Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
Actually, his views on race are closer to the Democratic Party's, not those of conservatives.so daveywoman... you and william joyce are tight on the issue of why blacks are so loyal to the democratic party. How does it feel to be in so close agreement? Make you wanna take a bath? Good luck with selling that ideology to actual BLACK people!
see, daveman, has nothing but his racist opinion.
Silence?
we're just laughin' at you. The poor old GOP has to bring up who the democratic party WAS as a means of getting black americans to forget who the GOP IS. Talking about FDR and assiduously avoiding Strom Thurmond or Ron Reagan or Dick Nixon and the southern strategy is FUNNY. It shows how desperate you are... and the numbers at the polls show that black americans KNOW how desperate you are and how racist you are deep within your party's base.
I also noticed while you at least acknowledged FDR and Dems role in Tuskegee, you didn't think enough of it to apologize for it.
Instead you're trying to deflect with "Nixon" or "Reagan" neither of whom ever used human beings as laboratory animals in a long and inefficient study of how long it takes syphilis to kill someone.
You want to try again?
Silence?
we're just laughin' at you. The poor old GOP has to bring up who the democratic party WAS as a means of getting black americans to forget who the GOP IS. Talking about FDR and assiduously avoiding Strom Thurmond or Ron Reagan or Dick Nixon and the southern strategy is FUNNY. It shows how desperate you are... and the numbers at the polls show that black americans KNOW how desperate you are and how racist you are deep within your party's base.
I also noticed while you at least acknowledged FDR and Dems role in Tuskegee, you didn't think enough of it to apologize for it.
Instead you're trying to deflect with "Nixon" or "Reagan" neither of whom ever used human beings as laboratory animals in a long and inefficient study of how long it takes syphilis to kill someone.
You want to try again?
you don't get it.... or perhaps you do and willfully ignore it... but blacks today are well aware of the racist roots of the Democratic Party. Blacks are well aware of the fact that Jim Crow was the policy of Democrats. They understand our past, and they understand that, starting in 1948, we began a concerted effort to take a different path. We didn't change overnight, but we did start to change overnight and today. we have purged the systemic racism and most all of the racists from our party. Blacks are well aware of that. For you to suggest that blacks in America would willingly vote for a party that had a racist agenda is to suggest that 90% of blacks in America are stupid and gullible.... and, from my perspective, that suggestion is, in and of itself, racist and demeaning to blacks. Blacks today also understand what "southern strategy" means and what party uses it. Blacks today are well aware of what happened in Philadelphia, Mississippi and they understand the significance of Ron Reagan choosing that spot, of all spots in America, to launch his presidential campaign. YOu can go ahead and talk about Tuskegee and FDR all day long... it's not going to bring a single black vote over to your side... it's old news and it's not who the Democratic Party IS today. Sorry.
Hmmmm...you don't get it.... or perhaps you do and willfully ignore it... but blacks today are well aware of the racist roots of the Democratic Party. Blacks are well aware of the fact that Jim Crow was the policy of Democrats. They understand our past, and they understand that, starting in 1948, we began a concerted effort to take a different path. We didn't change overnight, but we did start to change overnight and today. we have purged the systemic racism and most all of the racists from our party. Blacks are well aware of that. For you to suggest that blacks in America would willingly vote for a party that had a racist agenda is to suggest that 90% of blacks in America are stupid and gullible.... and, from my perspective, that suggestion is, in and of itself, racist and demeaning to blacks. Blacks today also understand what "southern strategy" means and what party uses it. Blacks today are well aware of what happened in Philadelphia, Mississippi and they understand the significance of Ron Reagan choosing that spot, of all spots in America, to launch his presidential campaign. YOu can go ahead and talk about Tuskegee and FDR all day long... it's not going to bring a single black vote over to your side... it's old news and it's not who the Democratic Party IS today. Sorry.
Bullshit. I do NOT feel empowered to speak for any community... only for myself.
Or...what?Move on.
Lonestar_Logic would fail his history course. No, the GOP did not introduce the Civil Rights Act of 1964 in the Senate but offered the change to co-sponsor it, which they did wisely. Second, the only northerners and westerners to vote against the Civil Rights Act were Republican. From first to last, the Republicans were in the second seat on this legislation.
I cite this selective and at times false posting above by L_L to note that the major events were passed almost always by Democratically controlled Congresses that put the pistol to the GOP to become "bi-partisan" or be labeled racists.
I also invite you to note that L_L's last date was 1996.
Yes, black Americans know what the Democratic Party was and what the GOP is. Black Americans correctly realize that the Democratic Party protects their interests while the GOP will sell them out to appease the southern wing of the Pubs.
You fail, L_L, you fail.
Move on.
Lonestar_Logic would fail his history course. No, the GOP did not introduce the Civil Rights Act of 1964 in the Senate but offered the change to co-sponsor it, which they did wisely. Second, the only northerners and westerners to vote against the Civil Rights Act were Republican. From first to last, the Republicans were in the second seat on this legislation.
I cite this selective and at times false posting above by L_L to note that the major events were passed almost always by Democratically controlled Congresses that put the pistol to the GOP to become "bi-partisan" or be labeled racists.
I also invite you to note that L_L's last date was 1996.
Yes, black Americans know what the Democratic Party was and what the GOP is. Black Americans correctly realize that the Democratic Party protects their interests while the GOP will sell them out to appease the southern wing of the Pubs.
You fail, L_L, you fail.
Move on.
I don't believe I ever stated that the Republicans introduced that particular legislation. Fact is the democrats attempted to filibuster the civil rights act of 1964.
This is how the vote went by party.
The original House version:
Democratic Party: 152-96 (61%39%)
Republican Party: 138-34 (80%20%)
Cloture in the Senate:
Democratic Party: 44-23 (66%34%)
Republican Party: 27-6 (82%18%)
The Senate version:
Democratic Party: 46-21 (69%31%)
Republican Party: 27-6 (82%18%)
The Senate version, voted on by the House:
Democratic Party: 153-91 (63%37%)
Republican Party: 136-35 (80%20%)
The bill came before the full Senate for debate on March 30, 1964 and the "Southern Bloc" of 18 southern Democratic Senators and one Republican Senator led by Richard Russell (D-GA) launched a filibuster to prevent its passage.[4] Said Russell: "We will resist to the bitter end any measure or any movement which would have a tendency to bring about social equality and intermingling and amalgamation of the races in our (Southern) states."[5]
The most fervent opposition to the bill came from Dixie lawmakers, like Senator Strom Thurmond (D-SC): "This so-called Civil Rights Proposals, which the President has sent to Capitol Hill for enactment into law, are unconstitutional, unnecessary unwise and extend beyond the realm of reason. This is the worst civil-rights package ever presented to the Congress and is reminiscent of the Reconstruction proposals and actions of the radical Republican Congress."
After 54 days of filibuster, Senators Everett Dirksen (R-IL), Thomas Kuchel (R-CA), Hubert Humphrey (D-MN), and Mike Mansfield (D-MT) introduced a substitute bill that they hoped would attract enough Republican swing votes to end the filibuster. The compromise bill was weaker than the House version in regard to government power to regulate the conduct of private business, but it was not so weak as to cause the House to reconsider the legislation.
On the morning of June 10, 1964, Senator Robert Byrd (D-W.Va.) completed an address that he had begun 14 hours and 13 minutes earlier opposing the legislation. Until then, the measure had occupied the Senate for 57 working days, including six Saturdays. A day earlier, Democratic Whip Hubert Humphrey of Minnesota, the bill's manager, concluded he had the 67 votes required at that time to end the debate and end the filibuster. With six wavering senators providing a four-vote victory margin, the final tally stood at 71 to 29. Never in history had the Senate been able to muster enough votes to cut off a filibuster on a civil rights bill. And only once in the 37 years since 1927 had it agreed to cloture for any measure.
I understand you liberal fucks have to lie in an attempt to win an argument, but most conservatives are on to your little games. You're not only a fucking joke, you're a lying fuck.
Hmmmm...you don't get it.... or perhaps you do and willfully ignore it... but blacks today are well aware of the racist roots of the Democratic Party. Blacks are well aware of the fact that Jim Crow was the policy of Democrats. They understand our past, and they understand that, starting in 1948, we began a concerted effort to take a different path. We didn't change overnight, but we did start to change overnight and today. we have purged the systemic racism and most all of the racists from our party. Blacks are well aware of that. For you to suggest that blacks in America would willingly vote for a party that had a racist agenda is to suggest that 90% of blacks in America are stupid and gullible.... and, from my perspective, that suggestion is, in and of itself, racist and demeaning to blacks. Blacks today also understand what "southern strategy" means and what party uses it. Blacks today are well aware of what happened in Philadelphia, Mississippi and they understand the significance of Ron Reagan choosing that spot, of all spots in America, to launch his presidential campaign. YOu can go ahead and talk about Tuskegee and FDR all day long... it's not going to bring a single black vote over to your side... it's old news and it's not who the Democratic Party IS today. Sorry.
Bullshit. I do NOT feel empowered to speak for any community... only for myself.
Guess there was a statute of limitations on that claim, huh?
You want to know what the black community thinks, ask a white liberal. He'll tell you.
Horseshit.Hmmmm...you don't get it.... or perhaps you do and willfully ignore it... but blacks today are well aware of the racist roots of the Democratic Party. Blacks are well aware of the fact that Jim Crow was the policy of Democrats. They understand our past, and they understand that, starting in 1948, we began a concerted effort to take a different path. We didn't change overnight, but we did start to change overnight and today. we have purged the systemic racism and most all of the racists from our party. Blacks are well aware of that. For you to suggest that blacks in America would willingly vote for a party that had a racist agenda is to suggest that 90% of blacks in America are stupid and gullible.... and, from my perspective, that suggestion is, in and of itself, racist and demeaning to blacks. Blacks today also understand what "southern strategy" means and what party uses it. Blacks today are well aware of what happened in Philadelphia, Mississippi and they understand the significance of Ron Reagan choosing that spot, of all spots in America, to launch his presidential campaign. YOu can go ahead and talk about Tuskegee and FDR all day long... it's not going to bring a single black vote over to your side... it's old news and it's not who the Democratic Party IS today. Sorry.
Bullshit. I do NOT feel empowered to speak for any community... only for myself.
Guess there was a statute of limitations on that claim, huh?
You want to know what the black community thinks, ask a white liberal. He'll tell you.
I am not SPEAKING for anyone.... what I said is clealy common knowledge... and their voting record obviously backs me up.
Yoo-hoo, Jake! Or what?Or...what?Move on.
Horseshit.Hmmmm...
Guess there was a statute of limitations on that claim, huh?
You want to know what the black community thinks, ask a white liberal. He'll tell you.
I am not SPEAKING for anyone.... what I said is clearly common knowledge... and their voting record obviously backs me up.
If you want to know what black people think, ask a white liberal. If the black person thinks differently that what the white liberal says he should, he's an Uncle Tom or Aunt Jemima.
daveman's comment reveals a hateful, inner turmoil over the issue of race.
Lonestar_Logic would fail his history course. No, the GOP did not introduce the Civil Rights Act of 1964 in the Senate but offered the change to co-sponsor it, which they did wisely. Second, the only northerners and westerners to vote against the Civil Rights Act were Republican. From first to last, the Republicans were in the second seat on this legislation.
I cite this selective and at times false posting above by L_L to note that the major events were passed almost always by Democratically controlled Congresses that put the pistol to the GOP to become "bi-partisan" or be labeled racists.
I also invite you to note that L_L's last date was 1996.
Yes, black Americans know what the Democratic Party was and what the GOP is. Black Americans correctly realize that the Democratic Party protects their interests while the GOP will sell them out to appease the southern wing of the Pubs.
You fail, L_L, you fail.
Move on.
I don't believe I ever stated that the Republicans introduced that particular legislation. Fact is the democrats attempted to filibuster the civil rights act of 1964.
This is how the vote went by party.
The original House version:
Democratic Party: 152-96 (61%39%)
Republican Party: 138-34 (80%20%)
Cloture in the Senate:
Democratic Party: 44-23 (66%34%)
Republican Party: 27-6 (82%18%)
The Senate version:
Democratic Party: 46-21 (69%31%)
Republican Party: 27-6 (82%18%)
The Senate version, voted on by the House:
Democratic Party: 153-91 (63%37%)
Republican Party: 136-35 (80%20%)
The bill came before the full Senate for debate on March 30, 1964 and the "Southern Bloc" of 18 southern Democratic Senators and one Republican Senator led by Richard Russell (D-GA) launched a filibuster to prevent its passage.[4] Said Russell: "We will resist to the bitter end any measure or any movement which would have a tendency to bring about social equality and intermingling and amalgamation of the races in our (Southern) states."[5]
The most fervent opposition to the bill came from Dixie lawmakers, like Senator Strom Thurmond (D-SC): "This so-called Civil Rights Proposals, which the President has sent to Capitol Hill for enactment into law, are unconstitutional, unnecessary unwise and extend beyond the realm of reason. This is the worst civil-rights package ever presented to the Congress and is reminiscent of the Reconstruction proposals and actions of the radical Republican Congress."
After 54 days of filibuster, Senators Everett Dirksen (R-IL), Thomas Kuchel (R-CA), Hubert Humphrey (D-MN), and Mike Mansfield (D-MT) introduced a substitute bill that they hoped would attract enough Republican swing votes to end the filibuster. The compromise bill was weaker than the House version in regard to government power to regulate the conduct of private business, but it was not so weak as to cause the House to reconsider the legislation.
On the morning of June 10, 1964, Senator Robert Byrd (D-W.Va.) completed an address that he had begun 14 hours and 13 minutes earlier opposing the legislation. Until then, the measure had occupied the Senate for 57 working days, including six Saturdays. A day earlier, Democratic Whip Hubert Humphrey of Minnesota, the bill's manager, concluded he had the 67 votes required at that time to end the debate and end the filibuster. With six wavering senators providing a four-vote victory margin, the final tally stood at 71 to 29. Never in history had the Senate been able to muster enough votes to cut off a filibuster on a civil rights bill. And only once in the 37 years since 1927 had it agreed to cloture for any measure.
I understand you liberal fucks have to lie in an attempt to win an argument, but most conservatives are on to your little games. You're not only a fucking joke, you're a lying fuck.
Actually you did Lonestar_Logic did say the GOP introduced it into the Senate. To say it didn't reveals you as clumsy or dishonest.
Give us the link for your information, please.
Horseshit.I am not SPEAKING for anyone.... what I said is clearly common knowledge... and their voting record obviously backs me up.
If you want to know what black people think, ask a white liberal. If the black person thinks differently that what the white liberal says he should, he's an Uncle Tom or Aunt Jemima.
90%. that ain't horseshit. them's the facts.... read 'em and weep.
Horseshit.
If you want to know what black people think, ask a white liberal. If the black person thinks differently that what the white liberal says he should, he's an Uncle Tom or Aunt Jemima.
90%. that ain't horseshit. them's the facts.... read 'em and weep.
They're facts because you say so? Why not support it with opinions from actual black democrats.
Lonestar_Logic would fail his history course. No, the GOP did not introduce the Civil Rights Act of 1964 in the Senate but offered the change to co-sponsor it, which they did wisely. Second, the only northerners and westerners to vote against the Civil Rights Act were Republican. From first to last, the Republicans were in the second seat on this legislation.
I cite this selective and at times false posting above by L_L to note that the major events were passed almost always by Democratically controlled Congresses that put the pistol to the GOP to become "bi-partisan" or be labeled racists.
I also invite you to note that L_L's last date was 1996.
Yes, black Americans know what the Democratic Party was and what the GOP is. Black Americans correctly realize that the Democratic Party protects their interests while the GOP will sell them out to appease the southern wing of the Pubs.
You fail, L_L, you fail.
Move on.
