France's top court:UNCONSTITUTIONAL to levy 75% tax on rich

[lukelk]

French Court Says 75% Tax Rate on Rich Is Unconstitutional - Bloomberg

Even the French are getting a taste of the failed policies of Socialism, to include their courts which will not allow the insane Socialists of that country to rob the wealthy blind. The really telling thing is that although a multitude of business has fled France over the tax inequality, soaking the rich-- these same blind politicians don't care.. Jobs don't matter, only stealing money from the rich to fund their pet projects. Just as here in the United States, you could tax the rich 100% of their income and it would only help to fund the government for 3 months and NOT MAKE ONE single dent in the debt.

LOL the only reason the French needed taxes that high was cause the FAILED policy of the right wing gov.t hey had in there

 

[lukelk]

and your right, the french gov. knocke down 75% to 70% holy shit how right wing of them

 

[bripat9643]

Like that ever mattered in France.

Oh, I have no doubt that your brethren socialists in France will get it passed, if they want. But given that Hollande has come under fire from the industrial groups to get growth growing again, lest France becomes another Italy, we'll see if he uses the ruling to back off.

France has finally learned to stand up to the plutocratic scum.

I hope we do in this country.

You sound just like a fucking commie, blow job.

 

[bripat9643]

Fact1: Romney won by 7 point margin among people living in households that make $50,000 or more

Fact2: Obama won by 28 point margin among people living in households that make less than $30,000

yeah, so essentially, what you proved that after 30 years of making war on the working class, the GOP has lost them badly.

Here's the hint. the guy make 50K has just as many votes as the guy making 28K.

So the guy making $50K isn't "working class?"

BTW, blow job, Only commies talk about classes all the time.

 

[JakeStarkey]

bripat the doosh is lost as usual.

 

[bripat9643]

LOL the only reason the French needed taxes that high was cause the FAILED policy of the right wing gov.t hey had in there

What "failed policy" was that, lower taxes?

 

[bripat9643]

bripat the doosh is lost as usual.

Fakey is babbling like a senile old fool, as usual.

 

[Toro]

'Progressive' taxation is a violation of equal protection of ones property.

We either have a national conversation on it, or a civil war.

We just had a conversation on it. It was the election. Conservatives lost.

Wrong. The people who write such tax laws won and control the vote in the People's House of Representatives.

lol

Yeah

Over the cliff and higher taxes we go!

 

[JakeStarkey]

Babble, babble by bripatDoosh. What a lost little Doosh.

bripat the doosh is lost as usual.

Fakey is babbling like a senile old fool, as usual.

 

[bripat9643]

Babble, babble by bripatDoosh. What a lost little Doosh.

bripat the doosh is lost as usual.

Fakey is babbling like a senile old fool, as usual.

It's spelled "douche," you fucking moron.

 

[JakeStarkey]

You are only a Doosh.

You are not good enough to be a douche.

 

[asterism]

The fact if you didn't have a government, you wouldn't have a business?

Let's say we had no government. No garbage pickup outside your business. No electric unless you put a generator in the basement. No internet. No Police to protect your property. No running water.

And no legal recourse if your vendor who you saved a million dollars with sent you crap product and ran off with your money.

Let's say we get back to the actual question since I never advocated for no government nor no taxes.

Why should the government get a higher percentage when a risk pays off?

Because the risk wouldn't have paid off if there wasn't a government.

No, that's the (valid) justification for a tax on that money. Why tax at a higher rate than other income?

And how is it stealing (one of your original claims about those who make over $1 Million per year)?

 

[asterism]

The fact if you didn't have a government, you wouldn't have a business?

Even if that were true, how does it justify giving government a blank check to take whatever it wants? why should a business be on the hook for anything more than the cost of services government provides?

Let's say we had no government. No garbage pickup outside your business. No electric unless you put a generator in the basement. No internet. No Police to protect your property. No running water.

And no legal recourse if your vendor who you saved a million dollars with sent you crap product and ran off with your money.

Garbage in my neighborhood is picked up by a private company - Waste Management Services. The power utility is also a private company. Internet is also supplied by a private company - Comcast. Many localities also have private water and sewer companies. Many companies also have private security - especially large corporations.

So what are these essential services that businesses can't live without?



.

None of those things would exist without the government. Comcast doesn't maintain the internet, it just uses what hte government already established. Ditto with Com Ed or Waste Management. So argument fail from a crazy libertarian.

As I said, maybe what we need to do is throw a big fence around a useless state like Wyoming and dump all the libertarians and Teabaggers there. And just leave them when they resort to cannibalism.

The government does not maintain the Internet and it has not maintained it in decades. The Internet is maintained by various telecommunications companies and ICANN.

 

[bripat9643]

Garbage in my neighborhood is picked up by a private company - Waste Management Services. The power utility is also a private company. Internet is also supplied by a private company - Comcast. Many localities also have private water and sewer companies. Many companies also have private security - especially large corporations.

So what are these essential services that businesses can't live without?

None of those things would exist without the government. Comcast doesn't maintain the internet, it just uses what hte government already established. Ditto with Com Ed or Waste Management. So argument fail from a crazy libertarian.

Sorry, turd, but government had nothing to do with the creation of Con Edison or Waste Management. Con Edison was the creation of, surprisingly enough, Thomas Edison. he built it from scratch. Furthermore, he invented all the technology it used.

What part of Waste Management do you imagine the government created, garbage trucks?

The government may have created a very small part of the initial internet, but that was long ago. Private companies have been in complete control of it for almost two decades now.

Everything in your head is complete bullshit.

As I said, maybe what we need to do is throw a big fence around a useless state like Wyoming and dump all the libertarians and Teabaggers there. And just leave them when they resort to cannibalism.

Why don't you just have us all lined up against the wall and shot? That's what you would like to do, isn't it?

 

[Desperado]

OH my God, somewhere a Rich person might be paying his fair share!!!!

We can't have that!

Interesting that you think that the government deserves 75% of your earnings.

 

[JakeStarkey]

bripat the Doosh does not believe the government can shut down the net anytime it wishes.

Tell us why you believe that.

 

[NoNukes]

You have devolved from the spiritless connection that behinds all life together.

Yes, in that sense, you have lost some of your humanity.

That is what a primitive thinker like you would believe, yes.

Religion began as superstition and a way to explain what primitive man did not understand. I have evolved beyond that, obviously some people have not.

My friend, you are lost. I have studied and practiced many religions and philosophies, but cheerfulness keeps breaking through. I am more spiritual without religion than with it. I meditate twice a day and I am very in tune to the rhythm of the universe.

 

[JakeStarkey]

If you say so for yourself, OK. Give the same grace tho those who believe differently.

You have devolved from the spiritless connection that behinds all life together.

Yes, in that sense, you have lost some of your humanity.

Religion began as superstition and a way to explain what primitive man did not understand. I have evolved beyond that, obviously some people have not.

My friend, you are lost. I have studied and practiced many religions and philosophies, but cheerfulness keeps breaking through. I am more spiritual without religion than with it. I meditate twice a day and I am very in tune to the rhythm of the universe.

 

[bripat9643]

bripat the Doosh does not believe the government can shut down the net anytime it wishes.

Tell us why you believe that.

The government can do pretty much whatever it likes since it gets to use guns to impose its demands.

 

[Too Tall]

35% is the lowest the rich have paid in our history, and our economy has worked better when they pay more.

The top Rate was 93% in the 1950's.. and that was a golden age of America.

Sorry, just because you are scared of death and need to tell yourself a fairy story about a nice man who will make you happy for all eternity, doesn't not make you more evolved than a monkey.

You are just putting more thought into your death fears...

You do realize that when the top rate was 90% that the bottom rate was over 20% don't you?

So if you're willing to double the bottom tax bracket then we can get back to the good old days.

When the bottom rate was 20%, you didn't have sales taxes, the Social Security tax was only 1% instead of 6, there was no medicare tax.

Again, you guys keep trying to pretend the income tax is the only tax that exists when it isn't.

The bottom rate was 20% in 1963, the top rate was 90%, the FICA was 3.125%, and the State sales tax was started in the State of Illinois in 1933. You did get one right since Medicare was not collected until 1966.