So far, democrats are very honest in comparison.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So far, democrats are very honest in comparison.
Your Marvel edition doesn't count.If you trust it so much, why is there are two sets of law books?
Keeping classified material, including SAP, on an unsecured server is a felony.I accept the American system of jurisprudence, and trust prosecutorial zeal to prove guilty whoever, until then, is innocent, regardless of how stridently or for however long hyper-partisans shriek
If anyone is indicted, prosecuted, and found guilty of doing so in a court of law, that person is guilty.Keeping classified material, including SAP, on an unsecured server is a felony.
Those the ones that come in two editions?Your Marvel edition doesn't count.
Check out Little, Brown & Company's publications of United States Statutes at Large .
Like I said, you can twist and spin all you want, but it won’t change the facts.If anyone is indicted, prosecuted, and found guilty of doing so in a court of law, that person is guilty.
There must be no shortage of partisans eager to bring such charges if the evidence so merits, I'm sure.
It's the part about getting indicted that seems to follow strict party lines, for some odd reason.If anyone is indicted, prosecuted, and found guilty of doing so in a court of law, that person is guilty.
There must be no shortage of partisans eager to bring such charges if the evidence so merits, I'm sure.
Meh. Most crimes go unsolved or unprosecuted. Doesn't mean the perpetrator didn't do it.If anyone is indicted, prosecuted, and found guilty of doing so in a court of law, that person is guilty.
Legal facts such as the identification, apprehension, and indictments of hundreds of Trump goons, with convictions and confessions aplenty.Like I said, you can twist and spin all you want, but it won’t change the facts.
Hitlery still committed a felony, but keep spinning and twisting.Legal facts such as the identification, apprehension, and indictments of hundreds of Trump goons, with convictions and confessions aplenty.
Since he fled justice, this Trump goon remains legally innocent:
In fact, I would make that alienation from America an option available to all Trump goons in lieu of incarceration.
I would not extend such a courtesy to Ms Clinton if she is ever convicted of a crime.
Your biased opinion vs indictment, trial, and conviction in accordance with all the requisites of American jurisprudence?Hitlery still committed a felony, but keep spinning and twisting.
In the case of prominent malefactors where there is credible evidence of a crime, you can rely on hyper-partisan zealotry among prosecutors hellbent upon indicting if they can find a pretext, of course.Meh. Most crimes go unsolved or unprosecuted. Doesn't mean the perpetrator didn't do it.
Sounds so swampy to me.....In the case of prominent malefactors where there is credible evidence of a crime, you can rely on hyper-partisan zealotry among prosecutors hellbent upon indicting if they can find a pretext, of course.
No amount of hyper-partisan ardor justifies abandoning the legal principle of innocent until proven guilty.
I never subscribed to the proposition that Trump actively conspired with Putin just because Putin was proven tom try to help Trump and hurt Clinton in 2016.
Neither did Special Counsel Mueller.
American jurisprudence is not to everyone's liking.Sounds so swampy to me.....
Sure, if the prominent malefactor is a republican. If they are a democrat I can rely on those same hyper-partisan prosecutors to look the other way.In the case of prominent malefactors where there is credible evidence of a crime, you can rely on hyper-partisan zealotry among prosecutors hellbent upon indicting if they can find a pretext, of course.
And when dems can't come up with evidence, they try you in the media like they did with Trump-Russia.No amount of hyper-partisan ardor justifies abandoning the legal principle of innocent until proven guilty.
I do not find that believable. I think if I looked, I would find a lot of posts from you that would at least lead me to believe you though the allegations from the Steele dossier were credible. Am I wrong?I never subscribed to the proposition that Trump actively conspired with Putin just because Putin was proven tom try to help Trump and hurt Clinton in 2016.
Neither did Special Counsel Mueller.
Not an opinion. Fact.Your biased opinion vs indictment, trial, and conviction in accordance with all the requisites of American jurisprudence?
I'll respect the latter.
Others can just get wee wee'd up and screech
Hyper-partisan crackpots reject democracy and our justice system. They pretend that there are no Trumpy or even Republican prosecutors, judges, legislators, etc., or that the ones there are are all corrupt and/or incompetent.Sure, if the prominent malefactor is a republican. If they are a democrat I can rely on those same hyper-partisan prosecutors to look the other way.
I'm neither judge, nor jury, nor pretend to be.Not an opinion. Fact.
Tell me, is it illegal to store SAP info on an unsecure server?
It's almost too much information for most people to process which is why their case will be difficult to prove.
Your pathetic dodge confirms your answer is "Yes, yes it is illegal but I don't want to admit it".I'm neither judge, nor jury, nor pretend to be.
Under our system of justice, evidence of criminality is assessed by prosecutors (of which there is no partisan shortage in this case) and, if deemed sufficient, indictments are issued and the accused stands trial, with the opportunity to rebut or refute whatever evidentiary charges are submitted. The case is carefully considered, and a verdict is then issued.
I enthusiastically support that admirable American process. It is far more apt to achieve justice than is a mob screeching, "Lock her up! Lock her up!"