Federal appeals court rules religious businesses can refuse same-sex weddings

[HappyJoy]

Since I have been mentioned...here is my view.

Any and all anti-discrimination laws applied to anyone but the government itself are unconstitutional. The Constitution tells the government they cannot discriminate, it does not tell me and you we cannot.

Considering the courts who are responsible for interpreting our laws and ensuring their Constitutionality by the Constitution disagree with you...

Furthermore, the very concept of a "protected class" violates the equal protection clause of the Constitution as protected classes have more protections, thus it is not equal.

Says which court?

I understand why we had them, but I do believe if they were removed today that the marketplace would weed out those that wanted to discriminate against any group.

Beliefs are nice.

Study: anti-black hiring discrimination is as prevalent today as it was in 1989

A new study, by researchers at Northwestern University, Harvard, and the Institute for Social Research in Norway, looked at every available field experiment on hiring discrimination from 1989 through 2015. The researchers found that anti-black racism in hiring is unchanged since at least 1989, while anti-Latino racism may have decreased modestly.

They looked at two kinds of experiments: résumé and in-person audits. In the first, researchers send out résumés with similar levels of education, experience, and so on, but the names differ so some résumés have a stereotypically black or Latino name and the others have a stereotypically white name. In the second, applicants go in-person to apply for a job; they each share similar qualifications, but some are white while others are black or brown.

In total, the researchers produced 24 studies with 30 estimates of discrimination for black and Latino Americans, collectively representing more than 54,000 applications submitted for more than 25,000 positions.

They concluded that, on average, “white applicants receive 36% more callbacks than equally qualified African Americans” while “[w]hite applicants receive on average 24% more callbacks than Latinos.”

They also found no evidence of changes over time in rates of hiring discrimination for black people, with anything but the slight possibility of “a slow decline” ruled out by the studies. With Latinos, the evidence indicates “a possible decline in discrimination, although this trend is outside of conventional levels of significance” — meaning the data isn’t statistically significant enough to draw a solid conclusion.

If I were an employer a degree from Harvard would eliminate them from potential employment.

You're not, so who cares?

Employers who do. Harvard has been a breeding ground for socialist. Business people know this. Only place for Harvard grads is in education so they can poison future generations with their Marxist bullshit ideology.

Harvard is a breeding ground of socialism?

You don't think Harvard turns out any Capitalists? OK, that's a new one, you fuckin' goof.

 

[WEATHER53]

Since I have been mentioned...here is my view.

Any and all anti-discrimination laws applied to anyone but the government itself are unconstitutional. The Constitution tells the government they cannot discriminate, it does not tell me and you we cannot.

Considering the courts who are responsible for interpreting our laws and ensuring their Constitutionality by the Constitution disagree with you...

Furthermore, the very concept of a "protected class" violates the equal protection clause of the Constitution as protected classes have more protections, thus it is not equal.

Says which court?

I understand why we had them, but I do believe if they were removed today that the marketplace would weed out those that wanted to discriminate against any group.

Beliefs are nice.

Study: anti-black hiring discrimination is as prevalent today as it was in 1989

A new study, by researchers at Northwestern University, Harvard, and the Institute for Social Research in Norway, looked at every available field experiment on hiring discrimination from 1989 through 2015. The researchers found that anti-black racism in hiring is unchanged since at least 1989, while anti-Latino racism may have decreased modestly.

They looked at two kinds of experiments: résumé and in-person audits. In the first, researchers send out résumés with similar levels of education, experience, and so on, but the names differ so some résumés have a stereotypically black or Latino name and the others have a stereotypically white name. In the second, applicants go in-person to apply for a job; they each share similar qualifications, but some are white while others are black or brown.

In total, the researchers produced 24 studies with 30 estimates of discrimination for black and Latino Americans, collectively representing more than 54,000 applications submitted for more than 25,000 positions.

They concluded that, on average, “white applicants receive 36% more callbacks than equally qualified African Americans” while “[w]hite applicants receive on average 24% more callbacks than Latinos.”

They also found no evidence of changes over time in rates of hiring discrimination for black people, with anything but the slight possibility of “a slow decline” ruled out by the studies. With Latinos, the evidence indicates “a possible decline in discrimination, although this trend is outside of conventional levels of significance” — meaning the data isn’t statistically significant enough to draw a solid conclusion.

If I were an employer a degree from Harvard would eliminate them from potential employment.

You're not, so who cares?

Employers who do. Harvard has been a breeding ground for socialist. Business people know this. Only place for Harvard grads is in education so they can poison future generations with their Marxist bullshit ideology.

Harvard is a breeding ground of socialism?

You don't think Harvard turns out any Capitalists? OK, that's a new one, you fuckin' goof.

With your language you appear neither Happy nor Joy. Try getting honest and go for Bitter Emotionalist

 

[Lysistrata]

GOOD. Gay-marriage is contrary thought. It's a slap in the face of core values, nature and common sense. Some people find the idea absurd, and I'm one of them. I'm not even religious.

Marriage supports the very core of nature in humans. Homosexuality does not fit into the category, because it's a contradiction. Homosexuality is not equal to heterosexuality on any level, so why pretend it is?

While some arguments for gay marriage sound plausible, every one of them could be applied to marriage between close relatives.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/federal-appeals-court-rules-religious-122449223.html

Go to a Muzzy butcher and ask for a leg of Ham and see what you get. (Civil case you can win?)

BS. What is this crap about calling someone a "Muzzy"? How cheap are you?

You apparently are so ignorant that you don't know that you can't sue a store for not stocking an item.

 

[HappyJoy]

Considering the courts who are responsible for interpreting our laws and ensuring their Constitutionality by the Constitution disagree with you...

Says which court?

Beliefs are nice.

Study: anti-black hiring discrimination is as prevalent today as it was in 1989

A new study, by researchers at Northwestern University, Harvard, and the Institute for Social Research in Norway, looked at every available field experiment on hiring discrimination from 1989 through 2015. The researchers found that anti-black racism in hiring is unchanged since at least 1989, while anti-Latino racism may have decreased modestly.

They looked at two kinds of experiments: résumé and in-person audits. In the first, researchers send out résumés with similar levels of education, experience, and so on, but the names differ so some résumés have a stereotypically black or Latino name and the others have a stereotypically white name. In the second, applicants go in-person to apply for a job; they each share similar qualifications, but some are white while others are black or brown.

In total, the researchers produced 24 studies with 30 estimates of discrimination for black and Latino Americans, collectively representing more than 54,000 applications submitted for more than 25,000 positions.

They concluded that, on average, “white applicants receive 36% more callbacks than equally qualified African Americans” while “[w]hite applicants receive on average 24% more callbacks than Latinos.”

They also found no evidence of changes over time in rates of hiring discrimination for black people, with anything but the slight possibility of “a slow decline” ruled out by the studies. With Latinos, the evidence indicates “a possible decline in discrimination, although this trend is outside of conventional levels of significance” — meaning the data isn’t statistically significant enough to draw a solid conclusion.

If I were an employer a degree from Harvard would eliminate them from potential employment.

You're not, so who cares?

Employers who do. Harvard has been a breeding ground for socialist. Business people know this. Only place for Harvard grads is in education so they can poison future generations with their Marxist bullshit ideology.

You are so full of shit, no employer is not hiring someone because they went to Harvard.

Am I? Why You Shouldn’t Hire Someone From Harvard

Do they make good presidents?

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Considering the courts who are responsible for interpreting our laws and ensuring their Constitutionality by the Constitution disagree with you...

Says which court?

Beliefs are nice.

Study: anti-black hiring discrimination is as prevalent today as it was in 1989

A new study, by researchers at Northwestern University, Harvard, and the Institute for Social Research in Norway, looked at every available field experiment on hiring discrimination from 1989 through 2015. The researchers found that anti-black racism in hiring is unchanged since at least 1989, while anti-Latino racism may have decreased modestly.

They looked at two kinds of experiments: résumé and in-person audits. In the first, researchers send out résumés with similar levels of education, experience, and so on, but the names differ so some résumés have a stereotypically black or Latino name and the others have a stereotypically white name. In the second, applicants go in-person to apply for a job; they each share similar qualifications, but some are white while others are black or brown.

In total, the researchers produced 24 studies with 30 estimates of discrimination for black and Latino Americans, collectively representing more than 54,000 applications submitted for more than 25,000 positions.

They concluded that, on average, “white applicants receive 36% more callbacks than equally qualified African Americans” while “[w]hite applicants receive on average 24% more callbacks than Latinos.”

They also found no evidence of changes over time in rates of hiring discrimination for black people, with anything but the slight possibility of “a slow decline” ruled out by the studies. With Latinos, the evidence indicates “a possible decline in discrimination, although this trend is outside of conventional levels of significance” — meaning the data isn’t statistically significant enough to draw a solid conclusion.

If I were an employer a degree from Harvard would eliminate them from potential employment.

You're not, so who cares?

Employers who do. Harvard has been a breeding ground for socialist. Business people know this. Only place for Harvard grads is in education so they can poison future generations with their Marxist bullshit ideology.

You are so full of shit, no employer is not hiring someone because they went to Harvard.

Am I? Why You Shouldn’t Hire Someone From Harvard

well, one dude from Waterloo U said you should not hire Harvard grads...that does it for me!

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Considering the courts who are responsible for interpreting our laws and ensuring their Constitutionality by the Constitution disagree with you...

Says which court?

Beliefs are nice.

Study: anti-black hiring discrimination is as prevalent today as it was in 1989

A new study, by researchers at Northwestern University, Harvard, and the Institute for Social Research in Norway, looked at every available field experiment on hiring discrimination from 1989 through 2015. The researchers found that anti-black racism in hiring is unchanged since at least 1989, while anti-Latino racism may have decreased modestly.

They looked at two kinds of experiments: résumé and in-person audits. In the first, researchers send out résumés with similar levels of education, experience, and so on, but the names differ so some résumés have a stereotypically black or Latino name and the others have a stereotypically white name. In the second, applicants go in-person to apply for a job; they each share similar qualifications, but some are white while others are black or brown.

In total, the researchers produced 24 studies with 30 estimates of discrimination for black and Latino Americans, collectively representing more than 54,000 applications submitted for more than 25,000 positions.

They concluded that, on average, “white applicants receive 36% more callbacks than equally qualified African Americans” while “[w]hite applicants receive on average 24% more callbacks than Latinos.”

They also found no evidence of changes over time in rates of hiring discrimination for black people, with anything but the slight possibility of “a slow decline” ruled out by the studies. With Latinos, the evidence indicates “a possible decline in discrimination, although this trend is outside of conventional levels of significance” — meaning the data isn’t statistically significant enough to draw a solid conclusion.

If I were an employer a degree from Harvard would eliminate them from potential employment.

You're not, so who cares?

Employers who do. Harvard has been a breeding ground for socialist. Business people know this. Only place for Harvard grads is in education so they can poison future generations with their Marxist bullshit ideology.

You are so full of shit, no employer is not hiring someone because they went to Harvard.

Employers know Harvard is a shit school that liberal elites get their lazy kids into. Then they enroll unqualified minorities to cover their tracks. It’s scandalous.
The No. 1 Ivy League school employers most want to see on a resume is ...

So, they are not the number 1 Ivy league school, yet they still get hired all the time.

 

[HappyJoy]

Considering the courts who are responsible for interpreting our laws and ensuring their Constitutionality by the Constitution disagree with you...

Says which court?

Beliefs are nice.

Study: anti-black hiring discrimination is as prevalent today as it was in 1989

A new study, by researchers at Northwestern University, Harvard, and the Institute for Social Research in Norway, looked at every available field experiment on hiring discrimination from 1989 through 2015. The researchers found that anti-black racism in hiring is unchanged since at least 1989, while anti-Latino racism may have decreased modestly.

They looked at two kinds of experiments: résumé and in-person audits. In the first, researchers send out résumés with similar levels of education, experience, and so on, but the names differ so some résumés have a stereotypically black or Latino name and the others have a stereotypically white name. In the second, applicants go in-person to apply for a job; they each share similar qualifications, but some are white while others are black or brown.

In total, the researchers produced 24 studies with 30 estimates of discrimination for black and Latino Americans, collectively representing more than 54,000 applications submitted for more than 25,000 positions.

They concluded that, on average, “white applicants receive 36% more callbacks than equally qualified African Americans” while “[w]hite applicants receive on average 24% more callbacks than Latinos.”

They also found no evidence of changes over time in rates of hiring discrimination for black people, with anything but the slight possibility of “a slow decline” ruled out by the studies. With Latinos, the evidence indicates “a possible decline in discrimination, although this trend is outside of conventional levels of significance” — meaning the data isn’t statistically significant enough to draw a solid conclusion.

If I were an employer a degree from Harvard would eliminate them from potential employment.

You're not, so who cares?

Employers who do. Harvard has been a breeding ground for socialist. Business people know this. Only place for Harvard grads is in education so they can poison future generations with their Marxist bullshit ideology.

Harvard is a breeding ground of socialism?

You don't think Harvard turns out any Capitalists? OK, that's a new one, you fuckin' goof.

With your language you appear neither Happy nor Joy. Try getting honest and go for Bitter Emotionalist

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Considering the courts who are responsible for interpreting our laws and ensuring their Constitutionality by the Constitution disagree with you...

Says which court?

Beliefs are nice.

Study: anti-black hiring discrimination is as prevalent today as it was in 1989

A new study, by researchers at Northwestern University, Harvard, and the Institute for Social Research in Norway, looked at every available field experiment on hiring discrimination from 1989 through 2015. The researchers found that anti-black racism in hiring is unchanged since at least 1989, while anti-Latino racism may have decreased modestly.

They looked at two kinds of experiments: résumé and in-person audits. In the first, researchers send out résumés with similar levels of education, experience, and so on, but the names differ so some résumés have a stereotypically black or Latino name and the others have a stereotypically white name. In the second, applicants go in-person to apply for a job; they each share similar qualifications, but some are white while others are black or brown.

In total, the researchers produced 24 studies with 30 estimates of discrimination for black and Latino Americans, collectively representing more than 54,000 applications submitted for more than 25,000 positions.

They concluded that, on average, “white applicants receive 36% more callbacks than equally qualified African Americans” while “[w]hite applicants receive on average 24% more callbacks than Latinos.”

They also found no evidence of changes over time in rates of hiring discrimination for black people, with anything but the slight possibility of “a slow decline” ruled out by the studies. With Latinos, the evidence indicates “a possible decline in discrimination, although this trend is outside of conventional levels of significance” — meaning the data isn’t statistically significant enough to draw a solid conclusion.

If I were an employer a degree from Harvard would eliminate them from potential employment.

You're not, so who cares?

Employers who do. Harvard has been a breeding ground for socialist. Business people know this. Only place for Harvard grads is in education so they can poison future generations with their Marxist bullshit ideology.

Harvard is a breeding ground of socialism?

You don't think Harvard turns out any Capitalists? OK, that's a new one, you fuckin' goof.

With your language you appear neither Happy nor Joy. Try getting honest and go for Bitter Emotionalist

Another snowflake whining about words? It is just a word dude, no different than any other word. Grow up for fucks sake

 

[Bush92]

If I were an employer a degree from Harvard would eliminate them from potential employment.

You're not, so who cares?

Employers who do. Harvard has been a breeding ground for socialist. Business people know this. Only place for Harvard grads is in education so they can poison future generations with their Marxist bullshit ideology.

You are so full of shit, no employer is not hiring someone because they went to Harvard.

Am I? Why You Shouldn’t Hire Someone From Harvard

Do they make good presidents?

Nope.

 

[Bush92]

If I were an employer a degree from Harvard would eliminate them from potential employment.

You're not, so who cares?

Employers who do. Harvard has been a breeding ground for socialist. Business people know this. Only place for Harvard grads is in education so they can poison future generations with their Marxist bullshit ideology.

You are so full of shit, no employer is not hiring someone because they went to Harvard.

Employers know Harvard is a shit school that liberal elites get their lazy kids into. Then they enroll unqualified minorities to cover their tracks. It’s scandalous.
The No. 1 Ivy League school employers most want to see on a resume is ...

So, they are not the number 1 Ivy league school, yet they still get hired all the time.

Because of alumni. Independent minded employers reject the leftist.
Graduate employability: top universities in the United States ranked by employers 2018

 

[HappyJoy]

You're not, so who cares?

Employers who do. Harvard has been a breeding ground for socialist. Business people know this. Only place for Harvard grads is in education so they can poison future generations with their Marxist bullshit ideology.

You are so full of shit, no employer is not hiring someone because they went to Harvard.

Am I? Why You Shouldn’t Hire Someone From Harvard

Do they make good presidents?

Nope.

Ok, Harvard is out, how about Cornell, Yale or Columbia?

 

[HappyJoy]

You're not, so who cares?

Employers who do. Harvard has been a breeding ground for socialist. Business people know this. Only place for Harvard grads is in education so they can poison future generations with their Marxist bullshit ideology.

You are so full of shit, no employer is not hiring someone because they went to Harvard.

Employers know Harvard is a shit school that liberal elites get their lazy kids into. Then they enroll unqualified minorities to cover their tracks. It’s scandalous.
The No. 1 Ivy League school employers most want to see on a resume is ...

So, they are not the number 1 Ivy league school, yet they still get hired all the time.

Because of alumni. Independent minded employers reject the leftist.

So, they are being hired?

Do you think Microsoft, Amazon, Walmart, American Express and other fortune 500 companies shy away from Harvard?

 

[Bush92]

If I were an employer a degree from Harvard would eliminate them from potential employment.

You're not, so who cares?

Employers who do. Harvard has been a breeding ground for socialist. Business people know this. Only place for Harvard grads is in education so they can poison future generations with their Marxist bullshit ideology.

You are so full of shit, no employer is not hiring someone because they went to Harvard.

Employers know Harvard is a shit school that liberal elites get their lazy kids into. Then they enroll unqualified minorities to cover their tracks. It’s scandalous.
The No. 1 Ivy League school employers most want to see on a resume is ...

So, they are not the number 1 Ivy league school, yet they still get hired all the time.

You can wipe your ass with a Harvard degree. It has become a joke. I’m sure all those Kennedy’s got in because of academic standards?

 

[Bush92]

Employers who do. Harvard has been a breeding ground for socialist. Business people know this. Only place for Harvard grads is in education so they can poison future generations with their Marxist bullshit ideology.

You are so full of shit, no employer is not hiring someone because they went to Harvard.

Employers know Harvard is a shit school that liberal elites get their lazy kids into. Then they enroll unqualified minorities to cover their tracks. It’s scandalous.
The No. 1 Ivy League school employers most want to see on a resume is ...

So, they are not the number 1 Ivy league school, yet they still get hired all the time.

Because of alumni. Independent minded employers reject the leftist.

So, they are being hired?

Do you think Microsoft, Amazon, Walmart, American Express and other fortune 500 companies shy away from Harvard?

Yep.

 

[Bush92]

Employers who do. Harvard has been a breeding ground for socialist. Business people know this. Only place for Harvard grads is in education so they can poison future generations with their Marxist bullshit ideology.

You are so full of shit, no employer is not hiring someone because they went to Harvard.

Am I? Why You Shouldn’t Hire Someone From Harvard

Do they make good presidents?

Nope.

Ok, Harvard is out, how about Cornell, Yale or Columbia?

Columbia is Marxist shit too.

 

[HappyJoy]

You are so full of shit, no employer is not hiring someone because they went to Harvard.

Employers know Harvard is a shit school that liberal elites get their lazy kids into. Then they enroll unqualified minorities to cover their tracks. It’s scandalous.
The No. 1 Ivy League school employers most want to see on a resume is ...

So, they are not the number 1 Ivy league school, yet they still get hired all the time.

Because of alumni. Independent minded employers reject the leftist.

So, they are being hired?

Do you think Microsoft, Amazon, Walmart, American Express and other fortune 500 companies shy away from Harvard?

Yep.

Where did Ken Chenault get his degree from? Greg Foran went to Harvard.

 

[HappyJoy]

You are so full of shit, no employer is not hiring someone because they went to Harvard.

Am I? Why You Shouldn’t Hire Someone From Harvard

Do they make good presidents?

Nope.

Ok, Harvard is out, how about Cornell, Yale or Columbia?

Columbia is Marxist shit too.

What about the other ivy league schools? All of them?

 

[Bush92]

Listen to this lump of shit. There’s your sign.
Cornel West: Corporate Media’s Superficial Coverage Helped Create “Fascist Frankenstein Trump” | Democracy Now!

 

[Bush92]

Am I? Why You Shouldn’t Hire Someone From Harvard

Do they make good presidents?

Nope.

Ok, Harvard is out, how about Cornell, Yale or Columbia?

Columbia is Marxist shit too.

What about the other ivy league schools? All of them?

Yale is ok. Harvard and Columbia are shit.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

You're not, so who cares?

Employers who do. Harvard has been a breeding ground for socialist. Business people know this. Only place for Harvard grads is in education so they can poison future generations with their Marxist bullshit ideology.

You are so full of shit, no employer is not hiring someone because they went to Harvard.

Employers know Harvard is a shit school that liberal elites get their lazy kids into. Then they enroll unqualified minorities to cover their tracks. It’s scandalous.
The No. 1 Ivy League school employers most want to see on a resume is ...

So, they are not the number 1 Ivy league school, yet they still get hired all the time.

Because of alumni. Independent minded employers reject the leftist.
Graduate employability: top universities in the United States ranked by employers 2018