HappyJoy
Platinum Member
- Apr 15, 2015
- 32,056
- 5,943
She might support replacing tennis balls with live kittens, but she's cute so the right loves her. If she doesn't win, and she doesn't mind showing off her legs, she could always become a Fox Barbie.
And here is the beautiful sexism of the left...
Any woman on the right is just a dumb bimbo according to progressives that dream of Reno, Hillary and Warren...
Not sexism of the left, looks more like a critique that the OP seems to put her looks (judging from all the glam shots) over anything else. "Here are the pictures" because the original poster doesn't care about anything else.
Sure, let just admit the truth that you and Bully look down on her because she is not running as a Democrat.
I believe this was a thread where a wingnut put a politicians looks above all else. I'm not sure why you're veering into this lane.
Bully made it clear he consider her a bimbo only good enough for FOX news...
No, I believe he said she could have a career on FOX because they value looks over substance. It's FOX who uses sex to sell their propaganda, deal with them.
Yeah, FOX is the only one that uses attractive looking people to sell propaganda...
For cable news? Yeah, selling sex is their bread and butter.
CNN should be told that you consider their propaganda sellers to be ugly as can be...
Another lie. Why are you this pathetic?
I get it you hate a woman that is minority that left the plantation and is running for Congress on the GOP.
Guess what? You told a fib again. What a horrible human you are that you just can't have a normal debate without making shit up.
You and Bully consider her too pretty to be smart and should only be on FOX and Hags to make their audience drool...
No, the OP focused only on her looks. If there was more about her positions, experience and ability to bring people along with her based on her ideas then that would go a lot further.
But again why do you lie and make up shit so much?