Fox News Sunday Anchors Upset About Obama's Job Growth:

[bedowin62]

yes loon; as YOU noted "with a smaller population". taking into account population increases under obama AND PEOPLE WHO HAVE DROPPED OUT OF THE LABOR MARKET ALTOGETHER THERE HAS BEEN ALMOST ZERO job growth under obama

thanks!!

Showing you as the rightard you are is always my pleasure, bedwetter ...

Civilian non-institutional population under Bush grew by 21 million and 17 million under Obama.

Meanwhile, Bush added 5 million jobs compared to Obama's 8. That makes Obama's job creation even better than Bush's when not factoring in population growth. And that's even factoring in how Bush dumped his Great Recession on Obama.

once again you choose to embarrass youself provinig your ignorance for all to see. bush had a MUCH LOWER UNEMPLOYMENT RATE FOR MOST OF HIS TIME IN OFFICE; often in the 4% range; so of course job creation didnt need to happen on the scale.

you're the one using a false narrative loser

and nothing you post about me can change that fact

We're within the full employment range now. According to bedwetter, we no longer need to create new jobs.

no we're not idiot; because unlike under bush, under obama record numbers of WORKING-AGE AMERICANS who are ABLE-BODIED arent participating in the Labor Force. i guess you're right if you count the WELFARE STATE INCREASE under obama though leftard!

Yes, ya flaming imbecile, we are.

According to its latest projections, the Fed sees "full employment" as the U3 rate falling between 5.2% and 5%.

US full employment - Business Insider

once more; because you're a loser who lies TO HIMSELF


U-3 is a garbage number; U-6 is more reliable. more long-tern unemployed under obama
more on disability
more dropping out of the Labor Market altogether not even being counted

 

[bedowin62]

you just cant stop makin a fool of yourself. when unemployment is in the 4% range you wont have as much job creation

you're the one using a straw man

keep trying

You said job creation isn't necessary when we're at full employment (which Bush wasn't at anyway). That's not my strawman, that's you being a retard.

And we are at full employment now. According to you, there is no need to create new jobs.

no idiot; bush's unemployment number was real, obama's is fake idiot.
just like his deportation numbers, and his drone strike casualty numbers.

just everything idiot

Holyfuckingshit!

Riiight ... because the BLS changed their accounting methods in determining the unemployment rate after Obama became president, right, bedwetter?

i already explaine this leftard. the U3 isnt a reliable measure by ANY president. the U6 i s better, and U6 under Bush was better

libs are losers who lie to themselves

wackjob. your idea of what is accurate isn't....

back that up leftard; or let the adults talk ok dummy???

 

[bedowin62]

and isnt it you losers always saying food stamps arent enough to live on?
so the low-paying jobs obama "created" allow you to still collect food stamps? and if you qualify for that you qualify for other programs idiot; especially if you ARENT working.

together you can get enough from Big Nanny Government where you DONT HAVE TO WORK

UR A MORON

And again, since it fails to penetrate you armor of ignorance, Bush added as many people onto food stamps as Obama, only with a smaller population and without being handed the worst economy since the Great Depression. Did you vote for him? You helped create this nanny state.

YAWN

obama's increases on food stamp enrollment come on top of bush's


keep trying...................................

Nice to see you're still exercising your jaw. Bush added as many but with a smaller population and without inheriting the worst economy since the Great Depression.

you're bragging about minimum-wage job growth leftard?

if so many jobs have been created why are there 13 MILLION MORE on food stamps LATE INTO OBAMA'S SEVENTH YEAR?

For the same reason 13 million were added under Bush -- because they qualify.

YAWN

once again retard; obama's 13 milion come on top of those Bush numbers



try again.............................................

 

[Faun]

and isnt it you losers always saying food stamps arent enough to live on?
so the low-paying jobs obama "created" allow you to still collect food stamps? and if you qualify for that you qualify for other programs idiot; especially if you ARENT working.

together you can get enough from Big Nanny Government where you DONT HAVE TO WORK

UR A MORON

And again, since it fails to penetrate you armor of ignorance, Bush added as many people onto food stamps as Obama, only with a smaller population and without being handed the worst economy since the Great Depression. Did you vote for him? You helped create this nanny state.

YAWN

obama's increases on food stamp enrollment come on top of bush's


keep trying...................................

Nice to see you're still exercising your jaw. Bush added as many but with a smaller population and without inheriting the worst economy since the Great Depression.

you're bragging about minimum-wage job growth leftard?

if so many jobs have been created why are there 13 MILLION MORE on food stamps LATE INTO OBAMA'S SEVENTH YEAR?

For the same reason 13 million were added under Bush -- because they qualify.

Long-term unemployment has doubled under Obama | Poor ...
poorrichardsnews.com/.../long-term-unemployment-has-doubled-under-...

• Cached

The media has focused on prolonged unemployment over 8 percent, while generally downplaying a shocker: the soaring number of people unemployed for ...

That was three years ago, bedwetter. :eusa_duh:

 

[jillian]

You said job creation isn't necessary when we're at full employment (which Bush wasn't at anyway). That's not my strawman, that's you being a retard.

And we are at full employment now. According to you, there is no need to create new jobs.

no idiot; bush's unemployment number was real, obama's is fake idiot.
just like his deportation numbers, and his drone strike casualty numbers.

just everything idiot

Holyfuckingshit!

Riiight ... because the BLS changed their accounting methods in determining the unemployment rate after Obama became president, right, bedwetter?

i already explaine this leftard. the U3 isnt a reliable measure by ANY president. the U6 i s better, and U6 under Bush was better

libs are losers who lie to themselves

wackjob. your idea of what is accurate isn't....

back that up leftard; or let the adults talk ok dummy???

I don't think so wackjob. we're here to make fun of you. and point out what extraordinarily insane freaks you are.

 

[easyt65]

What job growth? It was reported last week (NOT by Fox) that jobs dried up last month, that job growth is at 44% when 50% is needed to maintain the size of the Middle Class, that there are still 94,610,000 out of work Americans, which makes TRUE unemployment in this country 10.1%. The unemployment rate for black teens in this country is 30% and unemployment for young black adults is twice that of whites (20%).

 

[bedowin62]

DONALD LAMBRO: Obama hides jobs failure by not ...
www.washingtontimes.com/.../donald-lambro-ob...

• Cached
• Similar

The Washington Times
Loading...
Feb 10, 2015 - Obama hides his failure by not counting the long-term unemployed. Chart: Gallup ... The official unemployment rate is extremely misleading.”.

 

[g5000]

Showing you as the rightard you are is always my pleasure, bedwetter ...

Civilian non-institutional population under Bush grew by 21 million and 17 million under Obama.

Meanwhile, Bush added 5 million jobs compared to Obama's 8. That makes Obama's job creation even better than Bush's when not factoring in population growth. And that's even factoring in how Bush dumped his Great Recession on Obama.

once again you choose to embarrass youself provinig your ignorance for all to see. bush had a MUCH LOWER UNEMPLOYMENT RATE FOR MOST OF HIS TIME IN OFFICE; often in the 4% range; so of course job creation didnt need to happen on the scale.

you're the one using a false narrative loser

and nothing you post about me can change that fact

We're within the full employment range now. According to bedwetter, we no longer need to create new jobs.

no we're not idiot; because unlike under bush, under obama record numbers of WORKING-AGE AMERICANS who are ABLE-BODIED arent participating in the Labor Force. i guess you're right if you count the WELFARE STATE INCREASE under obama though leftard!

Yes, ya flaming imbecile, we are.

According to its latest projections, the Fed sees "full employment" as the U3 rate falling between 5.2% and 5%.

US full employment - Business Insider

once more; because you're a loser who lies TO HIMSELF


U-3 is a garbage number; U-6 is more reliable. more long-tern unemployed under obama
more on disability
more dropping out of the Labor Market altogether not even being counted

U-3 and U-6 have been falling for over a year.

 

[jillian]

and isnt it you losers always saying food stamps arent enough to live on?
so the low-paying jobs obama "created" allow you to still collect food stamps? and if you qualify for that you qualify for other programs idiot; especially if you ARENT working.

together you can get enough from Big Nanny Government where you DONT HAVE TO WORK

UR A MORON

And again, since it fails to penetrate you armor of ignorance, Bush added as many people onto food stamps as Obama, only with a smaller population and without being handed the worst economy since the Great Depression. Did you vote for him? You helped create this nanny state.

YAWN

obama's increases on food stamp enrollment come on top of bush's


keep trying...................................

Nice to see you're still exercising your jaw. Bush added as many but with a smaller population and without inheriting the worst economy since the Great Depression.

you're bragging about minimum-wage job growth leftard?

if so many jobs have been created why are there 13 MILLION MORE on food stamps LATE INTO OBAMA'S SEVENTH YEAR?

For the same reason 13 million were added under Bush -- because they qualify.

Long-term unemployment has doubled under Obama | Poor ...
poorrichardsnews.com/.../long-term-unemployment-has-doubled-under-...

• Cached

The media has focused on prolonged unemployment over 8 percent, while generally downplaying a shocker: the soaring number of people unemployed for ...

That was three years ago, bedwetter. :eusa_duh:

you mean after baby bush crashed the economy and the jobs started draining from the economy.

again, you people are dense.

 

[Faun]

And again, since it fails to penetrate you armor of ignorance, Bush added as many people onto food stamps as Obama, only with a smaller population and without being handed the worst economy since the Great Depression. Did you vote for him? You helped create this nanny state.

YAWN

obama's increases on food stamp enrollment come on top of bush's


keep trying...................................

Nice to see you're still exercising your jaw. Bush added as many but with a smaller population and without inheriting the worst economy since the Great Depression.

you're bragging about minimum-wage job growth leftard?

if so many jobs have been created why are there 13 MILLION MORE on food stamps LATE INTO OBAMA'S SEVENTH YEAR?

For the same reason 13 million were added under Bush -- because they qualify.

YAWN

once again retard; obama's 13 milion come on top of those Bush numbers



try again.............................................

There's no need to try again, bedwetter. You're a moron. Bush's 13 million increase was on top of Clinton's numbers.

You're clearly too stupid to comprehend that.

Bush added as many as Obama but with a smaller population and without inheriting the worst economy since the Great Depression. That makes Bush's increase of SNAP even worse than Obama's.

How many times did you vote for Bush?

 

[bedowin62]

no idiot; bush's unemployment number was real, obama's is fake idiot.
just like his deportation numbers, and his drone strike casualty numbers.

just everything idiot

Holyfuckingshit!

Riiight ... because the BLS changed their accounting methods in determining the unemployment rate after Obama became president, right, bedwetter?

i already explaine this leftard. the U3 isnt a reliable measure by ANY president. the U6 i s better, and U6 under Bush was better

libs are losers who lie to themselves

wackjob. your idea of what is accurate isn't....

back that up leftard; or let the adults talk ok dummy???

I don't think so wackjob. we're here to make fun of you. and point out what extraordinarily insane freaks you are.

you're a low-information dullard. you CANT make fun of me

 

[jillian]

DONALD LAMBRO: Obama hides jobs failure by not ...
www.washingtontimes.com/.../donald-lambro-ob...

• Cached
• Similar

The Washington Times
Loading...
Feb 10, 2015 - Obama hides his failure by not counting the long-term unemployed. Chart: Gallup ... The official unemployment rate is extremely misleading.”.

why would anyone use rev. moon's rag as a source?

 

[g5000]

 

[jillian]

Holyfuckingshit!

Riiight ... because the BLS changed their accounting methods in determining the unemployment rate after Obama became president, right, bedwetter?

i already explaine this leftard. the U3 isnt a reliable measure by ANY president. the U6 i s better, and U6 under Bush was better

libs are losers who lie to themselves

wackjob. your idea of what is accurate isn't....

back that up leftard; or let the adults talk ok dummy???

I don't think so wackjob. we're here to make fun of you. and point out what extraordinarily insane freaks you are.

you're a low-information dullard. you CANT make fun of me

no, wackjob. i'm a lot of things. low-information and/or dullard are neither of them. stop projecting.

 

[Faun]

Of course we want people to work. You're the one defending Bush's abysmal record in job creation when you claimed creating jobs wasn't necessary because we were near full employment.

"job creation isnt necessary when you have near full employment you idiot." ~ another rightard​

you just cant stop makin a fool of yourself. when unemployment is in the 4% range you wont have as much job creation

you're the one using a straw man

keep trying

You said job creation isn't necessary when we're at full employment (which Bush wasn't at anyway). That's not my strawman, that's you being a retard.

And we are at full employment now. According to you, there is no need to create new jobs.

no idiot; bush's unemployment number was real, obama's is fake idiot.
just like his deportation numbers, and his drone strike casualty numbers.

just everything idiot

Holyfuckingshit!

Riiight ... because the BLS changed their accounting methods in determining the unemployment rate after Obama became president, right, bedwetter?

i already explaine this leftard. the U3 isnt a reliable measure by ANY president. the U6 i s better, and U6 under Bush was better

libs are losers who lie to themselves

Under Bush, the U-6 nearly doubled from 7.3% to 14.2%.

Under Obama, the U-6 is down from 14.2% to 10%.

 

[bedowin62]

YAWN

obama's increases on food stamp enrollment come on top of bush's


keep trying...................................

Nice to see you're still exercising your jaw. Bush added as many but with a smaller population and without inheriting the worst economy since the Great Depression.

you're bragging about minimum-wage job growth leftard?

if so many jobs have been created why are there 13 MILLION MORE on food stamps LATE INTO OBAMA'S SEVENTH YEAR?

For the same reason 13 million were added under Bush -- because they qualify.

YAWN

once again retard; obama's 13 milion come on top of those Bush numbers



try again.............................................

There's no need to try again, bedwetter. You're a moron. Bush's 13 million increase was on top of Clinton's numbers.

You're clearly too stupid to comprehend that.

Bush added as many as Obama but with a smaller population and without inheriting the worst economy since the Great Depression. That makes Bush's increase of SNAP even worse than Obama's.

How many times did you vote for Bush?

now you're moving the goalposts LOSER; the comparison is bush to obama and obama to bush, not clinton to bush to obama


nice WHITE FLAG though loser, you wear it well!!

 

[bedowin62]

you just cant stop makin a fool of yourself. when unemployment is in the 4% range you wont have as much job creation

you're the one using a straw man

keep trying

You said job creation isn't necessary when we're at full employment (which Bush wasn't at anyway). That's not my strawman, that's you being a retard.

And we are at full employment now. According to you, there is no need to create new jobs.

no idiot; bush's unemployment number was real, obama's is fake idiot.
just like his deportation numbers, and his drone strike casualty numbers.

just everything idiot

Holyfuckingshit!

Riiight ... because the BLS changed their accounting methods in determining the unemployment rate after Obama became president, right, bedwetter?

i already explaine this leftard. the U3 isnt a reliable measure by ANY president. the U6 i s better, and U6 under Bush was better

libs are losers who lie to themselves

Under Bush, the U-6 nearly doubled from 7.3% to 14.2%.

Under Obama, the U-6 is down from 14.2% to 10%.

yawn; once again you poor idiot; Bush's U-6 AVERAGE will be much better than obama's

keep trying....................

 

[Lonestar_logic]

How anyone can trust what comes out of Obama's mouth is beyond me.

The man is a pathological liar.

 

[Faun]

and of course long-term unemployment would be even worse than it is now under obama if you mindless morons had succeeded with your narrative of Republicans taking food out of people's mouths and kept unemployment benefits AT 99 WEEKS WHICH IS WHAT THEY WERE UP TO


losers who lie..........................to themselves

They extended it for a while because of the recession, people needed the extra help. You know, the recession Bush dumped on Obama.

 

[bedowin62]

you're throwing out numbers from Bush's final years and comparing them to obama's right now

what an idiot

obama's numbers are worse by any objectionable measure. long-term unemployment under obama is WAY WORSE AND WORSE FOR A LONGER PERIOD under obama than under Bush

keep trying..........................