Gallup- Americans Less Likely to See U.S. as No. 1 Militarily

[pismoe]

And on a side note, you Neocons (Nazis) should stop all the warmongering and start contributing more of your time & money to helping our poor soldiers who come back from your wars with horrific mental and physical injuries.

You've sent so many to their deaths and caused so much pain & suffering. The least you could do is help them and their families. Contribute more. You owe that to them.

---------------------------- lots of the injuries and problems are caused by the 'cic' and his 'roe' that make USA soldiers shy about pulling the trigger . Same goes for mrobamas pin prick bombing campaign .

You guys want your wars and get our kids killed and maimed. We all know you're fully committed to that. But we also know you're not committed to helping them and their families with your time and money. You guys are why i no longer consider myself a Republican. I refuse to go the Nazi route with you.

------------------------------------ all volunteer military , no one forces the volunteers to join up Paul !!

---------------------------- by the way , I am no repub , can't stand them Paul !!

 

[paulitician]

And on a side note, you Neocons (Nazis) should stop all the warmongering and start contributing more of your time & money to helping our poor soldiers who come back from your wars with horrific mental and physical injuries.

You've sent so many to their deaths and caused so much pain & suffering. The least you could do is help them and their families. Contribute more. You owe that to them.

---------------------------- lots of the injuries and problems are caused by the 'cic' and his 'roe' that make USA soldiers shy about pulling the trigger . Same goes for mrobamas pin prick bombing campaign .

You guys want your wars and get our kids killed and maimed. We all know you're fully committed to that. But we also know you're not committed to helping them and their families with your time and money. You guys are why i no longer consider myself a Republican. I refuse to go the Nazi route with you.

------------------------------------ all volunteer military , no one forces the volunteers to join up Paul !!

You all break them, the least you could do is contribute more to fixing them. Every warmonger should be held accountable on that. They should have to contribute their own time and money to helping them and their families.

Or, they should at least be required to volunteer at VA hospitals so they can see up close the horrific suffering they cause. It might give them a healthier perspective on the issue of war.

 

[paulitician]

And on a side note, you Neocons (Nazis) should stop all the warmongering and start contributing more of your time & money to helping our poor soldiers who come back from your wars with horrific mental and physical injuries.

You've sent so many to their deaths and caused so much pain & suffering. The least you could do is help them and their families. Contribute more. You owe that to them.

---------------------------- lots of the injuries and problems are caused by the 'cic' and his 'roe' that make USA soldiers shy about pulling the trigger . Same goes for mrobamas pin prick bombing campaign .

You guys want your wars and get our kids killed and maimed. We all know you're fully committed to that. But we also know you're not committed to helping them and their families with your time and money. You guys are why i no longer consider myself a Republican. I refuse to go the Nazi route with you.

------------------------------------ all volunteer military , no one forces the volunteers to join up Paul !!

---------------------------- by the way , I am no repub , can't stand them Paul !!

My bad, but you are coming off as being a typical warmongering Neocon (Nazi) Republican. Just sayin.

 

[pismoe]

And on a side note, you Neocons (Nazis) should stop all the warmongering and start contributing more of your time & money to helping our poor soldiers who come back from your wars with horrific mental and physical injuries.

You've sent so many to their deaths and caused so much pain & suffering. The least you could do is help them and their families. Contribute more. You owe that to them.

---------------------------- lots of the injuries and problems are caused by the 'cic' and his 'roe' that make USA soldiers shy about pulling the trigger . Same goes for mrobamas pin prick bombing campaign .

You guys want your wars and get our kids killed and maimed. We all know you're fully committed to that. But we also know you're not committed to helping them and their families with your time and money. You guys are why i no longer consider myself a Republican. I refuse to go the Nazi route with you.

------------------------------------ all volunteer military , no one forces the volunteers to join up Paul !!

---------------------------- by the way , I am no repub , can't stand them Paul !!

--------------------------------------- just for honesties sake , I was registered repub from about 1970 till about 2006 then switched to Libertarian , small L libertarian because I don't want open borders or ANY immigration . I voted for 'gwb' one time but his trying to push an amnesty made me switch I think Paul .

 

[rightwinger]

goal is to be prepared . We now have problems starting with 'china' , Russia , Islamic state caliphate but the point is to be prepared to fight and kill all enemies if needed Rightwinger , just in case . Just my opinion but I have lots of company with about 49 percent of Americans thinking the same way . And to add , both Cruz and Trump have stated that they want to rebuild the USA military Rightwinger !!

Fear mongering is getting to you
Have you seen the size and power of our military compared to the next eight countries COMBINED?
Then realize that six of those eight are on our side

The threat is not there....morons like Cruz want you to think it is

------------------------------ NO Fearmongering , I'm looking for them to make their move Rightwinger !!

Who?

-------------------------------- whoever it is !!

Name a country and I will let you know if we should be afraid of them

 

[pismoe]

i wouldn't pay attention to you and your cohorts or 'mrobamas' reasoning Rightwinger !!

 

[rightwinger]

i wouldn't pay attention to you and your cohorts or 'mrobamas' reasoning Rightwinger !!

Our military needs to be large enough to respond to present day threats

Where are the threats to our nation to justify the current size of our military?

 

[Dragonlady]

I love how Republicans are all about honoring the Founders intentions for the country, except when it comes to foreign policy. The Founders were adamant that the US avoid the wars which sapped the vitality of every empire building nation in Europe. The US was to focus their efforts on building their own nation at home. International ambitions come with a hefty price tag. Better to sell equipment and weapons to the Europeans, and stay our of their incessant wars. Only these days it's the Middle East, but the Founders would probably have the same advice. Mind the business of your own nation first.

Republicans have not done this. And every Republican presidential candidate is completely bought into the idea of putting more boots in the ground in the ME. You're bankrupting you nation against the best advice the Founders ever gave you.

Equipping and maintaining a large standing army is expensive. It was one of the main downfalls of the Roman Empire. Every Republican politician should be required to read The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, because the US is making many of the same mistakes the Romans made, in terms of their military.

 

[pismoe]

different example but you libs guys oughta read about Rome for some knowledge on the hordes of barbarians that the Romans let into their country DLady .

 

[Dragonlady]

The Romans didn't let barbarians into Rome. The Empire was too large. Rome's armies were all garrisoned in the provinces and satellite states. There was no army in Rome itself. No army was allowed to cross the Rubicon lest the army be used to revolt against the lawfully elected government.

 

[Correll]

I love how Republicans are all about honoring the Founders intentions for the country, except when it comes to foreign policy. The Founders were adamant that the US avoid the wars which sapped the vitality of every empire building nation in Europe. The US was to focus their efforts on building their own nation at home. International ambitions come with a hefty price tag. Better to sell equipment and weapons to the Europeans, and stay our of their incessant wars. Only these days it's the Middle East, but the Founders would probably have the same advice. Mind the business of your own nation first.

Republicans have not done this. And every Republican presidential candidate is completely bought into the idea of putting more boots in the ground in the ME. You're bankrupting you nation against the best advice the Founders ever gave you.

Equipping and maintaining a large standing army is expensive. It was one of the main downfalls of the Roman Empire. Every Republican politician should be required to read The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, because the US is making many of the same mistakes the Romans made, in terms of their military.

A neo isolationist challenged GHWBush in 1992 primaries and your lib media marginalized him with Political Correctness.

He had my vote. Indeed, his support came from the hard right.


And for that matter, Bill Clinton was in charge for the best time for disentanglement and did nothing of the sort.

 

[Correll]

The Romans didn't let barbarians into Rome. The Empire was too large. Rome's armies were all garrisoned in the provinces and satellite states. There was no army in Rome itself. No army was allowed to cross the Rubicon lest the army be used to revolt against the lawfully elected government.

True.

THe Roman army left them into Germany, within the Empire, provided they swore an Oath of Allegiance so that they would be good little Roman subjects.

Somehow though, the promises they made failed to change their basic character and they in short order ended up rampaging though the EMpire.

 

[Geaux4it]

Like Carter, Obama ran our military into the dirt and spit on them. America will rise again, and there will be debts collected in the future

-Geaux

 

[rightwinger]

Like Carter, Obama ran our military into the dirt and spit on them. America will rise again, and there will be debts collected in the future

-Geaux

Carter reduced the military after Vietnam. It is what you are supposed to do

Obama's reductions are the result of pulling troops out of Iraq/Afghanistan and the stupid 10% sequester that Congress forced on him

 

[Correll]

Like Carter, Obama ran our military into the dirt and spit on them. America will rise again, and there will be debts collected in the future

-Geaux

Carter reduced the military after Vietnam. It is what you are supposed to do

Obama's reductions are the result of pulling troops out of Iraq/Afghanistan and the stupid 10% sequester that Congress forced on him

After Vietnam our military needed rebuilt, not reduced.

 

[Seawytch]

Like Carter, Obama ran our military into the dirt and spit on them. America will rise again, and there will be debts collected in the future

-Geaux

Carter reduced the military after Vietnam. It is what you are supposed to do

Obama's reductions are the result of pulling troops out of Iraq/Afghanistan and the stupid 10% sequester that Congress forced on him

After Vietnam our military needed rebuilt, not reduced.

Really? Explain that one. There was a draft during Vietnam. Once the conflict is over, those men get to go home. That's an automatic reduction. You're not making any sense.

Why didn't you address the sequestration issue?

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

What kind of idiot stick is reeetarded enough to consider the US being #2 militarily at ANYTHING!!!!!

Our military isn't #2 at anything BY FAR!!!!!

Who's the dumb ass?

China has a larger Army.

 

[Correll]

Like Carter, Obama ran our military into the dirt and spit on them. America will rise again, and there will be debts collected in the future

-Geaux

Carter reduced the military after Vietnam. It is what you are supposed to do

Obama's reductions are the result of pulling troops out of Iraq/Afghanistan and the stupid 10% sequester that Congress forced on him

After Vietnam our military needed rebuilt, not reduced.

Really? Explain that one. There was a draft during Vietnam. Once the conflict is over, those men get to go home. That's an automatic reduction. You're not making any sense.

Why didn't you address the sequestration issue?

A reduction in manpower makes sense when the war is over.

But while the US was mired in Vietnam, the soviets were building tanks and planes and nukes.

Our conventional forces needed upgraded and our military needed to have the damage of Vietnam fixed.


Did you ever see the military build up that Carter Planned for after the Soviets sent him a reality check with their invasion of Afghanistan?

It was GLORIOUS.

Even Carter realize, albeit late, that the military needed more funding, not less.

 

[rightwinger]

Like Carter, Obama ran our military into the dirt and spit on them. America will rise again, and there will be debts collected in the future

-Geaux

Carter reduced the military after Vietnam. It is what you are supposed to do

Obama's reductions are the result of pulling troops out of Iraq/Afghanistan and the stupid 10% sequester that Congress forced on him

After Vietnam our military needed rebuilt, not reduced.

Reagan tried to rebuild by throwing money at it. Problem is he spent money to fight the wrong war and bought equipment to fight the wrong mission

 

[Seawytch]

Like Carter, Obama ran our military into the dirt and spit on them. America will rise again, and there will be debts collected in the future

-Geaux

Carter reduced the military after Vietnam. It is what you are supposed to do

Obama's reductions are the result of pulling troops out of Iraq/Afghanistan and the stupid 10% sequester that Congress forced on him

After Vietnam our military needed rebuilt, not reduced.

Really? Explain that one. There was a draft during Vietnam. Once the conflict is over, those men get to go home. That's an automatic reduction. You're not making any sense.

Why didn't you address the sequestration issue?

A reduction in manpower makes sense when the war is over.

But while the US was mired in Vietnam, the soviets were building tanks and planes and nukes.

Our conventional forces needed upgraded and our military needed to have the damage of Vietnam fixed.


Did you ever see the military build up that Carter Planned for after the Soviets sent him a reality check with their invasion of Afghanistan?

It was GLORIOUS.

Even Carter realize, albeit late, that the military needed more funding, not less.

And Reagan took care of that didn't he. He went and outspent the Russians. We have our looming debt to show for it.

You're still dodging the current sequestration issue. Funny that.