Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
OK, now I see your problem.......Bloomburg participated in ZERO debates thus far. He is third nationally. Tulsi participated in a number of debates, her support is within margin of error from 0%.
Proposition that changes to debate qualification have already helped Bloomberg and hurt Tulsi is OBVIOUSLY bullshit.
Primaries, why? Why don't the two parties hold their conventions in July pick whoever the hell they want and spare us all this primary BS? Shorten the political cycle and spare us the debates until the parties have picked their candidates. This would also strengthen the chance for third party candidates and some better election cycles.
They like giving the snowflakes the ILLUSION that their voice / vote matters....Primaries, why? Why don't the two parties hold their conventions in July pick whoever the hell they want and spare us all this primary BS? .
Primaries, why? Why don't the two parties hold their conventions in July pick whoever the hell they want and spare us all this primary BS? Shorten the political cycle and spare us the debates until the parties have picked their candidates. This would also strengthen the chance for third party candidates and some better election cycles.
No thanks, I want to cast a my vote for a Democrat I feel best represents me going into the general election..
OK, now I see your problem.......Bloomburg participated in ZERO debates thus far. He is third nationally. Tulsi participated in a number of debates, her support is within margin of error from 0%.
Proposition that changes to debate qualification have already helped Bloomberg and hurt Tulsi is OBVIOUSLY bullshit.
Gabbard did not say the rule change hurt her...and neither did I. Gabbard points out that the only way Bloomberg made the debate is because the Democrats changed the Grassroots' rule that allowed Bloomberg to spend approx. $4 MILLION to flood the airways with ads, thus 'buying' his way onto the stage...which Sanders, Buttigieg, and Warren are also saying.
There was NO CHANGE to spending rules.
I posted the link and part of the article....but thank you for that emotional opinion....
Hillary did not say she was working for the Russians.
No, she just paid a known lying, untrustworthy, biased, Trump-hating, alternate agenda-driven foreign spy who was working with Russians for known false / debunked Russian-authored Counter-Intelligence propaganda she intended to use to alter the 2016 election even more....information the Obama administration used to committed FISA Court abuses, initiate a known bogus / illegal investigation in which they illegally spied on Trump and his team.....
That is a HUGE difference from personally working with Russians, as Barry did through Medvedev...
View attachment 307587
.
AGAIN.....Name the rules that were changed.
Rule change by Democrats could help Bloomberg
Rule change by Democrats could help Bloomberg
Critics say wealthy self-funded candidates could benefit while keeping most of the leaders in the racially diverse Democratic Party white.
'New Rule Change Scraps Grassroots Threshold....'
“This is totally an accommodation for a big-time spender who does have some traction”
She better be careful. Hillary is still at the top of that party. Tulsi may find herself committing suicide by a double-tap to the back of her head if she don't shut the fuck up and drop out of the race.Gabbard 'said the fact that a billionaire like Bloomberg could enter the race with the ability to change DNC rules to benefit his candidacy does a disservice to the American electorate. "It's wrong, and it's voters in these primaries and caucuses that that are unfortunately losing out because of the DNC decisions in Washington".
"It's clear that the DNC would rather hear from Michael Bloomberg, a billionaire, rather than hearing from me -- the only person of color left in this race, the first female combat veteran ever to run for president, and the voice that I bring from so many Americans that really challenges the establishment of the powerful elite."
As the GOP / WH Counsel pointed out, the DNC is once again up to its old tricks, rigging its primaries again and trying to steal election #2.
Mini-Mike is an old white Billionaire who gives the appearance of being 'acceptably moderate'
Bernie is a Tales-From-The-Crypt'-looking old white Socialist they do not want to be the nominee
Warren is a Minority-Wannabe nut who has told so many lies about herself SHE doesn't know who she is Buttigieg's number #1 'motto' / push to be Pres is: 'We elected the 1st Black Pres, now lets elect the 1st Gay'
Gabbard is the only minority left in the DNC's 'All-White (Preferred)' Primary Race. Moderate - yes, but her military background means she is an independent thinker, uncontrollable, not 'Deep State Overlord material'.
Give 'em hell, Gabby!
Tulsi Gabbard won't quit race, says she is 'still very focused on being the Democratic nominee'
]OK, now I see your problem.......Bloomburg participated in ZERO debates thus far. He is third nationally. Tulsi participated in a number of debates, her support is within margin of error from 0%.
Proposition that changes to debate qualification have already helped Bloomberg and hurt Tulsi is OBVIOUSLY bullshit.
Gabbard did not say the rule change hurt her...and neither did I. Gabbard points out that the only way Bloomberg made the debate is because the Democrats changed the Grassroots' rule that allowed Bloomberg to spend approx. $4 MILLION to flood the airways with ads, thus 'buying' his way onto the stage...which Sanders, Buttigieg, and Warren are also saying.
Busy was declaring no such rule change was made....it was.
YOU, it seems, are trying to say Gabbard is claiming something she ISN'T. The Rule Change didn't impact Gabbard..it was all for Bloomnberg, the only person in the entire race who was able to take advantage of it.
Moron, DNC doesn't cast votes, people do.
No shit.....snowflakes CAST VOTES, Democrats / the DNC RIG PRIMARIES.
Dude....Bro.....Donna Brazile....Moron, DNC doesn't cast votes, people do.
No shit.....snowflakes CAST VOTES, Democrats / the DNC RIG PRIMARIES.
The DNC does not rig primaries, People vote in them. The Republicans are the ones who are rigging the primaries.
Truly sad how you deny reality, posted links, articles....your mental instability is frightening.]OK, now I see your problem.......Bloomburg participated in ZERO debates thus far. He is third nationally. Tulsi participated in a number of debates, her support is within margin of error from 0%.
Proposition that changes to debate qualification have already helped Bloomberg and hurt Tulsi is OBVIOUSLY bullshit.
Gabbard did not say the rule change hurt her...and neither did I. Gabbard points out that the only way Bloomberg made the debate is because the Democrats changed the Grassroots' rule that allowed Bloomberg to spend approx. $4 MILLION to flood the airways with ads, thus 'buying' his way onto the stage...which Sanders, Buttigieg, and Warren are also saying.
Busy was declaring no such rule change was made....it was.
YOU, it seems, are trying to say Gabbard is claiming something she ISN'T. The Rule Change didn't impact Gabbard..it was all for Bloomnberg, the only person in the entire race who was able to take advantage of it.
You are lying as she is. There were no rule changes. The DNC head cannot change rules without the entire DNC approving it. Bloomberg is not accepting individual contributions so the debate criteria had to be changed. In this case, he has shown some support.
AGAIN.....Name the rules that were changed.
Rule change by Democrats could help Bloomberg
Rule change by Democrats could help Bloomberg
Critics say wealthy self-funded candidates could benefit while keeping most of the leaders in the racially diverse Democratic Party white.
'New Rule Change Scraps Grassroots Threshold....'
“This is totally an accommodation for a big-time spender who does have some traction”
There was no rule change. Rule changes have to be approved by the entire DNC in their regular meetings. This was a criteria that was set by the DNC not a rule. Certainly it was bound to be changed as the primaries got closer. It was a accommodation to the fact that Bloomberg is taking NO campaign contributions. Suppose Bloomberg became the frontrunner. and you face a situation where the frontrunner can't participate in the debates.
No way man, corrupt DNC is making special arrangements for big money Bloomberg at expense of small money salt-of-the-earthers like Tulsi. Thats why they changed the rules on the debates...so Bloomberg, who so far has been floating on infinite feel-good ads, can get on up there and get himself ripped a new one in prime time.
