Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The people he shot were "innocent"? Really, Mike? They weren't chasing Rittenhouse and attempting to beat him senseless? Nobody has the "right" to do that! All he was doing when they attacked him was putting out fires with the extinguisher he'd brought along with the gun. He didn't shoot anyone until they attacked him and wouldn't stop.As long as you MAGAt Trumptards think it's ok for little Kyle to wipe his butt with The U.S. Constitution shouldn't we REALLY REALLY be reexaming that pesky, outdated and obsolete language in The Second Amendment?
After all....we don't really NEED The Second Amendment anymore.
After all, the conditions and circumstances for which 2A were written don't exist anymore.
James Madison certainly never intended for children like Rittenhouse to walk around murdering INNOCENT people and then being aquitted of his crimes.
"Innocent" You may ask.
Well....yes.
Because you see, the people little wanna-be soldier Kyle murdered while (supposedly) "excercising his Second Amendment right" were denied THEIR Sixth Amendment rights.
Little Kyle Cuckoo completely STOLE that right, the right to a trial by a jury of their peers, from them.
So....as long as you MAGAt Trumptards are celebrating the complete shredding of one "constitutional right" why not take a good look at some of the others?
Surely everybody's on board with that.
Right?
I mean, we wouldn't want any double standards here would we?
6th Amendment
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.
Rittenhouse was found not guilty by a jury. Do you accept that or not?Ahhhh.
Ahhhh.....
More whataboutism huh?
That's when you know you've got a MAGAT Trumptard backed into a corner.
Just for grins I'll play along though.
How do I "piss on The Constitution" you fool?
Of course.Rittenhouse was found not guilty by a jury. Do you accept that or not?
What part of " Please stop shooting people. " don't you understand ? That's what Gaige Groskreutz said to him right before he shot him.
See, this is clear evidence of just how fucking stupid you are. You claim he "murdered" people after you claim you accept the finding of the jury of "not guilty".. You're a fucking idiot.Of course.
He was not found guilty in criminal court.
He may still be civily liable though for murdering those people and denying them their constitutionally guaranteed 6th Amendment right to trial.
Maybe the rest of this kid's miserable, meaningless life will be spent working hiss ass off to make money to pay the victim's families.
Absolute retardation.As long as you MAGAt Trumptards think it's ok for little Kyle to wipe his butt with The U.S. Constitution shouldn't we REALLY REALLY be reexaming that pesky, outdated and obsolete language in The Second Amendment?
We will always have the human right to self-defense and we continue the need to have that right enumerated and protected explicitly against tyrannical fuckwits like you.After all....we don't really NEED The Second Amendment anymore.
You fucking lying trash. A lynch mob of rioting and burning attempted murderers attacked an innocent kid. Two of them died. All of them deserved death. Those are the facts of the case and they were indisputable.After all, the conditions and circumstances for which 2A were written don't exist anymore.
James Madison certainly never intended for children like Rittenhouse to walk around murdering INNOCENT people and then being aquitted of his crimes.
That cowardly Antifa bitch Grosskreutz who only had intent to sneak attack and murder Kyle with a handgun? Anything he said was a pretense for his attack.What part of " Please stop shooting people. " don't you understand ? That's what Gaige Groskreutz said to him right before he shot him.
Do we really want Dimmer judges making up their own versions of the law?The people who died were distasteful characters it seems. Do we really want a system of judge, jury, executioner though? As a teen at that?
Not possible, another idiot Dim judge allowed this suit to move forward.Very good.
Let's hope civil law realizes some form of justice where criminal law failed to do so.
No, we said that the murdering cop who shot the unarmed woman on J6 should be in prison. Its you on the reprehensible left that thought murder was allowable.Once again the reprehensible right attempts to defend the indefensible.
As long as you MAGAt Trumptards think it's ok for little Kyle to wipe his butt with The U.S. Constitution shouldn't we REALLY REALLY be reexaming that pesky, outdated and obsolete language in The Second Amendment?
After all....we don't really NEED The Second Amendment anymore.
After all, the conditions and circumstances for which 2A were written don't exist anymore.
James Madison certainly never intended for children like Rittenhouse to walk around murdering INNOCENT people and then being aquitted of his crimes.
"Innocent" You may ask.
Well....yes.
Because you see, the people little wanna-be soldier Kyle murdered while (supposedly) "excercising his Second Amendment right" were denied THEIR Sixth Amendment rights.
Little Kyle Cuckoo completely STOLE that right, the right to a trial by a jury of their peers, from them.
So....as long as you MAGAt Trumptards are celebrating the complete shredding of one "constitutional right" why not take a good look at some of the others?
Surely everybody's on board with that.
Right?
I mean, we wouldn't want any double standards here would we?
6th Amendment
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.
Unarmed and confronting a scared rabbit with a gun is not smart but it's not an act of cowardice. You really can't tell courage from cowardice can you? It's fairly common among your tribe.The cowards got what they deserved. Kyle Rittenhouse took care of that. Go buy some flowers for their graves.
He wasnt the one looking to randomly kill people that night.It shows him shooting in self defense. If he wsa looking to randomly kill people he could have easily done that, he didn't. Of course we all should know this by now.
Unarmed and confronting a scared rabbit with a gun is not smart but it's not an act of cowardice. You really can't tell courage from cowardice can you? It's fairly common among your tribe.
You think I'm taking sides here? Of course you do.Your courageous felons got what they deserved.
Stupid Dimmer judge with a girls name.I guess self defense can now be punishable.
Yep, Kyle has been woken.Kyle has been woken. Woken up to the fact that like O.J. Simpson, he is open to civil suits, where the rules in court are different
View attachment 752833
Now you're lying. Lying is common to your tribe.Unarmed and confronting a scared rabbit with a gun is not smart but it's not an act of cowardice. You really can't tell courage from cowardice can you? It's fairly common among your tribe.
You think I'm taking sides here? Of course you do.
