🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Fox news analyst tells us he would impeach Trump

So tell the class, when the favor was completed? I know they got the aid, and if the favor was a requirement for the aid, you must have a date for us. RIGHT!!!!!!!!!!!!

.
A "favor" was never completed, because it turned into a bribe through extortion. Lol! Boss, you showed up late to this game. All these things have been proven with no counter arguments from Nunes and his corrupt committee members.


Wow, then it wasn't a requirement, was it? Perhaps you should stop throwing around words you obviously don't understand.

Also you obviously haven't seen the reporting on the minority report on the impeachment hoax, they put out 110 pages of counter arguments. But hey, feel free to keep being a lying commie, it's great entertainment.

.
Lol! Give it up boss. You have no real skills with cognitive thought processes while being grotesquely ignorant on the substance. You really have no business debating when you have zero understanding of semantics either. "Favors" turned into "requirements" for aid. The "requirement" being the announcement of the investigation by Ukraine about Biden that Mulvaney and Sondland coordinated with the president of ukraine. That is a Quid Pro Quo. The fact that it never reached fruition is totally irrelevant. The plot was staged and coordinated by the three amigos, and the confirmation to that was when Trump asked Sondland was he going to do it. Sondland said yes. Game over loser. You have no escape routes.

And why hasn't the WH included all the inappropriate phone calls to OMB between Giuliani and Mulvaney during this time frame? No explanations? Giuliani is no government official. He has no business with OMB. Call logs between Giuliani, budget office revealed in impeachment report

"requirement"
a thing that is compulsory; a necessary condition.

Evidently the announcement was neither compulsory or necessary, no announcement was made and the aid was released.

And how about you provide evidence that Giullani wasn't talking with Mulvaney in his capacity of chief of staff.

Basically all you commies have is a hand full of presumptions, assumptions and innuendo, which means all you have is a hand full of air. Carry on commie, get back to me when you have something real.

.
The aid was released after they got caught. I suspect that the Giuliani call log had a lot to do about all of that; House impeachment report reveals undisclosed calls between Giuliani, Nunes


I wonder what shitts call logs would show. And I don't think there's any law against Nunez talking to Giullani. Of course you're free to suspect anything you want, but your suspensions aren't evidence. Seems you have as little evidence as shitt.

.
 
A "favor" was never completed, because it turned into a bribe through extortion. Lol! Boss, you showed up late to this game. All these things have been proven with no counter arguments from Nunes and his corrupt committee members.


Wow, then it wasn't a requirement, was it? Perhaps you should stop throwing around words you obviously don't understand.

Also you obviously haven't seen the reporting on the minority report on the impeachment hoax, they put out 110 pages of counter arguments. But hey, feel free to keep being a lying commie, it's great entertainment.

.
Lol! Give it up boss. You have no real skills with cognitive thought processes while being grotesquely ignorant on the substance. You really have no business debating when you have zero understanding of semantics either. "Favors" turned into "requirements" for aid. The "requirement" being the announcement of the investigation by Ukraine about Biden that Mulvaney and Sondland coordinated with the president of ukraine. That is a Quid Pro Quo. The fact that it never reached fruition is totally irrelevant. The plot was staged and coordinated by the three amigos, and the confirmation to that was when Trump asked Sondland was he going to do it. Sondland said yes. Game over loser. You have no escape routes.

And why hasn't the WH included all the inappropriate phone calls to OMB between Giuliani and Mulvaney during this time frame? No explanations? Giuliani is no government official. He has no business with OMB. Call logs between Giuliani, budget office revealed in impeachment report

"requirement"
a thing that is compulsory; a necessary condition.

Evidently the announcement was neither compulsory or necessary, no announcement was made and the aid was released.

And how about you provide evidence that Giullani wasn't talking with Mulvaney in his capacity of chief of staff.

Basically all you commies have is a hand full of presumptions, assumptions and innuendo, which means all you have is a hand full of air. Carry on commie, get back to me when you have something real.

.
The aid was released after they got caught. I suspect that the Giuliani call log had a lot to do about all of that; House impeachment report reveals undisclosed calls between Giuliani, Nunes
Nunes the scum is suing CNN for 425 million


Great, I hope the jury give him more.

.
 
well yeah you sort of have to to say quid pro quo. look it up. in fact, watch sleepy joe's admitting to one.
I can't look it up and neither can you. You're also a liar.
I'm a liar about what?

not about this

What' was the Quid Pro Quo? :auiqs.jpg:Exactly! You can't name one. Like I said you're a liar with your own video.


You don't get the billion unless you fire the prosecutor who is looking into the company my son is working for without any experience and raking in hoards of cash.

Damn clear quid pro quo.

So Trump saying I don't want quid pro quo is evidence of quid pro quo? Then I guess Obama saying "I wasn't born in Kenya" is proof he was born in Kenya.

Works for me.

:auiqs.jpg:These idiotic defenses are priceless. There are no video quotes of Biden saying what you just said. "Unless you fire the prosecutor who is looking into the company my son is working" does not exist. You are a bald faced liar. No Quid Pro Quo. You are a liar.

Trump saying there is no Quid Pro Quo after getting caught pursuing that is still evidence of a Quid Pro Quo. No matter how you slice it, Trump and Sondland got caught. Sondland said there was a clear Quid Pro Quo. And he said it under sworn testimony. You lose again.

idiot
 
I'm a liar about what?

not about this

What' was the Quid Pro Quo? :auiqs.jpg:Exactly! You can't name one. Like I said you're a liar with your own video.


You don't get the billion unless you fire the prosecutor who is looking into the company my son is working for without any experience and raking in hoards of cash.

Damn clear quid pro quo.

So Trump saying I don't want quid pro quo is evidence of quid pro quo? Then I guess Obama saying "I wasn't born in Kenya" is proof he was born in Kenya.

Works for me.

:auiqs.jpg:These idiotic defenses are priceless. There are no video quotes of Biden saying what you just said. "Unless you fire the prosecutor who is looking into the company my son is working" does not exist. You are a bald faced liar. No Quid Pro Quo. You are a liar.

Trump saying there is no Quid Pro Quo after getting caught pursuing that is still evidence of a Quid Pro Quo. No matter how you slice it, Trump and Sondland got caught. Sondland said there was a clear Quid Pro Quo. And he said it under sworn testimony. You lose again.


Yes there is. And there is no video of Trump saying I'm holding up the cash until you investigate Biden but that's not stopping you from lying about it.

FLASHBACK, 2018: Joe Biden Brags At CFR Meeting About Withholding Aid To Ukraine To Force Firing Of Prosecutor

Biden flat out admitted it. WITH THOSE WORDS.

No there isn't. That video never says that. You're a liar.
You don't get the billion unless you fire the prosecutor who is looking into the company my son is working for without any experience and raking in hoards of cash.

Damn clear quid pro quo.

So Trump saying I don't want quid pro quo is evidence of quid pro quo? Then I guess Obama saying "I wasn't born in Kenya" is proof he was born in Kenya.

Works for me.
:auiqs.jpg:These idiotic defenses are priceless. There are no video quotes of Biden saying what you just said. "Unless you fire the prosecutor who is looking into the company my son is working" does not exist. You are a bald faced liar. No Quid Pro Quo. You are a liar.

Trump saying there is no Quid Pro Quo after getting caught pursuing that is still evidence of a Quid Pro Quo. No matter how you slice it, Trump and Sondland got caught. Sondland said there was a clear Quid Pro Quo. And he said it under sworn testimony. You lose again.

Yes there is. And there is no video of Trump saying I'm holding up the cash until you investigate Biden but that's not stopping you from lying about it.

FLASHBACK, 2018: Joe Biden Brags At CFR Meeting About Withholding Aid To Ukraine To Force Firing Of Prosecutor

Biden flat out admitted it. WITH THOSE WORDS.
You don't need that kind of proof. One more time for the intellectually challenged.
Surely you people can't be this stupid? Sondland had an agreement with Mulvaney to try and trigger Ukraine to do the investigations. Sondland talks to Trump on the phone confirming they are going to do the investigations. And it was in concert with Giuliani. You just can't make this shit up. There is 0% chance this is not a Quid Pro Quo. That's exactly what it was.
You don't need for Trump to tell Ukraine he is holding up the cash. Trump was already doing it you fool. Then he realized he was caught, and then he released the cash.

And where is proof of ANY OF THAT? I don't mean some liberal rag never trumper website. I mean a real news website. You just make this shit up and call it your case against Trump when we have Joe Biden admitting ON CAMERA of doing quid pro quo and your head is stuck so far up your ass you're lucking your own prostate.
Sworn testimony you dumb ass. That's how there is proof. The transcript. That's how there is proof. And there will never be a camera on Joe Biden you idiot admitting a Quid Pro Quo, because first, it never was, and you still don't know what it is. Lol!

You keep going around in circles. The proof is overwhelming. Stop defying the laws of logic, reasoning, and the truth. Trump got caught. It's that simple.

Impeachment transcript: White House officials testify quid pro quo effort was coordinated with Mulvaney - CNNPolitics If you can't understand and accept the findings from this video, then you're just dishonest and a waste of everyone's time.

No there isn't. That video never says that.

Well it doesn't say quid pro quo, but it does say you ain't getting the money without firing the prosecutor. Hey ignorant fk, you can ignore the statement all you want, I or we, don't really give two shits about your lack of credibility or integrity. live with yourself. I know I have no desire to know you.
 
Wow, I'm impressed. Evidently you didn't watch the public hearings, all admitted to making assumptions, presumptions and suppositions. None testified to first hand knowledge, the only one that actually spoke to Trump on the topic, said Trump said he wanted nothing from Ukriane except for them to do what they campaigned on. You're a loser on this one, just like the left wing hate sites you linked to.

Anything else you'd like to debate?

.
The one who said he wanted nothing from Ukraine was after they all got caught, and there is no record of the phone call. Next?


Oh ok, so Sondland is credible when he makes presumptions, but not when he accounts a call with Trump. I've always been warned about arguing with idiots, I guess you're the perfect example of why. You got anything else, idiot?

.
It's under sworn testimony and there are the transcripts. We also have Mulvaney admitting to it. Impeachment transcript: White House officials testify quid pro quo effort was coordinated with Mulvaney - CNNPolitics

And with no record of the phone call, while Trump stages that idiotic scene about no Pro Quo, after they got caught, could land Sondland a nice perjury prize? That's quite enough. I don't need anymore after all those screw ups by Trump, Mulvaney, and Sondland. Quite enough for any prosecutor as a matter of fact.

Surely you people can't be this stupid? Sondland had an agreement with Mulvaney to try and trigger Ukraine to do the investigations. Sondland talks to Trump on the phone confirming they are going to do the investigations. And it was in concert with Giuliani. You just can't make this shit up. There is 0% chance this is not a Quid Pro Quo. That's exactly what it was.


LMAO, the principles on the call say there wasn't a quid pro quo, both continue to say it. Sondland admitted there was no person on earth that told him there was. If Sondland acted on his presumptions, that on him. So yeah, you're making your shit up.

.
"Principles on the call?" :auiqs.jpg:Which one? The call that doesn't exist, or the one where Trump is asking Sondland if they were going to do it?

And the agreement between Sondland and Mulvaney? Impeachment transcript: White House officials testify quid pro quo effort was coordinated with Mulvaney - CNNPolitics
the ones the demofks wouldn't allow to testify. duh!!!!! you truly are an ignoramus.
 
I posted it for you junior, hit the play arrow and listen.
Already did. You do not know what Quid Pro Quo is. Nothing in that video proves that. Nor can you make a case.

You poor little fool. All your idiotic postings and false bravado can't hide the fact that you as well as most Democrats, and nothing but scared little rabbits.

Be a real man and admit it: You're scared shitless right now. You know damned well that none of your candidates have a chance of beating Trump in a real election. You scared little bunnies have tried everything you could think of to shake President Trump loose, but he's still clamped onto your collective asses like a Rottweiler on a ghetto goblin.

So what are you going to do? What can you do?

Nothing. :21:

How about the Supreme Court? Do you have any idea how you turdmongers are screwed over the next generation? Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and once Ginsberg kicks the bucket, it's all over but the crying.

You don't even understand the ramifications of a solid conservative ratio on the SC, do you? Consider this too: Do you have any idea how many conservatives Trump has appointed to the lower judicial benches over the last three year? Do you even have a clue how badly that is going to fuck up your little circle-jerk, possibly for the rest of your life?

It's pretty obvious you don't, otherwise you'd be curled up in your closet, sucking your thumb, and crying yourself to sleep every night, little bunny.
"Scared little rabbits." That's your entire argument. Lol! You and your ilk are so pitiful. You people never say anything.

Well I will say this: How are you going to stop Donald J. Trump?
The voting booth and law enforcement will take care of Trump like they did Duncan Hunter and Michael cohen for the same crimes.

And you, you have no self respect or love for country because you support and respect criminals. It's who you are as a human being. Nothing I can do about that but to call out every deplorable I see.
what same crime?
 
The call between the presidents, idiot. You commies are the best tools Russia has.

.
What about it? Trump asked the Ukrainian president for a favor furthering the narrative of Trump's guilt. There are so many different angles of Trump's guilt with his Quid Pro Quo, it's hard to keep up.


Perhaps you should look up the definition of "favor", words have meaning. And it's not what you commies chose to assign to them.

.
We know what the favor was courtesy of Sondland and Mulvaney. That's how the Quid Pro Quo was proven. The two of them agreed to pursue the Ukranian president to make the Biden announcement.

Damn you're stupid, a favor is done out of goodwill, not out of some sense of obligation. That said, "The two of them"? Were they acting on Sondland's presumption? BTW, when did Zelensky make the announcement?

.
And I'm stupid? :auiqs.jpg:Boss, you don't know shit from shine. Your "goodwill" turned out to be a "requirement" to receive military aid in exchange for an announcement to investigate Biden. Whether the announcement came or not isn't relevant at all. The pursuit of said announcement to investigate, attached to conditions, is. Just because Trump called it a favor when it turned out to be much, much more, doesn't mean it stays a favor. How stupid do you have to be not to get that?
where is that statement in the transcript? the one everyone says is accurate? Quote it for me genius.
 
View attachment 292858
And suddenly nepolitano, previously a darling of the right, becomes a RINO.
They are lost in the wilderness over this and only attack me and the judge. They're cultist weaklings. You gotta love it.
attack you? don't flatter yourself. too fking funny. attack. you have no idea what that would look like. wishful thinker you are.
Yes, yes... We are all terrified of your capslocking skills.
caps locking? you okay? it seems you fell off the cliff son.
 
Perhaps you should look up the definition of "favor", words have meaning. And it's not what you commies chose to assign to them.

.
We know what the favor was courtesy of Sondland and Mulvaney. That's how the Quid Pro Quo was proven. The two of them agreed to pursue the Ukranian president to make the Biden announcement.

Damn you're stupid, a favor is done out of goodwill, not out of some sense of obligation. That said, "The two of them"? Were they acting on Sondland's presumption? BTW, when did Zelensky make the announcement?

.
And I'm stupid? :auiqs.jpg:Boss, you don't know shit from shine. Your "goodwill" turned out to be a "requirement" to receive military aid in exchange for an announcement to investigate Biden. Whether the announcement came or not isn't relevant at all. The pursuit of said announcement to investigate, attached to conditions, is. Just because Trump called it a favor when it turned out to be much, much more, doesn't mean it stays a favor. How stupid do you have to be not to get that?


So tell the class, when the favor was completed? I know they got the aid, and if the favor was a requirement for the aid, you must have a date for us. RIGHT!!!!!!!!!!!!

.
A "favor" was never completed, because it turned into a bribe through extortion. Lol! Boss, you showed up late to this game. All these things have been proven with no counter arguments from Nunes and his corrupt committee members.
it did? quote the bribe in the transcript. And you should call the PM and force him to change his statement. cause he says you got dicks in your hand.
 
Judge "New World Order" has been a Trump Hater since Trump rejected him as a candidate for The Supreme Court. Why FOX keeps putting this fool on the air is beyond me. He is definitely biased.
That's the stupidest thing I've read yet from these Trump Sheep. "New world order?" WTF? The judge was explaining the value of the Constitution and the rule of law. Are you so up Trump's fat ass you can't see past your nose? Damn man, you are totally out to lunch. "New world order." :auiqs.jpg:
Only someone insane could spout off Hatred for THE US and it's president 24-7, 365 and do it for FREE. So which is it? Are you Insane or getting paid by an Enemy of The United States?
Where is the hatred, when I'm the only one praising the Constitution and the rule of law? You're full of shit because you damn sure aren't touting the Constitution or the rule of law. You're fighting against it in support of criminals and I'm fighting for the rule of law by telling the world 24/7 that Trump is a criminal, and that his candy ass weak supporters have no defense for this piece of shit.


I've never seen anyone troll their own thread so hard.


Treaty with Ukraine on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters


Treaty Document 106-16 - Treaty with Ukraine on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters


Signed by President Clinton in 2000

Click on the link - read the text - learn something.
This has nothing to do with the thread. Take a hike.
it has everything to do with this thread. you should actually learn yourself some educational shit.
 
So tell the class, when the favor was completed? I know they got the aid, and if the favor was a requirement for the aid, you must have a date for us. RIGHT!!!!!!!!!!!!

.
A "favor" was never completed, because it turned into a bribe through extortion. Lol! Boss, you showed up late to this game. All these things have been proven with no counter arguments from Nunes and his corrupt committee members.


Wow, then it wasn't a requirement, was it? Perhaps you should stop throwing around words you obviously don't understand.

Also you obviously haven't seen the reporting on the minority report on the impeachment hoax, they put out 110 pages of counter arguments. But hey, feel free to keep being a lying commie, it's great entertainment.

.
Lol! Give it up boss. You have no real skills with cognitive thought processes while being grotesquely ignorant on the substance. You really have no business debating when you have zero understanding of semantics either. "Favors" turned into "requirements" for aid. The "requirement" being the announcement of the investigation by Ukraine about Biden that Mulvaney and Sondland coordinated with the president of ukraine. That is a Quid Pro Quo. The fact that it never reached fruition is totally irrelevant. The plot was staged and coordinated by the three amigos, and the confirmation to that was when Trump asked Sondland was he going to do it. Sondland said yes. Game over loser. You have no escape routes.

And why hasn't the WH included all the inappropriate phone calls to OMB between Giuliani and Mulvaney during this time frame? No explanations? Giuliani is no government official. He has no business with OMB. Call logs between Giuliani, budget office revealed in impeachment report


Giuliani is a private citizen.

He can call the OMB if he wants to.

He doesn't have to be a government official to call the OMB.
Too bad his calls weren't reported as admissible evidence in the impeachment hearings. That's hiding evidence. It's also obstruction of justice.
or not.
 
Judge "New World Order" has been a Trump Hater since Trump rejected him as a candidate for The Supreme Court. Why FOX keeps putting this fool on the air is beyond me. He is definitely biased.
That's the stupidest thing I've read yet from these Trump Sheep. "New world order?" WTF? The judge was explaining the value of the Constitution and the rule of law. Are you so up Trump's fat ass you can't see past your nose? Damn man, you are totally out to lunch. "New world order." :auiqs.jpg:
Only someone insane could spout off Hatred for THE US and it's president 24-7, 365 and do it for FREE. So which is it? Are you Insane or getting paid by an Enemy of The United States?
Where is the hatred, when I'm the only one praising the Constitution and the rule of law? You're full of shit because you damn sure aren't touting the Constitution or the rule of law. You're fighting against it in support of criminals and I'm fighting for the rule of law by telling the world 24/7 that Trump is a criminal, and that his candy ass weak supporters have no defense for this piece of shit.


I've never seen anyone troll their own thread so hard.


Treaty with Ukraine on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters


Treaty Document 106-16 - Treaty with Ukraine on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters


Signed by President Clinton in 2000

Click on the link - read the text - learn something.
No disrespect to kindergarten children, but if you wanted to go off topic and also keep your debate at Kindergarten level intelligence, you should have started your own thread. It is off topic, because giving Ukraine an ultimatum that they had to announce the Biden investigation in exchange for military support, is no legal assistance.
well we are considering the student we're having to deal with here. just know that. go learn you some shit.
 
<< "The State Department called me and said would I take a call from Mr. [Andriy] Yermak, who's No. 2 or three to the president-elect who is now the president," said Giuliani, one of President Trump's personal attorneys.
When reached for comment, a State Department spokesperson said, "Mr. Giuliani is a private citizen and acts in a personal capacity as a lawyer for President Trump. He does not speak on behalf of the U.S. Government." >>

Giuliani says State Department asked him to take call from Ukrainian official
Then they're both in hot water. :auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg:
they're not allowed to talk to the PM of Ukraine? why?
 


If that doesn't tell Republicans how wrong they are about Trump, and how they are fighting the indefensible, then knock yourself out Trump cultists. Because you will pay a heavy price in the end for siding with stupid.



Pretty typical of the left...."hey this media guy says...."

Liberals are not capable of civilization.
 


If that doesn't tell Republicans how wrong they are about Trump, and how they are fighting the indefensible, then knock yourself out Trump cultists. Because you will pay a heavy price in the end for siding with stupid.



Pretty typical of the left...."hey this media guy says...."

Liberals are not capable of civilization.

they wouldn't agree the sky is blue when it's clear out.
 
Napolitano has gone off the deep end. His days at Fox are numbered.

Trump has not committed a crime. There is no basis for impeachment.

The end.
 
View attachment 292858
And suddenly nepolitano, previously a darling of the right, becomes a RINO.
They are lost in the wilderness over this and only attack me and the judge. They're cultist weaklings. You gotta love it.
attack you? don't flatter yourself. too fking funny. attack. you have no idea what that would look like. wishful thinker you are.
Yes, yes... We are all terrified of your capslocking skills.
caps locking? you okay? it seems you fell off the cliff son.
What else ya gonna do to him on the internet?
 
Napolitano has gone off the deep end. His days at Fox are numbered.

Trump has not committed a crime. There is no basis for impeachment.

The end.
Because you say so without an argument is worth shit. Try again.
 


If that doesn't tell Republicans how wrong they are about Trump, and how they are fighting the indefensible, then knock yourself out Trump cultists. Because you will pay a heavy price in the end for siding with stupid.



Pretty typical of the left...."hey this media guy says...."

Liberals are not capable of civilization.

All these Republican ignoramuses with no argument. Pitiful!
 


If that doesn't tell Republicans how wrong they are about Trump, and how they are fighting the indefensible, then knock yourself out Trump cultists. Because you will pay a heavy price in the end for siding with stupid.



Pretty typical of the left...."hey this media guy says...."

Liberals are not capable of civilization.

All these Republican ignoramuses with no argument. Pitiful!


Tell us what the media says again. That’s so important.
 

Forum List

Back
Top