Aldo Raine
Gold Member
- Aug 8, 2017
- 12,682
- 3,899
was he?
You know, FOR A FACT, he wasn't being audited?
Yup, he sure wasn't even when by law a sitting president and vice-president are supposed to be.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
was he?
You know, FOR A FACT, he wasn't being audited?
liar. That is not in the IRS policy manual. Violating the 4th Amendment is not IRS policy. Only a douchebag would claim otherwise.
We do know trump has been losing money for years...or so he claims. We will know more when they are released to the public. The Insurrectionist is politically finished. He is so desperate...he is selling badly photoshopped trading cards.Admit it Demtards, after years of pissing yourself demanding Trump's tax returns you got them and you found NOTHING. Poor Dems another swing and a miss for the intolerant Dem Nazis.
Check thee 4th Amendment, dumbfuck.There are no constitutional guarantees of privacy for tax returns.
Remember, you don't know what you're talking about.
Check thee 4th Amendment, dumbfuck.
Remember: everything you post is a lie.
What's the source of that quote? The author is dead wrong.The tax returns are in the possession of the treasury. Eliminating any 4th amendment application....as the government isn't searching Trump, they're searching their own records. The courts have been explicit on the matter:
"When an inquiry uncovers information worthy of legislation, that information often comes to light. This is particularly true with regard to tax returns. There is no constitutional guarantee to the privacy of tax returns. Rather, the privacy of tax returns is a creature of statute, the same statute that authorizes the Chairman to request this information. See 26 U.S.C. § 6103."
Again, you don't have the slightest clue what you're talking about. And your agressive ignorance doesn't have the slightest relevance to any legal outcome.
What's the source of that quote? The author is dead wrong.
Of course he was lying.
Of course he was lying.
Poopeypants hundreds of millions are nowhere to be found on any tax return doofus.Biden released his returns as every president has...except Nixon and trump...the two criminals.
post a link to it. Even if that's what it is, that doesn't prove your right. The SC is wrong all the time.That would be the appellant court ruling that authorized the Ways and Means committee access to Trump's documents.
And upheld by unanimous vote by the Supreme Court.
Laughing....but they're all wrong because you say so? That's adorable.
You prefer the centerfolds to the trading cards though, right jimboliar?We do know trump has been losing money for years...or so he claims. We will know more when they are released to the public. The Insurrectionist is politically finished. He is so desperate...he is selling badly photoshopped trading cards.
Listen to the doofus who believes Hunter's laptop is disinformation.Did he shoot someone on Fifth Avenue? No? They don't give a shit.
The crap is just pouring out now. We'll see how many of them keep bending over for this.
Imagine how weak a person has to be to do that.
post a link to it. Even if that's what it is, that doesn't prove your right. The SC is wrong all the time.
Aw, now you have to make stuff up again, trying to put me on the defensive. Ha ha.Listen to the doofus who believes Hunter's laptop is disinformation.
That's none of your damn business you lowlife scumbag slimes. Then there's the 10,000 posts you filth posted that as much as claimed Trump was hiding criminal tax issues. Democrats are truly the lowest form of human filth on the planet.We do know trump has been losing money for years...or so he claims. We will know more when they are released to the public. The Insurrectionist is politically finished. He is so desperate...he is selling badly photoshopped trading cards.
So you're saying the laptop is genuine?Aw, now you have to make stuff up again, trying to put me on the defensive. Ha ha.
You've been conned. Just like we've been saying. But you're too weak to face it.
Tough shit.
Aw, you're still trying. Instead of trying to weakly change the subject, start a thread and I'll provide examples of what I've said. Like this:So you're saying the laptop is genuine?
This really is pretty simple:
Whether it's the orange cult or Hillary or Hunter or anyone else. Period. No exceptions. Party affiliation irrelevant.
- If you suspect something, investigate
- If you find something, prosecute
- If they're found guilty, nail 'em
- If someone helped them, including family, nail them too.
- If it's political, maybe nail 'em a bit more
How have we gotten to a point at which we can't even agree on THAT?