Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This entire thread is nullified by the simple fact that private citizens that own and carry firearms have absolutely no obligation to come the the public defense.
You anti gun idiots should be happy that private citizens do not take up arms against criminals shouldn't you?
You guys?This entire thread is nullified by the simple fact that private citizens that own and carry firearms have absolutely no obligation to come the the public defense.
You anti gun idiots should be happy that private citizens do not take up arms against criminals shouldn't you?
But that isn't the point you guys make.
You all insist that guns make us safer from criminals. They apparently don't.
Incidently, I'm totally fine with the fact that gun owners aren't whipping out their guns in a "Active Shooter" incident. They'll just make it worse.
do you have a point you hysterical fairy?
[
You guys?
BTW I have always said that gun owners have no obligation to protect anyone else.
A firearm is for SELF DEFENSE PERIOD EXCLAMATION POINT
You should be happy that private citizens aren't out there playing cop but you're not why is that?
Why is it that self defense in your tiny mind means someone ends up dead?[
You guys?
BTW I have always said that gun owners have no obligation to protect anyone else.
A firearm is for SELF DEFENSE PERIOD EXCLAMATION POINT
You should be happy that private citizens aren't out there playing cop but you're not why is that?
I think that if someone is shooting up your workplace, that qualifies as "Self-Defense'.
The reality is, for all your guys claims, there are only 200 cases of self-defense homicide, most of those domestic incidents.
[
Why is it that self defense in your tiny mind means someone ends up dead?
What about all the times a gun is used in self defense where no one dies?
Now you have to quote me saying I can't wait to kill someone.[
Why is it that self defense in your tiny mind means someone ends up dead?
What about all the times a gun is used in self defense where no one dies?
Because I find that highly improbable.
Frankly, listening to you gun nuts, constantly talking about how you just can't WAIT for the opportunity to drill a bullet into the head of a bad guy, how you all Admire Zimmerman because he was "Livin' the Dream". (As opposed to just being a sociopath who showed bad judgement.)
I find it hard to believe that if an opportunity came up to kill a bad guy, you wouldn't fully avail yourselves of it.
claims for Defensive gun uses go from a low of 89,000 a year (US DOJ) to 2.5 million a year. (Kleck).
Yet we are to believe that when that happy day to finally get to use your Penis Compensater in a meaningful way comes, and you only manage to do it 0.2% to 0.008% of the time?
That sounds really kind of improbable. You all don't sound like you can maintain that much self-control.
[
Now you have to quote me saying I can't wait to kill someone.
Good luck with that.
The fact that you will not admit that the mere brandishing of a weapon is enough to deter crime is proof of your utter idiocy.
Irrelevant to the point that private citizens have no obligation to come to anyone's defense.[
Now you have to quote me saying I can't wait to kill someone.
Good luck with that.
The fact that you will not admit that the mere brandishing of a weapon is enough to deter crime is proof of your utter idiocy.
Guy, you're slimier than a politician, I don't hold you to anything.
I was talking about all the gun nuts who talk about how they just can't wait to shoot someone.
Yet, oddly, other than the odd kid buying Skittles, they never seem to.
[
Irrelevant to the point that private citizens have no obligation to come to anyone's defense.
BTW I have always said that Zimmerman was partially culpable in the death of Martin.
But now tell me can self defense with a firearm not lead to the death of someone.
I'll give you a hint : OF FUCKING COURSE IT CAN.
Proof of that stat you just pulled out of your ample ass please.[
Irrelevant to the point that private citizens have no obligation to come to anyone's defense.
BTW I have always said that Zimmerman was partially culpable in the death of Martin.
But now tell me can self defense with a firearm not lead to the death of someone.
I'll give you a hint : OF FUCKING COURSE IT CAN.
Could it? Yes.
99.8% of the time? That's kind of improbable.
Now you have to quote me saying I can't wait to kill someone.[
Why is it that self defense in your tiny mind means someone ends up dead?
What about all the times a gun is used in self defense where no one dies?
Because I find that highly improbable.
Frankly, listening to you gun nuts, constantly talking about how you just can't WAIT for the opportunity to drill a bullet into the head of a bad guy, how you all Admire Zimmerman because he was "Livin' the Dream". (As opposed to just being a sociopath who showed bad judgement.)
I find it hard to believe that if an opportunity came up to kill a bad guy, you wouldn't fully avail yourselves of it.
claims for Defensive gun uses go from a low of 89,000 a year (US DOJ) to 2.5 million a year. (Kleck).
Yet we are to believe that when that happy day to finally get to use your Penis Compensater in a meaningful way comes, and you only manage to do it 0.2% to 0.008% of the time?
That sounds really kind of improbable. You all don't sound like you can maintain that much self-control.
Good luck with that.
The fact that you will not admit that the mere brandishing of a weapon is enough to deter crime is proof of your utter idiocy.
Proof of that stat you just pulled out of your ample ass please.99.8% of the time? That's kind of improbable.
This entire thread is nullified by the simple fact that private citizens that own and carry firearms have absolutely no obligation to come the the public defense.
You anti gun idiots should be happy that private citizens do not take up arms against criminals shouldn't you?
But that isn't the point you guys make.
You all insist that guns make us safer from criminals. They apparently don't.
Incidently, I'm totally fine with the fact that gun owners aren't whipping out their guns in a "Active Shooter" incident. They'll just make it worse.
[
Yes, because no one ending a situation while the cops take 20 minutes to arrive, set up a perimeter and get authorization to breach is much better than the chance one guy with his gun can end it in 2.
[
Well, you're clearly an idiot, so it's very hard to refrain from letting you know this fact. . . especially because you are too stupid to figure it out for yourself. Just think of it as us helping you out. It would be cruel not to tell you, I think. Lol.
All you have is name calling. The facts aren't on your side. Guns are more dangerous to the people who own them than the people who they want to defend themselves from.
[
Yes, because no one ending a situation while the cops take 20 minutes to arrive, set up a perimeter and get authorization to breach is much better than the chance one guy with his gun can end it in 2.
Except apparently, that never actually happens.
[
Well, you're clearly an idiot, so it's very hard to refrain from letting you know this fact. . . especially because you are too stupid to figure it out for yourself. Just think of it as us helping you out. It would be cruel not to tell you, I think. Lol.
All you have is name calling. The facts aren't on your side. Guns are more dangerous to the people who own them than the people who they want to defend themselves from.
How about learning to form a grammatically correct sentence, little boy?
[
Yes it has. and before you go with "well they were all off duty law enforcement" most of the places this happens restrict gun possession TO law enforcement. Its still a guy/girl with a gun stopping the bad guy.
