Gender Queer and its effect on human sexuality

[Dogmaphobe]

You can't enlist till you are 17....they want the kiddie porn in school libraries for children as young as 5 and 6.

I'm sure they also want these children to be brought into the private booths at the back of the adult shops.


......and accuse others of being Nazi book-burners if they don't like that.

 

[iamwhatiseem]

It's your explanation that's wanting. Is sexual abuse against minors only abuse if they don't enjoy it?

 

[Curried Goats]

You suggested it fool. And it's something I've heard from right wingers here before.

Honestly, the key difference is it probably wont psychologically damage a boy. Boys like getting laid and they are perfectly fine with a no strings attached sexual encounter, or multiple encounters.

Boys are different from girls.

That's from a recent thread about a female teacher who was caught raping her 12 year old male student.

 

[iamwhatiseem]

You suggested it fool. And it's something I've heard from right wingers here before.

No... your inability to comprehend what a person is saying is the problem.
I don't know what planet you were on that gave you an inkling that this is what I was saying.
Go back to the 6th grade and learn reading comprehension

 

[Curried Goats]

No... your inability to comprehend what a person is saying is the problem.
I don't know what planet you were on that gave you an inkling that this is what I was saying.
Go back to the 6th grade and learn reading comprehension

And what do you think are the implications of him saying it? What's the point you were trying to make by bringing it up? Predators prey on children and their emerging emotional desires. That's probably why the author says this about his work.

The part that’s also being left out is that I am talking about sexual education. I am talking about consent. I am talking about agency. And I am using my story to teach kids about the mistakes that I made the first time that I was having sex, so they don’t make those same mistakes. I am teaching kids about not feeling guilty when sexual abuse happens, and how to recognize sexual abuse—most teens don’t even recognize they’ve been abused. And how to fight back against those traumas that you can hold on to for so very long. So they’re leaving very, very important context out, intentionally of course, to try and say my book is pornographic.

That sexual abuse can be wrapped up in desire and physical pleasure is part of what makes sexual abuse not just a physical assault but a mental assault that leaves behind not just physical trauma but emotional trauma as well. But I'm sure you had some Bingo point you'd like to make so let's hear it.

 

[iamwhatiseem]

And what do you think are the implications of him saying it? What's the point you were trying to make by bringing it up? Predators prey on children and their emerging emotional desires. That's probably why the author says this about his work.

The part that’s also being left out is that I am talking about sexual education. I am talking about consent. I am talking about agency. And I am using my story to teach kids about the mistakes that I made the first time that I was having sex, so they don’t make those same mistakes. I am teaching kids about not feeling guilty when sexual abuse happens, and how to recognize sexual abuse—most teens don’t even recognize they’ve been abused. And how to fight back against those traumas that you can hold on to for so very long. So they’re leaving very, very important context out, intentionally of course, to try and say my book is pornographic.

That sexual abuse can be wrapped up in desire and physical pleasure is part of what makes sexual abuse not just a physical assault but a mental assault that leaves behind not just physical trauma but emotional trauma as well. But I'm sure you had some Bingo point you'd like to make so let's hear it.

WTF are you talking about?
What do you not get that I would think differently than this?
There is not one modicum of what I said that would lead an intelligent person to think I was saying abusing kids is okay if they enjoy it. OBVIOUSLY I was saying the opposite.
If you have the capabilities to understand what someone is saying, then your preconceptions are clouding your intelligence. I suggest you stop judging people before you listen to them.

 

[2aguy]

And what do you think are the implications of him saying it? What's the point you were trying to make by bringing it up? Predators prey on children and their emerging emotional desires. That's probably why the author says this about his work.

The part that’s also being left out is that I am talking about sexual education. I am talking about consent. I am talking about agency. And I am using my story to teach kids about the mistakes that I made the first time that I was having sex, so they don’t make those same mistakes. I am teaching kids about not feeling guilty when sexual abuse happens, and how to recognize sexual abuse—most teens don’t even recognize they’ve been abused. And how to fight back against those traumas that you can hold on to for so very long. So they’re leaving very, very important context out, intentionally of course, to try and say my book is pornographic.

That sexual abuse can be wrapped up in desire and physical pleasure is part of what makes sexual abuse not just a physical assault but a mental assault that leaves behind not just physical trauma but emotional trauma as well. But I'm sure you had some Bingo point you'd like to make so let's hear it.

Again......what the author is lying about to get idiots like you to give him cover is irrelevant......the content of the book is about grooming children for sex with adults....

 

[Godboy]

That's from a recent thread about a female teacher who was caught raping her 12 year old male student.

Was my post incorrect?

 

[Curried Goats]

WTF are you talking about?
What do you not get that I would think differently than this?
There is not one modicum of what I said that would lead an intelligent person to think I was saying abusing kids is okay if they enjoy it. OBVIOUSLY I was saying the opposite.
If you have the capabilities to understand what someone is saying, then your preconceptions are clouding your intelligence. I suggest you stop judging people before you listen to them.

If it were obvious I wouldn't be asking you to clarify, moron. Hence me repeatedly asking you what the point of you bringing it up was and your continued inability to give me a straight answer. But go ahead and be a bitch about it because I asked you for clarification.

 

[Curried Goats]

Again......what the author is lying about to get idiots like you to give him cover is irrelevant......the content of the book is about grooming children for sex with adults....

Got any evidence the author is lying? Have you read the book?

 

[Curried Goats]

Was my post incorrect?

Yes. In so many ways....

 

[Godboy]

Yes. In so many ways....

Boys DONT like no strings attached sex? There is a big difference between being wrong and you simply not liking an uncomfortable fact.

 

[iamwhatiseem]

If it were obvious I wouldn't be asking you to clarify, moron. Hence me repeatedly asking you what the point of you bringing it up was and your continued inability to give me a straight answer. But go ahead and be a bitch about it because I asked you for clarification.

Again...
To any intelligent person, not clouded by preconceptions and heavy biases, there is absolutely nothing that I said in this thread that would lead a person to think I was saying what you bizarrely think I did.
I can't explain what isn't there.

 

[LeftofLeft]

Gender Queer - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Jenni Frencham, for the School Library Journal in 2019, called the graphic novel a "great resource for those who identify as nonbinary or asexual as well as for those who know someone who identifies that way and wish to better understand"

This seems to back up what I have stated. The only criticism I am seeing is from folk who have not read the book.

You can have books for those identifying as non-binary or asexual without the graphic content just like you can have coming of age books of heterosexual relationships discovering attraction to the opposite sex without detailed graphic content.

If that level of explicit content is in the books as read by Sen. Kennedy in the Senate in the hearing, then there is no need to have the book in K-12 schools. I listened to the content he read and thought what if the same sexual act and level of graphic content was describing a boy-girl teen romance. My reaction was the same….a book like that should not be in K-12 schools.

 

[Curried Goats]

Boys DONT like no strings attached sex?

Some do some don't as do some girls.

There is a big difference between being wrong and you simply not liking an uncomfortable fact.

I'm not uncomfortable with your implication that enjoyment cancels out statutory rape. That seems perfectly in line with deplorable mutant beliefs.

 

[Curried Goats]

Again...
To any intelligent person, not clouded by preconceptions and heavy biases, there is absolutely nothing that I said in this thread that would lead a person to think I was saying what you bizarrely think I did.
I can't explain what isn't there.

I'm asking you to explain what your point was in bringing it up and you continue to be an absolute bitch about giving an answer. I can infer why on my own if you're too scared to be honest.

 

[iamwhatiseem]

You can have books for those identifying as non-binary or asexual without the graphic content just like you can have coming of age books of heterosexual relationships discovering attraction to the opposite sex without detailed graphic content.

If that level of explicit content is in the books as read by Sen. Kennedy in the Senate in the hearing, then there is no need to have the book in K-12 schools. I listened to the content he read and thought what if the same sexual act and level of graphic content was describing a boy-girl teen romance. My reaction was the same….a book like that should not be in K-12 schools.

It really is this simple.
And exactly why progressives prefer to avoid talking about specifics.
They are comfortable only discussing ideas, not realities.
Any normal, responsible adult can instantly see this book as something that does not belong in a child's library. To explain to a child what homosexuality is, does not require you to graphically explain what sucking a dick is like. How a dick in your ass feels. That is pornographic. By definition.

 

[iamwhatiseem]

I'm asking you to explain what your point was in bringing it up and you continue to be an absolute bitch about giving an answer. I can infer why on my own if you're too scared to be honest.

Bringing what up?
You are wanting me to explain your bizarre conception of something that is a world away from what I said. You need a therapist for that.

 

[2aguy]

Got any evidence the author is lying? Have you read the book?

Yeah...you dipshit.........Senator Kennedy read from his book......

 

[Curried Goats]

It really is this simple.
And exactly why progressives prefer to avoid talking about specifics.
They are comfortable only discussing ideas, not realities.

This is hilarious considering how much of a bitch you're being about explaining yourself.

Any normal, responsible adult can instantly see this book as something that does not belong in a child's library. To explain to a child what homosexuality is, does not require you to graphically explain what sucking a dick is like. How a dick in your ass feels. That is pornographic. By definition.

Funny you should say that. Here's more from the author on that very subject.

It’s disingenuous for multiple reasons. There’s this misconception that this book is going to children—they’re using language like, ‘Do you think an eight-year-old should read this?’ And my response is, no, that’s why it’s geared for 14 to 18-year-olds.

We also have to stop pretending like my book is what’s introducing child to sex. It isn’t. A 14-year-old child, by the time they’ve read my book, may have already had sex. So them reading about a sex scene is possibly more about their own experience, in their own life.

Bringing what up?
You are wanting me to explain your bizarre conception of something that is a world away from what I said. You need a therapist for that.

You said that he also said he enjoyed it in asking you clarify what point you were making by bring that up to me. It's no sweat off my back when you people are top pussy to make your points clear.