oh no it was very real. The dems were completely different with putin…more flexibleIt was the symbolic gesture of resetting relations between us and them.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
oh no it was very real. The dems were completely different with putin…more flexibleIt was the symbolic gesture of resetting relations between us and them.
hhhahaa you didn’t read the article?Regardless, that article doesn't corroborate what struth falsely claimed. She claims Russia donated money to Hillary. When challenged to back that up, she idiotically offered a link to an article which states a Canadian entrepreneur made those donations, not Russia.
I would say someone would have to be an abject imbecile to rehash this debunked nonsense, but we're talking about brain-dead cultists. They lack the capacity to understand when their bullshit gets debunked.
um was she not the head of the State Dept???
Nope. You still think Russia donated to the Clinton foundation, but it was Frank Guistra. Has there ever been a conspiracy theory that you didn't jump on?hahahaha it was written years later, they had the facts
hahaha no he doesn’tLOL
It says those donations were from a Canadian, not from Russia. You do know that Canada is not Russia, right?
You really suck at this.
if the state department has to sign off on the deal…and she’s in charge…She was. Doesn't mean she signed off on the deal.
Your inability to present proof she signed off on it reveals you're grasping at straws.
Just following the Times reportingNope. You still think Russia donated to the Clinton foundation, but it was Frank Guistra. Has there ever been a conspiracy theory that you didn't jump on?
hhhahaa you didn’t read the article?
No one remembers this criminal giving our uranium to Russia
hahaha no he doesn’t
if the state department has to sign off on the deal…and she’s in charge…
sigh nevermind you are blinded by your cult
Just following the Times reporting
read the headlineLOL
No, you're really not as the Times did not report what you're claiming.
Watch this ....
Quote that NY Times article you linked stating Russians donated to Hillary or the Clinton Foundation....
When you fail to do so, you actually prove you were full of shit just as you were called out on.
read the headline
nope it was the russian deal to get nuclear material. That clinton signed off on, after, as the article highlights was flushed with russian moneyCash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal
^^^ nothing in there naming even one Russian donor. And that "Russian Uranium deal" is a misnomer. There was no "Russian Uranium deal." The deal was over "American Uranium." And it was a deal for a Russian company to purchase a Canadian company to mine it.
Regardless, not even the headline, sensationalized to fool readers, says any Russians donated. And in the article, it only mentions Canadians who did donate.
You really suck at this.
You just got owned by your own article.![]()
Hillary signed off the deal to allow Putin to buy 20% of our uranium AFTER receiving millions of dollars in ‘donations’.
nope it was the russian deal to get nuclear material. That clinton signed off on, after, as the article highlights was flushed with russian money
nope it was the russian deal to get nuclear material.
No US uranium can leave the country.
The Clintons sold out the US with that Russian uranium deal.
Now Joe Biden is selling out his country by trying to arrange another deal where the Russians get Iranian nuclear material.
You would think that after Putin threatened to nuke us the other day the last think an American President would want is for the sonofabitches to have more nuclear material.
Maybe that is what that multi million dollar payoff to Hunter Biden by the wife of the Mayor of Moscow was all about. You think?
The Clintons sold out the US with that Russian uranium deal.