Far Right Wing Violence Has Skyrocketed Since Obama Elected

Hey Save, what do you think? You tell lies and you now whine when you get it in return?

I truly believe that the reactionary far right, radicals, etc., are fascist in nature and would be so in behavior if they thought they could get away with it.
 
Hey Save, what do you think? You tell lies and you now whine when you get it in return?

I truly believe that the reactionary far right, radicals, etc., are fascist in nature and would be so in behavior if they thought they could get away with it.

Oh, you can say whatever you want. The rule states you have to cite some source or fact, not just rant. Look if the mods are cool with it great. I just didn't want you getting a strike without a chance to modify the post. Pardon me for watching your back.
 
Hey Save, what do you think? You tell lies and you now whine when you get it in return?

I truly believe that the reactionary far right, radicals, etc., are fascist in nature and would be so in behavior if they thought they could get away with it.

hey smeggie,

prove i'm a liar
 
the rw'ers need to stop w/ the violence already
People need to stop blaming people for the things they don't do, or such statements may be right on the mark in the near future sadly enough. This I think is true always, where as if all of us are not careful when we point our fingers all about, ((and especially against those who are innocent and are not guilty when we do this)), we could cause more and more bad as an indirect action due to playing around with false accusations against people as individuals or groups in these ways. This is when we all fail in this nation when we do this sort of thing, and especially so if they who are accused, are not participators in violent activities as they are attempted to be linked to. So for now it's just lies and more lies being directed towards people as individuals or groups, and this is happening when they aren't even linked in the ways that people are accusing them of being linked to in such ways, and so dig this, "wildly" enough they are being lied upon by people that are actually representative of groups who actually are the culprits of a worse violent history going on now per capita these days in this nation, where as they do hold the title on this type of activity right now and today as we are witnessing.

This is according to that which is found going on more and more today, and so they (the confused and ignorant) who are their protectors sadly enough, distract and spin these lies like a spider spinning it's web for them.

Sadly this accusing of violence is not being directed at the right people or crowd these days, because it ((this new violence)) is more so being conducted by others in this nation, and this more so than any so called right wing extremist groups are committing such violence these days, and therefore it should be levied against those who are actually being found as the culprits these days, but yet they ((the left wing)) are constantly accusing the right in these ways because they have a beef against them for other issues over time, and so it's all being done as a distraction to hold the lines over the agenda that is sought after, and that is what is going on it seems in evidence of these days.
 
Since the Socialist Marxists make this claim, can any one of them list by name and number the Far Right wingers apprehended and held responsible for this violence? Unlike the more than 400 acts of violence listed and those apprehended or caused by the OWS.

I've pointed out twice that in the 4 years from '90 to '93 there were about 30 incidences of far right-wing violence on average. In 2008, there were about 560 incidences. I also pointed out what these groups included groups such as Aryan Nation, White Supremacist and anarchist or anti-federalists. Those extreme groups are what they are talking about and the right-wingers defend them. I wouldn't be defending any extreme group and I'd be condemning them on the left or right. It hard to understand how anyone can defend that scum, particularly when they have done violent acts.
Well maybe you should get the msm on your side, and then maybe we could understand better the extent of the stats in which have been stated here. I mean every time this violence is occurring, it is reported by the msm as to the event, the outcome, and who done it. I have yet to hear the msm accuse the killers as being right wing extremist, white racist, or other. This I have determined by the media, where as we are having a problem with certain types of individuals or groups now in this nation, and also with certain types of beliefs in which are new here also in this nation. They are linked to specific ideologies, extremist views, vengeance seekers, radicals and so forth and so on, and they are protected by those whom think they are to be exploited in order to get change eventually for this nation.
 
What we have here are many to one side of the spectrum who are very unhappy that the demographics of the electorate have changed dramatically the last 12 years. They better accept the fact that the demographics are going to change even more dramatically, much to their dismay.

Adapt or disappear as a political force. The threat of violence will only result in the more rapid disappearance of influence from that sector.
 
500 deaths by liberals in Chicago alone.. in one year.

The states with the highest murder rates are all bright red. Fail from you as usual.

chicago, all liberal, no guns allowed, 500 murders in one year.. it's irrefutable.
How far is Chicago away from any number of states that have few if any obstacles when it comes to purchasing guns?

The gun enforcement chain is only as good as its weakest link!

The NRA and their supporters are in denial if they continue to think that public opinion is in their favor and that they can bluff their way through this without making concessions!
 
Last edited:
The states with the highest murder rates are all bright red. Fail from you as usual.

chicago, all liberal, no guns allowed, 500 murders in one year.. it's irrefutable.
How far is Chicago away from any number of states that have few if any obstacles when it comes to purchasing guns?

The gun enforcement chain is only as good as its weakest link!

The NRA and their supporters are in denial if they continue to think that public opinion is in their favor and that they can bluff their way through this without making concessions!
No, I think that calling the bluff and the lies of the libs these days, is of the upmost importance in this nation now, so it's time to get busy doing so by participation of, and this by those who are of like mind on such important issues, and no longer should it be done by sitting on ones hands, so staying focused is what needs to be done by many in order to win the day again for all who are Americans in this nation.
 
The bluffs and lies come from the reactionaries and radicals to the far right of the spectrum. The mainstream of America wants sensible gun control: who has them, what types, and who should not have them.
 
The states with the highest murder rates are all bright red. Fail from you as usual.

chicago, all liberal, no guns allowed, 500 murders in one year.. it's irrefutable.
How far is Chicago away from any number of states that have few if any obstacles when it comes to purchasing guns?

The gun enforcement chain is only as good as its weakest link!

The NRA and their supporters are in denial if they continue to think that public opinion is in their favor and that they can bluff their way through this without making concessions!

That is the problem with solving gun violence in Chicago. It's a hugh city surrounded by plenty of rural areas. There are other cities, but Michigan, Illinois and Ohio all have plenty of rural land where the rules about buying guns are very different. Hunting is very important in all those areas.

NYC exists around developed areas with stricter gun controls. Guns can be taken off the streets of NYC and have been since the cops actively pursued policies to do so. I don't think it could be done right now in Chicago, if they tried. It's possible, but I doubt it. A cop needs someone watching his back if he's attempting to disarm street gangs.
 
Link to where gun buying rules are different from Illinios to Michigan douchebags.
 
500 deaths by liberals in Chicago alone.. in one year.

Liberals? Do you have proof they are liberals?

Liberals passed the laws which took guns from law abiding citizens in Chicago Luissa. They at least need to own that part of the problem. Blacks vote 95% Democrat and the percentage is over 50% for Hispanics, so it really isn't a stretch on gangs either.

Not surprised a liberal is in denial again.
 
saveliberty, your assertions are not evidence.

President Barack Obama received 96 percent of the black vote and 77 percent of the Jewish vote. This is unbelievable. Just try to get 96 percent of any group of people to do anything. Yet, black politics in America has been unilateral since the progressive movement of the 1890s, the era of Woodrow Wilson.

Why blacks vote Democrat By Ellis Washington

President Barack Obama captured 71 percent of the Hispanic vote as he won a second term, according to a national exit poll.

Election 2012: Hispanic vote seen to help Obama, Democrats

As far as Chicago goes, apparently you're a victim of this:

MSNBC Host: Gun Control in Chicago Doesn't Even Exist - Katie Pavlich
 
The states with the highest murder rates are all bright red. Fail from you as usual.

chicago, all liberal, no guns allowed, 500 murders in one year.. it's irrefutable.
How far is Chicago away from any number of states that have few if any obstacles when it comes to purchasing guns?

The gun enforcement chain is only as good as its weakest link!

The NRA and their supporters are in denial if they continue to think that public opinion is in their favor and that they can bluff their way through this without making concessions!

Rights do not require favorable public opinion. That's just exactly why they are RIGHTS and not privileges.
 
500 deaths by liberals in Chicago alone.. in one year.

Liberals? Do you have proof they are liberals?

Liberals passed the laws which took guns from law abiding citizens in Chicago Luissa. They at least need to own that part of the problem. Blacks vote 95% Democrat and the percentage is over 50% for Hispanics, so it really isn't a stretch on gangs either.

Not surprised a liberal is in denial again.

The city of chicago is 100% black? Who knew? :eusa_think:
 

Forum List

Back
Top