PaintMyHouse
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #21
Equality isn't a fad, it's an American Value.It is truly ironic that anyone living in this cesspool known as the US would consider any definition of marriage, other than to follow the latest fad.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
Equality isn't a fad, it's an American Value.It is truly ironic that anyone living in this cesspool known as the US would consider any definition of marriage, other than to follow the latest fad.
It is truly ironic that anyone living in this cesspool known as the US would consider any definition of marriage, other than to follow the latest fad.
I don't see much of a legal basis for denying polygamous marriage if you allow gay marriage. However, there are two major differences to consider. From a legal perspective, a gay marriage ban is picking out a group of individuals based on their sexual orientation and denying them the freedom to marry who they choose. That is not the case with a polygamous marriage. From a social perspective, a 2 to 1 relationship is fraught with problems of jealousy, envy, and divisions of responsibility.Polygamy is not something that much noise is made about.
But polyamory is gaining popularity. More and more people are exploring relationships with more than one person.
Once again, consenting adults and no one is harmed.
I don't see much of a legal basis for denying polygamous marriage if you allow gay marriage. However, there are two major differences to consider. From a legal perspective, a gay marriage ban is picking out a group of individuals based on their sexual orientation and denying them the freedom to marry who they choose. That is not the case with a polygamous marriage. From a social perspective, a 2 to 1 relationship is fraught with problems of jealousy, envy, and divisions of responsibility.Polygamy is not something that much noise is made about.
But polyamory is gaining popularity. More and more people are exploring relationships with more than one person.
Once again, consenting adults and no one is harmed.
I agree that there doesn't seem to be much pressure for polygamous marriage. Historically polygamy has been between one husband and two or more wives. Not many women today would be interested in sharing a husband and not many husbands can afford multiple wives.
Polygamy has always been primarily about economics not sex or loving relationships.I don't see much of a legal basis for denying polygamous marriage if you allow gay marriage. However, there are two major differences to consider. From a legal perspective, a gay marriage ban is picking out a group of individuals based on their sexual orientation and denying them the freedom to marry who they choose. That is not the case with a polygamous marriage. From a social perspective, a 2 to 1 relationship is fraught with problems of jealousy, envy, and divisions of responsibility.Polygamy is not something that much noise is made about.
But polyamory is gaining popularity. More and more people are exploring relationships with more than one person.
Once again, consenting adults and no one is harmed.
I agree that there doesn't seem to be much pressure for polygamous marriage. Historically polygamy has been between one husband and two or more wives. Not many women today would be interested in sharing a husband and not many husbands can afford multiple wives.
Actually, since it typically takes two incomes to support a family, polygamy may make more sense. Since that would allow two incomes plus someone to provide more family times for the kids.
Mufti-generational households do the same thing, and are very traditional.I don't see much of a legal basis for denying polygamous marriage if you allow gay marriage. However, there are two major differences to consider. From a legal perspective, a gay marriage ban is picking out a group of individuals based on their sexual orientation and denying them the freedom to marry who they choose. That is not the case with a polygamous marriage. From a social perspective, a 2 to 1 relationship is fraught with problems of jealousy, envy, and divisions of responsibility.Polygamy is not something that much noise is made about.
But polyamory is gaining popularity. More and more people are exploring relationships with more than one person.
Once again, consenting adults and no one is harmed.
I agree that there doesn't seem to be much pressure for polygamous marriage. Historically polygamy has been between one husband and two or more wives. Not many women today would be interested in sharing a husband and not many husbands can afford multiple wives.
Actually, since it typically takes two incomes to support a family, polygamy may make more sense. Since that would allow two incomes plus someone to provide more family times for the kids.
It get's even messier with divorce.The big issue with polygamy is that it could get really messy with taxes, Social Security and insurance. Otherwise, I have no issue with it. If I was loaded, I'd give it a go.
It get's even messier with divorce.The big issue with polygamy is that it could get really messy with taxes, Social Security and insurance. Otherwise, I have no issue with it. If I was loaded, I'd give it a go.
Most women are up for a threesome, as long as it's two men, and one cooks while the other cleans.Polygamy and same sex marriages can be combined. A bisexual can have a spouse of both genders. Diversity, diversity, diversity!
Triplet brothers or sisters can marry. diversity, diversity, diversity.
The argument for gay marriage is the equal right to marry who you love. Well?
Equality isn't a fad, it's an American Value.It is truly ironic that anyone living in this cesspool known as the US would consider any definition of marriage, other than to follow the latest fad.
Prenups are fairly rare. They are only useful if you're trying to protect extensive assets, business ventures, investments, or savings. They cannot cover child custody or child support. Property division as well as custody laws are based on a one husband one wife relationship. Existing state laws simply would not apply. The biggest problem that divorce would pose on polygamous marriages would be the children.It get's even messier with divorce.The big issue with polygamy is that it could get really messy with taxes, Social Security and insurance. Otherwise, I have no issue with it. If I was loaded, I'd give it a go.
A simple prenup would solve that.
Plus, how many divorces are due to infidelity? Polygamy would, at the very least, reduce that by a good margin.
Good post! Really, if our government supports gay marriage I have three-four female candidates as my future wives. I want to marry all them. Wht's the problem?? I love them and they love me. Polygamy is my way to save America.The argument for gay marriage is the equal right to marry who you love. Well?
Good post! Really, if our government supports gay marriage I have three-four female candidates as my future wives. I want to marry all them. Wht's the problem?? I love them and they love me. Polygamy is my way to save America.The argument for gay marriage is the equal right to marry who you love. Well?
The argument for gay marriage is the equal right to marry who you love. Well?
well, what?
Not that there are enough people out there really advocating for polygamy, but as long as everyone is a consenting adult, I don't have a problem with it.
Prenups are fairly rare. They are only useful if you're trying to protect extensive assets, business ventures, investments, or savings. They cannot cover child custody or child support. Property division as well as custody laws are based on a one husband one wife relationship. Existing state laws simply would not apply. The biggest problem that divorce would pose on polygamous marriages would be the children.It get's even messier with divorce.The big issue with polygamy is that it could get really messy with taxes, Social Security and insurance. Otherwise, I have no issue with it. If I was loaded, I'd give it a go.
A simple prenup would solve that.
Plus, how many divorces are due to infidelity? Polygamy would, at the very least, reduce that by a good margin.