Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
*Except for when they are felonies. Such as , when they are violations of campaign finance laws.Payments to sign Non-Disclosure agreements are perfectly legal,
*Except for when they are felonies. Such as , when they are violations of campaign finance laws.Payments to sign Non-Disclosure agreements are perfectly legal,
And you got it.. I asked for proof.
*Except for when they are felonies. Such as , when they are violations of campaign finance laws.Payments to sign Non-Disclosure agreements are perfectly legal,
No it doesn't. That's fantasy. All that matters is whether or not it can be reasonably demonstrated that any of them were done to affect the campaign and election. And, if they were not reported as campaign expenses. And the payments to both stores and the playboy bunny were loans, not his own money. So you are way off baseThe fact that he has a history of making such payments disproves that they are subject to campaign finance laws.
And we know of two where this is not the case. So, the SDNY would be derelict not to investigate the others.Except if Trump paid them out of his own pocket.
No it doesn't. That's fantasy. All that matters is whether or not it can be reasonably demonstrated that any of them were done to affect the campaign and election. And, if they were not reported as campaign expenses. And the payments to both stores and the playboy bunny were loans, not his own money. So you are way off baseThe fact that he has a history of making such payments disproves that they are subject to campaign finance laws.
Do you actually believe that's why Cohen is going to prison? You don't follow the facts.haha... are you for real?That way you're only wrong once.
Um... hey dumbasses.... Trump's personal attorney literally is about to go to prison for it... I'm sure Dershowitz's opinion will be very comforting, as Bubba breathes lightly on the back of his neck...
Hmm,no, I am correct. You just failed a 10th grade English quiz. When you use a connection between two complete sentences, you need a comma before your conjunction.You are wrong
Since it was one of the charges of which he was convicted, and since it was cited at his sentencing...yes, I believe it, as only an idiot would not.Do you actually believe that's why Cohen is going to prison?
Hmm,no, I am correct. You just failed a 10th grade English quiz. When you use a connection between two complete sentences, you need a comma before your conjunction.You are wrong
Hasn't it come public that trump raided his charities for personal spending?? Is that lawful?*Except for when they are felonies. Such as , when they are violations of campaign finance laws.Payments to sign Non-Disclosure agreements are perfectly legal,
That is not the case. Trump's payments were personal expenses made with his own money. The fact that he has a history of making such payments disproves that they are subject to campaign finance laws. And, if they were, the penalty would be a civil fine such as the $400,000 one Obbable paid for campaign donation fraud.
100% incorrect. Every 10th grade English student knows this. And, if they don't, they fail the quiz.There is no requirement to place a comma between the two parts of the sentence I posted.
I believe thats more a civil matter. But New York forced him to shut down his charity already.Hasn't it come public that trump raided his charities for personal spending?? Is that lawful?
Punctuation Mod Report here quicklyHmm,no, I am correct. You just failed a 10th grade English quiz. When you use a connection between two complete sentences, you need a comma before your conjunction.You are wrong
You are wrong. There is no requirement to place a comma between the two parts of the sentence I posted. Go test it in a grammar checker and discover just how wrong you are.
Hasn't it come public that trump raided his charities for personal spending?? Is that lawful?*Except for when they are felonies. Such as , when they are violations of campaign finance laws.Payments to sign Non-Disclosure agreements are perfectly legal,
That is not the case. Trump's payments were personal expenses made with his own money. The fact that he has a history of making such payments disproves that they are subject to campaign finance laws. And, if they were, the penalty would be a civil fine such as the $400,000 one Obbable paid for campaign donation fraud.
100% incorrect. Every 10th grade English student knows this. And, if they don't, they fail the quiz.There is no requirement to place a comma between the two parts of the sentence I posted.
