WorldWatcher
Gold Member
a) There was no discrimination.What gender is being discriminated against? Men have rights of marriage. Women have equal rights of marriage. Doesn't matter what their sexual orientation is.
Under anti-miscegenation laws what race was being discriminated against? Coloreds had rights of marriage. Whites had equal rights of marriage. Didn't matter what their race was.
How well did that logic work before?
>>>>
b) White men could marry white women while black men could not. Black men were discriminated against because whites enjoyed a right they did not.
How can you say there was no discrimination and then point out that there was discrimination? That makes no sense.
So if "b) White men could marry white women while black men could not. Black men were discriminated against because whites enjoyed a right they did not." THen you have men could marry white women while a women could not. Women are discriminated against because men enjoy a right women did not.
Thanks for making our case.
>>>>