Asclepias
Diamond Member
Who initiated the confrontation doesn't matter. Kim Pham was beaten to death outside a Santa Ana night club. Her killers said they were not at fault because Pham threw the first punch. That's not a defense and why the murderers have been arrested right now.
Of course it matters, don't be ridiculous. You're citing a case where a) it hasn't yet been proven who threw the first punch; and b) if they will be acquitted if they prove Pham threw the first punch. Also, the laws in California don't apply in Florida.
You are wrong, who threw the first punch does not entitle the victim of that punch to beat the attacker to death. The laws in California and Florida aren't THAT different. If some punk hit me, even so much as a slap on the ass, I would LOVE for that to be license to beat them to death.
Thats not what he said. If TM had of killed or hurt Z after Z provoked the fight then TM would be in trouble. Z started the fight. All the evidence points to that. The jury was racist against the dangerous Black kid or just easily punked by the racists on the jury. Their acquittal means nothing and that is the reason Z is crying now. He has messed up his life as well as taking the life of a child.