Geologists On Global Climate Change

[jc456]

Can't comment on bogus research, huh?

I'm not a scientist, how would I know bogus research if I saw it?

Basically you are admitting that you are not intelligent enough to know the difference.

Feel free to demonstrate your incredible scientific expertise on this issue.

Hahahaha from you? You know shit but you are funny

If you were half as smart as you think you are, you'd be about twice as smart as I think you are.

And still smarter than you

 

[orogenicman]

Why is it ridiculous to insist that someone who claims to have conducted scientific research to demonstrate their claims by providing physical evidence that supports them? I have posted links to my work in the past. I have no problem doing that. So why does this guy have a problem with it, unless he was flat out lying.

I've seen none of your links.

Feel free to post them right now.

JSTOR An Error Occurred Setting Your User Cookie

LOL so you cannot. Why is that not a suprise?

Click on the link, Einstein.

Already did that and within a few seconds determined it to be irrelevant regarding the subject..

Where is your proof that human produced carbon dioxide is causing deleterious global warming?

You asked me to post something I had published. So that's what I did.

As for the proof you are asking for, science isn't about proof. When you figure that out, come back, and we'll talk some more.

 

[jc456]

The AGW doomsday cultists are the ones making extraordinary claims, therefore the onus them to show some extraordinary evidence to back up their claims if they want any person who is not a total fucking idiot and fool to take them seriously.

Exactly, times ten

 

[jc456]

I've seen none of your links.

Feel free to post them right now.

JSTOR An Error Occurred Setting Your User Cookie

LOL so you cannot. Why is that not a suprise?

Click on the link, Einstein.

Already did that and within a few seconds determined it to be irrelevant regarding the subject..

Where is your proof that human produced carbon dioxide is causing deleterious global warming?

You asked me to post something I had published. So that's what I did.

As for the proof you are asking for, science isn't about proof. When you figure that out, come back, and we'll talk some more.

Sure it is you fool! Now I know you're not a geologist

 

[orogenicman]

JSTOR An Error Occurred Setting Your User Cookie

LOL so you cannot. Why is that not a suprise?

Click on the link, Einstein.

Already did that and within a few seconds determined it to be irrelevant regarding the subject..

Where is your proof that human produced carbon dioxide is causing deleterious global warming?

The Carbon Dioxide Greenhouse Effect

If you read it, get back to us, if not, don't bother.

I don't need to read it. I am an expert regarding the science.

Can you prove that Al Gore's CO2 spewing out of his private jet is causing deleterious global warming or not?

That is the relevant question.

Really? What have you published?

 

[orogenicman]

I can tell the difference between someone who has actually done research, and a wannabe who makes a boast and then doesn't support it with facts.

I challenge you to state the supposed "facts" that you are speaking of, and support them with evidence. And explain the relevance.

I have already challenged you to post links to your so-called "research", which you have yet to do.

"research" and "links" are not mutuaally inclucsive, except in the minds of extremely stupid people.

So what you are saying is that you lied when you claimed "On my part, we are talking about decades of research". What research, where?

Perhaps you could ask for some specific information. I mean it appears you are requesting everything he's ever learned. BE SPECIFIC

No, I'm asking for ANYTHING he's ever published.

 

[orogenicman]

So what you are saying is that you lied when you claimed "On my part, we are talking about decades of research". What research, where?

Do you have any evidence whatsoever that I am lying? Or are you just full of shit?

What other reason is there for your refusal to back up your claim?

Why do left wing morons make ridicules requests and then fail to do themselves what they demand of others?

Its a fucking anonymous board you moron and yet you demand that someone tell you who they are so you and your cult members can harass and impugn them... Are you a stalker too? Are your cult members stalkers?

For all we know you are a left wing radical zealot fool who makes stupid demands.. Wait, that describes you to a T...

Why is it ridiculous to insist that someone who claims to have conducted scientific research to demonstrate their claims by providing physical evidence that supports them? I have posted links to my work in the past. I have no problem doing that. So why does this guy have a problem with it, unless he was flat out lying.

Of what? You didn't ask for anything fool

Reread the posts, moron.

 

[jc456]

The AGW doomsday cultists are the ones making extraordinary claims, therefore the onus them to show some extraordinary evidence to back up their claims if they want any person who is not a total fucking idiot and fool to take them seriously.

That doesn't sound even remotely like a scientifically based argument, more of politically minded rebuttal.

You already claimed you don't understand, that's wasted time

 

[orogenicman]

JSTOR An Error Occurred Setting Your User Cookie

LOL so you cannot. Why is that not a suprise?

Click on the link, Einstein.

Already did that and within a few seconds determined it to be irrelevant regarding the subject..

Where is your proof that human produced carbon dioxide is causing deleterious global warming?

You asked me to post something I had published. So that's what I did.

As for the proof you are asking for, science isn't about proof. When you figure that out, come back, and we'll talk some more.

Sure it is you fool! Now I know you're not a geologist

Science is not about proof. Science is about evidence. Mathematics and philosophy are about proof. Science is not.

 

[jc456]

Do you have any evidence whatsoever that I am lying? Or are you just full of shit?

What other reason is there for your refusal to back up your claim?

Why do left wing morons make ridicules requests and then fail to do themselves what they demand of others?

Its a fucking anonymous board you moron and yet you demand that someone tell you who they are so you and your cult members can harass and impugn them... Are you a stalker too? Are your cult members stalkers?

For all we know you are a left wing radical zealot fool who makes stupid demands.. Wait, that describes you to a T...

Why is it ridiculous to insist that someone who claims to have conducted scientific research to demonstrate their claims by providing physical evidence that supports them? I have posted links to my work in the past. I have no problem doing that. So why does this guy have a problem with it, unless he was flat out lying.

Of what? You didn't ask for anything fool

Reread the posts, moron.

I did peewee

 

[jc456]

LOL so you cannot. Why is that not a suprise?

Click on the link, Einstein.

Already did that and within a few seconds determined it to be irrelevant regarding the subject..

Where is your proof that human produced carbon dioxide is causing deleterious global warming?

You asked me to post something I had published. So that's what I did.

As for the proof you are asking for, science isn't about proof. When you figure that out, come back, and we'll talk some more.

Sure it is you fool! Now I know you're not a geologist

Science is not about proof. Science is about evidence. Mathematics and philosophy are about proof. Science is not.

Yes it is stupid

 

[orogenicman]

What other reason is there for your refusal to back up your claim?

Why do left wing morons make ridicules requests and then fail to do themselves what they demand of others?

Its a fucking anonymous board you moron and yet you demand that someone tell you who they are so you and your cult members can harass and impugn them... Are you a stalker too? Are your cult members stalkers?

For all we know you are a left wing radical zealot fool who makes stupid demands.. Wait, that describes you to a T...

Why is it ridiculous to insist that someone who claims to have conducted scientific research to demonstrate their claims by providing physical evidence that supports them? I have posted links to my work in the past. I have no problem doing that. So why does this guy have a problem with it, unless he was flat out lying.

Of what? You didn't ask for anything fool

Reread the posts, moron.

I did peewee

Well, apparently the big words went over your head, so maybe you should use a dictionary while you read.

 

[orogenicman]

Click on the link, Einstein.

Already did that and within a few seconds determined it to be irrelevant regarding the subject..

Where is your proof that human produced carbon dioxide is causing deleterious global warming?

You asked me to post something I had published. So that's what I did.

As for the proof you are asking for, science isn't about proof. When you figure that out, come back, and we'll talk some more.

Sure it is you fool! Now I know you're not a geologist

Science is not about proof. Science is about evidence. Mathematics and philosophy are about proof. Science is not.

Yes it is stupid

No it is not, and never has been. There are no proofs in science. There is only empirical evidence and empirically based interpretations of the evidence.

 

[jc456]

I challenge you to state the supposed "facts" that you are speaking of, and support them with evidence. And explain the relevance.

I have already challenged you to post links to your so-called "research", which you have yet to do.

"research" and "links" are not mutuaally inclucsive, except in the minds of extremely stupid people.

So what you are saying is that you lied when you claimed "On my part, we are talking about decades of research". What research, where?

Perhaps you could ask for some specific information. I mean it appears you are requesting everything he's ever learned. BE SPECIFIC

No, I'm asking for ANYTHING he's ever published.

He never claimed he did, perhaps you should reread his post moron squared

 

[jc456]

Already did that and within a few seconds determined it to be irrelevant regarding the subject..

Where is your proof that human produced carbon dioxide is causing deleterious global warming?

You asked me to post something I had published. So that's what I did.

As for the proof you are asking for, science isn't about proof. When you figure that out, come back, and we'll talk some more.

Sure it is you fool! Now I know you're not a geologist

Science is not about proof. Science is about evidence. Mathematics and philosophy are about proof. Science is not.

Yes it is stupid

No it is not, and never has been. There are no proofs in science. There is only empirical evidence and empirically based interpretations of the evidence.

Hahahaha what a fool

 

[orogenicman]

I have already challenged you to post links to your so-called "research", which you have yet to do.

"research" and "links" are not mutuaally inclucsive, except in the minds of extremely stupid people.

So what you are saying is that you lied when you claimed "On my part, we are talking about decades of research". What research, where?

Perhaps you could ask for some specific information. I mean it appears you are requesting everything he's ever learned. BE SPECIFIC

No, I'm asking for ANYTHING he's ever published.

He never claimed he did, perhaps you should reread his post moron squared

Right, then he has no pony in this show, and neither do you, I might add.

 

[jc456]

The AGW doomsday cultists are the ones making extraordinary claims, therefore the onus them to show some extraordinary evidence to back up their claims if they want any person who is not a total fucking idiot and fool to take them seriously.

That doesn't sound even remotely like a scientifically based argument, more of politically minded rebuttal.

It's a logically-based argument.

Put up or shut up, bitch. Where's your proof that Al Gore's jets are the cause of deleterious global warming?

Real genius rebuttal there. Another fucking phony....big surprise.

You wouldn't know if it hit you in the face

 

[orogenicman]

You asked me to post something I had published. So that's what I did.

As for the proof you are asking for, science isn't about proof. When you figure that out, come back, and we'll talk some more.

Sure it is you fool! Now I know you're not a geologist

Science is not about proof. Science is about evidence. Mathematics and philosophy are about proof. Science is not.

Yes it is stupid

No it is not, and never has been. There are no proofs in science. There is only empirical evidence and empirically based interpretations of the evidence.

Hahahaha what a fool

You are only fooling yourself, bubba.

Common misconceptions about science I Scientific proof Psychology Today

Scientific evidence - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

 

[jc456]

"research" and "links" are not mutuaally inclucsive, except in the minds of extremely stupid people.

So what you are saying is that you lied when you claimed "On my part, we are talking about decades of research". What research, where?

Perhaps you could ask for some specific information. I mean it appears you are requesting everything he's ever learned. BE SPECIFIC

No, I'm asking for ANYTHING he's ever published.

He never claimed he did, perhaps you should reread his post moron squared

Right, then he has no pony in this show, and neither do you, I might add.

I have as much as anyone

 

[jc456]

Sure it is you fool! Now I know you're not a geologist

Science is not about proof. Science is about evidence. Mathematics and philosophy are about proof. Science is not.

Yes it is stupid

No it is not, and never has been. There are no proofs in science. There is only empirical evidence and empirically based interpretations of the evidence.

Hahahaha what a fool

You are only fooling yourself, bubba.

Common misconceptions about science I Scientific proof Psychology Today

Scientific evidence - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

I supposed you think a hypothesis is theory right?