FEMA Deceives Nation About Twin Towers Core

[Christophera]

Hey Christo answer these questions/comments. I'll keep posting them until you do.

0. Personally ask the engineer who designed the WTC towers yourself. OMG, do you have any idea how cool it would be to get an answer from the Man himself? Or are you too sick in the head to admit you're simply a dupe?
Leslie E Robertson e-mail: [email protected]
just ask him if there were any concrete walls in the core above ground level. Then respect his answer, and thank him for the reply.

1. Here is the design page LERA | World Trade Center
LERA | World Trade Center
there is no mention of any concrete walls. only viscoelastic dampers. Why would they need to add dampers if the core was concrete? (nice job editing the Robertson mis-quote out of the Newsweek article)

2. Do you or don't you agree that the hijacked planes hitting the towers caused the WTC towers' collapse?

3. if there was a "secret method of mass murder" what was it, and why wait around for jets to hit the towers, why not just knock them down in a wind storm and kill 250,000?

4. You continually fail to describe the conspiracy. Who all was involved?

5. what difference would it make if there was a concrete core or not? If the buildings stood for ~35-years, however they were built was fine. What knocked them down?

agent kaiser. It appears you cannot show the steel core columns in the core area, nor can you provide any other independently verified evidence. All you seem to do is struggle with forming a question that you can distract me with.

You sir are absolutely unaccountable and unworthy of any answer because you said I had misquoted Leslie Robertson from the September 13, 2001 but then when a direct instance of it was asked for, you've failed to provide it.

Then you won't answer a simple question about the logic of what you assert, that the Newsweek article is in error.

I asked: "If Newsweek made and error, would Robertson fail to correct it when his company were the engineers of record and 3,000 were killed in what was being deemed a collapse? Or, would Newsweek refuse to correct the article if he did?

Either way, it makes no sense under the conditions and you've exposed yourself as a disinformation agent.

 

[kyzr]

Hey Christo answer these questions/comments. I'll keep posting them until you do.

0. Personally ask the engineer who designed the WTC towers yourself. OMG, do you have any idea how cool it would be to get an answer from the Man himself? Or are you too sick in the head to admit you're simply a dupe?
Leslie E Robertson e-mail: [email protected]
just ask him if there were any concrete walls in the core above ground level. Then respect his answer, and thank him for the reply.

1. Here is the design page LERA | World Trade Center
LERA | World Trade Center
there is no mention of any concrete walls. only viscoelastic dampers. Why would they need to add dampers if the core was concrete? (nice job editing the Robertson mis-quote out of the Newsweek article)

2. Do you or don't you agree that the hijacked planes hitting the towers caused the WTC towers' collapse?

3. if there was a "secret method of mass murder" what was it, and why wait around for jets to hit the towers, why not just knock them down in a wind storm and kill 250,000?

4. You continually fail to describe the conspiracy. Who all was involved?

5. what difference would it make if there was a concrete core or not? If the buildings stood for ~35-years, however they were built was fine. What knocked them down?

 

[Christophera]

Here is a segment of the core wall base of WTC 1, north side of the core. Note the APROX. 3x7' utility hallaway running the length of it.

It can be located in this aerial.

Here is a screen shot of the 3rd floor core plan.

The plan clearly shows there should be a steam shaft, an air shaft and a janitors closet there, with an elevator next to it.

 

[kyzr]

Hey Christo answer these questions/comments. I'll keep posting them until you do.

0. Personally ask the engineer who designed the WTC towers yourself. OMG, do you have any idea how cool it would be to get an answer from the Man himself? Or are you too sick in the head to admit you're simply a dupe?
Leslie E Robertson e-mail: [email protected]
just ask him if there were any concrete walls in the core above ground level. Then respect his answer, and thank him for the reply.

1. Here is the design page LERA | World Trade Center
LERA | World Trade Center
there is no mention of any concrete walls. only viscoelastic dampers. Why would they need to add dampers if the core was concrete? (nice job editing the Robertson mis-quote out of the Newsweek article)

2. Do you or don't you agree that the hijacked planes hitting the towers caused the WTC towers' collapse?

3. if there was a "secret method of mass murder" what was it, and why wait around for jets to hit the towers, why not just knock them down in a wind storm and kill 250,000?

4. You continually fail to describe the conspiracy. Who all was involved?

5. what difference would it make if there was a concrete core or not? If the buildings stood for ~35-years, however they were built was fine. What knocked them down?

 

[Christophera]

Does this mean you have no verified evidence of the steel core columns?

 

[kyzr]

Hey Christo answer these questions/comments. I'll keep posting them until you do.

0. Personally ask the engineer who designed the WTC towers yourself. OMG, do you have any idea how cool it would be to get an answer from the Man himself? Or are you too sick in the head to admit you're simply a dupe?
Leslie E Robertson e-mail: [email protected]
just ask him if there were any concrete walls in the core above ground level. Then respect his answer, and thank him for the reply.

1. Here is the design page LERA | World Trade Center
LERA | World Trade Center
there is no mention of any concrete walls. only viscoelastic dampers. Why would they need to add dampers if the core was concrete? (nice job editing the Robertson mis-quote out of the Newsweek article)

2. Do you or don't you agree that the hijacked planes hitting the towers caused the WTC towers' collapse?

3. if there was a "secret method of mass murder" what was it, and why wait around for jets to hit the towers, why not just knock them down in a wind storm and kill 250,000?

4. You continually fail to describe the conspiracy. Who all was involved?

5. what difference would it make if there was a concrete core or not? If the buildings stood for ~35-years, however they were built was fine. What knocked them down?

 

[Christophera]

After listening to Dr. Ron Larsens web radio show in 2007, one might realize that the missing documentary, "The Engineering and Construction of the Twin Towers" was a very intimate review of construction details of WTC 1.

6/20/07 interview (documentary search update 17:50 minutes)
LCB-062007-16kb-Chris.mp3 - www.libertycalling.com

A full understanding of the actual structure, and the fixtures that were used to build it.

 

[DiveCon]

After listening to Dr. Ron Larsens web radio show in 2007, one might realize that the missing documentary, "The Engineering and Construction of the Twin Towers" was a very intimate review of construction details of WTC 1.

6/20/07 interview (documentary search update 17:50 minutes)
LCB-062007-16kb-Chris.mp3 - www.libertycalling.com

A full understanding of the actual structure, and the fixtures that were used to build it.

hey, fucktard, where is your rebar, where are the concrete forms
that photo proves NO CONCRETE IN THE CORE ABOVE GRADE

 

[Christophera]

Here are the rebar and forms starting on WTC 2, at around the 5th floor. The thick vertical black bars behind the interior box columns on wide centers are the 6" rebar, just starting.

Where the form wood goes inwards above on WTC 2, matches the basic height of the concrete stain on the interior box column left of the 12 foot thick core wall at its base of WTC 1.

Can you name the structural elements at 1, 2 & 3 in the last image I posted? Or, do you basically know nothing of construction?

 

[DiveCon]

Here are the rebar and forms starting on WTC 2, at around the 5th floor. The thick vertical black bars behind the interior box columns on wide centers are the 6" rebar, just starting.

Where the form wood goes inwards above on WTC 2, matches the basic height of the concrete stain on the interior box column left of the 12 foot thick core wall at its base of WTC 1.

Can you name the structural elements at 1, 2 & 3 in the last image I posted? Or, do you basically know nothing of construction?

you dumbfuck
thats not rebar, that scaffolding

 

[KittenKoder]

OMG! You're still trying to debate this DiveCon?

 

[KittenKoder]

OMG! You're still trying to debate this DiveCon?

 

[DiveCon]

OMG! You're still trying to debate this DiveCon?

no, just pointing out what a fucktard troofers are in general and christophera in specific

 

[kyzr]

Hey Christo answer these questions/comments. I'll keep posting them until you do.

0. Personally ask the engineer who designed the WTC towers yourself. OMG, do you have any idea how cool it would be to get an answer from the Man himself? Or are you too sick in the head to admit you're simply a dupe?
Leslie E Robertson e-mail: [email protected]
just ask him if there were any concrete walls in the core above ground level. Then respect his answer, and thank him for the reply.

1. Here is the design page LERA | World Trade Center
LERA | World Trade Center
there is no mention of any concrete walls. only viscoelastic dampers. Why would they need to add dampers if the core was concrete? (nice job editing the Robertson mis-quote out of the Newsweek article)

2. Do you or don't you agree that the hijacked planes hitting the towers caused the WTC towers' collapse?

3. if there was a "secret method of mass murder" what was it, and why wait around for jets to hit the towers, why not just knock them down in a wind storm and kill 250,000?

4. You continually fail to describe the conspiracy. Who all was involved?

5. what difference would it make if there was a concrete core or not? If the buildings stood for ~35-years, however they were built was fine. What knocked them down?

 

[kyzr]

Hey Christo answer these questions/comments. I'll keep posting them until you do.

0. Personally ask the engineer who designed the WTC towers yourself. OMG, do you have any idea how cool it would be to get an answer from the Man himself? Or are you too sick in the head to admit you're simply a dupe?
Leslie E Robertson e-mail: [email protected]
just ask him if there were any concrete walls in the core above ground level. Then respect his answer, and thank him for the reply.

1. Here is the design page LERA | World Trade Center
LERA | World Trade Center
there is no mention of any concrete walls. only viscoelastic dampers. Why would they need to add dampers if the core was concrete? (nice job editing the Robertson mis-quote out of the Newsweek article)

2. Do you or don't you agree that the hijacked planes hitting the towers caused the WTC towers' collapse?

3. if there was a "secret method of mass murder" what was it, and why wait around for jets to hit the towers, why not just knock them down in a wind storm and kill 250,000?

4. You continually fail to describe the conspiracy. Who all was involved?

5. what difference would it make if there was a concrete core or not? If the buildings stood for ~35-years, however they were built was fine. What knocked them down?

 

[Christophera]

Here are the rebar and forms starting on WTC 2, at around the 5th floor. The thick vertical black bars behind the interior box columns on wide centers are the 6" rebar, just starting.

Where the form wood goes inwards above on WTC 2, matches the basic height of the concrete stain on the interior box column left of the 12 foot thick core wall at its base of WTC 1.

Can you name the structural elements at 1, 2 & 3 in the last image I posted? Or, do you basically know nothing of construction?

you dumbfuck
thats not rebar, that scaffolding

Oh yea, there's scaffolding, but there is rebar behind it and the line of the back face of the interior box columns, large vertical black lines. Then up above, the rebar is aligned by the boards up there. All inside the inner face of the columns, Being WTC 2 the concrete was cast after the steel was up 5 floors.
You will not find an image of WTC 1 at that point. Your masters took them all.

And what about the numbers on this image? Do you have enough experience or knowledge to identify what numbers 1, 2 & 3 indicate of the steel surrounding the core?

 

[kyzr]

Hey Christo answer these questions/comments. I'll keep posting them until you do.

0. Personally ask the engineer who designed the WTC towers yourself. OMG, do you have any idea how cool it would be to get an answer from the Man himself? Or are you too sick in the head to admit you're simply a dupe?
Leslie E Robertson e-mail: [email protected]
just ask him if there were any concrete walls in the core above ground level. Then respect his answer, and thank him for the reply.

1. Here is the design page LERA | World Trade Center
LERA | World Trade Center
there is no mention of any concrete walls. only viscoelastic dampers. Why would they need to add dampers if the core was concrete? (nice job editing the Robertson mis-quote out of the Newsweek article)

2. Do you or don't you agree that the hijacked planes hitting the towers caused the WTC towers' collapse?

3. if there was a "secret method of mass murder" what was it, and why wait around for jets to hit the towers, why not just knock them down in a wind storm and kill 250,000?

4. You continually fail to describe the conspiracy. Who all was involved?

5. what difference would it make if there was a concrete core or not? If the buildings stood for ~35-years, however they were built was fine. What knocked them down?

 

[kyzr]

Hey Christo answer these questions/comments. I'll keep posting them until you do.

0. Personally ask the engineer who designed the WTC towers yourself. OMG, do you have any idea how cool it would be to get an answer from the Man himself? Or are you too sick in the head to admit you're simply a dupe?
Leslie E Robertson e-mail: [email protected]
just ask him if there were any concrete walls in the core above ground level. Then respect his answer, and thank him for the reply.

1. Here is the design page LERA | World Trade Center
LERA | World Trade Center
there is no mention of any concrete walls. only viscoelastic dampers. Why would they need to add dampers if the core was concrete? (nice job editing the Robertson mis-quote out of the Newsweek article)

2. Do you or don't you agree that the hijacked planes hitting the towers caused the WTC towers' collapse?

3. if there was a "secret method of mass murder" what was it, and why wait around for jets to hit the towers, why not just knock them down in a wind storm and kill 250,000?

4. You continually fail to describe the conspiracy. Who all was involved?

5. what difference would it make if there was a concrete core or not? If the buildings stood for ~35-years, however they were built was fine. What knocked them down?

 

[DiveCon]

Here are the rebar and forms starting on WTC 2, at around the 5th floor. The thick vertical black bars behind the interior box columns on wide centers are the 6" rebar, just starting.



Where the form wood goes inwards above on WTC 2, matches the basic height of the concrete stain on the interior box column left of the 12 foot thick core wall at its base of WTC 1.

Can you name the structural elements at 1, 2 & 3 in the last image I posted? Or, do you basically know nothing of construction?

you dumbfuck
thats not rebar, that scaffolding

Oh yea, there's scaffolding, but there is rebar behind it and the line of the back face of the interior box columns, large vertical black lines. Then up above, the rebar is aligned by the boards up there. All inside the inner face of the columns, Being WTC 2 the concrete was cast after the steel was up 5 floors.
You will not find an image of WTC 1 at that point. Your masters took them all.

And what about the numbers on this image? Do you have enough experience or knowledge to identify what numbers 1, 2 & 3 indicate of the steel surrounding the core?

your numbers are meaningless
since there is NO REBAR, NO CONCRETE

 

[Christophera]

you dumbfuck
thats not rebar, that scaffolding

Oh yea, there's scaffolding, but there is rebar behind it and the line of the back face of the interior box columns, large vertical black lines. Then up above, the rebar is aligned by the boards up there. All inside the inner face of the columns, Being WTC 2 the concrete was cast after the steel was up 5 floors.
You will not find an image of WTC 1 at that point. Your masters took them all.

And what about the numbers on this image? Do you have enough experience or knowledge to identify what numbers 1, 2 & 3 indicate of the steel surrounding the core?

your numbers are meaningless
since there is NO REBAR, NO CONCRETE

The structural steel members I ask you to identify according to the yellow numerals in this image have nothing to do with concrete.

This is about determining if you have any competency whatsoever in identifying the structural elements of buildings.