Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You're confused. It's the voice of freedom and you heard it in 1776 when our founding fathers refused tyranny and chose freedom. It probably scares you.
Yea which is why you support government making decisions about what it's citizens wear. It's the voice of irrational fear of an entire group of people that might live right next door to you. That's never worked out well in the past... Uganda, Yugoslavia, Rwanda, the Holocaust, etc.
As opposed to supporting a religion that does the same..and worse?
Maybe you have an irrational fear of the French government upholding public standards.
You're confused. It's the voice of freedom and you heard it in 1776 when our founding fathers refused tyranny and chose freedom. It probably scares you.
Yea which is why you support government making decisions about what it's citizens wear. It's the voice of irrational fear of an entire group of people that might live right next door to you. That's never worked out well in the past... Uganda, Yugoslavia, Rwanda, the Holocaust, etc.
As opposed to supporting a religion that does the same..and worse?
Maybe you have an irrational fear of the French government upholding public standards.
I wouldn't go, quite frankly.
I don't believe in governments forcing standards (or lack of standards) on people, period.
How about a muslim woman who covers her face when her picture is taken for a driver's licence? How about a muslim woman who covers her face when she is called to testify in court?
You okay with all that?
Of course not. Here's the issue. A drivers licence isn't a right. If you don't want to do what it takes to get a licence because it's against your religion... walk. But women should have the freedom to make that decision to do so if they feel its THAT SERIOUS.
As for testifying in court, nobody has that right, not a muslim woman or a Jewish woman. That's not a specific attack on the Muslim religion it's a general law. I can't testify with a paper bag with two eyeholes cut into it. I can walk out in the street with one. Same concept. This is about rights not privilages.
I can understand why they did it...but are they not condemning some women to choosing between their religious beliefs and their ability to leave the house?
How about a muslim woman who covers her face when her picture is taken for a driver's licence? How about a muslim woman who covers her face when she is called to testify in court?
You okay with all that?
Of course not. Here's the issue. A drivers licence isn't a right. If you don't want to do what it takes to get a licence because it's against your religion... walk. But women should have the freedom to make that decision to do so if they feel its THAT SERIOUS.
As for testifying in court, nobody has that right, not a muslim woman or a Jewish woman. That's not a specific attack on the Muslim religion it's a general law. I can't testify with a paper bag with two eyeholes cut into it. I can walk out in the street with one. Same concept. This is about rights not privilages.
incorrect. you DO have a right to testify in court if the need arises.
You also do not have the right to walk around with a brown bag over your head in France. See it's not religious, it's just a safety measure, all the security cameras do know good if the operators can't see your face.
Not true.Of course not. Here's the issue. A drivers licence isn't a right. If you don't want to do what it takes to get a licence because it's against your religion... walk. But women should have the freedom to make that decision to do so if they feel its THAT SERIOUS.
As for testifying in court, nobody has that right, not a muslim woman or a Jewish woman. That's not a specific attack on the Muslim religion it's a general law. I can't testify with a paper bag with two eyeholes cut into it. I can walk out in the street with one. Same concept. This is about rights not privilages.
incorrect. you DO have a right to testify in court if the need arises.
You also do not have the right to walk around with a brown bag over your head in France. See it's not religious, it's just a safety measure, all the security cameras do know good if the operators can't see your face.
I meant nobody has the right to testify with their face covered.
Yes, go set by the phone and we will call you when it happens.Sorry bout that,
1. Oh wow, France is getting wise banning burkas.
2. Call me when they ban islam, when they really wise
Yea which is why you support government making decisions about what it's citizens wear. It's the voice of irrational fear of an entire group of people that might live right next door to you. That's never worked out well in the past... Uganda, Yugoslavia, Rwanda, the Holocaust, etc.
As opposed to supporting a religion that does the same..and worse?
Maybe you have an irrational fear of the French government upholding public standards.
Who's supporting a religion? All religions have their own standards on how to dress. Nobody in France is forced to muslim, so if you chose to be muslim in a free democratic society your forcing Muslim standards upon yourself as you see fit and that's your business.
As for MUSLIM STATES I most certainly do not support ANY state forcing religious standards on ANYONE. That goes for MUSLIM STATES as much as any other.
My problem is France claiming to be a democracy and picking and chosing what religious standards are acceptable in public and which ones are not.
The bill was passed by 246 votes to 1, which will be reviewed by the Constitutional Council and approved by President Nicolas Sarkozy.
The text makes no mention of Islam, but the France government promoted the law as a means to protect women from being forced to wear niqab.
Once in force, woman who chooses to defy the ban will receive a fine of $200 or a course of citizenship lessons. Also a man who compel woman to go veiled will be fined ($41,000) and serve a jail term.
Many Muslims believe the new law is one more blow of stereotype to France's government and risks raising the level of Islamophobia in the country.
However, the vast majority behind the measure say, it will preserve the nation's singular values and identity.
http://news.oneindia.in/2010/09/15/france-senate-passes-bill-on-burqa-ban.html
France is just creating an apartheid system against the muslims.
Much like the Nazis did with the Jews.
Or the south towards blacks before 1861
Yes, as a matter of fact, I am currently seeking a second wife.France is just creating an apartheid system against the muslims.
Much like the Nazis did with the Jews.
Or the south towards blacks before 1861
Wife? It is wife right? Or is it wives?
Yes, as a matter of fact, I am currently seeking a second wife.France is just creating an apartheid system against the muslims.
Much like the Nazis did with the Jews.
Or the south towards blacks before 1861
Wife? It is wife right? Or is it wives?
Yes, as a matter of fact, I am currently seeking a second wife.France is just creating an apartheid system against the muslims.
Much like the Nazis did with the Jews.
Or the south towards blacks before 1861
Wife? It is wife right? Or is it wives?
CornHole, I answered that question for you many posts ago.Yes, as a matter of fact, I am currently seeking a second wife.Wife? It is wife right? Or is it wives?
I notice you totally jumped over the question of hitting your wife , again. Why can't you answer that simple question for us?
Even though CornHole is Gay.Yes, as a matter of fact, I am currently seeking a second wife.Wife? It is wife right? Or is it wives?
You want conjob as a second wife?
