Truthseeker1
Member
- Nov 10, 2013
- 262
- 30
Yes yes, Obama has championed the advent of the part time employee with no benefits.
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The president can influence events but he cannot control them. So some things we can say Obama is responsible for. Other things he is largely responsible for. And some things he has no responsibility for.
The pitiful performance of the economy coming out of a recession is entire his responsibility. His demonizing of corporations, his additions of layers of bureaucracy, his added taxes with threats for more all have depressed corporate activity.
The scandals are things he is largely responsible for. I doubt he personally ordered the NSA to spy on every target. But his attitude filtered down and politicized the whole bureaucracy. Increased oil production happened despite Obama, not because of him. Recall he shut down drilling in the Gulf.
Positives from his administration? People are more engaged in the political process.
Negatives? Everything else.
Obama and Bush create no jobs other then maybe military or government. Bush's unemployment rate was barely ever over 5 percent if that. It took the take over of congress by the democrats to destroy the economy. The facts are, that before the democrats Bush's economy was doing well. After they took over and started ignoring Bush things went to crap. That is just undeniable fact. The debt that Obama has racked up is a rooster waiting to come home to roost. Not saying Bush was better but Obama isn't either.
You are of course conveniently denying that the economy was in a free fall starting in 2007. Obviously the effects of that are going to spill over into his presidency.
Tell me. What exactly have republicans done to improve our economy since Bush was in office up until now?
Please show me, in relation to the GDP where the economy was in free fall. Actually what we see is the GDP grow about the average and come back to where normal growth would have been. So no real "free fall."
The president can influence events but he cannot control them. So some things we can say Obama is responsible for. Other things he is largely responsible for. And some things he has no responsibility for.
The pitiful performance of the economy coming out of a recession is entire his responsibility. His demonizing of corporations, his additions of layers of bureaucracy, his added taxes with threats for more all have depressed corporate activity.
The scandals are things he is largely responsible for. I doubt he personally ordered the NSA to spy on every target. But his attitude filtered down and politicized the whole bureaucracy. Increased oil production happened despite Obama, not because of him. Recall he shut down drilling in the Gulf.
Positives from his administration? People are more engaged in the political process.
Negatives? Everything else.
How many people in that calculation had one full time job, but due to Obamacare were cut to 30 hours, now those people have two part time jobs... and that is counted as lowering the unemployment?
Jobs debt and poverty are up.
Your article sorries.
Jobs, debt and poverty all are up. Our latest report on statistical measures of his presidency.
Posted on October 8, 2013
Yes but like I said the economy was in a free fall since 2007. If you want to put all the blame for the high unemployment rate, you must also give him full credit for the millions of jobs he created.
Of course, holding Obama fully responsible for any of this is completely ridiculous.
The president can influence events but he cannot control them. So some things we can say Obama is responsible for. Other things he is largely responsible for. And some things he has no responsibility for.
The pitiful performance of the economy coming out of a recession is entire his responsibility. His demonizing of corporations, his additions of layers of bureaucracy, his added taxes with threats for more all have depressed corporate activity.
The scandals are things he is largely responsible for. I doubt he personally ordered the NSA to spy on every target. But his attitude filtered down and politicized the whole bureaucracy. Increased oil production happened despite Obama, not because of him. Recall he shut down drilling in the Gulf.
Positives from his administration? People are more engaged in the political process.
Negatives? Everything else.
Depressed corporate activity?! Profits are at an all time high! The stock market has done stellar.
Obama himself called for an increase in domestic drilling.
Under Obama poverty is much worse than Bush. Our standing in the world has declined. The number of people on public assistance has exploded. The Federal debt has exploded. Those are the main facts of the OP's story.
Those thing are measurable.
What is not measurable is much worse for Obama. The fact he lied about about almost every facet of Obamacare in order to get it passed has been a huge hit to his credibility, and will be a massive stain on his legacy. The fact he greatly escalated Bush's domestic spying program and then lied to Congress and the American people about it. The fact he made closing Gitmo a major campaign theme and hammered Bush on the issue, and then reneged on his promise.
The "fact check" posted by the OP is garbage (not the op's fault). It is something put together by an Obama apologist that tries to give the appearance of being fair....while largely ignoring the character lapses and failures of Obama that now have a majority American's actively distrusting him.
Most "fact check" things are complete bullshit...as the "fact checker" only looks at those facts they choose to, and then, only through a lens which helps make their political point. Do not be fooled.
Under Obama poverty is much worse than Bush. Our standing in the world has declined. The number of people on public assistance has exploded. The Federal debt has exploded. Those are the main facts of the OP's story.
Those thing are measurable.
What is not measurable is much worse for Obama. The fact he lied about about almost every facet of Obamacare in order to get it passed has been a huge hit to his credibility, and will be a massive stain on his legacy. The fact he greatly escalated Bush's domestic spying program and then lied to Congress and the American people about it. The fact he made closing Gitmo a major campaign theme and hammered Bush on the issue, and then reneged on his promise.
The "fact check" posted by the OP is garbage (not the op's fault). It is something put together by an Obama apologist that tries to give the appearance of being fair....while largely ignoring the character lapses and failures of Obama that now have a majority American's actively distrusting him.
Most "fact check" things are complete bullshit...as the "fact checker" only looks at those facts they choose to, and then, only through a lens which helps make their political point. Do not be fooled.
I don't understand why you do not take into account the 2007 recession. Yes obviously quality of life is going to be worse under Obama. Shit went bad a year before he came into office. That is not Obama's fault. Since then Obama has created 2.5 more jobs than Bush ever did. You want to put the blame on someone for the increased poverty? Blame the corporations. They have had record profits with stagnant wages. Obama tried to raise the minimum wage. And yeah, because of an increase in poverty, more people are on government assistance. That's just a consequence.
debt under obama has gone down.
The president can influence events but he cannot control them. So some things we can say Obama is responsible for. Other things he is largely responsible for. And some things he has no responsibility for.
The pitiful performance of the economy coming out of a recession is entire his responsibility. His demonizing of corporations, his additions of layers of bureaucracy, his added taxes with threats for more all have depressed corporate activity.
The scandals are things he is largely responsible for. I doubt he personally ordered the NSA to spy on every target. But his attitude filtered down and politicized the whole bureaucracy. Increased oil production happened despite Obama, not because of him. Recall he shut down drilling in the Gulf.
Positives from his administration? People are more engaged in the political process.
Negatives? Everything else.
Depressed corporate activity?! Profits are at an all time high! The stock market has done stellar.
Obama himself called for an increase in domestic drilling.