FEMA Deceives Nation About Twin Towers Core

Text assertions are vacuaous in the environment of hard evidence that is corroborated and consistent with photos from 9-11 and GZ.

Robertson is verified by Oxford, verifying Domel who describes a concrete core verified by the image of WTC 2 core, verifying the top of WTC 2 core falling onto WTC 3, the WTC 1 rebar, just after the WTC 1 west core wall is seen in an end view, then, the WTC 1 east shear wall toppling, consistent with interior box columns silhouetted on WTC 1 north core wall, consistent with ground zero showing the WTC 1 north concrete core base wall, 12 foot thick, all supported as clarification of the many confused statements that do mention concrete in the core including the latest revised NIST contracted analysis of free fall by Bazant et. al 6/21/2007, which actually provides an equivalent amount of high explosives needed to create the rate of fall they are attempting to justify with physics. It doesn't work, but at least they won't go down in history as totally supporting the deceptions.
 
Text assertions are vacuaous in the environment of hard evidence that is corroborated and consistent with photos from 9-11 and GZ.

holy fuck, what irony!!

this guy cant show on construction image, cant show one building plan and cant show one image from ground zero.....

and cant even keep his story from changing when proven wrong time and time again!!! :lol:
 
For example. The GZ evidence for a concrete core is massive.

wtc1.core.wall.base.annot4.jpg


And it also proves silerteins "leaked" scanned blueprints do not represent what was on the ground. Above where the blank concrete face with the hallways IS, below we see in the silverstein plans of the 3rd floor core plan, used by r. gage without question, an air shaft, a steam shaft and a janitors closet

A-A-24_1.3rdfloor.coreplan.jpg



The deception is over.
 
For example. The GZ evidence for a concrete core is massive.



And it also proves silerteins "leaked" scanned blueprints do not represent what was on the ground. Above where the blank concrete face with the hallways IS, below we see in the silverstein plans of the 3rd floor core plan, used by r. gage without question, an air shaft, a steam shaft and a janitors closet




The deception is over.
REALLY?!?!?!

Massive????

thats why the photo you use doesnt show ANY concrete at all, but it DOES show steel core columns


:cuckoo::eusa_liar:
 
For example. The GZ evidence for a concrete core is massive.

wtc1.core.wall.base.annot4.jpg


And it also proves silerteins "leaked" scanned blueprints do not represent what was on the ground. Above where the blank concrete face with the hallways IS, below we see in the silverstein plans of the 3rd floor core plan, used by r. gage without question, an air shaft, a steam shaft and a janitors closet

A-A-24_1.3rdfloor.coreplan.jpg



The deception is over.

you are a lying piece of shit. the blueprints you show have the edge cut off.... and what we see in the picture above is THE CORNER OF THE CORE not the fucking middle!!

you got caught making shit up and lying AGAIN!!!!!

here are the actual leaked blueprints of the ENTIRE third floor core. notice the steam shaft you claim should be in the photo is FOUR COLUMNS FROM THE CORNER!!! they dont exist in this picture. they have collapsed completely.
A-A-24_2.png
 
For example. The GZ evidence for a concrete core is massive.

And it also proves silerteins "leaked" scanned blueprints do not represent what was on the ground. Above where the blank concrete face with the hallways IS, below we see in the silverstein plans of the 3rd floor core plan, used by r. gage without question, an air shaft, a steam shaft and a janitors closet

The deception is over.

you are a lying piece of shit. the blueprints you show have the edge cut off.... and what we see in the picture above is THE CORNER OF THE CORE not the fucking middle!!

you got caught making shit up and lying AGAIN!!!!!

here are the actual leaked blueprints of the ENTIRE third floor core. notice the steam shaft you claim should be in the photo is FOUR COLUMNS FROM THE CORNER!!! they dont exist in this picture. they have collapsed completely.
A-A-24_2.png

The third floor was it ? Actually the plan shows the third floor core area but unfortunately Chris's (FEMA) pic is not of the third floor level at all .. another bowel evacuation from his enemas .. !

Stann :lol:
 
I count 4 columns from the corner in the GZ image.

wtc1.core.wall.base.annot4.jpg


Meaning my cropped plan, enlarged so it can be read is exactly what we should be looking at. The obsolete plans DO NOT represent the structure as it existed.

A-A-24_1.3rdfloor.coreplan.jpg
 
I count 4 columns from the corner in the GZ image.



Meaning my cropped plan, enlarged so it can be read is exactly what we should be looking at. The obsolete plans DO NOT represent the structure as it existed.
proving once again what a dipshit you are
the part of the structure still standing in that photo is NOT the area you are talking about on the plan
 
I count 4 columns from the corner in the GZ image.
:lol:

yeah? no shit... of course you would. you see concrete walls where they dont exist why not just add a few extra steel columns.

your words are worthless, oh chosen one.
 
This other angle shows where the corner column would be making 4.

34oc9zm.jpg


The concrete core is the only core that can be shown with evidence from 9-11. All of the construction photos were taken by gulinai in violations of law. Empowering the FEMA deception.
 
This other angle shows where the corner column would be making 4.



The concrete core is the only core that can be shown with evidence from 9-11. All of the construction photos were taken by gulinai in violations of law. Empowering the FEMA deception.
still no concrete in that photo
 
This other angle shows where the corner column would be making 4.

34oc9zm.jpg


The concrete core is the only core that can be shown with evidence from 9-11. All of the construction photos were taken by gulinai in violations of law. Empowering the FEMA deception.

more delusional bullshit :lol:

a few posts ago you said I COUNT FOUR COLUMNS!!!!!

now you admit you lied and there isnt four and make up some bullshit about a corner column. you are so full of shit your ears are trying to escape before your head explodes.

hey chris WHERE'S YOU FUCKING CONCRETE CORE?
got any pictures yet? all you keep showing is dust, shadows and smoke. WHERE'S THE ACTUAL FUCKING CONCRETE?
 
The agent refuses to use the logic of using the spacing of columns and location of perpendicular wall lines to know a corner location.

Or to acknowledge the corner had a column just like the obsolete plans show.

The core columns did not exist, but the 24 massive box columns surrounding the concrete core DID exist.
 
The core columns did not exist, but the 24 massive box columns surrounding the concrete core DID exist.

where is your documentation to support this claim that there was a concrete core surrounded by 24 box columns?:cuckoo:
 
Count the columns surrounding the core in your construction photos. That part is accurate but the vertical steel in the core is represented as core columns. It is not. It is elevator guide rail support steel.

End view of the WTC 1 west concrete core wall with the spire, an interior box column, outside the core wall.

wtc1spirecorewall.jpg


The floor beams show the steel structure to be part of the exeterior steel exoskeleton.

site1074.jpg


The interior box columns silhouetted against the concrete core wall behind it.

shearspirewall.jpg


The spire superimposed.

http://algoxy.com/psych/images/superimp.spire.wtc1.jpg[/img

[img]http://algoxy.com/psych/images/wtc1.core.wall.base.annot4.jpg

A globally published magazine has the engineer of record in Newsweek provides information describing a concrete core.

A globally recognized university identifies a concrete core.

Oxford University

Another structural engineer certified in 12 states identifies a concrete core. (See chapter 2.1)

August Domel, Ph.d SE. PE.
 
thanks for posting pics proving the WTC has a STEEL CORE!!!

(what a maroooooon!!):cuckoo:
 
Count the columns surrounding the core in your construction photos. That part is accurate but the vertical steel in the core is represented as core columns. It is not. It is elevator guide rail support steel.

End view of the WTC 1 west concrete core wall with the spire, an interior box column, outside the core wall.

wtc1spirecorewall.jpg

hey look, steel core
The floor beams show the steel structure to be part of the exeterior steel exoskeleton.

site1074.jpg
hey look again, more steel core
The interior box columns silhouetted against the concrete core wall behind it.

shearspirewall.jpg
well well, yet again, MORE steel core
The spire superimposed.

http://algoxy.com/psych/images/superimp.spire.wtc1.jpg[/img

[IMG]http://algoxy.com/psych/images/wtc1.core.wall.base.annot4.jpg
once more, dipshit posts proof of a steel core
A globally published magazine has the engineer of record in Newsweek provides information describing a concrete core.

A globally recognized university identifies a concrete core.

Oxford University

Another structural engineer certified in 12 states identifies a concrete core. (See chapter 2.1)

August Domel, Ph.d SE. PE.
and yet more delusional bullshit claiming something was said that never was
 

Forum List

Back
Top