George Bush - the most popular president in US history

Patek is lying now. That is what hardright loonies, like hardleft loonies, do. They lie to get power. Your gang is out, the people have spoken, and the next GOP group that wins will not include your type.

Cite the specific lie Starkey....cite it or shut the fuck up.

You been lying from the beginning of the thread. Tell the truth, and watch you fall on your face.:razz:
 
Starkey and rightwinger....their whole libtard world has just collapsed now that they, and their chosen party of dupes, idiots and buffoons,.... realize they are neck deep in shit.....just like everyone else.

You are goofy, Patek, just simply goofy.
 
Notice how the pathetic mouthpiece of the DNC, Starkey, cannot refute ONE SINGLE THING I have posted in this thread.

What a tool you are Starkey.....a DNC tool.
 
Starkey and rightwinger....their whole libtard world has just collapsed now that they, and their chosen party of dupes, idiots and buffoons,.... realize they are neck deep in shit.....just like everyone else.

You are goofy, Patek, just simply goofy.

Yet another loose movement from the lips of Jake, King of the Unsubstantianted Statement.
 
" A neo-conservative is a liberal... mugged by reality." W. Kristol

Starkey and rightwinger....their whole libtard world has just collapsed now that they, and their chosen party of dupes, idiots and buffoons,.... realize they are neck deep in shit.....just like everyone else.
That was Bill's daddy who said that. Irving Kristol was a member of the Young People's Socialist League in the '30s, a Trotskyist throughout his years at the City College of New York.
 
Last edited:
Starkey and rightwinger....their whole libtard world has just collapsed now that they, and their chosen party of dupes, idiots and buffoons,.... realize they are neck deep in shit.....just like everyone else.

You are goofy, Patek, just simply goofy.

and yet you STILL CANNOT REFUTE ONE SINGLE THING I have posted.

Quit while you are in last place Starkey.....just quit...it's one of the new Democrat values...so live up to it.
 
" A neo-conservative is a liberal... mugged by reality." W. Kristol

Starkey and rightwinger....their whole libtard world has just collapsed now that they, and their chosen party of dupes, idiots and buffoons,.... realize they are neck deep in shit.....just like everyone else.
That was Bill's daddy who said that. Irving Kristol was a member of the Young People's Socialist League in the '30s, a Trotskyist throughout his years at the City College of New York.

Yeah. David Horowitz was a confirmed COmmunist for most of the 1960s. People do change their views, ya know?
 
" A neo-conservative is a liberal... mugged by reality." W. Kristol

Starkey and rightwinger....their whole libtard world has just collapsed now that they, and their chosen party of dupes, idiots and buffoons,.... realize they are neck deep in shit.....just like everyone else.
That was Bill's daddy who said that. Irving Kristol was a member of the Young People's Socialist League in the '30s, a Trotskyist throughout his years at the City College of New York.

Yeah. David Horowitz was a confirmed COmmunist for most of the 1960s. People do change their views, ya know?
David Horowitz saw he could make more money as a wingnut.
 
" A neo-conservative is a liberal... mugged by reality." W. Kristol


That was Bill's daddy who said that. Irving Kristol was a member of the Young People's Socialist League in the '30s, a Trotskyist throughout his years at the City College of New York.

Yeah. David Horowitz was a confirmed COmmunist for most of the 1960s. People do change their views, ya know?
David Horowitz saw he could make more money as a wingnut.

Because we all know that universities are filled with well paid right wingers, right?
Fucking ignoramus tool.
 
After 9/11, George Bush was the most popular president in US history. Not only was the country firmly behind him, but also much of the rest of the world.

The question:

If the United States were attacked again, would Republicans stand behind Obama? Or would they want him to fail?

If, God forbid, we were ever attacked again

The right wing would hang Obama out to dry.....No question about it

Wrong. If Obama turtled and/or wimped out, he certainly would be...and rightfully so.

If he showed some backbone, I would support him.


Lets just hope his retarded leadership doesn't lead to another horrible attack like 911.
 
Last edited:
After 9/11, George Bush was the most popular president in US history. Not only was the country firmly behind him, but also much of the rest of the world.

The question:

If the United States were attacked again, would Republicans stand behind Obama? Or would they want him to fail?

If, God forbid, we were ever attacked again

The right wing would hang Obama out to dry.....No question about it





typically..........simpleton anaysis for the fail:lol:

If America is hit again, heres the poop.

The left becomes a permanent museum piece, displayed in a glass case like a relic of a former era!!! Its not even debatable. The limpwristed approach to things goes the way of the hula hoop.

rightwinger, as usual, displays the political IQ of a handball. Who cares about the right hanging Obama out to dry. Thats news? THE news is, the support from the political center.............who elected Obama by the way........completely disappears. And its already leaving him in droves. Picture in your mind a little submarine trying to navigate a harbor full of hundreds of mines s0ns..............
mine.jpg
 
Last edited:
You would think the Left would already be discredited by their actions in Vietnam during the war. It isn't so. Everything the center said would happen with a communist takeover did happen. Did anyone apologize? Did anyone admit they might have been wrong? NO.
 
You would think the Left would already be discredited by their actions in Vietnam during the war. It isn't so. Everything the center said would happen with a communist takeover did happen. Did anyone apologize? Did anyone admit they might have been wrong? NO.

VietNam??

Are you kidding me? Let me guess??? Time for more revisionist history from The Rabbi

"Oh yea, we could have won if we only had more bombs"
 
You would think the Left would already be discredited by their actions in Vietnam during the war. It isn't so. Everything the center said would happen with a communist takeover did happen. Did anyone apologize? Did anyone admit they might have been wrong? NO.

VietNam??

Are you kidding me? Let me guess??? Time for more revisionist history from The Rabbi

"Oh yea, we could have won if we only had more bombs"

You couldn't find Vietnam on the map with both hands.
 
Moer than that, the Left has been wrong every time in this country.
They were wrong about the Rosenbergs, they were wrong about Alger Hiss, they were wrong about Soviet intentions, they were wrong about Vietnam, they were wrong about Reagan and now they are wrong about every position they take.
You would think a movement so thoroughly discredited by history would take some stock of itself and go sulk in a corner.
 
Moer than that, the Left has been wrong every time in this country.
They were wrong about the Rosenbergs, they were wrong about Alger Hiss, they were wrong about Soviet intentions, they were wrong about Vietnam, they were wrong about Reagan and now they are wrong about every position they take.
You would think a movement so thoroughly discredited by history would take some stock of itself and go sulk in a corner.

Either that or take some advice from the Republicans on foreign policy. It seems every time they come into power they fuck up the entire planet...and then when the Republicans get in office we spend 8 years cleaning up their mess.
 
After 9/11, George Bush was the most popular president in US history. Not only was the country firmly behind him, but also much of the rest of the world.

The question:

If the United States were attacked again, would Republicans stand behind Obama? Or would they want him to fail?

Nope...
 

Forum List

Back
Top