Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There is no absolute right to own your weapon of choiceWhy would legitimate drivers object to training, licensing and insuranceWhy would legitimate gun owners object to gun safety training and preventing the mentally ill, domestic violence perpetrators, severe depression or anger issues from having guns?
Why would legitimate black voters have objected to literacy tests and poll taxes back in the late 19th to early 20th centuries?
There is no right to drive on public roads.
Driving is a privilege granted by the state and that privilege can be revoked at any time for any reason
There is no absolute right to own your weapon of choiceWhy would legitimate drivers object to training, licensing and insuranceWhy would legitimate gun owners object to gun safety training and preventing the mentally ill, domestic violence perpetrators, severe depression or anger issues from having guns?
Why would legitimate black voters have objected to literacy tests and poll taxes back in the late 19th to early 20th centuries?
There is no right to drive on public roads.
Driving is a privilege granted by the state and that privilege can be revoked at any time for any reason
Nobody wants to confiscate 350 million guns
We just want sensible gun legislation. Legislation supported by most Americans
It matters in terms of what weapons we want to allow in the general population.There is no absolute right to own your weapon of choiceWhy would legitimate drivers object to training, licensing and insuranceWhy would legitimate gun owners object to gun safety training and preventing the mentally ill, domestic violence perpetrators, severe depression or anger issues from having guns?
Why would legitimate black voters have objected to literacy tests and poll taxes back in the late 19th to early 20th centuries?
There is no right to drive on public roads.
Driving is a privilege granted by the state and that privilege can be revoked at any time for any reason
We are speaking of a category of weapons here not ALL weapons
What does it matter what firearm I own as long as I obey all the laws regarding the use of that firearm?
We already have hundreds if not thousands of laws on the books that very specifically outline what the legal uses of firearms are. Maybe we should enforce those laws.
It matters in terms of what weapons we want to allow in the general population.There is no absolute right to own your weapon of choiceWhy would legitimate drivers object to training, licensing and insuranceWhy would legitimate black voters have objected to literacy tests and poll taxes back in the late 19th to early 20th centuries?
There is no right to drive on public roads.
Driving is a privilege granted by the state and that privilege can be revoked at any time for any reason
We are speaking of a category of weapons here not ALL weapons
What does it matter what firearm I own as long as I obey all the laws regarding the use of that firearm?
We already have hundreds if not thousands of laws on the books that very specifically outline what the legal uses of firearms are. Maybe we should enforce those laws.
You can’t have a machine gun, RPG or Stinger missile
OKNobody wants to confiscate 350 million guns
We just want sensible gun legislation. Legislation supported by most Americans
Tell me which of our federal gun laws are not common sense?
We have a very specific list of who can and cannot possess a firearm
We have very specific laws both federal and state that outline what the legal uses of firearms are
It doesn't matter what firearm a person owns as long as he follows the laws already on the books
You know those laws that we do not enforce
OKNobody wants to confiscate 350 million guns
We just want sensible gun legislation. Legislation supported by most Americans
Tell me which of our federal gun laws are not common sense?
We have a very specific list of who can and cannot possess a firearm
We have very specific laws both federal and state that outline what the legal uses of firearms are
It doesn't matter what firearm a person owns as long as he follows the laws already on the books
You know those laws that we do not enforce
1. Background checks on ALL transactions are common sense
2. Not allowing 50 round magazines are common sense
3. Being able to trace each weapon and where it came from is common sense
4. Requiring safety training is common sense
OKNobody wants to confiscate 350 million guns
We just want sensible gun legislation. Legislation supported by most Americans
Tell me which of our federal gun laws are not common sense?
We have a very specific list of who can and cannot possess a firearm
We have very specific laws both federal and state that outline what the legal uses of firearms are
It doesn't matter what firearm a person owns as long as he follows the laws already on the books
You know those laws that we do not enforce
1. Background checks on ALL transactions are common sense
2. Not allowing 50 round magazines are common sense
3. Being able to trace each weapon and where it came from is common sense
4. Requiring safety training is common sense
What does it matter what size magazine a person has?
All that matter is the person obeys the laws that regulate the legal use of firearms.
It doesn't matter what type of gun a person owns all that matters is if he uses it in a legal manner.
If we enforce the laws we have regarding who can legally possess a firearm we will be leaps and bounds better off
But we don't enforce those laws.
OKNobody wants to confiscate 350 million guns
We just want sensible gun legislation. Legislation supported by most Americans
Tell me which of our federal gun laws are not common sense?
We have a very specific list of who can and cannot possess a firearm
We have very specific laws both federal and state that outline what the legal uses of firearms are
It doesn't matter what firearm a person owns as long as he follows the laws already on the books
You know those laws that we do not enforce
1. Background checks on ALL transactions are common sense
2. Not allowing 50 round magazines are common sense
3. Being able to trace each weapon and where it came from is common sense
4. Requiring safety training is common sense
What does it matter what size magazine a person has?
All that matter is the person obeys the laws that regulate the legal use of firearms.
It doesn't matter what type of gun a person owns all that matters is if he uses it in a legal manner.
If we enforce the laws we have regarding who can legally possess a firearm we will be leaps and bounds better off
But we don't enforce those laws.
OKNobody wants to confiscate 350 million guns
We just want sensible gun legislation. Legislation supported by most Americans
Tell me which of our federal gun laws are not common sense?
We have a very specific list of who can and cannot possess a firearm
We have very specific laws both federal and state that outline what the legal uses of firearms are
It doesn't matter what firearm a person owns as long as he follows the laws already on the books
You know those laws that we do not enforce
1. Background checks on ALL transactions are common sense
2. Not allowing 50 round magazines are common sense
3. Being able to trace each weapon and where it came from is common sense
4. Requiring safety training is common sense
What does it matter what size magazine a person has?
All that matter is the person obeys the laws that regulate the legal use of firearms.
It doesn't matter what type of gun a person owns all that matters is if he uses it in a legal manner.
If we enforce the laws we have regarding who can legally possess a firearm we will be leaps and bounds better off
But we don't enforce those laws.
Why do we want to make life easier for mass killers and terrorists?
You don’t need a Stinger Missile and you don’t need a 50 round magazine
OKNobody wants to confiscate 350 million guns
We just want sensible gun legislation. Legislation supported by most Americans
Tell me which of our federal gun laws are not common sense?
We have a very specific list of who can and cannot possess a firearm
We have very specific laws both federal and state that outline what the legal uses of firearms are
It doesn't matter what firearm a person owns as long as he follows the laws already on the books
You know those laws that we do not enforce
1. Background checks on ALL transactions are common sense
2. Not allowing 50 round magazines are common sense
3. Being able to trace each weapon and where it came from is common sense
4. Requiring safety training is common sense
What does it matter what size magazine a person has?
All that matter is the person obeys the laws that regulate the legal use of firearms.
It doesn't matter what type of gun a person owns all that matters is if he uses it in a legal manner.
If we enforce the laws we have regarding who can legally possess a firearm we will be leaps and bounds better off
But we don't enforce those laws.
Why do we want to make life easier for mass killers and terrorists?
You don’t need a Stinger Missile and you don’t need a 50 round magazine
For public safetyOKNobody wants to confiscate 350 million guns
We just want sensible gun legislation. Legislation supported by most Americans
Tell me which of our federal gun laws are not common sense?
We have a very specific list of who can and cannot possess a firearm
We have very specific laws both federal and state that outline what the legal uses of firearms are
It doesn't matter what firearm a person owns as long as he follows the laws already on the books
You know those laws that we do not enforce
1. Background checks on ALL transactions are common sense
2. Not allowing 50 round magazines are common sense
3. Being able to trace each weapon and where it came from is common sense
4. Requiring safety training is common sense
What does it matter what size magazine a person has?
All that matter is the person obeys the laws that regulate the legal use of firearms.
It doesn't matter what type of gun a person owns all that matters is if he uses it in a legal manner.
If we enforce the laws we have regarding who can legally possess a firearm we will be leaps and bounds better off
But we don't enforce those laws.
Why do we want to make life easier for mass killers and terrorists?
You don’t need a Stinger Missile and you don’t need a 50 round magazine
Why do you want to curb rights of people who will never be a terrorist or a mass murderer?
You don't need a car that can go faster than the posted speed limit. Maybe we should put governors on all cars to make it harder for reckless drivers to kill people.
You don't need alcohol. Why make it easy for people to drive drunk?
For public safetyOKTell me which of our federal gun laws are not common sense?
We have a very specific list of who can and cannot possess a firearm
We have very specific laws both federal and state that outline what the legal uses of firearms are
It doesn't matter what firearm a person owns as long as he follows the laws already on the books
You know those laws that we do not enforce
1. Background checks on ALL transactions are common sense
2. Not allowing 50 round magazines are common sense
3. Being able to trace each weapon and where it came from is common sense
4. Requiring safety training is common sense
What does it matter what size magazine a person has?
All that matter is the person obeys the laws that regulate the legal use of firearms.
It doesn't matter what type of gun a person owns all that matters is if he uses it in a legal manner.
If we enforce the laws we have regarding who can legally possess a firearm we will be leaps and bounds better off
But we don't enforce those laws.
Why do we want to make life easier for mass killers and terrorists?
You don’t need a Stinger Missile and you don’t need a 50 round magazine
Why do you want to curb rights of people who will never be a terrorist or a mass murderer?
You don't need a car that can go faster than the posted speed limit. Maybe we should put governors on all cars to make it harder for reckless drivers to kill people.
You don't need alcohol. Why make it easy for people to drive drunk?
If you can’t go out and buy the weapon of destruction of your choice.....My thoughts and prayers are with you
So, are you complaining or admitting that "laws" don't work?we would have tougher laws
There is no absolute right to own your weapon of choice
Choice is the most basic of rights- fortunately the founders knew that and clearly stated, in the rules for gov't- shall not be infringedThere is no absolute right to own your weapon of choice
Yet, in 200 plus years, it has never been interpreted that wayThere is no absolute right to own your weapon of choice
Our Constitution, this nation's highest law, says that there is.
Choice is the most basic of rights- fortunately the founders knew that and clearly stated, in the rules for gov't- shall not be infringedThere is no absolute right to own your weapon of choice
to encroach upon in a way that violates law or the rights of another
Definition of INFRINGE
