Free Speech for Teachers or Not?

[Lumpy 1]

Should a teacher be forced to pay union dues or agency fees when they have no say in the public-sector (teachers) union and their political, administrative, use of tax dollars, policies or most importantly what they feel is best for the students welfare and learning experience?

Kindly check out the link, well worth the read and I only scratched the surface, alas, none to well...

Meet the California Teacher Taking On the Unions

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

There are never any guarantees with the Court, but I believe they will put an end to this long-term socialist extortion of American workers.

 

[JoeB131]

The Republican Mantra "I want to work harder for less money!"

Yup, they're that stupid.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

The Republican Mantra "I want to work harder for less money!"

Yup, they're that stupid.

The Democrat Mantra: "I don't want to work at all, and won't so long as others pay for the house, cable TV, Internet, ,my car, top dollar sports shoes and the occasional lobster dinner."

 

[initforme]

The last post has nothing to do with the topic. We are talking about someone who works, who contributes a service. I say give them the choice, however they must then individually negotiate their own contract and benefits.

 

[baileyn45]

The Republican Mantra "I want to work harder for less money!"

Yup, they're that stupid.

It could be argued that they don't want to work harder to make more money for some one else. That's been one of my biggest problems with unions. You could be the worst teacher in the history of teaching and make the same money, receive the same benefits and retire with the same package as the best teacher in the history of teaching. And of course at the end of the day the real losers are the students.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

The last post has nothing to do with the topic. We are talking about someone who works, who contributes a service. I say give them the choice, however they must then individually negotiate their own contract and benefits.

The last post was a response to JoeB. Try to keep up.

 

[Iceweasel]

The last post has nothing to do with the topic. We are talking about someone who works, who contributes a service. I say give them the choice, however they must then individually negotiate their own contract and benefits.

The last post was a response to JoeB. Try to keep up.

He may have him blocked like I do. Sometimes it does look like a response to the quote above because the filter makes them non existent. JoeBlow got the first spot for me, a total waste of bandwidth.

 

[TNHarley]

nope. And I feel the SC will rule in favor of the teacher.

 

[TNHarley]

The Republican Mantra "I want to work harder for less money!"

Yup, they're that stupid.

tell me how raising wages artificially, are good for the economy. ACTUALLY good. Not some emotional feel good bullshit.

 

[Wilbur Right]

The last post has nothing to do with the topic. We are talking about someone who works, who contributes a service. I say give them the choice, however they must then individually negotiate their own contract and benefits.

The last post was a response to JoeB. Try to keep up.

He may have him blocked like I do. Sometimes it does look like a response to the quote above because the filter makes them non existent. JoeBlow got the first spot for me, a total waste of bandwidth.

So you got tired of Joe kicking your ass and making you look stupid.....so you blocked him eh?

Good call on your part.

 

[TNHarley]

joe kicking ass?
LMFAO
Boy, you just lost any credibility you had, n00b.

 

[Wilbur Right]

The Republican Mantra "I want to work harder for less money!"

Yup, they're that stupid.

tell me how raising wages artificially, are good for the economy. ACTUALLY good. Not some emotional feel good bullshit.

Would you explain how flat or declining wages are good for the economy.

 

[TNHarley]

The Republican Mantra "I want to work harder for less money!"

Yup, they're that stupid.

tell me how raising wages artificially, are good for the economy. ACTUALLY good. Not some emotional feel good bullshit.

Would you explain how flat or declining wages are good for the economy.

I didn't say they were, Mr. Strawman.
Try again?

 

[Wilbur Right]

joe kicking ass?
LMFAO
Boy, you just lost any credibility you had, n00b.

Credibility on a message board? LMAO.
How does that work?
Is that what you think this happy horse shit is? Credible.
this is a place to disparage and insult others.
What do you think this is for?
to establish your credibility? Funny shit.

 

[Wilbur Right]

The Republican Mantra "I want to work harder for less money!"

Yup, they're that stupid.

tell me how raising wages artificially, are good for the economy. ACTUALLY good. Not some emotional feel good bullshit.

Would you explain how flat or declining wages are good for the economy.

I didn't say they were, Mr. Strawman.
Try again?

Well guy it is one or the other. Wages are not increasing at a meaningful rate.

You seem opposed to forcing the MW to rise.

So what good does flat or declinig wages DO.

Give a credible answer though.

 

[TNHarley]

The Republican Mantra "I want to work harder for less money!"

Yup, they're that stupid.

tell me how raising wages artificially, are good for the economy. ACTUALLY good. Not some emotional feel good bullshit.

Would you explain how flat or declining wages are good for the economy.

I didn't say they were, Mr. Strawman.
Try again?

Well guy it is one or the other. Wages are not increasing at a meaningful rate.

You seem opposed to forcing the MW to rise.

So what good does flat or declinig wages DO.

Give a credible answer though.

Artificially raising wages are lazy. If you wanted higher wages, you need to drop this lefty bullshit of punishing the rich. Give the job creators incentive for investing here. We need to stop amnesty and actually FIX our immigration. Plus, employers have SO MUCH regulation now. Thanks big government!
Few other factors, obviously.

 

[Iceweasel]

The last post has nothing to do with the topic. We are talking about someone who works, who contributes a service. I say give them the choice, however they must then individually negotiate their own contract and benefits.

The last post was a response to JoeB. Try to keep up.

He may have him blocked like I do. Sometimes it does look like a response to the quote above because the filter makes them non existent. JoeBlow got the first spot for me, a total waste of bandwidth.

So you got tired of Joe kicking your ass and making you look stupid.....so you blocked him eh?

Good call on your part.

He can't kick my ass but you sure can lick his squeaky clean. It figures you're buddies with a lunatic.

 

[Iceweasel]

this is a place to disparage and insult others.
What do you think this is for?
to establish your credibility? Funny shit.

It's obviously all you had, at least you are honest about it. Stupid, hateful but honest. Now go lick a fresh one.

 

[Iceweasel]

The Republican Mantra "I want to work harder for less money!"

Yup, they're that stupid.

tell me how raising wages artificially, are good for the economy. ACTUALLY good. Not some emotional feel good bullshit.

Would you explain how flat or declining wages are good for the economy.

I didn't say they were, Mr. Strawman.
Try again?

Well guy it is one or the other. Wages are not increasing at a meaningful rate.

You seem opposed to forcing the MW to rise.

So what good does flat or declinig wages DO.

Give a credible answer though.

Run a hotdog stand or something, get some actual real world experience then get back to us.