Curried Goats
Platinum Member
- Aug 28, 2021
- 26,070
- 9,622
- 433
An excerpt taken out context according to the author. Dipshit.Yeah...you dipshit.........Senator Kennedy read from his book......
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
An excerpt taken out context according to the author. Dipshit.Yeah...you dipshit.........Senator Kennedy read from his book......
This is hilarious considering how much of a bitch you're being about explaining yourself.
Funny you should say that. Here's more from the author on that very subject.
It’s disingenuous for multiple reasons. There’s this misconception that this book is going to children—they’re using language like, ‘Do you think an eight-year-old should read this?’ And my response is, no, that’s why it’s geared for 14 to 18-year-olds.
We also have to stop pretending like my book is what’s introducing child to sex. It isn’t. A 14-year-old child, by the time they’ve read my book, may have already had sex. So them reading about a sex scene is possibly more about their own experience, in their own life.
You said that he also said he enjoyed it in asking you clarify what point you were making by bring that up to me. It's no sweat off my back when you people are top pussy to make your points clear.![]()
An excerpt taken out context according to the author. Dipshit.
Are they?Then why are leftists putting it in elementary school libraries you lying hack....?
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Yeah......
Author: You took out of context my book about children having sex with adults....I meant it to help them.....by showing them having sex with adults......
![]()
I didnt say it cancels it out. I fully expect her to go to prison. I merely said that it affects boys differently than girls. Im right about that and you will fail if you try to prove me wrong.Some do some don't as do some girls.
I'm not uncomfortable with your implication that enjoyment cancels out statutory rape. That seems perfectly in line with deplorable mutant beliefs.
You're not and it's you who has to prove your claim. Apparently you think women and girls can't and don't enjoy casual sex?I didnt say it cancels it out. I fully expect her to go to prison. I merely said that it affects boys differently than girls. Im right about that and you will fail if you try to prove me wrong.
Are they?
The author himself calls it abuse you moron. Keep denying reality. It makes you look sane as does the excess of laughing emojis.![]()
Strawman argument. I said no such thing. You will NEVER prove me wrong that sex affects boys differently than it does with girls. You are dumb as fuck for even trying to.You're not and it's you who has to prove your claim. Apparently you think women and girls can't and don't enjoy casual sex?![]()
Yes... and how you arrived to thinking this is saying abuse is not abuse if they like it is not grounded in reality, but how your brain is poisoned with pre-conceptions that makes you arrive to such an absurd interpretation.You said that he also said he enjoyed it in asking you clarify what point you were making by bring that up to me. It's no sweat off my back when you people are top pussy to make your points clear.![]()
This is hilarious considering how much of a bitch you're being about explaining yourself.
Funny you should say that. Here's more from the author on that very subject.
It’s disingenuous for multiple reasons. There’s this misconception that this book is going to children—they’re using language like, ‘Do you think an eight-year-old should read this?’ And my response is, no, that’s why it’s geared for 14 to 18-year-olds.
We also have to stop pretending like my book is what’s introducing child to sex. It isn’t. A 14-year-old child, by the time they’ve read my book, may have already had sex. So them reading about a sex scene is possibly more about their own experience, in their own life.
You said that he also said he enjoyed it in asking you clarify what point you were making by bring that up to me. It's no sweat off my back when you people are top pussy to make your points clear.![]()
YesThe author’s justification is anything but that. Do adolescents get exposed to graphic content by the time they are 14? Yes… that has been going on since the beginning of time as this type of graphic content will invariably reach them in discussion with peers and content from in books, media, etc. such as the content put forth by the author.
However, the author has failed to provide why this should be in K-12.
The book is about the things that he experienced in his own life, stupid. He didn't make it up for sensationalism. I actually just bought the book to support the author. Here's the intro where he clearly states what this book is about and what it's purpose is.Yeah...he calls it abuse and promotes it in his book...while idiots like you give him cover because he says he is trying to protect children....while he has children having sex with adults in his book....
Are you this stupid in real life, or just when you post?
Why are you protecting this kiddie porn guy?
Sure. Your impotent and angry retort speaks of confidence in your beliefs....Strawman argument. I said no such thing. You will NEVER prove me wrong that sex affects boys differently than it does with girls. You are dumb as fuck for even trying to.
Asking you for clarification is the opposite of a preconception you moron.Yes... and how you arrived to thinking this is saying abuse is not abuse if they like it is not grounded in reality, but how your brain is poisoned with pre-conceptions that makes you arrive to such an absurd interpretation.
It's not. In fact he says prey on desire and lust in young people is why they have a hard time coping with abuse or even recognizing that they were abused. You idiot.The author choosing to be so graphical, INCLUDING that the victim enjoyed parts of it - THAT is saying that abuse isn't so bad if you enjoy it. Not me saying FFS.
First gay is ok, abuse is not you stunted fucktard. Secondly these are things that happened to him. Things that happen to other teens. Those teens aren't done any favors by not talking about these things that happen.The author is a sick dude. Pure and simple.
Any person writing a book, he himself says is intended for 14 year olds, and contains pornographic, very descriptive sex acts is a sick fuck. It is not necessary to be pornographic to say "gay is ok".
Your fantasy reenactment isn't a dig on the author it's a revelation of your own psyche."Oh yeah... his penis is so awesome...mmm... it feels so juicy in my mouth" (paraphrase) - that is pornographic. That belongs in the adult section in an adult bookstore. Not a fucking school library.
Teenagers have sex you incel. We shouldn't be afraid to discuss the topic responsibly with them. You know what isn't responsible? Pretending as if girls can't and don't enjoy casual sex like your friend Godboy.This is an EXACT example of why I say progressives want to make it okay to bring underage children into the world of sex and sexual enjoyment.
Please post the material that people are actually objecting to instead pretending it is this. You, and everybody else with a triple digit IQ knows you are being dishonest.
Thanks
He hasn't? I doubt you've actually read anything he said. I provided the intro to his book. He explains himself exceptionally and so far all I got from you Bingos is that gay sex is evil and girls can't feel sexual desire like boys.The author’s justification is anything but that. Do adolescents get exposed to graphic content by the time they are 14? Yes… that has been going on since the beginning of time as this type of graphic content will invariably reach them in discussion with peers and content from in books, media, etc. such as the content put forth by the author.
However, the author has failed to provide why this should be in K-12.
No, you're being an obvious idiot. People like me and the author aren't going away. You ignorant Bingos are. You're dying out and going extinct because your ignorance isn't a desirable trait in decent society. You can cosplay about the purpose of this book all you like but only trailer park trash who can't read would fall for it.
I couldnt help but notice that you STILL havent proven me wrong.Sure. Your impotent and angry retort speaks of confidence in your beliefs....![]()
Because you're that stupid that you think it's on me to prove your claim wrong rather than you prove your claim correct.I couldnt help but notice that you STILL havent proven me wrong.![]()
What claim? Type it out so you can see how fucking stupid you are for disagreeing with it.Because you're that stupid that you think it's on me to prove your claim wrong rather than you prove your claim correct.![]()