
US Report Still Lacks Proof on Russia 'Hack'




There is the January 6th intelligence community report on Russian spying, that should serve as the only document that is dispositive in this connection:

a. "We did not make an assessment that Russian activities had on the outcome of the 2016 election..."

b. "Judgments are not intended to imply that we have proof that shows something to be a fact. Assessments are based on collected information, which is often incomplete or fragmentary, as well as logic, argumentation, and precedents.”


Get that???? No evidence.....unlike the Susan Rice revelations.

No proof of Trump-Putin collusion, yet it's all over the Leftist media.....proof that Obamunists hacked, spied on, listened into, revealed Trump and his associates....and the Left censors it.


Where has recent history shown this sort of activity before?

 

[KeiserC]

7. Let's get to some real "Lies"....those that hide the espionage of the Obama administration:



" Repeating an accusation over and over again is not evidence that the accused is guilty, no matter how much “confidence” the accuser asserts about the conclusion. Nor is it evidence just to suggest that someone has a motive for doing something. Many conspiracy theories are built on the notion of “cui bono” – who benefits – without following up the supposed motive with facts.


.... that is essentially what the U.S. intelligence community has done regarding the dangerous accusation that Russian President Vladimir Putin orchestrated a covert information campaign to influence the outcome of the Nov. 8 U.S. presidential election in favor of Republican Donald Trump.


....the case, as presented, is one-sided and lacks any actual proof. Further, the continued use of the word “assesses” – as in the U.S. intelligence community “assesses” that Russia is guilty – suggests that the underlying classified information also may be less than conclusive because, in intelligence-world-speak, “assesses” often means “guesses.”
US Report Still Lacks Proof on Russia 'Hack'




There is the January 6th intelligence community report on Russian spying, that should serve as the only document that is dispositive in this connection:

a. "We did not make an assessment that Russian activities had on the outcome of the 2016 election..."

b. "Judgments are not intended to imply that we have proof that shows something to be a fact. Assessments are based on collected information, which is often incomplete or fragmentary, as well as logic, argumentation, and precedents.”


Get that???? No evidence.....unlike the Susan Rice revelations.

No proof of Trump-Putin collusion, yet it's all over the Leftist media.....proof that Obamunists hacked, spied on, listened into, revealed Trump and his associates....and the Left censors it.


Where has recent history shown this sort of activity before?

Just put Rice's statements together with Farkas's desire to broadly disseminate the 'leakage'... Consciousness of guilt is best proved by false exculpatory statements. That’s a genre in which Susan Rice has rich experience. Two weeks ago, she was asked in an interview about allegations by Nunes that the Obama administration had unmasked Trump-team members. “I know nothing about this,” Rice replied. “I was surprised to see reports from Chairman Nunes on that count today.” Well, at least she didn’t blame it on a video.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

DESPERATE ATTEMPT AT DIVERSION FROM THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN'S RUSSIAN COMMUNICATIONS!

Clearly a dunce like you doesn't understand what a diversion is.

Let me help:


"CNN’s Don Lemon Comes Unglued Over Susan Rice: ‘We Will Not Aid and Abet People Trying to Misinform You’ (VIDEO)"
CNN’s Don Lemon Comes Unglued Over Susan Rice: ‘We Will Not Aid and Abet People Trying to Misinform You’ (VIDEO)



Clearly CNN is afraid it might jar you into actually 'thinking.'

Tell them that isn't a possibility.

Seems you're on a mission. Why don't you make yourself a sign and trek down to D.C. and have your one person protest in front of the Capitol.

Seems like you've penned a post that attempts to hide your desire to dispute what I've posted.....

....but admits that you can't.

Hence....not well hidden at all.



I fervently desire you inserting that 'Dunce' in the middle of your avi, as it would provide information, and an amusing alliterative avi.

No I meant if you don't like it or feel you're correct, do something about it. Again though unmasking is not illegal.

If there was no criminal activity it most certainly is illegal.

 

[PoliticalChic]

8. The public is being bombarded with accusations of Trump, suggestions that we know for certain that Russia hacked the DNC's and Podesta's emails......


But we don't.



Even the intelligence community states that:

"Judgments are not intended to imply that we have proof that shows something to be a fact. Assessments are based on collected information, which is often incomplete or fragmentary, as well as logic, argumentation, and precedents.”


Yet the Democrats are banging the drum, impugning Trump, actually threatening jail!!

"Dem predicts Trump aides will go to jail in Russia investigation
Washington (CNN)Democratic Rep. Joaquin Castro predicted Tuesday that the investigations into President Donald Trump's campaign's ties to Russia would lead to imprisonment for some of the key players."
Democratic Rep.: People will probably go to jail in Russia investigation - CNNPolitics.com


That....in the face of this:
"...the U.S. intelligence community’s assessment on alleged Russian “hacking” still lacks hard public evidence, a case of “trust-us” by politicized spy agencies,..."
US Report Still Lacks Proof on Russia 'Hack'


And they have many of the simpletons convinced.

 

[PoliticalChic]

9. California Democrat Brad Sherman makes the flat statement that, although he has no proof, Russia hacked the DNC and Podesta emails and these leaks had 'a greater effect on the election than the files stolen from Watergate....those we know didn't effect the election."





If he knows this...or any believe this....or any simpletons believe it......give any examples of any information about Bill's wife that were gleaned from the Wiki leaks that were not known about the career criminal prior to the leaks.

Any????

a. The day before any leaks, wikileaks or otherwise, the RealClearPolitics had Hillary at 48%

b. The election result gave Hillary 48.08% per the election.





The one thing we have learned is that any information from a Democrat source is a lie.

 

[jwoodie]

The Vast Right Wing Conspiracy is continually vindicated.

 

[Siete]

horse crap on the homefront ..

and Trumps leading the charge..

PC is just a Canadian foaming at the chops trying to be relevant as usual.

big bad Dems, bla bla bla

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

 

[PoliticalChic]

The Vast Right Wing Conspiracy is continually vindicated.

It has taken too darn long!

 

[PoliticalChic]

horse crap on the homefront ..

and Trumps leading the charge..

PC is just a Canadian foaming at the chops trying to be relevant as usual.

big bad Dems, bla bla bla

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Wait....you're the fool who believes New York City is in CANADA?????


Sooo....you're a reliable Democrat voter, huh?

 

[koshergrl]

BBBBBut...CNN told us to ignore this issue!

 

[Siete]

horse crap on the homefront ..

and Trumps leading the charge..

PC is just a Canadian foaming at the chops trying to be relevant as usual.

big bad Dems, bla bla bla

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Wait....you're the fool who believes New York City is in CANADA?????


Sooo....you're a reliable Democrat voter, huh?

you're on vacation now? or were you lying about living in the sticks and getting crappy internet service ?

NYC .... deep in Dem country

 

[PoliticalChic]

horse crap on the homefront ..

and Trumps leading the charge..

PC is just a Canadian foaming at the chops trying to be relevant as usual.

big bad Dems, bla bla bla

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Wait....you're the fool who believes New York City is in CANADA?????


Sooo....you're a reliable Democrat voter, huh?

you're on vacation now? or were you lying about living in the sticks and getting crappy internet service ?

NYC .... deep in Dem country

The only one lying is you.


BTW,,,,,in what country is NYC???

C'mon, dunce, try.....

 

[Care4all]

5. A medial review:

Obama increases agencies with access to raw intell data.....what reason other than to encourage leaks?


Ben Rhodes is one to whom this data is available....a man admitted to organizing media hordes to advance administration policies.


Evelyn Farcas, Obama appointee speaks of helping here 'colleagues' in raking up all sorts of anti-Trump data and passing it to Democrat politicians


Susan Rice has been exposed as lying to the public on many occasions, the latest in lots of unmasking of Trump associates on classified data.....and passing it on to multiple agencies


Sooo....this looks less and less like an accident and more like an enterprise.

Wow! Contrary to what I believed at one time, you are not very bright PC...

Evelyn Farcas, Obama appointee speaks of helping her 'colleagues' in raking up all sorts of anti-Trump data and passing it to Democrat politicians

When did she leave office PC?

Where did she say in the whole interview,

"all sorts of Anti Trump data"?

 

[PoliticalChic]

5. A medial review:

Obama increases agencies with access to raw intell data.....what reason other than to encourage leaks?


Ben Rhodes is one to whom this data is available....a man admitted to organizing media hordes to advance administration policies.


Evelyn Farcas, Obama appointee speaks of helping here 'colleagues' in raking up all sorts of anti-Trump data and passing it to Democrat politicians


Susan Rice has been exposed as lying to the public on many occasions, the latest in lots of unmasking of Trump associates on classified data.....and passing it on to multiple agencies


Sooo....this looks less and less like an accident and more like an enterprise.

Wow! Contrary to what I believed at one time, you are not very bright PC...

Evelyn Farcas, Obama appointee speaks of helping her 'colleagues' in raking up all sorts of anti-Trump data and passing it to Democrat politicians

When did she leave office PC?

Where did she say in the whole interview,

"all sorts of Anti Trump data"?

OK....time to prove you're an Obamunist boot-licker.

"UPDATE: President Obama’s Own Defense Deputy Admits Obama White House Spied on Candidate/President-Elect Trump…
...Obama administration official Evelyn Farkas (Deputy Asst. Secretary of Defense) appearing on MSNBC and admitting first hand knowledge the Obama administration spied on candidate and president-elect Donald Trump’s transition team to gather “intelligence” for political use.

....significant admissions she was making about the Obama administration spying on Donald Trump’s team and generating classified intelligence for Ms. Farkas (and others) to spread to Capitol Hill politicians.

'I was urging my former colleagues, and, and frankly speaking the people on the Hill [Democrat politicians], it was more actually aimed at telling the Hill people, get as much information as you can – get as much intelligence as you can – before President Obama leaves the administration.

Because I had a fear that somehow that information would disappear with the senior [Obama] people who left; so it would be hidden away in the bureaucracy, um, that the Trump folks – if they found out HOW we knew what we knew about their, the Trump staff, dealing with Russians– that they would try to compromise those sources and methods; meaning we no longer have access to that intelligence.

So I became very worried because not enough was coming out into the open and I knew that there was more. We have very good intelligence on Russia; so then I had talked to some of my former colleagues and I knew that they were also trying to help get information to [Democrat politicians].'

...Farkas outs herself as the key source for a New York Times reportwhich discussed President Obama officials leaking classified information to media."
UPDATE: President Obama’s Own Defense Deputy Admits Obama White House Spied on Candidate/President-Elect Trump…








'I was urging my former colleagues,..."
[Folks I knew from the job....]
Now.....does that indicate whether this was during her time in office.....or, in fact, any time frame?
Could be a confession that she continued breaking the law and leaking classified intell after she left the administration.


Nailed ya,' huh?

Sooooo who isn't very bright?

 

[PoliticalChic]

5. A medial review:

Obama increases agencies with access to raw intell data.....what reason other than to encourage leaks?


Ben Rhodes is one to whom this data is available....a man admitted to organizing media hordes to advance administration policies.


Evelyn Farcas, Obama appointee speaks of helping here 'colleagues' in raking up all sorts of anti-Trump data and passing it to Democrat politicians


Susan Rice has been exposed as lying to the public on many occasions, the latest in lots of unmasking of Trump associates on classified data.....and passing it on to multiple agencies


Sooo....this looks less and less like an accident and more like an enterprise.

Wow! Contrary to what I believed at one time, you are not very bright PC...

Evelyn Farcas, Obama appointee speaks of helping her 'colleagues' in raking up all sorts of anti-Trump data and passing it to Democrat politicians

When did she leave office PC?

Where did she say in the whole interview,

"all sorts of Anti Trump data"?

"Where did she say in the whole interview,

"all sorts of Anti Trump data"?"


So.....it could be she was collating anti-Hillary data, too???


What sort of dunce are you????


Now.....what was that about 'not very bright'?

 

[imawhosure]

1. Monitoring foreign agents rather than Trump associates being the targets?
Perhaps...but while the intent is up for debate, we have learned that the fact of surveillance and monitoring and spying, is not.
Exactly what Trump said a month ago about the Obama Administration has been proven true.


2. Before Obama, the protocols were clear as far as revealing the names of American citizens who were monitored in these NSA tapings:

There are only two reasons for unmasking of a US citizen's name:

a. Is there a need to know the name of the citizen to understand the contest of the monitored intell.

b. If the citizen is involved in illegal activity.

And far worse, leaks of classified data to the press just didn't occur before Obama.

Flynn was spied on without a warrant, without his knowledge, and his name was leaked to the press. We know that an Obama functionary described this as pro forma.
We no longer have a 4th amendment.

Evelyn Farkas:
'I was urging my former colleagues, and, and frankly speaking the people on the Hill [Democrat politicians], it was more actually aimed at telling the Hill people, get as much information as you can – get as much intelligence as you can – before President Obama leaves the administration.

Because I had a fear that somehow that information would disappear with the senior [Obama] people who left; so it would be hidden away in the bureaucracy, um, that the Trump folks – if they found out HOW we knew what we knew about their, the Trump staff, dealing with Russians– that they would try to compromise those sources and methods; meaning we no longer have access to that intelligence.

So I became very worried because not enough was coming out into the open and I knew that there was more. We have very good intelligence on Russia; so then I had talked to some of my former colleagues and I knew that they were also trying to help get information to [Democrat politicians].'

...Farkas outs herself as the key source for a New York Times reportwhich discussed President Obama officials leaking classified information to media."
UPDATE: President Obama’s Own Defense Deputy Admits Obama White House Spied on Candidate/President-Elect Trump…



3. The cat is out of the bag when the most watched Liberal cable outlet screams that nobody should have access to the story:

"CNN Goes On Rampage Against Susan Rice Bombshell, Instructs Viewers To Ignore Story - 'We will not aid and abet the people trying to misinform you'"
CNN Goes On Rampage Against Susan Rice Bombshell, Instructs Viewers To Ignore Story - 'We will not aid and abet the people trying to misinform you' • r/conspiracy



4. Lest any mistake purely natural functioning of the intelligence community, consider this: Hillary Clinton, her campaign, the Clinton Foundation, and every one associated with these spoke to all sorts of foreign officials.
Yet.....we have no intell leaks from that side.

"There is NO evidence that the same thing was done to Hillary Clinton or to her top campaign officials. ... the FBI wanted to look at the DNC servers to see if there was any foreign activity going on and the Democratic Party refused to allow them.

Which proves that the real reason the Obama administration was feverishly collecting and sharing the classified information was not for national security purposes, but for nakedly POLITICAL reasons having nothing to do with anything other than Democrats being nothing but rancid, rotten, toxic piles of demonized slime.

... what you REALLY have is American election hacking under Obama." Confirmed: Fascist, Felonious Obama Administration Spied On Private American Citizens And Used US Intelligence Services As Political Weapon


Look carefully at those who rush to shield, excuse, and ignore that is clearly anti-American activities by the Left and their stooges.

Now we see the results of the Patriot Act bear fruit; we, as a nation, have given up our essential liberties out of fear and for the illusion of security.

1. Monitoring foreign agents rather than Trump associates being the targets?
Perhaps...but while the intent is up for debate, we have learned that the fact of surveillance and monitoring and spying, is not.
Exactly what Trump said a month ago about the Obama Administration has been proven true.


2. Before Obama, the protocols were clear as far as revealing the names of American citizens who were monitored in these NSA tapings:

There are only two reasons for unmasking of a US citizen's name:

a. Is there a need to know the name of the citizen to understand the contest of the monitored intell.

b. If the citizen is involved in illegal activity.

And far worse, leaks of classified data to the press just didn't occur before Obama.

Flynn was spied on without a warrant, without his knowledge, and his name was leaked to the press. We know that an Obama functionary described this as pro forma.
We no longer have a 4th amendment.

Evelyn Farkas:
'I was urging my former colleagues, and, and frankly speaking the people on the Hill [Democrat politicians], it was more actually aimed at telling the Hill people, get as much information as you can – get as much intelligence as you can – before President Obama leaves the administration.

Because I had a fear that somehow that information would disappear with the senior [Obama] people who left; so it would be hidden away in the bureaucracy, um, that the Trump folks – if they found out HOW we knew what we knew about their, the Trump staff, dealing with Russians– that they would try to compromise those sources and methods; meaning we no longer have access to that intelligence.

So I became very worried because not enough was coming out into the open and I knew that there was more. We have very good intelligence on Russia; so then I had talked to some of my former colleagues and I knew that they were also trying to help get information to [Democrat politicians].'

...Farkas outs herself as the key source for a New York Times reportwhich discussed President Obama officials leaking classified information to media."
UPDATE: President Obama’s Own Defense Deputy Admits Obama White House Spied on Candidate/President-Elect Trump…



3. The cat is out of the bag when the most watched Liberal cable outlet screams that nobody should have access to the story:

"CNN Goes On Rampage Against Susan Rice Bombshell, Instructs Viewers To Ignore Story - 'We will not aid and abet the people trying to misinform you'"
CNN Goes On Rampage Against Susan Rice Bombshell, Instructs Viewers To Ignore Story - 'We will not aid and abet the people trying to misinform you' • r/conspiracy



4. Lest any mistake purely natural functioning of the intelligence community, consider this: Hillary Clinton, her campaign, the Clinton Foundation, and every one associated with these spoke to all sorts of foreign officials.
Yet.....we have no intell leaks from that side.

"There is NO evidence that the same thing was done to Hillary Clinton or to her top campaign officials. ... the FBI wanted to look at the DNC servers to see if there was any foreign activity going on and the Democratic Party refused to allow them.

Which proves that the real reason the Obama administration was feverishly collecting and sharing the classified information was not for national security purposes, but for nakedly POLITICAL reasons having nothing to do with anything other than Democrats being nothing but rancid, rotten, toxic piles of demonized slime.

... what you REALLY have is American election hacking under Obama." Confirmed: Fascist, Felonious Obama Administration Spied On Private American Citizens And Used US Intelligence Services As Political Weapon


Look carefully at those who rush to shield, excuse, and ignore that is clearly anti-American activities by the Left and their stooges.

Now we see the results of the Patriot Act bear fruit; we, as a nation, have given up our essential liberties out of fear and for the illusion of security.

The revelations expose the nexus of espionage and politicization.

It is the latter that moves the episode out of the 'national safety' realm.

PC, just like Divine Wind said, we now see how the Patriot Act can/could/and probably was abused. I am in shock that the Democrats who actually stood against this (which I agreed with) now won't even go there because it is their people who got busted. It is NOT the Patriot Act itself, as much as it is the power it gives government officials from either party who abuse it.

I know it is asking a lot, but shouldn't Democrats and Repubs stand together on this one? It is obvious if it happened once this quickly and we don't demand a change, it will happen again, and again, and again.

As far as the Obama administration, their legacy is now screwed, and it is going to get worse. Why? Because what nobody is realizing is--------->either Trump is in cahoots with Russia, (and that is not likely since with all the leaks here, there, and everywhere, we would have every liberal media outlet with a leak that would damn him) or, the Obama administration if watching Trump for a year without knowing he was going to win the nomination, then must also have surveilled at least 1 if not 2 of the other Republican candidates, probably Cruz for sure.

If that is the case; which most logical thinking people would agree with, then all pretense of this not being political will evaporate. If you notice, Shiff has shut up! That should tell all Democrats reading this, that when the person on your side who got to read the evidence clams up, it is all bad for you. Unlike other Democrats, he can't claim ignorance as he did not get to view the evidence, he seen it, and now keeps quiet. The rest of the Democrats still have plausible deniability.

If you read the political tea leaves, the Democrats are in trouble, it is obvious; and when I say trouble, I mean big trouble. I am sure they are praying for something to happen on the world stage to redirect focus off of this. The funny thing is------------->the leftists on here aren't aware of it, and keep beating the same drum.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Markle and PC clearly do not understand economics.

 

[Divine Wind]

....I know it is asking a lot, but shouldn't Democrats and Repubs stand together on this one? It is obvious if it happened once this quickly and we don't demand a change, it will happen again, and again, and again.

As far as the Obama administration, their legacy is now screwed, and it is going to get worse. Why? Because what nobody is realizing is--------->either Trump is in cahoots with Russia, (and that is not likely since with all the leaks here, there, and everywhere, we would have every liberal media outlet with a leak that would damn him) or, the Obama administration if watching Trump for a year without knowing he was going to win the nomination, then must also have surveilled at least 1 if not 2 of the other Republican candidates, probably Cruz for sure.

If that is the case; which most logical thinking people would agree with, then all pretense of this not being political will evaporate. If you notice, Shiff has shut up! That should tell all Democrats reading this, that when the person on your side who got to read the evidence clams up, it is all bad for you. Unlike other Democrats, he can't claim ignorance as he did not get to view the evidence, he seen it, and now keeps quiet. The rest of the Democrats still have plausible deniability.

If you read the political tea leaves, the Democrats are in trouble, it is obvious; and when I say trouble, I mean big trouble. I am sure they are praying for something to happen on the world stage to redirect focus off of this. The funny thing is------------->the leftists on here aren't aware of it, and keep beating the same drum.

It would be great if they did, but the sad fact is that modern Democrats and modern Republicans are both supporters of big government. Their difference is in their agendas, not their quest for power.

The Patriot Act was passed with bipartisan approval and renewed under President Obama, again with bipartisan approval.