Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Pure bullshit.#2 and #3 are certainly myths....not so sure about #1, #4, and #5. Ron Paul is kind of a hippie, the "true" libertarians are for drug/abortion/religion rights (ie: the right to have, and the right not to have them), and libertarians are certainly hurting the Republican party by not voting republican.
Republicans are hurting the party, by campaigning like libertarians and governing like socialists.....That's no fault of any libertarian.
I'd ask if you were really that stupid if I didn't already know that you are.Libertarians love to claim they have a solitary claim of supporting Liberty
I know you are....but what am I?
Pure bullshit.#2 and #3 are certainly myths....not so sure about #1, #4, and #5. Ron Paul is kind of a hippie, the "true" libertarians are for drug/abortion/religion rights (ie: the right to have, and the right not to have them), and libertarians are certainly hurting the Republican party by not voting republican.
Republicans are hurting the party, by campaigning like libertarians and governing like socialists.....That's no fault of any libertarian.
I think that's pretty close too true.
Republicrats seem to talk a great game about "The Constitution", liberty, free markets and smaller gov't. Yet when they had the entire gov't locked in between 2002-2006, WTF did they do?
They've been better about resisting liberalism since 2010, and if they mangae to take gov't back in 2016, it better be about rolling back liberalism, not just slowing down liberalism.
The reason most people don't see Libertarianism as insane as it is is because Libertarianism is such a fringe political philosophy that it never actually gets to have its way,
on all or most of its positions,
in any government of any size.
Read the Libertarian platform, and then imagine that somehow, whatever how that might be,
that Libertarians were in power, holding the House, the Senate, and the Presidency.
Then, all you people who think you're kind of sort of 'libertarian', imagine if you would really want your country to look like that.
That's because they don't have any power...They can say anything they want without having to actually do anything....Also, they have to put up the front of being an "opposition" party, to throw the blind party faithful rubes a couple of bones.Pure bullshit.#2 and #3 are certainly myths....not so sure about #1, #4, and #5. Ron Paul is kind of a hippie, the "true" libertarians are for drug/abortion/religion rights (ie: the right to have, and the right not to have them), and libertarians are certainly hurting the Republican party by not voting republican.
Republicans are hurting the party, by campaigning like libertarians and governing like socialists.....That's no fault of any libertarian.
I think that's pretty close too true.
Republicrats seem to talk a great game about "The Constitution", liberty, free markets and smaller gov't. Yet when they had the entire gov't locked in between 2002-2006, WTF did they do?
They've been better about resisting liberalism since 2010, and if they mangae to take gov't back in 2016, it better be about rolling back liberalism, not just slowing down liberalism.
The reason most people don't see Libertarianism as insane as it is is because Libertarianism is such a fringe political philosophy that it never actually gets to have its way,
on all or most of its positions,
in any government of any size.
Read the Libertarian platform, and then imagine that somehow, whatever how that might be,
that Libertarians were in power, holding the House, the Senate, and the Presidency.
Then, all you people who think you're kind of sort of 'libertarian', imagine if you would really want your country to look like that.
Imagine derp herp derppity herp derp derp. Now herp derp, derp herp herp herp. Then, derpity derp derp derp.
The reason most people don't see Libertarianism as insane as it is is because Libertarianism is such a fringe political philosophy that it never actually gets to have its way,
on all or most of its positions,
in any government of any size.
Read the Libertarian platform, and then imagine that somehow, whatever how that might be,
that Libertarians were in power, holding the House, the Senate, and the Presidency.
Then, all you people who think you're kind of sort of 'libertarian', imagine if you would really want your country to look like that.
Imagine derp herp derppity herp derp derp. Now herp derp, derp herp herp herp. Then, derpity derp derp derp.
That's essentially the type of breadth and depth you display over libertarian discussions, yes.
The reason most people don't see Libertarianism as insane as it is is because Libertarianism is such a fringe political philosophy that it never actually gets to have its way,
on all or most of its positions,
in any government of any size.
Read the Libertarian platform, and then imagine that somehow, whatever how that might be,
that Libertarians were in power, holding the House, the Senate, and the Presidency.
Then, all you people who think you're kind of sort of 'libertarian', imagine if you would really want your country to look like that.
Imagine derp herp derppity herp derp derp. Now herp derp, derp herp herp herp. Then, derpity derp derp derp.
I disagree. Liberts fall on the side of less government. So they prefer government not even weigh in on the issue at all. Same for drugs. We are adults, we can make adult choices.So Ron Paul is a hippie, despite being deeply conservative in his personal life. True libertarians understand that there is no libertarian position on abortion, and that there are both pro-life and pro-choice libertarians.
Liberts are about free will....
Minarchist libertarians believe that one of the responsibilities of government is to outlaw murder. A pro-life libertarian obviously sees abortion as murder. Thus there is nothing anti-libertarian about being pro-life.
The reason most people don't see Libertarianism as insane as it is is because Libertarianism is such a fringe political philosophy that it never actually gets to have its way,
on all or most of its positions,
in any government of any size.
Read the Libertarian platform, and then imagine that somehow, whatever how that might be,
that Libertarians were in power, holding the House, the Senate, and the Presidency.
Then, all you people who think you're kind of sort of 'libertarian', imagine if you would really want your country to look like that.
Imagine derp herp derppity herp derp derp. Now herp derp, derp herp herp herp. Then, derpity derp derp derp.
You're the perfect example of what makes Libertarianism so foolish. It's a party inhabited by fools who can't even defend their own party's platform.
Imagine derp herp derppity herp derp derp. Now herp derp, derp herp herp herp. Then, derpity derp derp derp.
You're the perfect example of what makes Libertarianism so foolish. It's a party inhabited by fools who can't even defend their own party's platform.
I dont belong to a party, derp. You'll forgive me for not taking your line of bullshit with anything more than a mocking rebuttal. if you wanna "imagine", but some John Lennon on and STFU. You belong over in the LOLberal threads, where you can spray the usual liquid shit.
#2 and #3 are certainly myths....not so sure about #1, #4, and #5. Ron Paul is kind of a hippie, the "true" libertarians are for drug/abortion/religion rights (ie: the right to have, and the right not to have them), and libertarians are certainly hurting the Republican party by not voting republican.
I disagree. Liberts fall on the side of less government. So they prefer government not even weigh in on the issue at all. Same for drugs. We are adults, we can make adult choices.
Liberts are about free will....
Minarchist libertarians believe that one of the responsibilities of government is to outlaw murder. A pro-life libertarian obviously sees abortion as murder. Thus there is nothing anti-libertarian about being pro-life.
Liberts find it a private issue where government has no opinion on it
Anything else and you are not a libert.
And btw liberts talk about this because they can. Just like liberals talk about liberals and cons talk about cons....there is no special reason beyond nothing.
Libertarian creed
I got mine.......Fuck the rest of you
I disagree. Liberts fall on the side of less government. So they prefer government not even weigh in on the issue at all. Same for drugs. We are adults, we can make adult choices.
Liberts are about free will....
Minarchist libertarians believe that one of the responsibilities of government is to outlaw murder. A pro-life libertarian obviously sees abortion as murder. Thus there is nothing anti-libertarian about being pro-life.
Liberts find it a private issue where government has no opinion on it
Anything else and you are not a libert.
And btw liberts talk about this because they can. Just like liberals talk about liberals and cons talk about cons....there is no special reason beyond nothing.
That is a myth... They are mostly kids and old school democrat hippiesFor the less educated posters on the board, and for the curious.
1. Libertarians are a fringe band of “hippies of the right.”
The Neoconfederates dont really and you have too fucking many of them calling themselves libertarians...You should tell them to go back to the democrat party.2. Libertarians don’t care about minorities or the poor.
I never thought of it but I dont remember seeing many women libertarians....Funny Must just be a coincidence.3. Libertarianism is a boys’ club.
You are you all just say the war on drugs is what made crime ( a ignorant lie) Abortion should be a state issue( A cowardly cop out) Also most attack all Christians that use their faith as a morale center.4. Libertarians are pro-drug, pro-abortion and anti-religion.
They are not destroying the republican party...... If they were Paul would have won the nomination.5. Libertarians are destroying the Republican Party.
Five myths about libertarians - The Washington Post
Libertarians fail to realize that it's 2013 and everything is more complex than they can understand.
Libertarians fail to understand 'greed'.
Libertarians are the original hypocrites. Their 'god' Ayn who denounced social programs, but used social programs when it was in her best interest. (under an assumed name)
Are you hypocrite enough?
