For the last time, I'm gonna try to educate the left on GUNS; Can't take ignorance any longer.

[P@triot]

Why? How about we eliminate all internet communications so that we don't have to hear the anti-constitutional views of assholes like you?

You have a right to arms, not any fucking arms ever made. Like, you're not allowed rocket launchers, tank cannons, nukes... So your 2nd Amendment right has never been absolute. You knew that, right?

No, we have a right to every weapon ever made, provided we can maintain it. If I want a rocket launcher, I can have one.

And I will have one, if I want one. Your stupid piddly ass bed wetter gun grabber laws are irrelevant.

So you're saying that anyone in the US can own a nuke? Umm... No.

Yes jack-ass. Yes they can. That very immature and nonsensical libtard response has been well covered. Legally, anyone can own a nuke. Why don't you grow up or go join a juvenile bed-wetter board so that the grown ups can speak here?

The US is trying to stop COUNTRIES from getting nukes, you really think they're just going to let anyone in the US buy one and take it home?

Of course oppressive libtards aren't going to let people own nukes. That doesn't mean we don't have a Constitutional right to own them dumb-ass. You're a very special kind of stupid, aren't you? Then again, what else should we expect from you - being that you've never read the U.S. Constitution.

Tell me something really quick here junior - what company in the U.S. sells nuclear weapons? Where can I buy one?

 

[Siete]

Moron journalist Tom Brokaw called for a ban on the "AR-14" today. MSNBC morons said 2nd amendment covers guns...not "weapons of war". I can't take it anymore. My final attempt to educate them.

Guns: An AR-15 shoots a TINY bullet...a .223. That bullet is HALF THE size of a standard cops pistol bullet...a .45. Plus....pistols have big hollow point bullets...far deadlier. In fact...so deadly...they aren't allowed in war. That's right....the hollow point pistol bullet is banned from wars by the 1899 Hague Convention treaty. The .223 bullet an AR shoots? Army and Marine troops complain that they aren't deadly enough in war. They created the 6.8 round to try to fix it....which the standard AR-15 doesn't shoot.

Guns: 30 round magazines for a .223 AR??? GUESS WHAT??? They make 30 round mags for Glocks...that shoot the far larger and far deadlier hollow point bullets. AR15s are almost all semi auto...not full auto. Almost none are full auto.

**A side note: A gunman with a rifle is also FAR EASIER to disarm than one with a pistol. Imagine trying to pry away a broom from a guy vs prying away a fork. The larger gun is by far easier to grab...control...and wrestle away.


2nd Amendment: Libs are now saying the Founders meant muskets....not "Weapons of War". Hey idiots....in 1776....muskets WERE WEAPONS OF WAR

View attachment 78100



I'll add more later. Can't overwhelm the ignorant brains reading this.

this is your head ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ....................... this is your head after a .223 hits it ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^


any questions from IDIOTS?

I can hit with a 30.06 at twice the range of the AR...yet liberals are fine with that particular rifle.

and I have a .270 that will out distance a 30.06 ... so what?

.223's are nasty little bastards at closer ranges ... why do you suppose our military carry them?

And what exactly makes you think you can hit further with the .270? Keep in mind I have one of those as well.

any ballistic chart you can find shows a .270 will out distance an .06, given the same load.

sniper rifles are .308 ... they will reach out and hit hard.

 

[Moonglow]

You have a right to arms, not any fucking arms ever made. Like, you're not allowed rocket launchers, tank cannons, nukes... So your 2nd Amendment right has never been absolute. You knew that, right?

No, we have a right to every weapon ever made, provided we can maintain it. If I want a rocket launcher, I can have one.

And I will have one, if I want one. Your stupid piddly ass bed wetter gun grabber laws are irrelevant.

So you're saying that anyone in the US can own a nuke? Umm... No.

Yes jack-ass. Yes they can. That very immature and nonsensical libtard response has been well covered. Legally, anyone can own a nuke. Why don't you grow up or go join a juvenile bed-wetter board so that the grown ups can speak here?

The US is trying to stop COUNTRIES from getting nukes, you really think they're just going to let anyone in the US buy one and take it home?

Of course oppressive libtards aren't going to let people own nukes. That doesn't mean we don't have a Constitutional right to own them dumb-ass. You're a very special kind of stupid, aren't you? Then again, what else should we expect from you - being that you've never read the U.S. Constitution.

Tell me something really quick here junior - what company in the U.S. sells nuclear weapons? Where can I buy one?

Make your own, dip shit..

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

My favorite liberal moron moment regarding firearms.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Moron journalist Tom Brokaw called for a ban on the "AR-14" today. MSNBC morons said 2nd amendment covers guns...not "weapons of war". I can't take it anymore. My final attempt to educate them.

Guns: An AR-15 shoots a TINY bullet...a .223. That bullet is HALF THE size of a standard cops pistol bullet...a .45. Plus....pistols have big hollow point bullets...far deadlier. In fact...so deadly...they aren't allowed in war. That's right....the hollow point pistol bullet is banned from wars by the 1899 Hague Convention treaty. The .223 bullet an AR shoots? Army and Marine troops complain that they aren't deadly enough in war. They created the 6.8 round to try to fix it....which the standard AR-15 doesn't shoot.

Guns: 30 round magazines for a .223 AR??? GUESS WHAT??? They make 30 round mags for Glocks...that shoot the far larger and far deadlier hollow point bullets. AR15s are almost all semi auto...not full auto. Almost none are full auto.

**A side note: A gunman with a rifle is also FAR EASIER to disarm than one with a pistol. Imagine trying to pry away a broom from a guy vs prying away a fork. The larger gun is by far easier to grab...control...and wrestle away.


2nd Amendment: Libs are now saying the Founders meant muskets....not "Weapons of War". Hey idiots....in 1776....muskets WERE WEAPONS OF WAR

View attachment 78100



I'll add more later. Can't overwhelm the ignorant brains reading this.

this is your head ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ....................... this is your head after a .223 hits it ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^


any questions from IDIOTS?

I can hit with a 30.06 at twice the range of the AR...yet liberals are fine with that particular rifle.

and I have a .270 that will out distance a 30.06 ... so what?

.223's are nasty little bastards at closer ranges ... why do you suppose our military carry them?

And what exactly makes you think you can hit further with the .270? Keep in mind I have one of those as well.

any ballistic chart you can find shows a .270 will out distance an .06, given the same load.

sniper rifles are .308 ... they will reach out and hit hard.

Use a lower grain slug in the 30.06....problem solved.

 

[P@triot]

No, we have a right to every weapon ever made, provided we can maintain it. If I want a rocket launcher, I can have one.

And I will have one, if I want one. Your stupid piddly ass bed wetter gun grabber laws are irrelevant.

So you're saying that anyone in the US can own a nuke? Umm... No.

Yes jack-ass. Yes they can. That very immature and nonsensical libtard response has been well covered. Legally, anyone can own a nuke. Why don't you grow up or go join a juvenile bed-wetter board so that the grown ups can speak here?

The US is trying to stop COUNTRIES from getting nukes, you really think they're just going to let anyone in the US buy one and take it home?

Of course oppressive libtards aren't going to let people own nukes. That doesn't mean we don't have a Constitutional right to own them dumb-ass. You're a very special kind of stupid, aren't you? Then again, what else should we expect from you - being that you've never read the U.S. Constitution.

Tell me something really quick here junior - what company in the U.S. sells nuclear weapons? Where can I buy one?

Make your own, dip shit..

Nope. Not mine. My company doesn't sell nuclear weapons. For the record - my company doesn't sell any weapons. Would you like to try again junior?

 

[Moonglow]

So you're saying that anyone in the US can own a nuke? Umm... No.

Yes jack-ass. Yes they can. That very immature and nonsensical libtard response has been well covered. Legally, anyone can own a nuke. Why don't you grow up or go join a juvenile bed-wetter board so that the grown ups can speak here?

The US is trying to stop COUNTRIES from getting nukes, you really think they're just going to let anyone in the US buy one and take it home?

Of course oppressive libtards aren't going to let people own nukes. That doesn't mean we don't have a Constitutional right to own them dumb-ass. You're a very special kind of stupid, aren't you? Then again, what else should we expect from you - being that you've never read the U.S. Constitution.

Tell me something really quick here junior - what company in the U.S. sells nuclear weapons? Where can I buy one?

Make your own, dip shit..

Nope. Not mine. My company doesn't sell nuclear weapons. For the record - my company doesn't sell any weapons. Would you like to try again junior?

No, really, you can make one yerself....All you need is uranium-235..A naturally occurring element..

 

[nat4900]

WE WILL NOT BE DEPRIVED - WE WILL NOT BE DISARMED

THE MOTHERFUCKERS WILL NOT TELL ME WHICH FIREARM I CAN CARRY

Shove one of those guns you own into one of your orifices. LOL....

 

[Siete]

this is your head ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ....................... this is your head after a .223 hits it ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^


any questions from IDIOTS?

I can hit with a 30.06 at twice the range of the AR...yet liberals are fine with that particular rifle.

and I have a .270 that will out distance a 30.06 ... so what?

.223's are nasty little bastards at closer ranges ... why do you suppose our military carry them?

And what exactly makes you think you can hit further with the .270? Keep in mind I have one of those as well.

any ballistic chart you can find shows a .270 will out distance an .06, given the same load.

sniper rifles are .308 ... they will reach out and hit hard.

Use a lower grain slug in the 30.06....problem solved.

ok, apples to oranges, you made your point .....you don't have a point.

 

[Contumacious]

No, we have a right to every weapon ever made, provided we can maintain it. If I want a rocket launcher, I can have one.

And I will have one, if I want one. Your stupid piddly ass bed wetter gun grabber laws are irrelevant.

So you're saying that anyone in the US can own a nuke? Umm... No.

Yes jack-ass. Yes they can. That very immature and nonsensical libtard response has been well covered. Legally, anyone can own a nuke. Why don't you grow up or go join a juvenile bed-wetter board so that the grown ups can speak here?

The US is trying to stop COUNTRIES from getting nukes, you really think they're just going to let anyone in the US buy one and take it home?

Of course oppressive libtards aren't going to let people own nukes. That doesn't mean we don't have a Constitutional right to own them dumb-ass. You're a very special kind of stupid, aren't you? Then again, what else should we expect from you - being that you've never read the U.S. Constitution.

Tell me something really quick here junior - what company in the U.S. sells nuclear weapons? Where can I buy one?

Make your own, dip shit..

Nuclear weapons are NOT defensive - they kill a lot of innocent bystanders. WHY do you approve of the federal government having them?

 

[Moonglow]

So you're saying that anyone in the US can own a nuke? Umm... No.

Yes jack-ass. Yes they can. That very immature and nonsensical libtard response has been well covered. Legally, anyone can own a nuke. Why don't you grow up or go join a juvenile bed-wetter board so that the grown ups can speak here?

The US is trying to stop COUNTRIES from getting nukes, you really think they're just going to let anyone in the US buy one and take it home?

Of course oppressive libtards aren't going to let people own nukes. That doesn't mean we don't have a Constitutional right to own them dumb-ass. You're a very special kind of stupid, aren't you? Then again, what else should we expect from you - being that you've never read the U.S. Constitution.

Tell me something really quick here junior - what company in the U.S. sells nuclear weapons? Where can I buy one?

Make your own, dip shit..

Nuclear weapons are NOT defensive - they kill a lot of innocent bystanders. WHY do you approve of the federal government having them?

Well I guess we might need one or two to commit suicide..

 

[Contumacious]

WE WILL NOT BE DEPRIVED - WE WILL NOT BE DISARMED

THE MOTHERFUCKERS WILL NOT TELL ME WHICH FIREARM I CAN CARRY

Shove one of those guns you own into one of your orifices. LOL....

Ooooooops, I touched a nerve.



We can buy the AR-15 from these vendors

1. BCM
2. Noveske
3. Knight’s Armament
4. Lewis Machine & Tool
5. Daniel Defense
6. LWRC
7. Colt
8. H&K
9. Midwest Industries
10. Barrett

Or if push come to shove

da' blackmarket


WE WILL NOT BE DEPRIVED - WE WILL NOT BE DISARMED

THE MOTHERFUCKERS WILL NOT TELL ME WHICH FIREARM I CAN CARRY

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Moron journalist Tom Brokaw called for a ban on the "AR-14" today. MSNBC morons said 2nd amendment covers guns...not "weapons of war". I can't take it anymore. My final attempt to educate them.

Guns: An AR-15 shoots a TINY bullet...a .223. That bullet is HALF THE size of a standard cops pistol bullet...a .45. Plus....pistols have big hollow point bullets...far deadlier. In fact...so deadly...they aren't allowed in war. That's right....the hollow point pistol bullet is banned from wars by the 1899 Hague Convention treaty. The .223 bullet an AR shoots? Army and Marine troops complain that they aren't deadly enough in war. They created the 6.8 round to try to fix it....which the standard AR-15 doesn't shoot.

Guns: 30 round magazines for a .223 AR??? GUESS WHAT??? They make 30 round mags for Glocks...that shoot the far larger and far deadlier hollow point bullets. AR15s are almost all semi auto...not full auto. Almost none are full auto.

**A side note: A gunman with a rifle is also FAR EASIER to disarm than one with a pistol. Imagine trying to pry away a broom from a guy vs prying away a fork. The larger gun is by far easier to grab...control...and wrestle away.


2nd Amendment: Libs are now saying the Founders meant muskets....not "Weapons of War". Hey idiots....in 1776....muskets WERE WEAPONS OF WAR

View attachment 78100



I'll add more later. Can't overwhelm the ignorant brains reading this.

this is your head ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ....................... this is your head after a .223 hits it ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^


any questions from IDIOTS?

I can hit with a 30.06 at twice the range of the AR...yet liberals are fine with that particular rifle.

and I have a .270 that will out distance a 30.06 ... so what?

.223's are nasty little bastards at closer ranges ... why do you suppose our military carry them?

And what exactly makes you think you can hit further with the .270? Keep in mind I have one of those as well.

any ballistic chart you can find shows a .270 will out distance an .06, given the same load.

sniper rifles are .308 ... they will reach out and hit hard.

The 30.06 is actually more powerful and both shoot essentially the same slug.
And you can load a wider variety of slugs in the 30.06

 

[P@triot]

My favorite liberal moron moment regarding firearms.

WE WILL NOT BE DEPRIVED - WE WILL NOT BE DISARMED

THE MOTHERFUCKERS WILL NOT TELL ME WHICH FIREARM I CAN CARRY

Shove one of those guns you own into one of your orifices. LOL....

Leave it to an uneducated libtard to immediately talk about deviant sexual behavior. Everything immediately goes to turning any object or topic into some deviant sexual behavior. Every one of you sick bastards need to be permanently restrained in a behavioral health wing.

 

[Fair&Balanced]

Moron journalist Tom Brokaw called for a ban on the "AR-14" today. MSNBC morons said 2nd amendment covers guns...not "weapons of war". I can't take it anymore. My final attempt to educate them.

Guns: An AR-15 shoots a TINY bullet...a .223. That bullet is HALF THE size of a standard cops pistol bullet...a .45. Plus....pistols have big hollow point bullets...far deadlier. In fact...so deadly...they aren't allowed in war. That's right....the hollow point pistol bullet is banned from wars by the 1899 Hague Convention treaty. The .223 bullet an AR shoots? Army and Marine troops complain that they aren't deadly enough in war. They created the 6.8 round to try to fix it....which the standard AR-15 doesn't shoot.

Guns: 30 round magazines for a .223 AR??? GUESS WHAT??? They make 30 round mags for Glocks...that shoot the far larger and far deadlier hollow point bullets. AR15s are almost all semi auto...not full auto. Almost none are full auto.

**A side note: A gunman with a rifle is also FAR EASIER to disarm than one with a pistol. Imagine trying to pry away a broom from a guy vs prying away a fork. The larger gun is by far easier to grab...control...and wrestle away.


2nd Amendment: Libs are now saying the Founders meant muskets....not "Weapons of War". Hey idiots....in 1776....muskets WERE WEAPONS OF WAR

View attachment 78100



I'll add more later. Can't overwhelm the ignorant brains reading this.

this is your head ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ....................... this is your head after a .223 hits it ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^


any questions from IDIOTS?

I can hit with a 30.06 at twice the range of the AR...yet liberals are fine with that particular rifle.

and I have a .270 that will out distance a 30.06 ... so what?

.223's are nasty little bastards at closer ranges ... why do you suppose our military carry them?

And what exactly makes you think you can hit further with the .270? Keep in mind I have one of those as well.

any ballistic chart you can find shows a .270 will out distance an .06, given the same load.

sniper rifles are .308 ... they will reach out and hit hard.

a 30.06 will not outdistance a .223 in terms of effective range. They are each around 500 yards. Obviously the .223 will require much more adjustment at that range but only has about 25% less velocity and barely any difference in energy at maximum range.

The .270 on the other hand has the same effective range, but is another league entirely compared to either in terms of energy and velocity. Having nearly double the velocity and FOUR times the energy of the 30.06.

The .270 is also superior to the standard 7.62 NATO round .

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

I can hit with a 30.06 at twice the range of the AR...yet liberals are fine with that particular rifle.

and I have a .270 that will out distance a 30.06 ... so what?

.223's are nasty little bastards at closer ranges ... why do you suppose our military carry them?

And what exactly makes you think you can hit further with the .270? Keep in mind I have one of those as well.

any ballistic chart you can find shows a .270 will out distance an .06, given the same load.

sniper rifles are .308 ... they will reach out and hit hard.

Use a lower grain slug in the 30.06....problem solved.

ok, apples to oranges, you made your point .....you don't have a point.

So why would you want to ban a rifle that is less deadly?

 

[P@triot]

My favorite liberal moron moment regarding firearms.

Oh man....that is astounding stupidity. Even by normal Dumbocrat standards. Seriously - it's no wonder these people desire socialism. They couldn't survive without conservatives being forced to care for them.

 

[Fair&Balanced]

My favorite liberal moron moment regarding firearms.

Oh man....that is astounding stupidity. Even by normal Dumbocrat standards. Seriously - it's no wonder these people desire socialism. They couldn't survive without conservatives being forced to care for them.

That's almost as stupid as that negro who was afraid to vote yes to putting more troops in Guam b/c he was afraid the island would tip over unbelievable that he actually got elected.

 

[kaz]

That is one of the most retarded analogies I've ever seen. So by your logic, if you think cars should be legal, you are guilty of bank robbery as well.

Check out whatever you have left of a conscience....since you're probably also an evangelical christian. You are COMPLICIT to the crime in advocating that EVERYONE should have that type of weapon.

Doubling down on stupidity I see. So if I think they should be legal, I think "EVERYONE" should have that weapon. So you think everything should be illegal unless you think everyone should have one. What a retard you are.

As for "evangelical" Christian, I'm so not evangelical that I stopped calling myself a Christian because Christians keep telling me I'm not one at all. I believe in the teachings of the bible, but I don't believe in any of the dogma. I don't even think it matters whether Jesus was the son of God or physically walked on the earth. I do believe in what he said. Most of my disagreements with the religion of Christianity center around things Jesus never actually said.

You sure are wrong a lot. Explains your test scores, doesn't it?

 

[Mudda]

Nuclear weapons are NOT defensive - they kill a lot of innocent bystanders. WHY do you approve of the federal government having them?

You can't have a well regulated militia without nukes!