Andylusion
Platinum Member
- Jan 23, 2014
- 21,320
- 6,434
Train wreck with millions of barrels will do the same. There are thousands of miles of lines already. They do well.
Those lines don't go over a major aquifer like the Keystone one does.
And, no, a rail car will not pollute nearly as much as a pipeline rupture would.
You just make up stuff. Nothing in this world, is dumber than a partisan idiot, parroting stupidity.
Now please please please, continue to explain how none of the rail lines cross aquifers. By all means. Let's hear your brilliant explanation.
And, no, a rail car will not pollute nearly as much as a pipeline rupture would.
Factually wrong. Oil tankers leak too. Anything that carries a liquid, especially a corrosive liquid, is going to leak at some point. And even more likely is a container being dragged down rails and roads.
![oilprice.com](https://d32r1sh890xpii.cloudfront.net/article/718x300/265e143baa3b6439cd6a2aca13969bf8.jpg)
Trucks, Trains, or Pipelines – The Best Way to Transport Petroleum | OilPrice.com
a review of the different methods via which most of the petroleum products in the US are transported around the country, and the different threats that each one poses, along with the benefits
Fact is, every report ever done on various methods of oil transport has consistently found that the most dangerous, and highest pollution method for transporting crud oil is by truck, followed by train. The top safest, and least polluting method, is boat, followed by pipe.
Facts over opinion.