Fatal crashes involving pot use have TRIPLED!!

ShootSpeeders

Gold Member
May 13, 2012
20,232
2,369
280
I've been saying for years that the legal pot movement is funded by the auto industry. They have lost a bundle because of the war on drunk drivers and would love to see stoned drivers everywhere. Car crashes mean car sales.:clap2:

Study: Fatal Car Crashes Involving Marijuana Have Tripled « CBS Seattle

Feb 4, 2014

– According to a recent study, fatal car crashes involving pot use have tripled in the U.S.
“Currently, one of nine drivers involved in fatal crashes would test positive for marijuana,” Dr. Guohua Li, director of the Center for Injury Epidemiology and Prevention at Columbia, and co-author of the study told HealthDay News.

Researchers from Columbia University’s Mailman School of Public Health gathered data from six states – California, Hawaii, Illinois, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and West Virginia – that perform toxicology tests on drivers involved in fatal car accidents. This data included over 23,500 drivers that died within one hour of a crash between 1999 and 2010.
Li reported in the study that alcohol contributed to about 40 percent of traffic fatalities throughout the decade.
The researchers found that drugs played an increasing role in fatal traffic accidents. Drugged driving accounted for more than 28 percent of traffic deaths in 2010, which is 16 percent more than it was in 1999.

The researchers also found that marijuana was the main drug involved in the increase. It contributed to 12 percent of fatal crashes, compared to only 4 percent in 1999.
“If a driver is under the influence of alcohol, their risk of a fatal crash is 13 times higher than the risk of the driver who is not under the influence of alcohol,” Li said. “But if the driver is under the influence of both alcohol and marijuana, their risk increased to 24 times that of a sober person.”
 
The board notes you evaded the issue and made a personal attack. Thanks for admitting i'm right.:clap2:
I didn't evade the issue, I pointed out you were full of shit, you are just too much of a simpleton to have caught the message.

Actually his link provides the Data, it is not conjecture nor personal opinion. The troll here is you.
 
Isn't more deaths a small price to pay for the right to get high and drive?

Legalization is no more funded by the auto industry than it is funded by the mortician industry. The more deaths the more caskets sold. The more the crematoriums make.
 
I've been saying for years that the legal pot movement is funded by the auto industry. They have lost a bundle because of the war on drunk drivers and would love to see stoned drivers everywhere. Car crashes mean car sales.:clap2:

Study: Fatal Car Crashes Involving Marijuana Have Tripled « CBS Seattle

Feb 4, 2014

– According to a recent study, fatal car crashes involving pot use have tripled in the U.S.
“Currently, one of nine drivers involved in fatal crashes would test positive for marijuana,” Dr. Guohua Li, director of the Center for Injury Epidemiology and Prevention at Columbia, and co-author of the study told HealthDay News.

Researchers from Columbia University’s Mailman School of Public Health gathered data from six states – California, Hawaii, Illinois, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and West Virginia – that perform toxicology tests on drivers involved in fatal car accidents. This data included over 23,500 drivers that died within one hour of a crash between 1999 and 2010.
Li reported in the study that alcohol contributed to about 40 percent of traffic fatalities throughout the decade.
The researchers found that drugs played an increasing role in fatal traffic accidents. Drugged driving accounted for more than 28 percent of traffic deaths in 2010, which is 16 percent more than it was in 1999.

The researchers also found that marijuana was the main drug involved in the increase. It contributed to 12 percent of fatal crashes, compared to only 4 percent in 1999.
“If a driver is under the influence of alcohol, their risk of a fatal crash is 13 times higher than the risk of the driver who is not under the influence of alcohol,” Li said. “But if the driver is under the influence of both alcohol and marijuana, their risk increased to 24 times that of a sober person.”

When couple of months ago in one of the other threads I informed some our crazy pot glorifiers that every other young trauma patient admitted to the SICU in a big university center where I was doing my residency has been testing positive for THC ( and some also for other substances) the glorifiers were appalled and labelled it "impossible".
 
We used to roll joints while driving, using a knee to steer the car.
Ahhh da good ol' days.

in those good old days the joints you were smoking were at least 5 times weaker than they are now.
Plus traffic was less intense as well.
 
Here is the original study

Trends in Alcohol and Other Drugs Detected in Fatally Injured Drivers in the United States, 1999?2010



Abstract

Drugged driving is a safety issue of increasing public concern. Using data from the Fatality Analysis Reporting System for 1999&#8211;2010, we assessed trends in alcohol and other drugs detected in drivers who were killed within 1 hour of a motor vehicle crash in 6 US states (California, Hawaii, Illinois, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and West Virginia) that routinely performed toxicological testing on drivers involved in such crashes. Of the 23,591 drivers studied, 39.7% tested positive for alcohol and 24.8% for other drugs. During the study period, the prevalence of positive results for nonalcohol drugs rose from 16.6% in 1999 to 28.3% in 2010 (Z = &#8722;10.19, P < 0.0001), whereas the prevalence of positive results for alcohol remained stable. The most commonly detected nonalcohol drug was cannabinol, the prevalence of which increased from 4.2% in 1999 to 12.2% in 2010 (Z = &#8722;13.63, P < 0.0001). The increase in the prevalence of nonalcohol drugs was observed in all age groups and both sexes. These results indicate that nonalcohol drugs, particularly marijuana, are increasingly detected in fatally injured drivers.
 
I've been saying for years that the legal pot movement is funded by the auto industry. They have lost a bundle because of the war on drunk drivers and would love to see stoned drivers everywhere. Car crashes mean car sales.:clap2:

Study: Fatal Car Crashes Involving Marijuana Have Tripled « CBS Seattle

Feb 4, 2014

– According to a recent study, fatal car crashes involving pot use have tripled in the U.S.
“Currently, one of nine drivers involved in fatal crashes would test positive for marijuana,” Dr. Guohua Li, director of the Center for Injury Epidemiology and Prevention at Columbia, and co-author of the study told HealthDay News.

Researchers from Columbia University’s Mailman School of Public Health gathered data from six states – California, Hawaii, Illinois, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and West Virginia – that perform toxicology tests on drivers involved in fatal car accidents. This data included over 23,500 drivers that died within one hour of a crash between 1999 and 2010.
Li reported in the study that alcohol contributed to about 40 percent of traffic fatalities throughout the decade.
The researchers found that drugs played an increasing role in fatal traffic accidents. Drugged driving accounted for more than 28 percent of traffic deaths in 2010, which is 16 percent more than it was in 1999.

The researchers also found that marijuana was the main drug involved in the increase. It contributed to 12 percent of fatal crashes, compared to only 4 percent in 1999.
“If a driver is under the influence of alcohol, their risk of a fatal crash is 13 times higher than the risk of the driver who is not under the influence of alcohol,” Li said. “But if the driver is under the influence of both alcohol and marijuana, their risk increased to 24 times that of a sober person.”

"This data included over 23,500 drivers that died within one hour of a crash between 1999 and 2010."

Long before any state legalized it.
 
We used to roll joints while driving, using a knee to steer the car.
Ahhh da good ol' days.

in those good old days the joints you were smoking were at least 5 times weaker than they are now.
Plus traffic was less intense as well.

We occasionally scored some super-weed. And this was the '70s, not the pre-super highway era. Geez I'm not that old. :eusa_eh:
 
We used to roll joints while driving, using a knee to steer the car.
Ahhh da good ol' days.

in those good old days the joints you were smoking were at least 5 times weaker than they are now.
Plus traffic was less intense as well.

We occasionally scored some super-weed. And this was the '70s, not the pre-super highway era. Geez I'm not that old. :eusa_eh:

I figured it was around that time :D

still weed was much weaker then and less pure than it is now.

plus it is not the availability of highways but the amount of the cars on them what counts.

you really think the intensity of traffic was the same?
 
Last edited:
You guys are missing one important quote here... "1 in 9 drivers involved in a fatal crash will test positive for marijuana".

If I was in a fatal car crash on my way home from work today, I too would test positive for marijuana, but I haven't smoked any today. Weed stays in your system for a month. Testing positive for marijuana doesn't mean you were high at the time.

That is a bogus article and it shouldn't be taken seriously. The writer is clearly incompetent.
 
in those good old days the joints you were smoking were at least 5 times weaker than they are now.
Plus traffic was less intense as well.

We occasionally scored some super-weed. And this was the '70s, not the pre-super highway era. Geez I'm not that old. :eusa_eh:

I figured it was around that time :D

still weed was much weaker than and less pure than it is now.

plus it is not the availability of highways but the amount of the cars on them what counts.

you really think the intensity of traffic was the same?
I don't remember.

What was the question?
 
We occasionally scored some super-weed. And this was the '70s, not the pre-super highway era. Geez I'm not that old. :eusa_eh:

I figured it was around that time :D

still weed was much weaker than and less pure than it is now.

plus it is not the availability of highways but the amount of the cars on them what counts.

you really think the intensity of traffic was the same?
I don't remember.

What was the question?

question? pass me that fatty :D
 
The board notes you evaded the issue and made a personal attack. Thanks for admitting i'm right.:clap2:
I didn't evade the issue, I pointed out you were full of shit, you are just too much of a simpleton to have caught the message.

Actually his link provides the Data, it is not conjecture nor personal opinion. The troll here is you.
I quoted the part where he said the auto industry is behind the legal pot movement, which was nowhere in the article.

We'll all try to type more slowly so you can follow.
 
You guys are missing one important quote here... "1 in 9 drivers involved in a fatal crash will test positive for marijuana".

If I was in a fatal car crash on my way home from work today, I too would test positive for marijuana, but I haven't smoked any today. Weed stays in your system for a month. Testing positive for marijuana doesn't mean you were high at the time.

That is a bogus article and it shouldn't be taken seriously. The writer is clearly incompetent.

People are ignoring this post for some reason. Do any of you have an argument to refute what I said, or can I claim victory now?
 
If I was in a fatal car crash on my way home from work today, I too would test positive for marijuana, but I haven't smoked any today. Weed stays in your system for a month. Testing positive for marijuana doesn't mean you were high at the time.

Which makes you an impaired driver for a month. You're like the drunk drivers who insist their boozing did not affect their driving.
 

Forum List

Back
Top