Ray From Cleveland
Diamond Member
- Aug 16, 2015
- 97,215
- 37,439
Even in old west towns open carry was not allowed everywhere..
Not allowed everywhere here either.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
Even in old west towns open carry was not allowed everywhere..
we already have gun regulations so people who want them already have what they wantWestwall cannot prove that 93% does not approve gun regulations, when it fact the percentage is solid.
Westwall does not understand the Constitution's 2d Amendment or the jurisprudence supporting appropriate regulation.
So Westwall, the propagandist, calls me a propagandist.
The fact is that guns have been regulated in the past and such has been sustained by SCOTUS.
I agree with the far right that regulation of vehicles and guns needs to increase.
Even in old west towns open carry was not allowed everywhere..
Westwall cannot prove that 93% does not approve gun regulations, when it fact the percentage is solid.
Westwall does not understand the Constitution's 2d Amendment or the jurisprudence supporting appropriate regulation.
So Westwall, the propagandist, calls me a propagandist.
The fact is that guns have been regulated in the past and such has been sustained by SCOTUS.
I agree with the far right that regulation of vehicles and guns needs to increase.
Try to buy a car these days, and the salesman will be forced to file a government IFO to make sure you are not on a watch list.
And those who oppose the same for guns and watch lists are the allies of radical jihadism.
How many times do we need to ask for your source on that 93% number?
Even in old west towns open carry was not allowed everywhere..
Your candidate is a silly goof, so we are fine with that. 31000 gun deaths, 29000 vehicle deaths. Yeah, regulation makes sense. 93% of America wants it, and you are wrong.
I demand that all vehicles that exist for the sole purpose of killing things be immediately taken off the road.
WE have insecticide for the same reason: killing things. Should that be made illegal as well? Come to think of it, isopropyl alcohol and antibiotics should also be made illegal, since they are made to kill bacteria.I demand that all vehicles that exist for the sole purpose of killing things be immediately taken off the road.
Notice that to make this lame analogy you have to say "things" instead of "people," because you know that if you said "killing people" you would leave out millions of hunting rifles.
WTF? There's a big difference between a vehicle and a gun. Vehicles transports our entire effin economy,,,while a goddamn gun only real focus is to KILL! Don't you understand?
No, keep the gun control, it works.... Criminals obey the law and will abide by it...I mean Chicago has heavy gun control and ......oh nevermind.
Wow so dumb.WE have insecticide for the same reason: killing things. Should that be made illegal as well? Come to think of it, isopropyl alcohol and antibiotics should also be made illegal, since they are made to kill bacteria.I demand that all vehicles that exist for the sole purpose of killing things be immediately taken off the road.
Notice that to make this lame analogy you have to say "things" instead of "people," because you know that if you said "killing people" you would leave out millions of hunting rifles.
You know...you are feeding his fetish.WTF? There's a big difference between a vehicle and a gun. Vehicles transports our entire effin economy,,,while a goddamn gun only real focus is to KILL! Don't you understand?
Oh now you're making up things that I never said. You're really bad at arguing Brifag.Wow so dumb.WE have insecticide for the same reason: killing things. Should that be made illegal as well? Come to think of it, isopropyl alcohol and antibiotics should also be made illegal, since they are made to kill bacteria.I demand that all vehicles that exist for the sole purpose of killing things be immediately taken off the road.
Notice that to make this lame analogy you have to say "things" instead of "people," because you know that if you said "killing people" you would leave out millions of hunting rifles.
How is that "dumb?" You are the one who implied anything that is manufactured solely to kill "things" should be illegal, not me.
WTF? There's a big difference between a vehicle and a gun. Vehicles transports our entire effin economy,,,while a gun only real focus is to KILL! Don't you understand?
But vehicles kill five times more people than guns do, and vehicles are frequently used in many crimes--from robberies to assaults to human trafficking to kidnapping,
And, is it a bad thing when a woman shoots a man who's trying to rape her? Or when a father shoots a burglar? Or when a cop shoots violent criminal who's trying to kill him? Or when a store owner shoots a guy who's trying to rob his store? Or when a soldier shoots a radical Muslim terrorist? Or when a rural family shoots a deer for meat and skins. Or when an animal-control person shoots a rabid dog? Would it have been bad if a sniper had been able to shoot Hitler in 1939?
To mindlessly condemn all "killing" is superficial and silly--and mindless--like all other liberal arguments.
Chicago is a wonderful example of people using their 2nd amendment rights. Murica!!!!No, keep the gun control, it works.... Criminals obey the law and will abide by it...I mean Chicago has heavy gun control and ......oh nevermind.
Yes they do. Now Chicago lost a lawsuit to the NRA for hundreds of thousands of dollars. Who said there is no God?
Oh now you're making up things that I never said. You're really bad at arguing Brifag.Wow so dumb.WE have insecticide for the same reason: killing things. Should that be made illegal as well? Come to think of it, isopropyl alcohol and antibiotics should also be made illegal, since they are made to kill bacteria.I demand that all vehicles that exist for the sole purpose of killing things be immediately taken off the road.
Notice that to make this lame analogy you have to say "things" instead of "people," because you know that if you said "killing people" you would leave out millions of hunting rifles.
How is that "dumb?" You are the one who implied anything that is manufactured solely to kill "things" should be illegal, not me.
I have to shake my head in sorrow and pity for you guys. How many times do you deny the number is solid, used in congressional debate as we all know here, which makes the rest of the country stare at you guys as freaks. Congress outlawed assault weapons then allowed them, SCOTUS found it lawful.Try to buy a car these days, and the salesman will be forced to file a government IFO to make sure you are not on a watch list.
And those who oppose the same for guns and watch lists are the allies of radical jihadism.
How many times do we need to ask for your source on that 93% number?
It's something you wish but is not true..Even in old west towns open carry was not allowed everywhere..
Pretty much untrue. There were a few places that tried it, and then abandoned those rules very quickly. You watch too many bad TV shows.
Yeah that's exactly the same as: anything that is manufactured solely to kill "things" should be illegalOh now you're making up things that I never said. You're really bad at arguing Brifag.Wow so dumb.WE have insecticide for the same reason: killing things. Should that be made illegal as well? Come to think of it, isopropyl alcohol and antibiotics should also be made illegal, since they are made to kill bacteria.Notice that to make this lame analogy you have to say "things" instead of "people," because you know that if you said "killing people" you would leave out millions of hunting rifles.
How is that "dumb?" You are the one who implied anything that is manufactured solely to kill "things" should be illegal, not me.
Allow me to quote your idiocy:
I demand that all vehicles that exist for the sole purpose of killing things be immediately taken off the road.