SwimExpert
Gold Member
- Nov 26, 2013
- 16,247
- 1,679
It is also worth nothing that the the AR-15 that was originally designed as a military weapons was a fully automatic rifle, and is now known as the M16-A1. The civilian AR-15 is not that weapon.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The guy in Florida used a "Sig" NOT an AR. NONE of the Sig parts will even interchange with an AR. Learn BEFORE you write or keep looking like an idiot, your choice.
Yet another right winger getting sexual arousal from citing "gun" stats......These fuckers are too stupid to even safely own a BB gun.
......These fuckers are too stupid to even safely own a BB gun.
I'm sure that this guy will now be maligned by the right wingers who seem to have an eternal and unrequited LOVE for their lethal weapons.
His name is Jim Sullivan, and he was a key designer of the AR-15 back in 1957, almost 60 years ago. Here are excerpts for a recent interview (the interviewer was someone named David Scott):
Jim sSullivan, who also designed the Ruger Mini-14 (a scaled down .223 Remington sporting version of the military M-14), goes on to say he never envisioned the rifle having any civilians applications:
DAVID SCOTT: “Did you ever imagine—“
JIM SULLIVAN: “No. Never even considered that—it had any civilian application.”
DAVID SCOTT: “Concern you at all?”
JIM SULLIVAN: “Of course, everybody gets concerned when there’s one of these school issues where children are killed by an AR-15. I mean, that’s sickening. But that was never the intended purpose. Civilian sales was never the intended purpose.
Jim goes onto say that a fully automatic M16 is not more lethal than a semi-automatic AR-15
DAVID SCOTT: “The lethality of the AR-15, is that reduced in the civilian semi-automatic mode?”
JIM SULLIVAN: “No.”
DAVID SCOTT: “It’s not?”
JIM SULLIVAN: “Same effectiveness. I mean, in fact, the gun is functioning exactly the way the military model is in semi-automatic.”
Breaking: Jim Sullivan, AR-15 Designer, Makes Some Controversial Statements on HBO Tonight - The Firearm Blog
The guy in Florida used a "Sig" NOT an AR. NONE of the Sig parts will even interchange with an AR. Learn BEFORE you write or keep looking like an idiot, your choice.
Yet another right winger getting sexual arousal from citing "gun" stats......These fuckers are too stupid to even safely own a BB gun.
......These fuckers are too stupid to even safely own a BB gun.
I wouldn't trust you with a pea shooter.
(you might blow your brains out)
Velcro was not designed for civilian use. Toddlers are just going to have to learn how to tie shoelaces.
Everyone with half a brain knows Stoner designed the M16
Here he is with Kalishnikov the AK47 man
Quite a few actually. Tomahawk missiles don't distinguish between adults and kids.GPS was also not designed for civilian use. I guess we better uninstall Google Maps from every computer!
Sure nitwit........how many 5 and 6 years old were slaughtered by a GPS???
The Bushmaster is modeled on the AR-15.Second, beside this latest carnage, which weapon was used in:
San Bernardino
Sandy Hook
Aurora
A Bushmaster was used in Sandy Hook.
You do know that the Mateen did not use an AR-15, right?
Or didn't you..........
Mateen used a weapon also modeled on the AR-15.
A French policeman was attacked in his home yesterday. ISIS is claiming responsibility.
The maniac stabbed the policeman to death with a knife. He then took the cop's wife and three year old son hostage. By the end, the wife was dead, too. He stabbed her to death.
All because French police are not allowed to take their service weapons home with them.
They will be now. This case has taught the French some common sense.
You should thank me for correcting you. Now you have accurate information.Taz is right, it was first assumed he used an AR-15, but he actually, as being reported now, used a Sig Sauer .223 caliber assault rifle.
Whew, that should prove of great comfort to the families of those 50.....Thanks
Velcro was not designed for civilian use. Toddlers are just going to have to learn how to tie shoelaces.
Tanks weren't either. Like the AR-15 they were designed for war, GPS, TANG and velcro have uses not designed to kill people. I think this line of argument is a tad dishonest.
A French policeman was attacked in his home yesterday. ISIS is claiming responsibility.
The maniac stabbed the policeman to death with a knife. He then took the cop's wife and three year old son hostage. By the end, the wife was dead, too. He stabbed her to death.
All because French police are not allowed to take their service weapons home with them.
They will be now. This case has taught the French some common sense.
So, the moral of that story above is this,,,,,,,
A criminal has a knife......therefore a homeowner better have a gun.......AND
If a criminal has a gun, the homeowner better secure a cannon.
Velcro was not designed for civilian use. Toddlers are just going to have to learn how to tie shoelaces.
Tanks weren't either. Like the AR-15 they were designed for war, GPS, TANG and velcro have uses not designed to kill people. I think this line of argument is a tad dishonest.
And surprise surprise, civilians can own tanks too. This is Jacques Littlefield and a very small part of his collection. He sadly passed away a few years ago, but a lot of his collection has gone to other CIVILIANS. Gosh, there's that dread word and classification of people. Damn civilians.
![]()
Velcro was not designed for civilian use. Toddlers are just going to have to learn how to tie shoelaces.
Tanks weren't either. Like the AR-15 they were designed for war, GPS, TANG and velcro have uses not designed to kill people. I think this line of argument is a tad dishonest.
And surprise surprise, civilians can own tanks too. This is Jacques Littlefield and a very small part of his collection. He sadly passed away a few years ago, but a lot of his collection has gone to other CIVILIANS. Gosh, there's that dread word and classification of people. Damn civilians.
![]()
He would first have to have brains of which there is no evidence to support. And all of these anti gunners can whine and snivel all they want. The guns have been used in the civilian market since they were mass produced. I bought my first AR-15 waaaaay back in 1965.
Sounds reasonable to me. In your warped world, the criminal has the knife and the woman being raped should just lay back and take it and think about something else.
He would first have to have brains of which there is no evidence to support. And all of these anti gunners can whine and snivel all they want. The guns have been used in the civilian market since they were mass produced. I bought my first AR-15 waaaaay back in 1965.
Well, how "impressive" you've had an AR-15 for 60 yeras. ....obviously, My "hero",,,,,,,
Sounds reasonable to me. In your warped world, the criminal has the knife and the woman being raped should just lay back and take it and think about something else.
NO, NO......regarding the raping, according to your ilk that's only done my illegal Mexicans. LOL
Velcro was not designed for civilian use. Toddlers are just going to have to learn how to tie shoelaces.
Tanks weren't either. Like the AR-15 they were designed for war, GPS, TANG and velcro have uses not designed to kill people. I think this line of argument is a tad dishonest.
And surprise surprise, civilians can own tanks too. This is Jacques Littlefield and a very small part of his collection. He sadly passed away a few years ago, but a lot of his collection has gone to other CIVILIANS. Gosh, there's that dread word and classification of people. Damn civilians.
![]()
Yes, and those tanks are about as lethal as a tractor trailer since their guns are non functioning. But, you would have to be a total moron to not understand the difference, amiright?
Velcro was not designed for civilian use. Toddlers are just going to have to learn how to tie shoelaces.
Tanks weren't either. Like the AR-15 they were designed for war, GPS, TANG and velcro have uses not designed to kill people. I think this line of argument is a tad dishonest.
And surprise surprise, civilians can own tanks too. This is Jacques Littlefield and a very small part of his collection. He sadly passed away a few years ago, but a lot of his collection has gone to other CIVILIANS. Gosh, there's that dread word and classification of people. Damn civilians.
![]()
Where does he store the live shells for these?
You people find your lies anywhere you can find them. Do you look at a pretzel and immediately think "they didn't twist this nearly enough".