For the last time, I'm gonna try to educate the left on GUNS; Can't take ignorance any longer.

The gun nuts have decided that the background check loopholes are the most important element of gun rights in this country.

Why is that?
 
A 223 bullet for an M-16 or AR-15 are smaller for two reasons.
1. The ability to carry more ammo into combat.
2. Long range hiking means less weight..
The bullet when fired, hits the target and rolls through the body, causing more damage..

Ok. So you're saying a .223 bullet fired from an AR at 25 yards will do more damage to a human than a Glock .45 hollow point?? What about a .357 mag revolver hollow point???

This should be interesting.
25 yards, hell with an AR-15 I can plink your azz at 800-1000 meters, so I'd fuck you first..

How many people are being killed in America by an AR15 at 1000 meters?
I have not counted lately, but if it was me..there would be more..
 
A 223 bullet for an M-16 or AR-15 are smaller for two reasons.
1. The ability to carry more ammo into combat.
2. Long range hiking means less weight..
The bullet when fired, hits the target and rolls through the body, causing more damage..

Ok. So you're saying a .223 bullet fired from an AR at 25 yards will do more damage to a human than a Glock .45 hollow point?? What about a .357 mag revolver hollow point???

This should be interesting.

You obviously know that there is more to the discussion than just the caliber of said round.

Then say them....what are they?

A 30 round Glock with large caliber hollow points
A 30 round AR with small caliber FMJs.

Inside a standard building.

Which is deadlier?
 
A 223 bullet for an M-16 or AR-15 are smaller for two reasons.
1. The ability to carry more ammo into combat.
2. Long range hiking means less weight..
The bullet when fired, hits the target and rolls through the body, causing more damage..

Ok. So you're saying a .223 bullet fired from an AR at 25 yards will do more damage to a human than a Glock .45 hollow point?? What about a .357 mag revolver hollow point???

This should be interesting.
25 yards, hell with an AR-15 I can plink your azz at 800-1000 meters, so I'd fuck you first..

How many people are being killed in America by an AR15 at 1000 meters?
I have not counted lately, but if it was me..there would be more..

The answer is none.
 
Gun control assholes want to take away the rights of law abiding gun owners. The question is why?

Alcohol kills more people than guns but they are not proposing to ban alcohol. Drugs kill thousands but the left wants to legalize drugs. Illegals kill over 3,000 Americans each year yet the left defends illegals pouring into our country.

So why the lefts obsession about banning guns hmmm? I suspect its because they know it pisses off conservatives and there's not much more to it than that. That's just how petty and low the left are.
 
A 223 bullet for an M-16 or AR-15 are smaller for two reasons.
1. The ability to carry more ammo into combat.
2. Long range hiking means less weight..
The bullet when fired, hits the target and rolls through the body, causing more damage..

Ok. So you're saying a .223 bullet fired from an AR at 25 yards will do more damage to a human than a Glock .45 hollow point?? What about a .357 mag revolver hollow point???

This should be interesting.
25 yards, hell with an AR-15 I can plink your azz at 800-1000 meters, so I'd fuck you first..

How many people are being killed in America by an AR15 at 1000 meters?
I have not counted lately, but if it was me..there would be more..

The answer is none.
I can't help that everyone is on close combat mode....
 
Get rid of all assault style weapons. Pretty simple concept really.
Australia confiscated 650,000 guns. Murders and suicides plummeted.


Did Australia have a Second Amendment? Oh....

Guess it's a more advanced society and people.

You bet. Direct descendants of criminals. Murders and suicides have not plummeted...at least that's not evidenced by that laughable article.

This is garbage, btw, that would be laughed out of any statistical classroom:

"However, the paper's findings about suicide were statistically significant — and astounding. Buying back 3,500 guns correlated with a 74 percent drop in firearm suicides. Non-gun suicides didn't increase to make up the decline."

Lolololol...no, the findings are not statistically significant at all. The CORRELATION means NOTHING the way it is presented here. And the author knows that. He counts on hysterical gun grabbers to gobble it up. And they do.
 
"For the last time, I'm gonna try to educate the left on GUNS; Can't take ignorance any longer."

lol

Moronic thread premise.

Liberals own guns, know all about guns, enjoy the shooting sports, and respect current Second Amendment jurisprudence.

Clearly the ignorance is on the right, as usual.
 
Moron journalist Tom Brokaw called for a ban on the "AR-14" today. MSNBC morons said 2nd amendment covers guns...not "weapons of war". I can't take it anymore. My final attempt to educate them.

Guns: An AR-15 shoots a TINY bullet...a .223. That bullet is HALF THE size of a standard cops pistol bullet...a .45. Plus....pistols have big hollow point bullets...far deadlier. In fact...so deadly...they aren't allowed in war. That's right....the hollow point pistol bullet is banned from wars by the 1899 Hague Convention treaty. The .223 bullet an AR shoots? Army and Marine troops complain that they aren't deadly enough in war. They created the 6.8 round to try to fix it....which the standard AR-15 doesn't shoot.

Guns: 30 round magazines for a .223 AR??? GUESS WHAT??? They make 30 round mags for Glocks...that shoot the far larger and far deadlier hollow point bullets. AR15s are almost all semi auto...not full auto. Almost none are full auto.

**A side note: A gunman with a rifle is also FAR EASIER to disarm than one with a pistol. Imagine trying to pry away a broom from a guy vs prying away a fork. The larger gun is by far easier to grab...control...and wrestle away.


2nd Amendment: Libs are now saying the Founders meant muskets....not "Weapons of War". Hey idiots....in 1776....muskets WERE WEAPONS OF WAR

View attachment 78100



I'll add more later. Can't overwhelm the ignorant brains reading this.


I would bet that you got some "sexual thrill" out of explaining to us your obvious LOVE of guns.....

Now go and explain the DIFFERENCE to the families of those 50 poor people killed by the same gun you seem to love......That should prove "comforting" to them....

I don't give a fuck if you label an AR-15 your personal dildo.....it is STILL a very, very lethal weapon that should not be in the hands of everybody....including the terrorists that YOU ARE AIDING in getting those guns readily.
 
"For the last time, I'm gonna try to educate the left on GUNS; Can't take ignorance any longer."

lol

Moronic thread premise.

Liberals own guns, know all about guns, enjoy the shooting sports, and respect current Second Amendment jurisprudence.

Clearly the ignorance is on the right, as usual.
You'll never convince a grade school dropout, that liberals and leftist own weapons..It just eludes them by virtue of droolability..
 
Gun control assholes want to take away the rights of law abiding gun owners. The question is why?

Alcohol kills more people than guns but they are not proposing to ban alcohol. Drugs kill thousands but the left wants to legalize drugs. Illegals kill over 3,000 Americans each year yet the left defends illegals pouring into our country.

So why the lefts obsession about banning guns hmmm? I suspect its because they know it pisses off conservatives and there's not much more to it than that. That's just how petty and low the left are.

Alcohol has all kinds of regulations. And high proofs are banned .

What is the purpose of an AR ? Oh enlightend one!!
 
Get rid of all assault style weapons. Pretty simple concept really.
Australia confiscated 650,000 guns. Murders and suicides plummeted.


Did Australia have a Second Amendment? Oh....

Guess it's a more advanced society and people.

You bet. Direct descendants of criminals. Murders and suicides have not plummeted...at least that's not evidenced by that laughable article.

This is garbage, btw, that would be laughed out of any statistical classroom:

"However, the paper's findings about suicide were statistically significant — and astounding. Buying back 3,500 guns correlated with a 74 percent drop in firearm suicides. Non-gun suicides didn't increase to make up the decline."

Lolololol...no, the findings are not statistically significant at all. The CORRELATION means NOTHING the way it is presented here. And the author knows that. He counts on hysterical gun grabbers to gobble it up. And they do.

Own and permitted to carry, so I'm not sure what to do with your labeling criteria other than to write it off as myopic partisanshit. But you as an expert? Nah, you're too emotional about this. As for how a society began? Slavers and genocidal land grabbers ain't a lot better in my mind. I'm sure you disagree. But yes, the Australians seem much more coherent when it comes to dealing with guns than americans can manage to be. Pretty obvious to even the most casual of observers.
 
Gun control assholes want to take away the rights of law abiding gun owners. The question is why?

Alcohol kills more people than guns but they are not proposing to ban alcohol. Drugs kill thousands but the left wants to legalize drugs. Illegals kill over 3,000 Americans each year yet the left defends illegals pouring into our country.

So why the lefts obsession about banning guns hmmm? I suspect its because they know it pisses off conservatives and there's not much more to it than that. That's just how petty and low the left are.

Alcohol has all kinds of regulations. And high proofs are banned .

What is the purpose of an AR ? Oh enlightend one!!

Murder. War.
 
I don't give a fuck if you label an AR-15 your personal dildo.....it is STILL a very, very lethal weapon that should not be in the hands of everybody....including the terrorists that YOU ARE AIDING in getting those guns readily





Makes you wonder why millions of AR15s have been sold? Not very lethal, aren't for assault purposes, much better guns out there to kill with.

So why do the gun nutters buy so many of them a person might ask.

Must be millions of varmit hunters out there. I am surprised there are any varmints left.

So it must be that the gun nutters love the AR cause it's scary looking. You can dress it up in all the finery a real assault rifle would have and prance around in the woods and play army with a scary looking weapon.

Is that the reason nutters love the AR15?

Though that little .223 round killed effectively in the night club.
 

Forum List

Back
Top