Forbes/Harris poll: Majority say verdict rigged...

This law has been applied in the past against those who were not presidential candidates.

Ultimately however you have a point that if Trump had never ran for president this probably would not have come up.

That is just the nature of the game.

Would Starr's whitewater investigation have happened if Bill hadn't been president?

Would Hunter Biden's tax crimes/gun been investigated by the house if Biden wasn't president?

Would Benghazi had been investigated 8 separate times if Hillary didn't run for president?

Are these focused investigations a bad thing? Technically yes but their is some good to be had by highly scrutinizing our political leaders.
Scrutinizing YES, Telling LIES to achieve political wins, NO.
 
Did you make a thread about other leaders crimes yet?

I don't remember commenting on other people's crimes. This thread is about Trump.

Make your own thread.

Can't wait.
He was convicted on intent to do the crime but didn't do it. Hillary did the crime, but Comey said he thought she didn't intend too. Trump had a kangaroo court.
 
I would rather lose an election because someone was held accountable for their crimes then win an election by putting someone above the law.

I'm pretty pragmatic about it. If America wants to elect a sexual assaulter, fraudster and convicted felon then we get the America we deserve.
The above the law shit is meaningless. DC is full of people above the law. Idiot.
 
Vote was rigged,
trial was rigged,
Jan 6 is a lie.
everything negative about Biden is True.
And nothing is true about Anything negative said about Trump.
IS THAT A TRUE AND CLEAR reality about WHAT MAGA BELEIVES??
Well you are consistent at being Scum.

Try selling your BS to your Hitler youth. They might believe you.
 
He was convicted on intent to do the crime but didn't do it.

No. He was convicted for falsifying business records.

The multiplier crimes that escalated it to a felony only require intent.

This has been covered as nauseam.

Hillary did the crime, but Comey said he thought she didn't intend too. Trump had a kangaroo court.
Hillary didn't do a crime because she wasn't convicted.

Remember; innocent until proven guilty?
 
I see your pragmatic'ism prevents you from even acknowledging the perversion of a man showering with his young daughter.

Greed, like Ole' Joe claiming he never had any involvement with his son's business dealings when those repeated lies were continuously debunked.

Greed, You mean like Biden using money from Dem / Socialist donors to pay his legal bills?
WE HAVE Actual problems with our government
and you are focused on & have questions about a ? mark 25 year old shower.
 
No. He was convicted for falsifying business records.

The multiplier crimes that escalated it to a felony only require intent.

This has been covered as nauseam.


Hillary didn't do a crime because she wasn't convicted.

Remember; innocent until proven guilty?
No, they got Trump on intent to falsely the records. Comey admitted that Hillary did the crime. But he didn't think intended too, so he didn't charge her. You don't believe in what you preach.
 
No, they got Trump on intent to falsely the records. Comey admitted that Hillary did the crime. But he didn't think intended too, so he didn't charge her. You don't believe in what you preach.
No. They got Trump on falsifying business records...the main crime. It wasn't based on intent.

The only intent were the three multiplier crimes which is in keeping with the law.

Yeah, intent matters for the main crime.

No offense but you really seem to be struggling with this.
 
Ok. Let’s be honest for a moment.

Each jurisdiction has its own laws. Hillary’s campaign headquarters were not in New York and paying New York taxes. Ok? So like the claims of self defense where shootings in other states are used as proof, what matters is the laws of the jurisdiction you are in.

Second. The question of voters going to Trump or not. Let’s continue being honest.

A third of the voters would vote Republican no matter who was on the ballot. They would eat a raw turd before they voted for a Democrat.

A third of the voters would vote Democrat exactly the same way. They would rather shave with broken glass than vote Republican.

The last third is who decides the elections. The moderates. They shift right and left based upon issues and candidates. They are the ones who decide things for us.

The two base groups are always going to vote for their party. Obama’s Base would never dream of voting for anyone else. Nothing else mattered. Just as with Trump’s base. They wouldn’t vote for a Democrat if Jesus was the candidate.

When it was Clinton they were called the Clintonistas. When it was Obama it was the Obamabots. Remember the people fainting just from being near Obama?

The question is always what will the moderates do?
Use to vote for the person I believed would work best for there state or country.
Now the negative possibility's are scary. The presidential election is way beyond a mess.
Trying to use reason instead of anger. The dishonesty is affecting my reasonability.
 
After a 55 page jury instruction from a corrupt judge. Try the facts.
Jury instructions? Lol.

You must be desperate indeed to be posting about the length of jury instructions.

What is the maximum length of jury instructions?

How many pages are jury instructions on average?
 
He's a guy who isn't afraid to say what needs to be said...and THAT inspires hatred and division.

Other than monetary policy, ie adding to the debt...please name one policy on which you disagree with Trump.
Sorry but much of what he says is devices,
Not said to unite the country, but to divide us into groups that are filled with anger.
 

Forum List

Back
Top