Garland, "I am not the president's lawyer"

Wnen Marty is corrected for specious arguments and not getting to be the decider. Gosnell was a criminal doctor, not reflective of his professional community, and handled correctly. Yet Mart continued to argue speciously, as pointed out earlier, along with his specious nonsense about the Ashlii Babbit case. This is reaction to being corrected.
View attachment 832239
Every time.
 
All you SJW idiots are the same. you never directly confront, just go off on a tangent when you don't get your way.

Like a mewling kitten who's milk got spilt.
Please stop whining. It's a bad look, for an old man.

You have been confronted. The law doesn't agree with you. Noncultists don't agree with you. Reality doesn't agree with you (go check).

What more is anyone supposed to do, but be embarrassed by your awful behavior?
 
Please stop whining. It's a bad look, for an old man.

You have been confronted. The law doesn't agree with you. Noncultists don't agree with you. Reality doesn't agree with you (go check).

What more is anyone supposed to do, but be embarrassed by your awful behavior?

Your opinion is the only thing that doesn't agree with reality, and a sham investigation that was nothing more than a coverup.
 
All you SJW idiots are the same. you never directly confront, just go off on a tangent when you don't get your way. Like a mewling kitten who's milk got spilt.
You can be all as unhappy as you want for not being taken seriously here, but, like, man, that's just your opinion, Mr. Specious.
 
Those officers weren't standing between them and their target.

Members of Congress.

They were a few feet away, amongst the people you think would have maimed congresscritters.

Meanwhile those cops weren't touched.
 
They were a few feet away, amongst the people you think would have maimed congresscritters.

Meanwhile those cops weren't touched.
Irrelevant.

There were three officers standing in front of those doors that moved seconds before the rioters broke through them. Do you know why they moved? They felt threatened.
 
You advance on an armed officer when told to stop you inherit the result.

The shooting was righteous.
When the armed officer is hiding out of sight and then jumps out and opens fire without a warning that turns your "scenario" into hot garbage, John! Babbitt wasn't advancing on Lt. Byrd. She didn't even know he was there until people started shouting about a gun...and it was the protesters that were shouting the warning...not Byrd! That coward didn't say a word. Just stepped out from the side of the door and shot an unarmed woman in cold blood!
 
Irrelevant.

There were three officers standing in front of those doors that moved seconds before the rioters broke through them. Do you know why they moved? They felt threatened.
Not much reason to debate. We won this debate over 3 years ago. Let Marty pull his taffy, it makes no difference.
 

Forum List

Back
Top