Federal appeals court rules religious businesses can refuse same-sex weddings

[rightwinger]

GOOD. Gay-marriage is contrary thought. It's a slap in the face of core values, nature and common sense. Some people find the idea absurd, and I'm one of them. I'm not even religious.

Marriage supports the very core of nature in humans. Homosexuality does not fit into the category, because it's a contradiction. Homosexuality is not equal to heterosexuality on any level, so why pretend it is?

While some arguments for gay marriage sound plausible, every one of them could be applied to marriage between close relatives.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/federal-appeals-court-rules-religious-122449223.html

Won’t be held up in higher courts

Opens up a huge can of worms for religious based discrimination

 

[HappyJoy]

Listen to this lump of shit. There’s your sign.
Cornel West: Corporate Media’s Superficial Coverage Helped Create “Fascist Frankenstein Trump” | Democracy Now!

So? Ivy League school has created a ton of capitalists.

 

[rightwinger]

GOOD. Gay-marriage is contrary thought. It's a slap in the face of core values, nature and common sense. Some people find the idea absurd, and I'm one of them. I'm not even religious.

Marriage supports the very core of nature in humans. Homosexuality does not fit into the category, because it's a contradiction. Homosexuality is not equal to heterosexuality on any level, so why pretend it is?

While some arguments for gay marriage sound plausible, every one of them could be applied to marriage between close relatives.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/federal-appeals-court-rules-religious-122449223.html

This is a good ruling, not because there is anything wrong with same sex marriage, but because companies should not be forced to serve people or provide a service they do not wish to.

We finally agree on something: Their business, their rules.

"We reserve the right to refuse service to anyone"

We don’t serve negroes here

 

[HappyJoy]

Do they make good presidents?

Nope.

Ok, Harvard is out, how about Cornell, Yale or Columbia?

Columbia is Marxist shit too.

What about the other ivy league schools? All of them?

Yale is ok. Harvard and Columbia are shit.

Are you sure?

Yale faculty skews liberal, survey shows

 

[Bush92]

Listen to this lump of shit. There’s your sign.
Cornel West: Corporate Media’s Superficial Coverage Helped Create “Fascist Frankenstein Trump” | Democracy Now!

So? Ivy League school has created a ton of capitalists.

I don’t know how much they weigh.

 

[Bush92]

Employers know Harvard is a shit school that liberal elites get their lazy kids into. Then they enroll unqualified minorities to cover their tracks. It’s scandalous.
The No. 1 Ivy League school employers most want to see on a resume is ...

So, they are not the number 1 Ivy league school, yet they still get hired all the time.

Because of alumni. Independent minded employers reject the leftist.

So, they are being hired?

Do you think Microsoft, Amazon, Walmart, American Express and other fortune 500 companies shy away from Harvard?

Yep.

Where did Ken Chenault get his degree from? Greg Foran went to Harvard.

So did Barry Sotoro. Test my case.

 

[Lysistrata]

Considering the courts who are responsible for interpreting our laws and ensuring their Constitutionality by the Constitution disagree with you...

Says which court?

Beliefs are nice.

Study: anti-black hiring discrimination is as prevalent today as it was in 1989

A new study, by researchers at Northwestern University, Harvard, and the Institute for Social Research in Norway, looked at every available field experiment on hiring discrimination from 1989 through 2015. The researchers found that anti-black racism in hiring is unchanged since at least 1989, while anti-Latino racism may have decreased modestly.

They looked at two kinds of experiments: résumé and in-person audits. In the first, researchers send out résumés with similar levels of education, experience, and so on, but the names differ so some résumés have a stereotypically black or Latino name and the others have a stereotypically white name. In the second, applicants go in-person to apply for a job; they each share similar qualifications, but some are white while others are black or brown.

In total, the researchers produced 24 studies with 30 estimates of discrimination for black and Latino Americans, collectively representing more than 54,000 applications submitted for more than 25,000 positions.

They concluded that, on average, “white applicants receive 36% more callbacks than equally qualified African Americans” while “[w]hite applicants receive on average 24% more callbacks than Latinos.”

They also found no evidence of changes over time in rates of hiring discrimination for black people, with anything but the slight possibility of “a slow decline” ruled out by the studies. With Latinos, the evidence indicates “a possible decline in discrimination, although this trend is outside of conventional levels of significance” — meaning the data isn’t statistically significant enough to draw a solid conclusion.

If I were an employer a degree from Harvard would eliminate them from potential employment.

You're not, so who cares?

Employers who do. Harvard has been a breeding ground for socialist. Business people know this. Only place for Harvard grads is in education so they can poison future generations with their Marxist bullshit ideology.

You are so full of shit, no employer is not hiring someone because they went to Harvard.

Am I? Why You Shouldn’t Hire Someone From Harvard

This article has nothing to do with politics. It deals only with STEM degrees. So where do you get the ranting about socialism and marxism being taught at Harvard? How do you know anything at all about Harvard and its curriculum?

 

[Bush92]

Nope.

Ok, Harvard is out, how about Cornell, Yale or Columbia?

Columbia is Marxist shit too.

What about the other ivy league schools? All of them?

Yale is ok. Harvard and Columbia are shit.

Are you sure?

Yale faculty skews liberal, survey shows

All faculty on almost all college campuses skews liberals. What’s your point? Yale has Skull and Bones and many of them worked for CIA during Cold War to defeat communism.

 

[Lysistrata]

Christians don’t need to accommodate or capitulate.

Nobody else does, either.

 

[Bush92]

If I were an employer a degree from Harvard would eliminate them from potential employment.

You're not, so who cares?

Employers who do. Harvard has been a breeding ground for socialist. Business people know this. Only place for Harvard grads is in education so they can poison future generations with their Marxist bullshit ideology.

You are so full of shit, no employer is not hiring someone because they went to Harvard.

Am I? Why You Shouldn’t Hire Someone From Harvard

This article has nothing to do with politics. It deals only with STEM degrees. So where do you get the ranting about socialism and marxism being taught at Harvard? How do you know anything at all about Harvard and its curriculum?

Sure. It’s socialist.

 

[HappyJoy]

Listen to this lump of shit. There’s your sign.
Cornel West: Corporate Media’s Superficial Coverage Helped Create “Fascist Frankenstein Trump” | Democracy Now!

So? Ivy League school has created a ton of capitalists.

I don’t know how much they weigh.

^Sometimes humor works to deflect. Not in this case. Ivy League schools produce a lot of capitalists you dink.

 

[JGalt]

GOOD. Gay-marriage is contrary thought. It's a slap in the face of core values, nature and common sense. Some people find the idea absurd, and I'm one of them. I'm not even religious.

Marriage supports the very core of nature in humans. Homosexuality does not fit into the category, because it's a contradiction. Homosexuality is not equal to heterosexuality on any level, so why pretend it is?

While some arguments for gay marriage sound plausible, every one of them could be applied to marriage between close relatives.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/federal-appeals-court-rules-religious-122449223.html

This is a good ruling, not because there is anything wrong with same sex marriage, but because companies should not be forced to serve people or provide a service they do not wish to.

We finally agree on something: Their business, their rules.

"We reserve the right to refuse service to anyone"

We don’t serve negroes here

The Civil Rights Act was about giving equal rights, regardless of race or gender.

It wasn't about supporting sodomy, the gender-confused, and same-sex marriage.

 

[HappyJoy]

Ok, Harvard is out, how about Cornell, Yale or Columbia?

Columbia is Marxist shit too.

What about the other ivy league schools? All of them?

Yale is ok. Harvard and Columbia are shit.

Are you sure?

Yale faculty skews liberal, survey shows

All faculty on almost all college campuses skews liberals. What’s your point? Yale has Skull and Bones and many of them worked for CIA during Cold War to defeat communism.

Just curious as to why you have an issue with Harvard and not Yale.

 

[Bush92]

Columbia is Marxist shit too.

What about the other ivy league schools? All of them?

Yale is ok. Harvard and Columbia are shit.

Are you sure?

Yale faculty skews liberal, survey shows

All faculty on almost all college campuses skews liberals. What’s your point? Yale has Skull and Bones and many of them worked for CIA during Cold War to defeat communism.

Just curious as to why you have an issue with Harvard and not Yale.

Harvard student scorns casual communism of classmates
Just posted. Bonesmen helped OSS and CIA defeat communism.

 

[Bush92]

GOOD. Gay-marriage is contrary thought. It's a slap in the face of core values, nature and common sense. Some people find the idea absurd, and I'm one of them. I'm not even religious.

Marriage supports the very core of nature in humans. Homosexuality does not fit into the category, because it's a contradiction. Homosexuality is not equal to heterosexuality on any level, so why pretend it is?

While some arguments for gay marriage sound plausible, every one of them could be applied to marriage between close relatives.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/federal-appeals-court-rules-religious-122449223.html

This is a good ruling, not because there is anything wrong with same sex marriage, but because companies should not be forced to serve people or provide a service they do not wish to.

We finally agree on something: Their business, their rules.

"We reserve the right to refuse service to anyone"

We don’t serve negroes here

The Civil Rights Act was about giving equal rights, regardless of race or gender.

It wasn't about supporting sodomy and same-sex marriage.

I don’t recall any language that mentions taking it up the ass.

 

[Lysistrata]

You're not, so who cares?

Employers who do. Harvard has been a breeding ground for socialist. Business people know this. Only place for Harvard grads is in education so they can poison future generations with their Marxist bullshit ideology.

You are so full of shit, no employer is not hiring someone because they went to Harvard.

Am I? Why You Shouldn’t Hire Someone From Harvard

This article has nothing to do with politics. It deals only with STEM degrees. So where do you get the ranting about socialism and marxism being taught at Harvard? How do you know anything at all about Harvard and its curriculum?

Sure. It’s socialist.

Where does your information come from?

 

[HappyJoy]

What about the other ivy league schools? All of them?

Yale is ok. Harvard and Columbia are shit.

Are you sure?

Yale faculty skews liberal, survey shows

All faculty on almost all college campuses skews liberals. What’s your point? Yale has Skull and Bones and many of them worked for CIA during Cold War to defeat communism.

Just curious as to why you have an issue with Harvard and not Yale.

Harvard student scorns casual communism of classmates
Just posted. Bonesmen helped OSS and CIA defeat communism.

Campus Reform is a group of disgruntled idiots on the right.

Capitalist companies routinely hire Capitalists from Harvard and other schools. I already showed you two of them from Walmart and American Express, two companies that represent nothing short of pure Capitalism.

 

[dblack]

That's conjecture. I think you're wrong.

Conjecture is a two way street. I've posted evidence to my point.

We is society. Not just the majority of voters, but everyone who takes part.
Whoever wants to. But who gets loans, and who doesn't, shouldn't be the government's decision.

Society as a whole mostly has rejected libertarianism. Sure, some aspect may be popular such as marijuana legalization though I don't think libertarians own that idea out right. In the great market of ideas libertarians have a failed party and are teetering out of the GOP.

Giving up? I see you've resorted to the, ”Well, it ain't ever going" harrumphing. Of course that says nothing about whether it should, whether it's right or wrong, whether we should try to make it happen.

Nobody wants to live in a libertarian style government, the masses have not been converted. Nobody said anything about giving up but you're not going anywhere until you make something of your party that doesn't resemble a joke with joke candidates.

In a way libertarians remind me of people who only vote third party. Their candidate is never going to win and they aren't putting any effort into changing that either. Bragging about voting for a losing candidate every 4 years and not doing anything in between is just people who like to complain and not be a substantive part of anything having to do with shaping the future of the country.

More harrumphing. "Lesser of two evils” is far worse, and you know it. Which is why you lept to making excuses for it before I even brought it up.

Far worse than what?

Voting honestly.

 

[JGalt]

GOOD. Gay-marriage is contrary thought. It's a slap in the face of core values, nature and common sense. Some people find the idea absurd, and I'm one of them. I'm not even religious.

Marriage supports the very core of nature in humans. Homosexuality does not fit into the category, because it's a contradiction. Homosexuality is not equal to heterosexuality on any level, so why pretend it is?

While some arguments for gay marriage sound plausible, every one of them could be applied to marriage between close relatives.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/federal-appeals-court-rules-religious-122449223.html

This is a good ruling, not because there is anything wrong with same sex marriage, but because companies should not be forced to serve people or provide a service they do not wish to.

We finally agree on something: Their business, their rules.

"We reserve the right to refuse service to anyone"

We don’t serve negroes here

The Civil Rights Act was about giving equal rights, regardless of race or gender.

It wasn't about supporting sodomy and same-sex marriage.

I don’t recall any language that mentions taking it up the ass.

Exactly:

"SEC. 201. (a) All persons shall be entitled to the full and equal Equal access, enjoyment of the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, and accommodations of any place of public accommodation, as de-fined in this section, without discrimination or segregation on the ground of race, color, religion, or national origin."

Text of H.R. 7152 (88th): An Act to enforce the constitutional right to vote, to confer jurisdiction upon ... (Passed Congress version) - GovTrack.us

Where does it say that Sodomites are a special protected group?

 

[rightwinger]

GOOD. Gay-marriage is contrary thought. It's a slap in the face of core values, nature and common sense. Some people find the idea absurd, and I'm one of them. I'm not even religious.

Marriage supports the very core of nature in humans. Homosexuality does not fit into the category, because it's a contradiction. Homosexuality is not equal to heterosexuality on any level, so why pretend it is?

While some arguments for gay marriage sound plausible, every one of them could be applied to marriage between close relatives.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/federal-appeals-court-rules-religious-122449223.html

This is a good ruling, not because there is anything wrong with same sex marriage, but because companies should not be forced to serve people or provide a service they do not wish to.

We finally agree on something: Their business, their rules.

"We reserve the right to refuse service to anyone"

We don’t serve negroes here

The Civil Rights Act was about giving equal rights, regardless of race or gender.

It wasn't about supporting sodomy, the gender-confused, and same-sex marriage.

Civil Rights are still Civil Rights

Same sex marriage is the law of the land. Denying services is just a back door attempt at harassment