Farrakhan the Traitor

Calling for death to our nation is not covered by the first. Iran has already proven to be a true threat to our national security in more ways than one over the years. The Iranian regime's willingness to commit violent acts is already well established.

Fighting words, as defined by the Court, is speech that "tend to incite an immediate breach of the peace".

What types of speech are not protected by the First Amendment?
Although different scholars view unprotected speech in different ways, there are basically nine categories:
  • Obscenity.
  • Fighting
  • Defamation (including libel and slander)
  • Child pornography.
  • Perjury.
  • Blackmail.
  • Incitement to imminent lawless action.
  • True threats.
Farrakhan inciting in a terrorist nation should have some severe consequences. If you hate this country that much GTFO and the rest of us can say good riddance.
Wasn’t it Iran who held Americans hostage? Who took our navy guys and imprisoned them? And Farrakhan wants to yell Death to American
Yes and Rod was in the Air force then and their guys over here for training tore the crap and vandalized the base and our guys were told to stay in their quarters and stand down. That was in Carter's era. Just another case of Demwitted idiots in charge causing unnecessary shit for the American people.
 
Farrakhan is a Muslim doing what members of the death cult do.

Death to America. Hell he should stay in Iran. Hope the fuck he does and we are rid of his stupid ass.
 
He should be arrested and dealt with as a traitor. He should hang.

Louis Farrakhan, Nation of Islam leader, leads 'Death to America' chant in Iran

That whole First Amendment thing just sails over your head huh.
In Iran? Death to America?
He doesn't care that a religious/political leader gives aid and comfort to a terrorist enemy of the United States.

He exemplifies what's wrong with today's Demonrat Party.
IS he a Democrat?

here is what someone tweeted back to the Israeli journalist that posted the tweet about Farrakhan saying death to America while in Iran, it seems that someone pulled a fast one on FOX, and did one of those editing tricks, propagandists love to do?


Replying to @Hassanvand
U take his statement out of context to bolster your criticism ? He's quoting what he heard in Iraq during a visit-play full clip

Remarkably similar to the Fox Noise edit about the fake "Hillary southern accent" or the Fox Noise edit about the fake crowd scene applied to a different event. Not that there's a repeating pattern or anything. Not that there's a repeating pattern or anything. Not that there's a repeating pattern or anything.

This is exactly why I expressed skepticism about a quote snippet in Farsi translated by fucking Tweeter. Sure doesn't take much of a high bar for partisan hax to swallow whole, does it.
 
Calling for death to our nation is not covered by the first.

Bullshit.

Prove me wrong and quote where the Constitution says that.

Or perhaps you have SCOTUS interpretations that would apply. Roll 'em.


What types of speech are not protected by the First Amendment?
Although different scholars view unprotected speech in different ways, there are basically nine categories:
  • Obscenity.
  • Fighting
  • Defamation (including libel and slander)
  • Child pornography.
  • Perjury.
  • Blackmail.
  • Incitement to imminent lawless action.
  • True threats.


Nope, nothing there.

Once AGAIN you can't "hang", "shoot", "drone strike" or "imprison" somebody for their speech, even if it were in English and in context, thus spake the First Amendment and there's nothing you can do about that short of a Constitutional Convention. Because that Constitution specifically states that no such law may be passed. Period.
 
Oh? What’s Obama’s relationship with Farrakhan? Expand...
Close enough for photo ops right? Didn’t obamaturd say he would stand with the Muslims? Yes, I think he did.
I have a photo of myself and my wife with Bill Clinton taken at a speech he gave. Yet that offers no proof that Obama is any closer to Farrakhan than I am with Clinton, which is not at all.
 
newsEngin.21176103_DSCN0441obama-shopped-3.jpg
Don't forget "Rev" Wright and the terrorist Bill Ayres. It was a shameful part of America's recent history.
I don't see Ayers in the picture..
 
Oh? What’s Obama’s relationship with Farrakhan? Expand...
Close enough for photo ops right? Didn’t obamaturd say he would stand with the Muslims? Yes, I think he did.
I have a photo of myself and my wife with Bill Clinton taken at a speech he gave. Yet that offers no proof that Obama is any closer to Farrakhan than I am with Clinton, which is not at all.
Sure you and Bill did coke together in Little Rock..
 
Oh? What’s Obama’s relationship with Farrakhan? Expand...
Close enough for photo ops right? Didn’t obamaturd say he would stand with the Muslims? Yes, I think he did.
I have a photo of myself and my wife with Bill Clinton taken at a speech he gave. Yet that offers no proof that Obama is any closer to Farrakhan than I am with Clinton, which is not at all.
Sure you and Bill did coke together in Little Rock..
That was before we gang raped Juanita.
 
You mean THIS Farrakhan...?

View attachment 227072
Oh? What’s Obama’s relationship with Farrakhan? Expand...
Close enough for photo ops right? Didn’t obamaturd say he would stand with the Muslims? Yes, I think he did.
I have a photo of myself and my wife with Bill Clinton taken at a speech he gave. Yet that offers no proof that Obama is any closer to Farrakhan than I am with Clinton, which is not at all.
Sure you and Bill did coke together in Little Rock..
That was before we gang raped Juanita.
Did you use a strap-on?
 
Calling for death to our nation is not covered by the first.

Bullshit.

Prove me wrong and quote where the Constitution says that.

Or perhaps you have SCOTUS interpretations that would apply. Roll 'em.


What types of speech are not protected by the First Amendment?
Although different scholars view unprotected speech in different ways, there are basically nine categories:
  • Obscenity.
  • Fighting
  • Defamation (including libel and slander)
  • Child pornography.
  • Perjury.
  • Blackmail.
  • Incitement to imminent lawless action.
  • True threats.


Nope, nothing there.

Once AGAIN you can't "hang", "shoot", "drone strike" or "imprison" somebody for their speech, even if it were in English and in context, thus spake the First Amendment and there's nothing you can do about that short of a Constitutional Convention. Because that Constitution specifically states that no such law may be passed. Period.
I did not say anything about "hang", "shoot", "drone strike" or "imprison" somebody for their speech. There are several laws which can be applied to prosecute him for his acts against us. There is a history of convictions upheld by the Supreme Court. Apparently you are too lazy to look or do not want to know. Title 50 of the United States Code also outlines the role of War and National Defense in the United States Code. The Supreme Court invented the famous "clear and present danger" test to determine when a state could constitutionally limit an individual's free speech rights under the First Amendment.

The Smith Act made it unlawful to advocate or organize the destruction or overthrow of any government in the United States by force.

Dennis v. United States, 341 U.S. 494 1951. Convicted under provisions of the Smith Act for conspiring and organizing for the overthrow and destruction of the United States government by force and violence.

Schenck v. United States, 249 U.S. 47 1919. Upheld conviction with the Espionage Act for "inciting violent overthrow".

Frohwerk v. United States, 249 U.S. 204 1919. A newspaper man conviction with the Espionage Act "willful obstruction".

There is enough information out there online for the subject that you do not have to remain ignorant on the matter. Home - Supreme Court of the United States
 
Oh? What’s Obama’s relationship with Farrakhan? Expand...
Close enough for photo ops right? Didn’t obamaturd say he would stand with the Muslims? Yes, I think he did.
I have a photo of myself and my wife with Bill Clinton taken at a speech he gave. Yet that offers no proof that Obama is any closer to Farrakhan than I am with Clinton, which is not at all.
Define "any closer". There was a reason that Obama was photographed hanging with that anti Semitic shit bag Louis Farrakhan. I'm surprised Jeremiah Wright, also an admirer and fan of Farrakhan, wasn't there.

These are the sort of weak transparent denials we used to get all the time when Barry Obama was in office.
 
Calling for death to our nation is not covered by the first.

Bullshit.

Prove me wrong and quote where the Constitution says that.

Or perhaps you have SCOTUS interpretations that would apply. Roll 'em.


What types of speech are not protected by the First Amendment?
Although different scholars view unprotected speech in different ways, there are basically nine categories:
  • Obscenity.
  • Fighting
  • Defamation (including libel and slander)
  • Child pornography.
  • Perjury.
  • Blackmail.
  • Incitement to imminent lawless action.
  • True threats.


Nope, nothing there.

Once AGAIN you can't "hang", "shoot", "drone strike" or "imprison" somebody for their speech, even if it were in English and in context, thus spake the First Amendment and there's nothing you can do about that short of a Constitutional Convention. Because that Constitution specifically states that no such law may be passed. Period.
I did not say anything about "hang", "shoot", "drone strike" or "imprison" somebody for their speech.

You may not have but several others did, starting with the OP right at the beginning. Read the thread.

There are several laws which can be applied to prosecute him for his acts against us. There is a history of convictions upheld by the Supreme Court. Apparently you are too lazy to look or do not want to know. Title 50 of the United States Code also outlines the role of War and National Defense in the United States Code. The Supreme Court invented the famous "clear and present danger" test to determine when a state could constitutionally limit an individual's free speech rights under the First Amendment.

The Smith Act made it unlawful to advocate or organize the destruction or overthrow of any government in the United States by force.

Dennis v. United States, 341 U.S. 494 1951. Convicted under provisions of the Smith Act for conspiring and organizing for the overthrow and destruction of the United States government by force and violence.

Schenck v. United States, 249 U.S. 47 1919. Upheld conviction with the Espionage Act for "inciting violent overthrow".

Frohwerk v. United States, 249 U.S. 204 1919. A newspaper man conviction with the Espionage Act "willful obstruction".

There is enough information out there online for the subject that you do not have to remain ignorant on the matter. Home - Supreme Court of the United States

You already cited you laundry list of SCOTUS scenaria and none of them apply here.

Your Smith Act met up with its deserved SCOTUS stop sign numerous times as unConstitutional. I'm referring to that Constitution, not abuses of it like the Smith Act and Sedition Acts and freaking blasphemy laws. The Constitution trumps 'em.
 
I vaguely remember way back in the 80's reading something about Farrakhan being involved in a scandal to secretly sell arms to Iran (our fucking enemy) -- to raise money to buy drugs and sell them to his own people -- and no one did anything about it!!!

Oh nevermind, that was Reagan.....I am sure Farrakhan did something like that tho...
 

Forum List

Back
Top