Faith Based Initiatives by President Trump

[Moonglow]

I don't know if this has been posted yet, but if it has then please disregard. This is obviously a breech of the Constitution, the separation of church and state. What shall be done?
On National Day of Prayer, Trump establishes new faith-based initiative

The kershchins and their immoral orange turd want taxpayer money to help them force their religion on everyone else.


What a surprise.

So what are the God haters going to do about this violation of the Constitution, the separation of church and state?

God is jealous of all the tail The Don chases...

 

[BS Filter]

I think he means the one where the OT says adulterers should be stoned
and the NT says looking at woman with lust is the same as adultery, and they should cut the offending member off.

Both refer to Trump.

And Jimmy Carter. He admitted to committing NT adultery. He didn't whack his weenie off, though.[/QUOTE

feelings of lust, was he an Evangelical. Trump is so he should of been stoned or at least blinded.

Paula White led him to God.

You're confused, dear. Christians are in the New Testament, not the Old Testament. Do you understand the difference between the law and grace?

 

[Moonglow]

First off I can't see how this guy that goes to church, regularly, if it is set up on the 9th hole..Can want us to have a national day of prayer when there already is a national day of prayer on the Sabbath...It seems so redundant and God needs a day off like everyone else you know...

 

[Moonglow]

I think he means the one where the OT says adulterers should be stoned
and the NT says looking at woman with lust is the same as adultery, and they should cut the offending member off.

Both refer to Trump.

And Jimmy Carter. He admitted to committing NT adultery. He didn't whack his weenie off, though.[/QUOTE

feelings of lust, was he an Evangelical. Trump is so he should of been stoned or at least blinded.

Paula White led him to God.

You're confused, dear. Christians are in the New Testament, not the Old Testament. Do you understand the difference between the law and grace?

Then why do Christians tell the tale of Adam and Eve in Sunday school?
The Tower of Babel.
Soddom and Gamera. er Gomorrah

The Walls of Jericho...and blasting trumpets and how you are supposed to make noise from musical instruments to honor the Lord....

 

[BS Filter]

First off I can't see how this guy that goes to church, regularly, if it is set up on the 9th hole..Can want us to have a national day of prayer when there already is a national day of prayer on the Sabbath...It seems so redundant and God needs a day off like everyone else you know...

What day is the Sabbath?

 

[BS Filter]

I think he means the one where the OT says adulterers should be stoned
and the NT says looking at woman with lust is the same as adultery, and they should cut the offending member off.

Both refer to Trump.

And Jimmy Carter. He admitted to committing NT adultery. He didn't whack his weenie off, though.[/QUOTE

feelings of lust, was he an Evangelical. Trump is so he should of been stoned or at least blinded.

Paula White led him to God.

You're confused, dear. Christians are in the New Testament, not the Old Testament. Do you understand the difference between the law and grace?

Then why do Christians tell the tale of Adam and Eve in Sunday school?
The Tower of Babel.
Soddom and Gamera. er Gomorrah

Because they are true and there are lessons to be learned. However, Christians do not live under the law. The law ended on the cross.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Democratically approved taxes are not theft.

Congressional authority to levy tax begins and ends at the Constitution. Congressional-levied taxes that take assets from one individual and gives them to another individual for the sole benefit of that individual are unconstitutional, enforced at gunpoint, and are therefore theft.

The rest are state matters, we are not a democracy, and never have been.

 

[Moonglow]

I think he means the one where the OT says adulterers should be stoned
and the NT says looking at woman with lust is the same as adultery, and they should cut the offending member off.

Both refer to Trump.

And Jimmy Carter. He admitted to committing NT adultery. He didn't whack his weenie off, though.[/QUOTE

feelings of lust, was he an Evangelical. Trump is so he should of been stoned or at least blinded.

Paula White led him to God.

You're confused, dear. Christians are in the New Testament, not the Old Testament. Do you understand the difference between the law and grace?

Then why do Christians tell the tale of Adam and Eve in Sunday school?
The Tower of Babel.
Soddom and Gamera. er Gomorrah

Because they are true and there are lessons to be learned. However, Christians do not live under the law. The law ended on the cross.

Jesus said he came to change no laws. But he did add a new one, which is really a reiteration of a previous declaration in the OT....But many humans have no capacity to offer up what is commanded, love, and we know the reasons why, humans....

 

[Penelope]

I think he means the one where the OT says adulterers should be stoned
and the NT says looking at woman with lust is the same as adultery, and they should cut the offending member off.

Both refer to Trump.

And Jimmy Carter. He admitted to committing NT adultery. He didn't whack his weenie off, though.[/QUOTE

feelings of lust, was he an Evangelical. Trump is so he should of been stoned or at least blinded.

Paula White led him to God.

You're confused, dear. Christians are in the New Testament, not the Old Testament. Do you understand the difference between the law and grace?

Well so why did you say we are a Judeo-Christian nation???

 

[Moonglow]

Democratically approved taxes are not theft.

Congressional authority to levy tax begins and ends at the Constitution. Congressional-levied taxes that take assets from one individual and gives them to another individual for the sole benefit of that individual are unconstitutional, enforced at gunpoint, and are therefore theft.

The rest are state matters, we are not a democracy, and never have been.

Can you cite any annotated cases?

 

[Moonglow]

I think he means the one where the OT says adulterers should be stoned
and the NT says looking at woman with lust is the same as adultery, and they should cut the offending member off.

Both refer to Trump.

And Jimmy Carter. He admitted to committing NT adultery. He didn't whack his weenie off, though.[/QUOTE

feelings of lust, was he an Evangelical. Trump is so he should of been stoned or at least blinded.

Paula White led him to God.

You're confused, dear. Christians are in the New Testament, not the Old Testament. Do you understand the difference between the law and grace?

Well so why did you say we are a Judeo-Christian nation???

It's what they want him to believe since it involves the Old Testament which they claim is part of the Judean bible.

 

[BS Filter]

And Jimmy Carter. He admitted to committing NT adultery. He didn't whack his weenie off, though.[/QUOTE

feelings of lust, was he an Evangelical. Trump is so he should of been stoned or at least blinded.

Paula White led him to God.

You're confused, dear. Christians are in the New Testament, not the Old Testament. Do you understand the difference between the law and grace?

Then why do Christians tell the tale of Adam and Eve in Sunday school?
The Tower of Babel.
Soddom and Gamera. er Gomorrah

Because they are true and there are lessons to be learned. However, Christians do not live under the law. The law ended on the cross.

Jesus said he came to change no laws. But he did add a new one, which is really a reiteration of a previous declaration in the OT....But many humans have no capacity to offer up what is commanded, love, and we know the reasons why, humans....

Not quite. Jesus came to fulfill the law and he did. The Scriptures in the New Testament declare the law was nailed to the cross. Jesus is the last Old Testament sacrifice. Jesus fulfilled all of the law. There is no more law. If you need scriptures to show you this, you can easily find them.

 

[BS Filter]

I think he means the one where the OT says adulterers should be stoned
and the NT says looking at woman with lust is the same as adultery, and they should cut the offending member off.

Both refer to Trump.

And Jimmy Carter. He admitted to committing NT adultery. He didn't whack his weenie off, though.[/QUOTE

feelings of lust, was he an Evangelical. Trump is so he should of been stoned or at least blinded.

Paula White led him to God.

You're confused, dear. Christians are in the New Testament, not the Old Testament. Do you understand the difference between the law and grace?

Well so why did you say we are a Judeo-Christian nation???

Where did I say that we are a Judeo-Christian nation?

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Democratically approved taxes are not theft.

Congressional authority to levy tax begins and ends at the Constitution. Congressional-levied taxes that take assets from one individual and gives them to another individual for the sole benefit of that individual are unconstitutional, enforced at gunpoint, and are therefore theft.

The rest are state matters, we are not a democracy, and never have been.

Can you cite any annotated cases?

Irrelevant. Case law and precedent do not change the Constitution. Only the amendment process can do that.

 

[Moonglow]

Democratically approved taxes are not theft.

Congressional authority to levy tax begins and ends at the Constitution. Congressional-levied taxes that take assets from one individual and gives them to another individual for the sole benefit of that individual are unconstitutional, enforced at gunpoint, and are therefore theft.

The rest are state matters, we are not a democracy, and never have been.

Can you cite any annotated cases?

Irrelevant. Case law and precedent do not change the Constitution. Only the amendment process can do that.

That's a great try, but...it is used...as a research source for all courts in the US and its territories.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Democratically approved taxes are not theft.

Congressional authority to levy tax begins and ends at the Constitution. Congressional-levied taxes that take assets from one individual and gives them to another individual for the sole benefit of that individual are unconstitutional, enforced at gunpoint, and are therefore theft.

The rest are state matters, we are not a democracy, and never have been.

Can you cite any annotated cases?

Irrelevant. Case law and precedent do not change the Constitution. Only the amendment process can do that.

That's a great try, but...it is used...as a research source for all courts in the US and its territories.

Perhaps it is, but the fact remains. Just because a law exists does not make it constitutional.

 

[Moonglow]

Democratically approved taxes are not theft.

Congressional authority to levy tax begins and ends at the Constitution. Congressional-levied taxes that take assets from one individual and gives them to another individual for the sole benefit of that individual are unconstitutional, enforced at gunpoint, and are therefore theft.

The rest are state matters, we are not a democracy, and never have been.

Can you cite any annotated cases?

Irrelevant. Case law and precedent do not change the Constitution. Only the amendment process can do that.

That's a great try, but...it is used...as a research source for all courts in the US and its territories.

Perhaps it is, but the fact remains. Just because a law exists does not make it constitutional.

It is null and void before it ever gets to the Supreme Court then.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Congressional authority to levy tax begins and ends at the Constitution. Congressional-levied taxes that take assets from one individual and gives them to another individual for the sole benefit of that individual are unconstitutional, enforced at gunpoint, and are therefore theft.

The rest are state matters, we are not a democracy, and never have been.

Can you cite any annotated cases?

Irrelevant. Case law and precedent do not change the Constitution. Only the amendment process can do that.

That's a great try, but...it is used...as a research source for all courts in the US and its territories.

Perhaps it is, but the fact remains. Just because a law exists does not make it constitutional.

It is null and void before it ever gets to the Supreme Court then.

Only if formally challenged in the courts.

 

[August West]

Just like Bush and Obama. Did you give a damn when Obama did it?

Yes, I did give a damn when Obama did it. I endorse it. My point is the left will not like it simply because Trump did it. If Obama did it, the God haters on the left wouldn't say a word.

Really "God haters" no one hates God, but they hate radicals . Now some either believe in God, have no idea or disbelieve in God, so I doubt anyone hates God, but the radicals.

The "radicals".....You mean the Christians that believe their Bible, huh.

The Evans, like Paula White.

Yeah, the bible believers.

Which part of the bible? The part that directs slaves to obey their masters? The part that says adulterers should be stoned to death? No thanks, and I`m a churchgoer.

 

[Moonglow]

Can you cite any annotated cases?

Irrelevant. Case law and precedent do not change the Constitution. Only the amendment process can do that.

That's a great try, but...it is used...as a research source for all courts in the US and its territories.

Perhaps it is, but the fact remains. Just because a law exists does not make it constitutional.

It is null and void before it ever gets to the Supreme Court then.

Only if formally challenged in the courts.

That is the drawback..Believe it or not, there is a law on it being null and void. But with Congress being mostly lawyers you think they could stay within the lines while coloring legislation.